Positive expectations for recovery affects outcomes for patients with low back pain
Vanessa Jordan 1New Zealand Cochrane Fellow, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Email v.jordan@auckland.ac.nz
Journal of Primary Health Care 11(4) 384-384 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC15948
Published: 18 December 2019
Journal Compilation © Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 2019 This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Cochrane review: Hayden JA, Wilson MN, Riley RD, Iles R, Pincus T, Ogilvie R. Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019(11).1
Background: Low back pain is a condition that affects ∼1% of the world’s population and has been listed as the leading cause of disability globally.2 Patient expectations of recovery can influence how much effort a patient may employ to assist their recovery and in turn may influence treatment compliance.3 How much people expect from their recovery may be a modifiable prognostic factor and therefore of interest to clinicians treating low back pain.
Clinical Bottom Line: Patients with low back pain are more likely to return to work, have an important improvement in recovery and feel less pain if they have positive expectations for their recovery.1 As treatment expectation has been identified as potentially modifiable there is a role for clinicians to play in supporting a positive recovery frame of mind in patients with low back pain.4
References
[1] Hayden JA, Tougas M, Riley R, et al. Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019;| Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31765487PubMed |
[2] GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016; 388 1545–602.
| Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27733282PubMed |
[3] Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31 143–64.
| Health promotion by social cognitive means.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15090118PubMed |
[4] Guzman J, Hayden J, Furlan AD, et al. Key factors in back disability prevention: a consensus panel on their impact and modifiability. Spine. 2007; 32 807–15.
| Key factors in back disability prevention: a consensus panel on their impact and modifiability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17414917PubMed |