An efficient, multi-scale neighbourhood index to quantify wildfire likelihood

Douglas A. G. Radford; Holger R. Maier; Hedwig van Delden; Aaron C. Zecchin; Amelie Jeanneau

doi:10.1071/WF23055

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Next Contents Vol 33(5)

An efficient, multi-scale neighbourhood index to quantify wildfire likelihood

Douglas A. G. Radford

^A ^* , Holger R. Maier ^A , Hedwig van Delden ^A ^B , Aaron C. Zecchin ^A and Amelie Jeanneau ^A

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

^B Research Institute for Knowledge Systems, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

^* Correspondence to: douglas.radford@adelaide.edu.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 33, WF23055 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF23055

Submitted: 25 April 2023 Accepted: 4 April 2024 Published: 26 April 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of IAWF. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).

Abstract

Background

To effectively reduce future wildfire risk, several management strategies must be evaluated under plausible future scenarios, requiring models that provide estimates of how likely wildfires are to spread to community assets (wildfire likelihood) in a computationally efficient manner. Approaches to quantifying wildfire likelihood using fire simulation models cannot practically achieve this because they are too computationally expensive.

Aim

This study aimed to develop an approach for quantifying wildfire likelihood that is both computationally efficient and able to consider contagious and directionally specific fire behaviour properties across multiple spatial ‘neighbourhood’ scales.

Methods

A novel, computationally efficient index for quantifying wildfire likelihood is proposed. This index is evaluated against historical and simulated data on a case study in South Australia.

Key results

The neighbourhood index explains historical burnt areas and closely replicates patterns in burn probability calculated using landscape fire simulation (ρ = 0.83), while requiring 99.7% less computational time than the simulation-based model.

Conclusions

The neighbourhood index represents patterns in wildfire likelihood similar to those represented in burn probability, with a much-reduced computational time.

Implications

By using the index alongside existing approaches, managers can better explore problems involving many evaluations of wildfire likelihood, thereby improving planning processes and reducing future wildfire risks.

Keywords: burn probability, fire behaviour, fire management, fire simulation modelling, neighbourhood index, planning, risk, wildfire likelihood.

References

Ager AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA (2010) A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure. Forest Ecology and Management 259, 1556-1570.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ager AA, Evers CR, Day MA, Alcasena FJ, Houtman R (2021) Planning for future fire: scenario analysis of an accelerated fuel reduction plan for the western United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 215, 104212.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Arif M, Alghamdi KK, Sahel SA, Alosaimi SO, Alsahaft ME, Alharthi MA, Arif M (2021) Role of machine learning algorithms in forest fire management: a literature review. Journal of Robotics and Automation 5, 212-226.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2021) 2021 Census All persons QuickStats. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/40102 [Verified 15 April 2024]

Bardsley DK, Weber D, Robinson GM, Moskwa E, Bardsley AM (2015) Wildfire risk, biodiversity and peri-urban planning in the Mt Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Applied Geography 63, 155-165.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bardsley DK, Prowse TAA, Siegfriedt C (2019) Seeking knowledge of traditional Indigenous burning practices to inform regional bushfire management. Local Environment 24, 727-745.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Barros AMG, Ager AA, Day MA, Palaiologou P (2019) Improving long-term fuel treatment effectiveness in the National Forest System through quantitative prioritization. Forest Ecology and Management 433, 514-527.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Beguería S (2006) Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management. Natural Hazards 37, 315-329.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Beverly JL, Forbes AM (2023) Assessing directional vulnerability to wildfire. Natural Hazards 117, 831-849.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Beverly JL, McLoughlin N (2019) Burn probability simulation and subsequent wildland fire activity in Alberta, Canada – Implications for risk assessment and strategic planning. Forest Ecology and Management 451, 117490.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Beverly JL, McLoughlin N, Chapman E (2021) A simple metric of landscape fire exposure. Landscape Ecology 36, 785-801.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Caggiano MD, Hawbaker TJ, Gannon BM, Hoffman CM (2020) Building loss in WUI disasters: evaluating the core components of the Wildland–Urban Interface definition. Fire 3, 73.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Canadell JG, Meyer CP, Cook GD, Dowdy A, Briggs PR, Knauer J, Pepler A, Haverd V (2021) Multi-decadal increase of forest burned area in Australia is linked to climate change. Nature Communications 12, 6921.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Chung W (2015) Optimizing fuel treatments to reduce wildland fire risk. Current Forestry Reports 1, 44-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cirulis B, Clarke H, Boer M, Penman T, Price O, Bradstock R (2020) Quantification of inter-regional differences in risk mitigation from prescribed burning across multiple management values. International Journal of Wildland Fire 29, 414-426.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Clarke H, Cirulis B, Penman T, Price O, Boer MM, Bradstock R (2022) The 2019–2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions. Scientific Reports 12, 11871.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Cruz MG, Gould JS, Alexander ME, Sullivan AL, McCaw WL, Matthews S (2015) ‘A Guide to Rate of Fire Spread Models for Australian Vegetation.’ (CSIRO Land and Water: Canberra, ACT, and AFAC: Melbourne, Vic.)

Department for Environment and Water (2021) Bushfires and Prescribed Burns History. Available at https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/e5434c77-9815-48e6-8ea7-fb35c78f6786 [accessed 02 August 2021]

Duff TJ, Penman TD (2021) Determining the likelihood of asset destruction during wildfires: modelling house destruction with fire simulator outputs and local-scale landscape properties. Safety Science 139, 105196.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Falk DA, Heyerdahl EK, Brown PM, Farris C, Fulé PZ, McKenzie D, Swetnam TW, Taylor AH, Van Horne ML (2011) Multi-scale controls of historical forest-fire regimes: new insights from fire-scar networks. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9, 446-454.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Filkov AI, Ngo T, Matthews S, Telfer S, Penman TD (2020) Impact of Australia’s catastrophic 2019/20 bushfire season on communities and environment. Retrospective analysis and current trends. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience 1, 44-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-model development and evaluation. (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station) 10.2737/RMRS-RP-4

Finney MA (2005) The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 97-108.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fletcher MS, Hall T, Alexandra AN (2021) The loss of an indigenous constructed landscape following British invasion of Australia: an insight into the deep human imprint on the Australian landscape. Ambio 50, 138-149.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Furlaud JM, Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS (2018) Simulating the effectiveness of prescribed burning at altering wildfire behaviour in Tasmania, Australia. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 15-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gazzard T, Walshe T, Galvin P, Salkin O, Baker M, Cross B, Ashton P (2020) What is the ‘appropriate’ fuel management regime for the Otway Ranges, Victoria, Australia? Developing a long-term fuel management strategy using the structured decision-making framework. International Journal of Wildland Fire 29, 354-370.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Geoscience Australia (2010) 3 second SRTM Digital Elevation Model (DEM) v01. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Available at https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/12e0731d-96dd-49cc-aa21-ebfd65a3f67a [accessed 31 July 2021]

Gill AM, Allan G (2008) Large fires, fire effects and the fire-regime concept. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 688-695.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gill AM, Stephens SL, Cary GJ (2013) The worldwide “wildfire” problem. Ecological Applications 23, 438-454.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Grassberger P, Manna SS (1990) Some more sandpiles. Journal de Physique 51, 1077-1098.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hantson S, Pueyo S, Chuvieco E (2015) Global fire size distribution is driven by human impact and climate. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24, 77-86.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Heyerdahl EK, Brubaker LB, Agee JK (2001) Spatial controls of historical fire regimes: a multiscale example from the interior west, USA. Ecology 82, 660-678.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hijmans R (2022) terra: Spatial Data Analysis. R package version 1.6-41. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra [accessed 18 November 2022]

Hirsch K, Martell D (1996) A review of initial attack fire crew productivity and effectiveness. International Journal of Wildland Fire 6, 199-215.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) ‘Applied logistic regression.’ 3rd edn. (John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA)

Jain P, Coogan SCP, Subramanian SG, Crowley M, Taylor S, Flannigan MD (2020) A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management. Environmental Reviews 28, 478-505.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jones MW, Abatzoglou JT, Veraverbeke S, Andela N, Lasslop G, Forkel M, Smith AJP, Burton C, Betts RA, Van Der Werf GR, Sitch S, Canadell JG, Santín C, Kolden C, Doerr SH, Le Quéré C (2022) Global and regional trends and drivers of fire under climate change. Reviews of Geophysics 60, 1-76.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lauer CJ, Montgomery CA, Dietterich TG (2017) Spatial interactions and optimal forest management on a fire-threatened landscape. Forest Policy and Economics 83, 107-120.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Leuenberger M, Parente J, Tonini M, Pereira MG, Kanevski M (2018) Wildfire susceptibility mapping: deterministic vs. stochastic approaches. Environmental Modelling & Software 101, 194-203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Liberatore F, León J, Hearne J, Vitoriano B (2021) Fuel management operations planning in fire management: a bilevel optimisation approach. Safety Science 137, 105181.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Maier HR, Galelli S, Razavi S, Castelletti A, Rizzoli A, Athanasiadis IN, Sànchez-Marrè M, Acutis M, Wu W, Humphrey GB (2023) Exploding the myths: an introduction to artificial neural networks for prediction and forecasting. Environmental Modelling & Software 167, 105776.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McArthur AG (1967) ‘Fire behaviour in eucalypt forest.’ Leaflet 107. (Commonwealth of Australia, Forestry and Timber Bureau: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

McKenzie D, Kennedy MC (2011) Scaling laws and complexity in fire regimes. In ‘The Landscape Ecology of Fire’. (Eds D McKenzie, C Miller, DA Falk) pp. 27–49. (Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany)

McKenzie D, Miller C, Falk DA (2011) Toward a theory of landscape fire. In ‘The Landscape Ecology of Fire’. (Eds D McKenzie, C Miller, DA Falk) pp. 3–25. (Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany)

Miller C, Ager AA (2013) A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 1-14.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Miller C, Hilton J, Sullivan A, Prakash M (2015) SPARK – A Bushfire Spread Prediction Tool. In ‘International Symposium on Environmental Software Systems’, Melbourne, Vic. (Eds R Denzer, RM Argent, G Schimack, J Hřebíček) pp. 262–271. (Springer International Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) 10.1007/978-3-319-15994-2_26 [accessed 4 May 2022]

Newman EA, Kennedy MC, Falk DA, McKenzie D (2019) Scaling and complexity in landscape ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7, 1-16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Noble IR, Gill AM, Bary GAV (1980) McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Australian Journal of Ecology 5, 201-203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

O’Donnell AJ, Boer MM, McCaw WL, Grierson PF (2011) Vegetation and landscape connectivity control wildfire intervals in unmanaged semi-arid shrublands and woodlands in Australia. Journal of Biogeography 38, 112-124.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ott JE, Kilkenny FF, Jain TB (2023) Fuel treatment effectiveness at the landscape scale: a systematic review of simulation studies comparing treatment scenarios in North America. Fire Ecology 19, 10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Parisien M-A, Moritz MA (2009) Environmental controls on the distribution of wildfire at multiple spatial scales. Ecological Monographs 79, 127-154.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Parisien M-A, Miller C, Ager AA, Finney MA (2010) Use of artificial landscapes to isolate controls on burn probability. Landscape Ecology 25, 79-93.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Parisien M-A, Dawe DA, Miller C, Stockdale CA, Armitage OB (2019) Applications of simulation-based burn probability modelling: a review. International Journal of Wildland Fire 28, 913-926.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Parisien M-A, Ager AA, Barros AM, Dawe D, Erni S, Finney MA, McHugh CW, Miller C, Parks SA, Riley KL, Short KC, Stockdale CA, Wang X, Whitman E (2020) Commentary on the article “Burn probability simulation and subsequent wildland fire activity in Alberta, Canada – Implications for risk assessment and strategic planning” by J.L. Beverly and N. McLoughlin. Forest Ecology and Management 460, 117698.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Parks SA, Parisien M-A, Miller C (2011) Multi-scale evaluation of the environmental controls on burn probability in a southern Sierra Nevada landscape. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 815-828.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Penman TD, Bradstock RA, Price OF (2014) Reducing wildfire risk to urban developments: simulation of cost-effective fuel treatment solutions in south eastern Australia. Environmental Modelling & Software 52, 166-175.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Peterson GD (2002) Contagious disturbance, ecological memory, and the emergence of landscape pattern. Ecosystems 5, 329-338.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Price OF, Bedward M (2020) Using a statistical model of past wildfire spread to quantify and map the likelihood of fire reaching assets and prioritise fuel treatments. International Journal of Wildland Fire 29, 401-413.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Price OF, Bradstock RA (2010) The effect of fuel age on the spread of fire in sclerophyll forest in the Sydney region of Australia. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 35-45.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Price O, Borah R, Bradstock R, Penman T (2015a) An empirical wildfire risk analysis: the probability of a fire spreading to the urban interface in Sydney, Australia. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 597-606.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Price OF, Penman TD, Bradstock RA, Boer MM, Clarke H (2015b) Biogeographical variation in the potential effectiveness of prescribed fire in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Biogeography 42, 2234-2245.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

R Core Team (2022) ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at https://www.R-project.org/ [accessed 16 March 2022]

Roberts ME, Rawlinson AA, Wang Z (2021) Ember risk modelling for improved wildfire risk management in the peri-urban fringes. Environmental Modelling & Software 138, 104956.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rothermel RC (1983) ‘How to Predict the Spread and Intensity of Forest and Range Fires.’ (United Stated Department of Agriculture Forest Service: Ogden, UT)

Sharma LK, Gupta R, Fatima N (2022) Assessing the predictive efficacy of six machine learning algorithms for the susceptibility of Indian forests to fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 31, 735-758.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

South Australian Country Fire Service (2022) Bushfire History. Available at https://www.cfs.sa.gov.au/about/about/bushfire-history/ [accessed 19 September]

State of Victoria (2015) Measuring bushfire risk in Victoria. Available at https://www.safertogether.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0031/126949/DELWP0017_BushfireRiskProfiles_rebrand_v5.pdf [accessed 27 October 2023]

Su C-H, Eizenberg N, Steinle P, Jakob D, Fox-Hughes P, White CJ, Rennie S, Franklin C, Dharssi I, Zhu H (2019) BARRA v1.0: the Bureau of Meteorology atmospheric high-resolution regional reanalysis for Australia. Geoscientific Model Development 12, 2049-2068.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Telfer S (2019) Bushfire Simulation and Suppression Probability Weighting for Strategic Bushfire Planning. In ‘6th International Fire Behaviour and Fuels Conference’, Sydney, Australia. (International Association of Wildland Fire: Missoula, MT, USA)

Thompson MP, Calkin DE (2011) Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 92, 1895-1909.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Tolhurst KG, Shields BJ, Chong DM (2008) Phoenix: development and application of a bushfire risk management tool. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 23, 47-54.
| Google Scholar |

Tymstra C, Bryce R, Wotton B, Taylor S, Armitage O (2010) Development and structure of Prometheus: the Canadian wildland fire growth simulation model. Information Report NOR-X-417. (Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre: Edmonton, AB)

Van Wagner CE (1969) A simple fire-growth model. The Forestry Chronicle 45, 103-104.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Verde JC, Zêzere JL (2010) Assessment and validation of wildfire susceptibility and hazard in Portugal. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 10, 485-497.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wang X, Wotton BM, Cantin AS, Parisien M-A, Anderson K, Moore B, Flannigan MD (2017) cffdrs: an R package for the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System. Ecological Processes 6, 5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Williams BA, Shoo LP, Wilson KA, Beyer HL (2017) Optimising the spatial planning of prescribed burns to achieve multiple objectives in a fire‐dependent ecosystem. Journal of Applied Ecology 54, 1699-1709.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |