Measurements of moisture in smoldering smoke and implications for fog
Gary L. AchtemeierUSDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Athens, GA 30602, USA. Email: gachtemeier@fs.fed.us
International Journal of Wildland Fire 15(4) 517-525 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF05115
Published: 7 December 2006
Abstract
Smoke from wildland burning in association with fog has been implicated as a visibility hazard over roadways in the southern United States. A project began in 2002 to determine whether moisture released during the smoldering phases of southern prescribed burns could contribute to fog formation. Temperature and relative humidity measurements were taken from 27 smoldering ‘smokes’ during 2002 and 2003. These data were converted to a measure of the mass of water vapor present to the mass of dry air containing the vapor (smoke mixing ratio). Some smokes were dry with almost no moisture beyond ambient. Other smokes were moist with moisture excesses as large as 39 g kg–1. Calculations show that ground-level smoke moisture excesses have no impact on ambient relative humidity during the day. However, the impact at night can be large enough to increase the ambient relative humidity to 100%. Therefore smoke moisture may be a contributing factor to the location and timing of fog formation.
Additional keywords: highway accidents; visibility.
Achtemeier GL (2005) Planned burn – Piedmont. A local operational numerical meteorological model for tracking smoke on the ground at night: model development and sensitivity tests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 85–98.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kokkola H, Romakkaniemi S , Laaksonen A (2003) On the formation of radiation fogs under heavily polluted conditions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 3, 581–589.
Phillips JD , Marion DA (2004) Pedological memory in forest soil development. Forest Ecology and Management 188, 363–380.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ward DE , Hardy C (1991) Smoke emissions from wildland fires. Environment International 17, 117–134.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |