Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF24067
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)
Contents Vol 75(14)

Realising the benefits of modern fish-protection screening in Australia

Thomas S. Rayner https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9616-1068 A B * , Craig A. Boys https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6434-2937 A B , John Conallin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2508-1930 B , Boyd Blackwell C D , Anthony Moore E , Marita Pearson F and Rodney Price F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Freshwater Ecosystems Research, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Taylors Beach, NSW, Australia.

B Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia.

C Freshwater Environment Branch, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

D Centre for Global Food and Resources, School of Economics and Public Policy, Faculty of Arts, Business, Law and Economics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

E Freshwater Environment Branch, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Bega, NSW, Australia.

F Freshwater Environment Branch, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Dubbo, NSW, Australia.

* Correspondence to: tom.rayner@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Handling Editor: Max Finlayson

Marine and Freshwater Research 75, MF24067 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF24067
Submitted: 28 March 2024  Accepted: 16 August 2024  Published: 20 September 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY)

Abstract

Context

Modern fish-protection screens are being implemented globally to conserve aquatic ecosystems and protect water infrastructure. Australian governments have invested ~A$40 × 106 towards incentive programs. However, evaluation remains limited.

Aims

This study aimed to review progress, summarise research, and identify future priorities for screening in Australia.

Methods

The study analysed screen installations to date, estimating their benefits for native fish and agricultural water supply.

Key results

In New South Wales, 36 pumped water diversions were screened from 2018 to 2024. These installations protect over 819,000 native fish annually and can deliver up to 2600 ML of cleaner water per day, servicing over 230 km2 of irrigated agriculture. By 2026, these figures are set to rise to 48 sites, 1.72 × 106 native fish year−1 and 5461 ML day−1 of water.

Conclusions

Although incentive programs are generating substantial public benefits, valued at least A$177 ML−1 of water passing through a modern screen, and with benefit–cost ratios averaging 4:1, installation costs remain high and national progress has been limited.

Implications

Addressing these challenges is crucial to realising the full potential benefits of screening. Action is required to identify high-priority water diversions, improve affordability, encourage industry stewardship, and pursue advancements to facilitate wider adoption.

Keywords: agriculture, aquatic ecosystems, complementary measures, conservation, fish screens, irrigation, river infrastructure, water diversion, water extraction.

References

Baumgartner LJ, Boys CA (2012) Reducing the perversion of diversion: applying world-standard fish screening practices to the Murray–Darling Basin. Ecological Management & Restoration 13(2), 135-143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Boys CA (2021) ‘Design specifications for fish-protection screens in Australia’, 1st edn. (NSW Department of Primary Industries: Taylors Beach, NSW, Australia)

Boys CA, Baumgartner LJ, Lowry M (2013a) Entrainment and impingement of juvenile silver perch, Bidyanus bidyanus, and golden perch, Macquaria ambigua, at a fish screen: effect of velocity and light. Fisheries Management and Ecology 20(4), 362-373.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Boys CA, Robinson W, Baumgartner LJ, Rampano B, Lowry M (2013b) Influence of approach velocity and mesh size on the entrainment and contact of a lowland river fish assemblage at a screened irrigation pump. PLoS ONE 8(6), e67026.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Boys CA, Rayner TS, Baumgartner LJ, Doyle KE (2021a) Native fish losses due to water extraction in Australian rivers: evidence, impacts and a solution in modern fish- and farm-friendly screens. Ecological Management & Restoration 22(2), 134-144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Boys CA, Rayner TS, Kelly B, Doyle KE, Baumgartner LJ (2021b) The practical guide to modern fish-protection screening in Australia. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Taylors Beach, NSW, Australia.

Bretzel JB, Boys CA, Watts RJ, Doyle KE, Baumgartner LJ (2023) Alleviating the loss: a conical fish screen installation reduces native fish entrainment at a gravity-fed water diversion. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 33(12), 1477-1491.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313(5783), 58-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Bureau of Reclamation (2006) Fish protection at water diversions. A guide for planning and designing fish exclusion facilities. US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO, USA.

Conallin J, Ning N, Bond J, Pawsey N, Baumgartner LJ, Atminarso D, McPherson H, Robinson W, Thorncraft G (2022) A review of the applicability of the motivations and abilities (MOTA) framework for assessing the implementation success of water resources management plans and policies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(5), 1357-1370.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Crook DA, Schilling HT, Gilligan DM, Asmus M, Boys CA, Butler GL, Cameron LM, Hohnberg D, Michie LE, Miles NG, Rayner TS, Robinson WA, Rourke ML, Stocks JR, Thiem JD, Townsend A, van der Meulen DE, Wooden I, Cheshire KJM (2023) Multi-decadal trends in large-bodied fish populations in the New South Wales Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 74(11), 899-916.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Doyle K, Stuart I, Ning N, An V, Zarski D, Thomas K, McGregor C, Bretzel J, Mallen-Cooper M, Fanson B, Thew P, Senevirathna L, Baumgartner L (2023) Redfin larvae screen entrainment study. Research Commissioned by Snowy Hydro Limited. (Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University: Albury, NSW, Australia). Available at https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/350106801/Redfin_Larvae_Screen_Entrainment_Study_Doyle_et_al_2023.pdf

Ducros A, Steele P (2022) Biocredits to finance nature and people: emerging lessons. (IIED: London, UK) Available at https://www.iied.org/21216iied [Verified 13 March 2024]

Fish Screens Australia (2023) Flow-On effect of fish screens technology a win-win situation for farmers. (FSA: Newcastle, NSW, Australia) Available at https://fishscreens.org.au/screens/flow-on-effect-of-fish-screens-technology-a-win-win-situation-for-farmers/ [Verified 5 February 2024]

Game ET, Kareiva P, Possingham H (2013) Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting. Conservation Policy 27(30), 480-485 10.1111/cobi.12051.
| Google Scholar |

Gilligan D, Schiller C (2003) Downstream transport of larval and juvenile fish in the Murray River. NSW Fisheries Final Report Series Number 50. NSW Government, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Hutchinson M, Nixon D, Shiau J, Norris A (2022) Impacts and solutions: a scoping study on relative impacts of irrigation infrastructure on fish in the Fitzroy Basin. Final report. Cotton Cooperative Research Centre, Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

Jaensch L (2023) Liquid assets – implementing modern fish-protection screens to maximise benefits for rivers & communities. MGlobalFoodAgricBus thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. Available at https://fishscreens.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Jaensch-2023-liquid-assets.pdf [Verified 10 September 2024]

King AJ, Thurgate N, Davey C (2020) Assessment of the benefits of fish exclusion screens in Victoria. Report prepared for the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning by the Centre for Freshwater Ecosystems, Publication 257, La Trobe University, Vic., Australia.

Koehen JD, Balcombe SR, Baumgartner LJ, Bice CM, Burndred K, Ellis I, Koster WM, Lintermans M, Pearce L, Sharpe C, Stuart I, Todd CR (2020) What is needed to restore native fishes in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin? Marine and Freshwater Research 71(11), 1464-1468.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lake PS, Bond NR (2007) Australian futures: freshwater ecosystems and human water usage. Futures 39(2–3), 288-305.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Leblanc M, Tweed S, Van Dijk A, Timbal B (2012) A review of historic and future hydrological changes in the Murray–Darling Basin. Global and Planetary Change 80-81, 226-246.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lintermans M, Maiko L, Whiterod N, Gruber B, Hammer MP, Kennard MJ, Morgan DL, Raadik TA, Unmack P, Brooks S, Ebner BC, Gilligan D, Butler GL, Moore G, Brown C, Freeman R, Kerezsy A, Bice CM, Le Feuvre MC, Beatty S, Arthington AH, Kohen J, Larson HK, Coleman RA, Mathwin R, Pearce L, Tonkin Z, Bruce A, Espinoza T, Kern P, Lieschke JA, Martin K, Sparks J, Stoessel DJ, Wedderburn SD, Allan H, Clunie P, Cockayne B, Ellis I, Hardie S, Koster W, Moy K, Roberts D, Schmarr D, Sharley K, Sternberg D, Zukowski S, Walsh C, Zampatti B, Shelley JJ, Sayer C, Chapple DG (2024) Troubled waters in the land down under: pervasive threats and high extinction risks demand urgent conservation actions to protect Australia’s freshwater fishes. SSRN [Preprint, posted 21 May 2024].
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McSweeny P (2021) Determining swimming performance of native fish larvae in front of fish protection screens. BSc(Hons) thesis, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Marsden T, Baumgartner LJ, Duffy D, Horta A, Ning N (2023) Evaluation of a new practical low-cost method for prioritising the remediation of fish passage barriers in resource-deficient settings. Ecological Engineering 194(2023), 107024.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moore GA (2014) ‘Crossing the chasm, 3rd edition: marketing and selling disruptive products to mainstream consumers.’ (Harper Business: New York, NY, USA)

Moyle PB, Israel JA (2005) Untested assumptions: effectiveness of screening diversions for conservation of fish populations. Fisheries 30(5), 20-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moyle PB, White D (2002) Effects of screening diversions on fish populations in the Central Valley: what do we know? A report for the Science Board, CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program. January 2002. (California State Water Resources Control Board) Available at https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs/bay_delta/wq_control_plans/2006wqcp/exhibits/append2/doi/doi-48j.pdf

Murray–Darling Basin Authority (2020) Native fish recovery strategy: working together for the future of native fish. (MDBA: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.mdba.gov.au/basin/plants-and-wildlife/fish/native-fish-recovery [Verified 15 March 2024]

Murray–Darling Basin Authority (2023) Northern basin toolkit measures: August 2023 progress update from the Northern Basin Project Committee. (MDBA: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications-and-data/publications/northern-basin-toolkit-progress [Verified 15 March 2024]

National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (2023) ‘Toward national guidance for fish screen facilities to ensure safe passage for freshwater fishes.’ (NIWA: Christchurch, New Zealand)

Nayeem T, Pawsey N, Baumgartner L, Sexton A, Boys C (2023a) Water users’ attitudes towards fish-protection screens: a case study from Australia’s Murray–Darling (Baaka) Basin. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 30(1), 107-126.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nayeem T, Pawsey N, Murshed F, Baumgartner L, Boys C, Rayner T (2023b) Modern sustainable fish screens: a study on developing effective communication with water users. Sustainability 15(9), 7964.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (2020) NSW water strategy. (NSW DPIE: Sydney, NSW, Australia) Available at https://water.dpie.nsw.gov.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0007/409957/nsw-water-strategy.pdf [Verified 5 February 2024]

NSW Environmental Protection Authority (2021) NSW State of the Environment 2021. (NSW EPA: Sydney, NSW, Australia) Available at https://www.soe.epa.nsw.gov.au [Verified 9 August 2024]

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (2023) Oregon’s fish screening program 2021–2023 biennial report. (ODFW: Salem, OR, USA) Available at https://dfw.state.or.us/fish/screening/

Rayner TS, Conallin J, Boys CA, Price R (2023) Protecting fish and farms: incentivising adoption of modern fish-protection screens for water pumps and gravity-fed diversions in Australia. PLOS Water 2(8), e0000107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rogers E (2003) ‘Diffusion of innovations’, 5th edn. (Free Press: New York, NY, USA)

Stocks JR, Walsh CT, Rodgers MP, Boys CA (2019) Approach velocity and impingement duration influences the mortality of juvenile golden perch (Macquaria ambigua) at a fish exclusion screen. Ecological Management & Restoration 20, 136-141.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Stocks JR, Walsh CT, Rayner TS, Boys CA (2024) Murray cod and modern fish screens: influence of water velocity and screen design on the entrainment and impingement of larval and young-of-year fish at water offtakes. Marine and Freshwater Research 75, MF23239.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sverdrup HU, Olafsdottir AH (2019) Assessing the long-term global sustainability of the production and supply for stainless steel. BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality 4, 8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Swanson C, Young PS, Cech JJ, Jr (2005) Close encounters with a fish screen: integrating physiological and behavioral results to protect endangered species in exploited ecosystems. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134, 1111-1123.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Turnpenny AW, Struthers G, Hanson P (1998) ‘A UK guide to intake fish-screening regulations, policy and best practice with particular reference to hydroelectric power schemes.’ (Fawley Aquatic Research Laboratories Ltd & Hydroplan: Fawley, UK)