Translating hunger training research to primary health: a qualitative study of nurse attitudes towards a novel weight management intervention
Jennifer T. Gale 1 , Aimee L. Ward 1 , Willemijn E. de Bruin 1 , Rachael W. Taylor 1 , Michelle R. Jospe 1 21 Department of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
2 Corresponding author. Email: michelle.jospe@otago.ac.nz
Journal of Primary Health Care 12(1) 79-87 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC19052
Published: 24 February 2020
Journal Compilation © Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 2020 This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Practice nurses in general practice are ideally placed to deliver weight management treatments. Teaching people to eat according to their appetite, based on measurements of blood glucose (‘hunger training’), is known to lead to weight loss and improved eating behaviour. To effectively translate this research to primary care requires understanding of key stakeholder perspectives.
AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of practice nurses on the suitability of using hunger training as a weight management intervention in general practice.
METHODS: Ten nurses trialled hunger training for 1 week, followed by a semi-structured interview where they were asked about their experience; perceived patient interest; enablers and barriers; and suggested changes to hunger training.
RESULTS: All nurses were positive about hunger training and wanted to use it with their patients. They thought it was a useful method for teaching patients about eating according to their appetite, and the impact of food choices on glucose. Motivation was seen to be both an important potential barrier and enabler for patients. Other anticipated patient enablers included the educational value of hunger training and ease of the programme. Other barriers included lack of time and cost of equipment and appointments. For most nurses, 1 week of following hunger training was sufficient training to deliver the intervention. Suggested refinements included adding nutrition advice to the booklet, incorporating other health goals and enabling social support.
DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that hunger training could be translated to primary care with minor modifications.
KEYwords: Obesity; Blood glucose self-monitoring; Intuitive eating; Food intake regulation
References
[1] World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight fact sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.[2] Ministry of Health. Annual Update of Key Results 2015/16 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2016.
[3] Finalyson M, Heridan NF, Cumming J. Nursing developments in primary health care 2001–2007. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2009.
[4] Claridge R, Gray L, Stubbe M, et al. General practitioner opinion of weight management interventions in New Zealand. J Prim Health Care. 2014; 6 212–20.
| General practitioner opinion of weight management interventions in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25194248PubMed |
[5] Schaefer JT, Magnuson AB. A review of interventions that promote eating by internal cues. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014; 114 734–60.
| A review of interventions that promote eating by internal cues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24631111PubMed |
[6] Field AE, Inge TH, Belle SH, et al. Association of obesity subtypes in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery study and 3-year postoperative weight change. Obesity. 2018; 26 1931–7.
| Association of obesity subtypes in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery study and 3-year postoperative weight change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30421853PubMed |
[7] Jospe MR, Taylor RW, Athens J, et al. Adherence to hunger training over 6 months and the effect on weight and eating behaviour: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Nutrients. 2017; 9 1260
| Adherence to hunger training over 6 months and the effect on weight and eating behaviour: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Barkeling B, King NA, Naslund E, Blundell JE. Characterization of obese individuals who claim to detect no relationship between their eating pattern and sensations of hunger or fullness. Int J Obes. 2007; 31 435–9.
| Characterization of obese individuals who claim to detect no relationship between their eating pattern and sensations of hunger or fullness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Dalton M, Hollingworth S, Blundell J, et al. Weak satiety responsiveness is a reliable trait associated with hedonic risk factors for overeating among women. Nutrients. 2015; 7 7421–36.
| Weak satiety responsiveness is a reliable trait associated with hedonic risk factors for overeating among women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26404367PubMed |
[10] Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23 334–40.
| Whatever happened to qualitative description?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10940958PubMed |
[11] Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1998.
[12] Strack RW, Magill C, McDonagh K. Engaging youth through photovoice. Health Promot Pract. 2004; 5 49–58.
| Engaging youth through photovoice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14965435PubMed |
[13] Mason M. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2010; 11 1–19.
[14] Ward AL, Freeman C, McGee R. The influence of transport on well-being among teenagers: a photovoice project in New Zealand. J Transp Health. 2015; 2 414–22.
| The influence of transport on well-being among teenagers: a photovoice project in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006; 27 237–46.
| A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Simons D, Clarys P, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Why do young adults choose different transport modes? A focus group study. Transp Policy. 2014; 36 151–9.
| Why do young adults choose different transport modes? A focus group study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Curtis K, Fry M, Shaban RZ, et al. Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice. J Clin Nurs. 2017; 26 862–72.
| Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27649522PubMed |
[18] Ploeg J, Davies B, Edwards N, et al. Factors influencing best-practice guideline implementation: lessons learned from administrators, nursing staff, and project leaders. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007; 4 210–9.
| Factors influencing best-practice guideline implementation: lessons learned from administrators, nursing staff, and project leaders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18076464PubMed |
[19] Mathieson A, Grande G, Luker K. Strategies, facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice in community nursing: a systematic mixed-studies review and qualitative synthesis. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019; 20 e6
| Strategies, facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice in community nursing: a systematic mixed-studies review and qualitative synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30068402PubMed |
[20] Nolan C, Deehan A, Wylie A, et al. Practice nurses and obesity: professional and practice-based factors affecting role adequacy and role legitimacy. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012; 13 353–63.
| Practice nurses and obesity: professional and practice-based factors affecting role adequacy and role legitimacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22464138PubMed |
[21] Woodruff RC, Schauer GL, Addison AR, et al. Barriers to weight loss among community health center patients: qualitative insights from primary care providers. BMC Obes. 2016; 3 43
| Barriers to weight loss among community health center patients: qualitative insights from primary care providers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27785364PubMed |
[22] Nemeth LS, Rice LJ, Potts M, et al. Priorities and preferences for weight management and cardiovascular risk reduction in primary care. Fam Community Health. 2017; 40 245–52.
| Priorities and preferences for weight management and cardiovascular risk reduction in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28525445PubMed |
[23] Ayres CG, Griffith HM. Perceived barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of priority clinical preventive services guidelines. Am J Manag Care. 2007; 13 150–5.
| 17335358PubMed |
[24] Ivankova NV. Applying mixed methods in community-based participatory action research: a framework for engaging stakeholders with research as a means for promoting patient-centredness. J Res Nurs. 2017; 22 282–94.
| Applying mixed methods in community-based participatory action research: a framework for engaging stakeholders with research as a means for promoting patient-centredness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Nursing Council of New Zealand. The New Zealand Nursing Workforce. Wellington, NZ: Nursing Council of New Zealand; 2011.
