He mana tō te mātauranga – knowledge is power: a qualitative study of sexual and reproductive healthcare experiences of wāhine Māori
Chelsea Harris 1 * , Susan Bidwell 2 , Ben Hudson 1 , Maira Patu 3 , Christina McKerchar 2 , Ibrahim S. Al-Busaidi 11
2
3
Abstract
Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is important for well-being, yet Indigenous peoples, including Māori, have poorer SRH outcomes than non-Indigenous peoples. Healthcare providers (HCPs) play a critical role in enhancing patients’ health literacy, directly impacting health outcomes by providing clear, accessible information and guidance. Therefore, it is important to explore the experiences that wāhine Māori (Māori women) have when interacting with HCPs and how they learn about SRH. Such research could guide interventions to improve dissemination of SRH knowledge to Māori.
This study aimed to explore the experiences wāhine Māori have of sexual health care and accessing SRH knowledge.
Wāhine were interviewed in this Kaupapa Māori study. Interviews were transcribed and coded, and thematic analysis was performed.
Twelve wāhine were interviewed. An overarching theme, He mana tō te mātauranga (knowledge is power), was identified. There were four subthemes: being informed about contraceptive options is empowering, informed consent is important, high-stress situations call for better communication and improved dissemination of SRH knowledge is needed. The wāhine valued being well-informed about their health and options, however, their experiences of receiving information varied.
Wāhine Māori want to be told more about their health and options when encountering HCPs regarding SRH. Being informed is empowering, while feeling uninformed results in a breakdown in trust in the healthcare system and inability to exercise mana motuhake (autonomy). Facilitating improved dissemination of knowledge about SRH may help improve SRH outcomes for Māori by supporting health literacy, so that Māori can make informed decisions about their health.
Keywords: equity, health literacy, informed consent, Kaupapa Māori, Māori health, reproductive health, sexual health, women’s health.
WHAT GAP THIS FILLS |
What is already known: Māori experience sexual and reproductive health (SRH) inequities. Healthcare providers (HCPs) and health services have critical roles in facilitating the health literacy of our population, which impacts on SRH. |
What this study adds: Wāhine Māori (Māori women) want to be well-informed when accessing SRH care and find this empowering, however, their experiences of this are variable and accurate SRH knowledge can be inaccessible. Improved dissemination of SRH knowledge, in the community and by HCPs, is needed. |
Introduction
Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is important for well-being,1 and encompasses ‘physical, emotional, mental and social well-being in relation to sexuality’.1 Examples of SRH outcomes include rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and psychosocial well-being relating to sexuality. Unplanned pregnancy has also been considered important, although can be contested as problematising unintended pregnancy, particularly for Indigenous communities who have been subjected to attempts to control their fertility.2 Indigenous peoples have the right to the ‘highest attainable standard’ of health.3 However, around the world they experience SRH inequities,4 and Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) is no different. Compared to Pakehā (New Zealand Europeans), wāhine Māori (Māori women) have higher rates of gonorrhoea,5 syphilis in pregnancy,5 cervical cancer6 and pregnancy-related mortality.7 Māori health inequities are breaches of The Treaty of Waitangi,8 which promised the right to health for Māori,9 and are due to systemic failures of the healthcare system to meet the needs of and engage with Māori.5–7
Health literacy is one’s ability to access, understand and use information to improve and maintain well-being.10 It can influence how patients make decisions about contraception, prepare for healthy pregnancy and protect themselves from STIs. Organisational health literacy, defined as ‘the degree to which organisations equitably enable individuals to find, understand and use information and services to inform health-related decisions’,11 is also important – it highlights the responsibility of services to equitably support the populations’ health literacy. Power imbalances and racism can be barriers to Indigenous peoples engaging with health services,12 and health information can be inaccessible for Indigenous peoples.13 It is the responsibility of healthcare providers (HCPs) to support patient health literacy.14 HCPs are seen as the most reliable source of health information.15 Therefore, interactions with HCPs can impact on health literacy.
Colonial attitudes towards reproduction, women and Māori have resulted in scrutinisation of the reproductive lives of wāhine.16 This impacts how wāhine access and experience health care, for example through the marginalisation of Māori birthing practices.17 In NZ, SRH care is provided by general practice clinics, sexual health clinics, Sexual Wellbeing Aotearoa, youth health clinics, midwives and hospitals. Little literature is available regarding the experiences wāhine have of accessing SRH services. One study found that Māori youth are less likely to feel that HCPs understood their SRH needs compared to Pakehā, and are more likely to report negative experiences at SRH appointments.18 Further literature regarding how wāhine Māori experience SRH care could guide improvements in dissemination of SRH knowledge to Māori and improve the cultural safety of HCPs. This study aimed to explore the experiences of wāhine when encountering the healthcare system for SRH purposes. Learning about how Māori experience healthcare is key in addressing cultural safety gaps in the system.
Methods
The study was informed by Kaupapa Māori theory. Kaupapa Māori research challenges the normalisation of Western cultural ideals and epistemology, and prioritises Māori values and self-determination.19 The study privileged a Māori worldview and aimed to benefit Māori. Whakawhanaungatanga (trust and connection building) was undertaken. The primary investigator (CH) identifies as Māori and has experience in women’s health. She was supported by two Māori co-authors (MP and CM) who were experienced in Māori research. CH’s clinical experience and identity as a wāhine Māori facilitated open dialogue with participants.
Initially, wāhine were recruited from an urban general practice clinic in Canterbury. Women who identified as Māori aged 18–69 years were eligible. A Māori receptionist phoned eligible wāhine enrolled at the practice to inform them of the study. Advertisement flyers were disseminated by clinic staff. Additional wāhine from outside of the clinic were recruited via snow-balling. Wāhine who had been under the clinical care of CH were excluded. Twelve wāhine were recruited, the number of interviews by which data saturation is usually achieved.20 Wāhine were offered a choice of interviewing face-to-face or via videoconferencing. For the in-person interviews, wāhine chose the location and whānau were welcome to attend. The wāhine received grocery vouchers in recognition of their contributions.
Interviews lasted 35–75 min and were audio-recorded and transcribed manually by CH. The interview topic guide (see Supplementary File S1) covered experiences of health care pertaining to SRH (in any healthcare setting, at any time), perspectives about the importance of sexual wellbeing, how SRH healthcare services could be improved for Māori and how SRH information is acquired. The interviews were coded and themes generated from the most frequently recurring codes using inductive thematic analysis.21 CH was assisted by SB (an experienced Pakehā qualitative researcher) in the interpretation of the data, and results were discussed with MP to ensure a Kaupapa Māori approach. The COREQ checklist for reporting qualitative studies22 was used to inform study reporting (see Supplementary File S2).
The wāhine are identified in the manuscript by pseudonyms and age. Approval was granted by the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (reference number: H22/148) and the Ngāi Tahu Research Consultation Committee.
Results
Twelve wāhine aged 25–57 years were interviewed between March and September 2023. Eleven interviews were face-to-face and one was via Zoom. Thematic analysis yielded two main themes: He mana tō te mātauranga (knowledge is power) and Te hāpai i te mana wāhine, te takahe i te mana wāhine (empowering women, disempowering women). This paper presents the first theme.
He mana tō te mātauranga had four subthemes:
Being informed about contraceptive options is empowering.
Informed consent is important.
High-stress situations call for better communication.
Improved dissemination of sexual health knowledge is needed.
Being informed about contraceptive options is empowering
The wāhine reported wanting to be better informed about contraception. Pip (25) described how this impacted on her compliance with her prescribed contraceptive:
She [the GP] put me on the pill … I wasn’t really comfortable with it … I was more into the injection, but she never really talked me through my options properly … so when I went on the pill I didn’t take it, and I’m still not on any sort of contraception. (Pip, 25)
As Pip alludes to, there are a variety of contraceptive options available. The wāhine described being unaware of what options were available, which could impact on decision-making:
I think sometimes having better information and options. Instead of saying, “This is what will happen”, or “I think you should be on this.” Give me a couple of options. (Mere, 44)
Aroha (57) highlighted how this can be an issue, particularly for disadvantaged wāhine:
I’m still mind-blown about things that are out there that are helpful for us … what would you put us … low income? …there’s so much out there that can help us, that had we known, would make our lives easier. (Aroha, 57)
When the wāhine did not feel informed about contraceptive options or involved in the decision, it resulted in them discontinuing the contraceptives they had been prescribed. Mere (44) was without contraception at the time of her interview due to a consult in which she had not felt listened to, where she asked specifically for information about the Depo Provera (injectable contraceptive), but her doctor recommended the Jadelle (implantable rods):
I said well I’d prefer to go on the Depo, and he just printed me out the information about the rod, nothing about the Depo … I was pissed … I felt like I wasn’t listened to. (Mere, 44)
In contrast, Anahera (35) had a relationship with her GP that facilitated forthright and effective discussions about SRH:
Pretty straight up. Doesn’t beat around the bush. He’s just all out, with “well if you have unsafe sex you can get this and you can get that, and this is what it can do”. (Anahera, 35)
Because of Anahera’s longstanding relationship with her GP, she was happy to try different contraceptives, despite experiencing side effects. Marama (50) described how being forewarned by a trusted HCP can improve Mirena (intrauterine contraceptive device) adherence through initial bleeding disturbances:
I’d rather have a recognisable face say, “hey, it’s going to be hard for the first few months … this may happen”. (Marama, 50)
The wāhine who reported better interactions with their HCPs had accessed multiple types of contraception before they found the option that suited them. This contrasts with Pip and Mere’s experiences, where unilateral decision-making and lack of information sharing resulted in the wāhine having no contraceptive cover.
Informed consent is important
The wāhine stressed the importance of being adequately informed about medical and surgical procedures. Aroha (57) described not understanding why she was having repeated cervical exams:
They didn’t explain to me why they were doing what they were doing … it would have been nice to know. (Aroha, 57)
Age was a factor in informed consent. Whina (40) provided an example of inadequate consent, when she was subjected to an intra-vaginal ultrasound scan as a teenager to diagnose polycystic ovaries:
… they wanted to do an internal ultrasound, which … when you’re a teenager, I don’t think many of us would know what that means … and when they pulled out the … probe, and it was just quite terrifying … there was just no kind of explanation about what was going to happen, it just happened. And it just felt really intrusive. (Whina, 40)
Maia (39) recalled being taken to the GP by her mother for the Depo Provera as a teenager:
Mum took me in, when I was in my teens … I didn’t get any information about what it was … I wasn’t interested in sex … they never talked to me about the side effects or anything else, it was pretty much just … the doctor pulling part of my pants down, jabbing me and that was it. (Maia, 39)
Maia did not continue with the injections. Both Maia and Whina were poorly informed and inadequately consented to their procedures, which involved intrusively accessing private body parts. They were young and not yet sexually active. Lisa (44), in contrast, described her age as facilitating informed consent when accessing a termination at the age of 40:
Because I’m older, more articulated, know what I want … the doctor did an extremely thorough talk with me … made sure that I was really wanting to, that was the steps I wanted to take. (Lisa, 44)
The wāhine had quite different experiences of informed consent depending on their age, despite Maia and Whina being old enough to participate in their healthcare decisions.
Whina provided her thoughts on informed consent:
Don’t assume everyone knows why or what’s happening … make sure that they have the opportunity to ask questions, or that you’ve given as much information as you can prior to starting … it shouldn’t always just be done to the person, it should be done with them. (Whina, 40)
High-stress situations call for better communication
Being well-informed was particularly important in the context of stressful situations. Wāhine who described positive experiences felt that they knew what was happening throughout their stressful situations, whereas wāhine who reported negative experiences described feeling uncertain, scared and dismissed. Whina described her experience at the time of her first (emergency) Caesarean section:
The care was really good … they were pretty good at keeping me informed even when things were quite tense, because it was obviously an emergency. (Whina, 40)
However, when she later presented to discuss delivery of her subsequent child, she had the opposite experience:
I didn’t feel I was able to make informed decisions … there was no time for my husband and I to just have even five minutes to talk about it by ourselves … and I felt like the doctor just couldn’t wait to get us out the door … so I felt really pressured to have another Caesarean, which wasn’t my preference. (Whina, 40)
This experience left Whina feeling powerless.
Ruth (37) recalled her confusion during a cervical cancer scare:
All I could gather was that “abnormal” meant cancer … I was actually quite scared by that … the way it was sort of presented to me was, “you basically have cancer, we’re gonna figure out where your stage of cancer is …”, to “oh no, it’s fine now, there’s nothing there”. And it’s like, “Are you sure? Like, do we need to do another test?” (Ruth, 37)
Maia described how uncertainty worsened her experience of miscarriage in her first pregnancy, when her midwife was unsupportive and never contacted her again after advising her to go to hospital:
It was scary to go through that for the first time, and for my husband to go through that for the first time, and both of us not knowing what we’re doing. (Maia, 39)
This resulted in Maia experiencing anxiety when she became pregnant again later. The way that wāhine experienced being informed (or otherwise) during distressing events impacted on their psychological well-being and their trust of the medical system.
Improved dissemination of sexual health knowledge is needed
All but one of the wāhine reported learning about SRH through unofficial routes, such as through personal experience, sometimes with consequences such as unplanned pregnancy.
I was sexually active when I was a very younger teen … I didn’t know what the hell I was doing … I went to a twenty-four hour clinic, and they told me, “… you’re pregnant” … I didn’t think I would get pregnant every time I had sex. (Nikita, 39)
Others learnt about sex from their sisters, cousins and friends:
Everything was through your mates, your peers. (Mere, 44)
School sexual education was generally deemed insufficient:
In terms of actual information, I remember them doing some at school, but now that I’m an adult I think that it was terrible. (Whina, 40)
(Interviewer): Can you tell me about how you learnt what you know about sexual health?
(Marama, 50): Piss-poor Form 2 education.
The internet was one information source. Some wāhine used strategies to ensure they found more reliable information, for example, using Google Scholar or comparing multiple sources:
I’ll sort of look at the first sort of five pieces of information that came up, just to see if they match each other. (Ruth, 37)
Some of the wāhine said they would talk to a doctor about the information:
I’d probably go to my GP. (Sarah, 41)
But they also noted that access to doctors was problematic:
My doctor is usually always booked out. (Joanne, 28)
It was evident that the doctor played a role in ensuring that the wāhine felt able to ask questions:
She [GP] made it comfortable enough for me to ask questions even though I thought they were kind of dumb, and she talked me through all that sort of stuff and made me feel a lot better. (Maia, 39).
Often information is provided in written form during GP consults, however, this was not necessarily effective:
[Doctors] just give us a whole bunch of resources, “Take this, go home and read it …” But I’d rather somebody talked to me, talked me through it face to face. (Pip, 25)
The wāhine were asked what they thought of the idea of a free wāhine-only wānanga (setting of open discussion and teaching) about SRH. Ten of the wāhine thought this was a good idea:
I think that’s cool … if we can come to a place that we know, and learn about it, especially I think for women’s stuff (Whina, 40)
It would probably be a more comfortable space for people … if there’s familiar faces around and kai. (Pip, 25)
Wāhine noted such wānanga would suit people struggling to afford doctor appointments. Some wāhine did voice that shyness could be a barrier:
Personally myself no, only because I get a little bit anxious in big groups like that. (Joanne, 28)
Anahera thought intergenerational mingling could be beneficial, so that experienced wāhine could support younger people:
I think the younger generation needs to see experiences from older women, and meet people who have had real struggles having kids when they’re younger. (Anahera, 35)
Marama noted that having a respected older wāhine would help keep the wānanga on track:
You’ll have a toa, or an aunty in your whanau, yeah? Grab them along, because someone will pick up, and then they’ll say “ah shut up”, you need someone like that … that’s the only way we’ll all listen. (Marama, 50)
Overall, the opportunity to be able to ask a knowledgeable person questions in a comfortable community setting rather than in a consult room appealed to most of the wāhine.
Discussion
This is the first study to report wāhine Māori healthcare experiences in relation to a range of SRH topics. The results demonstrate the importance to wāhine Māori of being informed about their SRH care, but that they do not consistently experience this. Thematic analysis resulted in the theme ‘He mana tō te mātauranga’ (knowledge is power), with four subthemes: being informed about contraceptive options is empowering, informed consent is important, high-stress situations call for better communication and improved dissemination of sexual health knowledge is needed.
As has been found elsewhere,23,24 the women in this study wanted to know more about contraception options, particularly funded ones. While there are options to assist those with financial difficulties in accessing contraception (eg free consults for youth through Sexual Wellbeing Aotearoa and funding of Mirenas and Jadelles for eligible patients), awareness limits access. Māori have lower disposable income compared to other ethnicities excluding Pasifika.25 Māori teenaged mothers experience financial barriers to contraception post-partum.26 Improved awareness of funded options is important for those suffering income inequities.
Some wāhine in this study discontinued contraception due to feeling uninformed. Concerns included medication side effects and negative experiences with prescribers. Similarly, Barker and Faasse27 found that people to whom information about possible side effects is not disclosed are less likely to take prescribed medications. Hikaka et al.28 identified the doctor–patient relationship as being important for Māori elders to feel comfortable taking medications. Elders feel more informed about their medications, and trusting of their doctor, if they feel their doctor cares about them.28 Whakawhanaungatanga is crucial in building trust with Māori patients.29 Trust in the prescriber is important for patient acceptance of medication recommendations, and this trust requires time to develop.30 For wāhine to feel comfortable with their contraception, they require information about options and possible side effects, and positive experiences with their prescribers.
Being informed is required for consent.31 The wāhine described feeling uninformed about medical procedures. Elsewhere, wāhine Māori have reported feeling uninformed about obstetric procedures,32 however, no other literature was identified about wāhine Māori experiences of consent for gynaecological or obstetric procedures. Women who undergo gynaecological or obstetric procedures without adequate consent are at risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).33 How and when information is provided is important – receiving information immediately before a procedure can be distressing.34 Denying patients the right to informed consent disregards their autonomy and can destroy trust in HCPs.
Women’s SRH often involves stressful situations: pregnancy (wanted or not), miscarriage, infertility, childbirth, termination, cervical screening and STIs. Being informed is particularly important during these times. How wāhine recalled potentially traumatic encounters with healthcare services was affected by experiences of not being informed and able to participate in decision-making. This has been found in other studies.32,35 Feeling less in control and informed during labour has been associated with higher scoring of PTSD symptoms.36 This is relevant in regards to equity as Māori women have higher rates of postpartum mental health difficulties.37 Wāhine have also described experiencing fear regarding abnormal cervical test results, and uncertainty regarding whether they had cancer.38 Similar findings have been reported overseas.39 Another distressing situation described in this study was feeling unsupported during miscarriage. Being well-informed during miscarriage can help reduce distress.40 Being insufficiently informed during stressful health situations results in patient dissatisfaction and adverse effects on mental health.41,42 Therefore it is important that wāhine experience effective information sharing during stressful encounters with the healthcare system for SRH.
This study highlighted that SRH knowledge is inaccessible. Supporting health literacy is a responsibility of HCPs.14 The wāhine preferred face-to-face discussion with HCPs, rather than receiving written information. This has been found elsewhere.43 Due to the brief nature of appointments, it can be difficult for GPs to comprehensively discuss SRH with patients.44,45 The concept of a wāhine-only wānanga to facilitate informative discussion about SRH was proposed to the wāhine, nearly all of whom approved. Internationally, researchers work with Indigenous communities to make health information more accessible,46,47 including developing a sexual health literacy framework.48 The necessity of such projects suggests that mainstream health care does not support health literacy needs for Indigenous communities.
Strengths and limitations
The age range of the participants generated multigenerational data, although the older wāhine were sometimes trying to recall events from decades ago. The semi-structured nature of the interviews and whakawhanaungatanga resulted in a rich dataset. Manual transcription of the interviews allowed thorough familiarisation with the data.
Only 12 wāhine from one city were recruited. Interviewing wāhine from other parts of NZ would be valuable: the lived realities of Māori and the structure and availability of healthcare services vary across the country, so these results are unlikely to represent all wāhine. Finally, the wāhine were not given the opportunity to review their transcripts or the final manuscript, limiting the portrayal of their experiences to the interpretation of the researchers.
Implications for policy and practice
This study indicates that HCPs and health services need training regarding their responsibilities in supporting health literacy across the population, and keeping patients well-informed about their SRH care. HCPs should be also able to utilise a Māori model of clinical assessment, such as the Meihana Model49 (demonstrated by Al-Busaidi et al.50) to provide culturally safe care for Māori. Finally, interventions to disseminate SRH information could be helpful in improving SRH outcomes for Māori, particularly if Māori lead their design. Further research could explore methods of disseminating knowledge about SRH among wāhine, such as wānanga.
Conclusions
Wāhine value being informed about their SRH care, but sometimes do not experience this. Healthcare organisations and HCPs play important roles in supporting patient and population health literacy, and improvements are needed in clinical care and services to ensure wāhine are well-informed and able to participate in decision-making related to their SRH.
Data availability
The dataset used and analysed during the current study is not available due to confidentiality and sensitivity of the nature of the data.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the wāhine who were interviewed for this research. We also acknowledge the staff at the medical centre who assisted with recruitment, and academic colleagues who also assisted with this. CH acknowledges her relative SH, who kindly allowed CH to practice the interview with her before interviewing participants.
Author contributions
CH conceived of the idea, organised and carried out the interviews, transcribed and coded the data and generated the themes and final manuscript. SB assisted with study design, checked the coding and provided feedback and guidance during the thematic analysis and writing process. BH and IA provided guidance with setting up the study and support to CH throughout. MP provided guidance to keep the study in line with Kauapapa Māori research principles, and gave feedback on the developing themes. CM provided guidance with the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
1 World Health Organization. Sexual Health. World Health Organization. 2024. Available at https://www.who.int/health-topics/sexual-health#tab=tab_1 [verified 29 October 2024].
3 United Nations. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: resolution/adopted by the General Assembly. United Nations. 2007. Available athttps://social.desa.un.org/issues/indigenous-peoples [verified 29 October 2024].
4 Inter-Agency Support Group on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations; 2014. Available at https://www.un.org/en/ga/69/meetings/indigenous/#&panel1-1 [verified 29 October 2024].
5 ESR (The Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd). Sexually transmitted infections in New Zealand: supplementary annual surveillance report 2022. Porirua, New Zealand; 2023. Available at https://www.esr.cri.nz/media/zv5bzjyo/esr-sexually-transmitted-infections-supplementary-annual-surveillance-report-2022.pdf [verified 21 November 2024]
6 Hider P, Dempster-Rivett K, Williman J, et al. A review of cervical cancer occurrences in New Zealand 2008-2012. N Z Med J 2018; 131(1472): 53-63.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 The Treaty of Waitangi, February 6, 1840. Available at https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/en/about/the-treaty/maori-and-english-versions [verified 29 October 2024].
9 Waitangi Tribunal. Hauora: Report on Stage One of the Health Services and Outcomes Kaupapa Inquiry. Waitangi Tribunal; 2023. Available at www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz [verified 29 October 2024].
10 World Health Organization. Track 2: Health literacy and health behaviour. World Health Organization; 2024. Available at https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/seventh-global-conference/health-literacy [verified 1 November 2024].
11 United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health literacy basics. 2021. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/health-literacy/php/about/index.html [verified 1 November 2024].
12 Horrill T, McMillan D, Schultz A, et al. Understanding access to healthcare among Indigenous peoples: a comparative analysis of biomedical and postcolonial perspectives. Nurs Inq 2018; 25: e12237.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Lambert M, Luke J, Downey B, et al. Health literacy: health professionals’ understandings and their perceptions of barriers that Indigenous patients encounter. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14: 614.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Walsh C, Shuker C, Merry A. Health literacy: from the patient to the professional to the system. N Z Med J 2015; 128(1423): 10-16.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Honey M, Roy D, Bycroft J, et al. New Zealand consumers’ health information needs: results of an interpretive descriptive study. J Prim Health Care 2014; 6(3): 203-211.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Le Grice J, Braun V. Mātauranga Māori and reproduction: inscribing connections between the natural environment, kin and the body. AlterNative 2016; 12(2): 151-164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
17 Kenney C. Midwives, women and their families: a Māori gaze: towards partnerships for maternity care in Aotearoa New Zealand. AlterNative. 2011; 7(2): 123-137.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
18 Rose S, Garrett S, McKinlay E, et al. Experience of Sexual Healthcare by Māori and Non-Māori young people: an online survey of 15–24 year olds in Hawkes Bay, New Zealand. Int J Sex Health 2022; 34(1): 118-129.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Walker S, Eketone A, Gibbs A. An exploration of Kaupapa Māori research, its principles, processes and applications. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2006; 9(4): 331-344.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
20 Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006; 18(1): 59-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
21 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
22 Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19(6): 349-357.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
23 Rose S, Cooper A, Baker N, et al. Attitudes toward long-acting reversible contraception among young women seeking abortion. J Womens Health 2011; 20(11): 1729-1735.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Oppelt P, Baier F, Fahlbusch C, et al. What do patients want to know about contraception and which method would they prefer? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 295: 1483-1491.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
25 New Zealand Government. Household income and housing-cost statistics: year ended June 2023. New Zealand Government. 2023. Available at https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/household-income-and-housing-cost-statistics-year-ended-june-2023/ [verified 30 April 2024]
26 Lawton B, Makowharemahihi C, Cram F, et al. Access to contraception for indigenous Māori teenage mothers. J Prim Health Care 2016; 8(1): 52-59.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Barker J, Faasse K. Influence of side effect information on patient willingness to take medication: consequences for informed consent and medication adherence. Int Med J 2023; 53(9): 1692-1696.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Hikaka J, Jones R, Hughes C, et al. “It is through shared conversation, that I understand” – Māori older adults’ experiences of medicines and related services in Aotearoa New Zealand. N Z Med J 2020; 133(1516): 33-46.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
29 Komene E, Pene B, Gerard D, et al. Whakawhanaungatanga – building trust and connections: a qualitative study indigenous Māori patients and whānau (extended family network) hospital experiences. J Adv Nurs 2024; 80: 1545-1558.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
30 Goff S, Mazor K, Meterko V, et al. Patients’ beliefs and preferences regarding doctors’ medication recommendations. J Gen Int Med 2008; 23(3): 236-241.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
32 Lawrie F, Mitchell Y, Barrett-Young A, et al. Birth by emergency caesarean delivery: perspectives of wāhine Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand. J Health Psychol 2024; 29(12): 1307-1320.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
33 Menage J. Post-traumatic stress disorder in women who have undergone obstetric and/or gynaecological procedures: a consecutive series of 30 cases of PTSD. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1993; 11(4): 221-228.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
34 Hall M, Hall S. When treatment becomes trauma: defining, preventing, and transforming medical trauma. VISTAS 2013; 73: 1-15.
| Google Scholar |
35 Rodríguez-Almagro J, Hernández-Martínez A, Rodríguez-Almagro D, et al. Women’s perceptions of living a traumatic childbirth experience and factors related to a birth experience. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16(9): 1654.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
36 Czarnocka J, Slade P. Prevalence and predictors of post-traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth. Br J Clin Psychol 2000; 39(1): 35-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
38 Adcock A, Stevenson K, Cram F, et al. He Tapu Te Whare Tangata (sacred house of humanity): under-screened Māori women talk about HPV self-testing cervical screening clinical pathways. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 155(2): 275-281.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
39 Jentschke M, Lehmann R, Drews N, et al. Psychological distress in cervical cancer screening: results from a German online survey. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2020; 302(3): 699-705.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
40 Robinson J. Provision of information and support to women who have suffered an early miscarriage. Br J Midwifery 2014; 22(3): 175-180.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
41 Rees J, Davies HR, Birchall C, et al. Psychological effects of source isolation nursing (2): patient satisfaction. Nurs Stand 2000; 14(29): 32-36.
| Google Scholar |
42 Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171(9): 987-994.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
43 Arlidge B, Abel S, Asiasiga L, et al. Experiences of whānau/families when injured children are admitted to hospital: a multi-ethnic qualitative study from Aotearoa/New Zealand. Ethn Health 2009; 14(2): 169-183.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
44 Gott M, Galena E, Hinchliff S, et al. “Opening a can of worms”: GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care. Fam Pract 2004; 21(5): 528-536.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
45 Thompson K, Casson K, Fleming P, et al. Sexual health promotion in primary care – activities and views of general practitioners and practice nurses. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2008; 9: 319-330.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
46 Nash S, Arora A. Interventions to improve health literacy among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2021; 21(1): 248.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
47 Wali S, Superina S, Mashford-Pringle A, et al. What do you mean by engagement? – evaluating the use of community engagement in the design and implementation of chronic disease-based interventions for Indigenous populations – scoping review. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20(1): 8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
48 Ireland S, Maypilama EL. “We are sacred”: an intercultural and multilingual approach to understanding reproductive health literacy for Yolŋu girls and women in remote Northern Australia. Health Promot J Austr 2021; 32 Suppl 1: 192-202.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
49 Pitama S, Robertson P, Cram F, et al. Meihana Model: a clinical assessment framework. N Z J Psychol 2007; 36(3): 118-125.
| Google Scholar |
50 Al-Busaidi IS, Huria T, Pitama S, et al. Māori Indigenous Health Framework in action: addressing ethnic disparities in healthcare. N Z Med J 2018; 131(1470): 89-93.
| Google Scholar |