Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Tertiary institution’s duty of care for the health and well-being of Pacific students during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross sectional survey

Faafetai Sopoaga https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8509-8726 1 * , Shyamala Nada-Raja https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5743-4107 1 , Malia Lameta 2
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Va’a o Tautai – Centre for Pacific Health, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.

2 Pacific Community Engagement, Auckland campus, Division of External Engagement, University of Otago, Auckland 1141, New Zealand.

* Correspondence to: tai.sopoaga@otago.ac.nz

Handling Editor: Tim Stokes

Journal of Primary Health Care https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24039
Submitted: 7 March 2024  Accepted: 21 June 2024  Published: 8 July 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Introduction

There is increasing concern about the wellbeing of tertiary students, and this is likely to be further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is minimal information about what support is being provided. In New Zealand, there is even less information available on Pacific students in the tertiary environment.

Aim

This study explored the role of one tertiary institution in the provision of support for Pacific tertiary students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Pacific students’ perceptions of all the support they received from the University of Otago during the COVID-19 pandemic were obtained from a cross-sectional survey between April to June 2022. All Pacific students attending the University in 2022 were eligible to participate. An online survey was emailed to all students.

Results

There were 1277 Pacific students enrolled at the University in 2022. Of all eligible Pacific students, 358 (28%) completed the survey. Three quarters of students had to isolate since the start of the academic year, either because they had COVID-19, or they were a close contact of someone with the disease. Of all participants, 356 (99%) received a health pack. At least two-thirds (67.6%) had accessed other support from the University. A third (32.4%) accessed support through the Otago University Students’ Association and some from the community and local Pacific health provider. The support was highly valued by students who utilised these services.

Discussion

Institutions can provide effective leadership in the coordination of support for their students through working together with student-led, government and non-governmental organisations in the community.

Keywords: COVID-19, equity, mental health, minority students, pacific communities, pacific students, pandemic, well-being, workforce, tertiary institutions.

WHAT GAP THIS FILLS
What is already known: There is increasing concern about the health and well-being of tertiary students internationally and comparatively little is known about the context in New Zealand, especially the support being provided for minority students.
What this study adds: This research provides information on support services for Pacific students at a university in New Zealand including students’ response to support provided during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction

There has been increasing international interest in the health and wellbeing of students undertaking tertiary studies.16 There may be expectations that the health and wellbeing of students attending university might be better than that of the general population. Contrary to this, there is increasing evidence that there are significant concerns about the health of students in higher education, particularly their mental health and wellbeing.79 Additionally, the help and services that students are requiring support for have changed from minor ailments to more severe psychological problems.10 The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to have exacerbated these problems.2,5,11,12

While there is increasing concern and recognition about the health and wellbeing needs of students in higher education internationally, there are relatively few studies that focus on access to support or feedback on how the support provided is received by students.1315 The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted further the concerns for student mental health and wellbeing needs.2,5,12,16 There was a range of responses from institutions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in G20 countries,17 some explored the reorientation of services through health promotion campaigns,18 while others developed changes in their systems and approaches.19

There is limited information in New Zealand about the health, wellbeing and services for students in higher education.11,2022 This is even more so for Pacific students.23,24 The New Zealand Union of Student’s Association conducted a survey on the mental health of students in New Zealand in 2017.25 Of the 1762 participants only 90 (5%) identified with a Pacific ethnicity. More than half (56%) considered dropping out of tertiary studies, some felt overwhelmed (28.2%), self-reported mental illness (20.2%) and had a fear of failure (17.3%). The mean Kessler 10 score was 28.1 (moderate level of distress). Research with first-year Pacific students at a New Zealand university showed 55% reported experiencing moderate to severe symptoms of psychological distress, depression and/or anxiety on standardised measures.23 Two-thirds of those with poor mental health had sought assistance from professional support services on campus. Having a range of approaches to meeting the needs of students was recommended as being a helpful strategy. The aim of this research is to explore the role of one tertiary institution in the provision of support for Pacific tertiary students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Pacific students’ perceptions of the support they received from the University of Otago during the COVID-19 pandemic were obtained from a cross-sectional survey conducted between April and June 2022. All Pacific students attending the University in 2022 were eligible to participate. An invitation to complete the survey was emailed to students. Eligible participants received three reminder emails during the data collection period. Pacific students from Otago Polytechnic were also invited to participate but were excluded from the analyses because of the very low response rate.

In addition to the usual support the University provides, students were also offered a health care pack at the beginning of the year. The contents of the health care pack included medical supplies and Pacific blessing cards. The main distribution site for health care packs was the Va’a o Tautai – Centre for Pacific Health at the University’s local campus. A number of smaller distribution sites were also available across the University. Students were directed to the distribution site that was closest to their location of study or accommodation. For students who were unwell or unable to pick up their health care packs at the local campus, the packs were delivered directly to their homes. For students who were located at other campuses, following confirmation of their addresses, the health care packs were posted to their home addresses.

The survey (for further details see Supplementary File S1) consisted of multi-choice questions including free text options and open-ended questions and took approximately 5 min to complete. Basic sociodemographic information was obtained, this included course of study, whether they had to self-isolate, support accessed and how helpful each type of support was for them rated on a four-point Likert scale. The survey responses were totalled for each question and summarised in frequency tables using descriptive statistics. The free text and open-ended questions were analysed to determine groups of ideas from the responses. These were further analysed to identify emerging themes from the data.

Ethics approval was granted by the University’s Human Ethics Committee (reference: D22/091) and standard University procedures for consultation with Māori were completed prior to commencing data collection. The information sheet about the survey, details about the survey responses being anonymised and contact details for support were included in the online forms before the online survey questions were presented. Informed consent was obtained before students were able to complete the online survey.

Results

There were 1277 Pacific students enrolled at the University in 2022 across different campuses that were eligible to participate. Of these students, 1068 (83%) were distributed a health care pack. Some did not respond to the invitation to receive a health care pack. Of all eligible Pacific students, 358 (28%) completed the survey. The sociodemographic details of students are summarised in Table 1. Most students (43%) were aged between 17 and 20 years and three quarters were female. Students were able to self-identify with as many ethnicities as they thought applied to them. Samoans made up nearly half of all those who identified with a Pacific ethnicity, Tongans and Cook Island Māori made up 18 and 16% respectively, Fijians (Indian and i-Tauke) made up 18 and Niuean 8%. Two students identified as indigenous Māori. Approximately one-quarter were in their first year and one-third in their fourth year of university studies, and half of all respondents were enrolled in a course within Health Sciences.

Table 1.Description of students who participated in the survey (total n = 358).

Variablen (%)
Age17–20 years155 (43.2)
21–25 years126 (35.4)
26–30 years26 (7.6)
31–35 years11 (3.0)
36–40 years11 (3.0)
>40 years24 (6.5)
Missing5
GenderFemale264 (74.5)
Male87 (24.5)
Gender diverse4 (1.1)
Missing3
EthnicityASamoan169 (48.6)
Tongan64 (18.4)
Cook Islands Māori55 (15.8)
Fijian Indian37 (10.6)
Fijian i-Tauke23 (6.6)
Kiribatian11 (3.2)
Tokelauan8 (2.3)
Tuvaluan9 (2.6)
Solomon Islander2 (0.6)
Niuean27 (7.8)
Māori2 (0.5)
NZ European94 (7.0)
Other (not mentioned above)7 (2.0)
Year of study at university196 (26.1)
274 (20.1)
371 (19.3)
4114 (31.0)
Missing data3
Academic divisionCommerce26 (7.5)
Humanities85 (24.2)
Health Sciences178 (51.2)
Sciences59 (17.0)
Missing data10
A Students were able to nominate all ethnic groups they self-identified with.

Three quarters of students had to isolate since the start of the academic year, either because they had COVID-19, or they were a close contact of someone with the disease. At least two-thirds had received support from the University, including support from Residential Colleges and academic departments. More than half accessed support from the Pacific Islands Centre and one-third through the Otago University Student Association. There were some (16%) who accessed support services from local Pacific health providers in addition to local communities and churches. The support accessed was valued by students who utilised these services. See Table 2 for a summary of support students accessed.

Table 2.Support students accessed including feedback on the support provided (total n = 358).

Variablen (%)
Received a health packYes356 (99.4)
Somewhat or very helpful341 (95.8)
Received other support from the University during isolationYes242 (67.6)
No116 (32.4)
Received support fromPutea Tautoko85 (23.9)
Somewhat or very helpful75 (88.2)
Received support fromVa’a o Tautai – Centre for Pacific Health237 (66.6)
Somewhat or very helpful224 (94.5)
Received support fromOUSA (Otago University Students Association)116 (32.4)
Somewhat or very helpful75 (64.5)
Received support fromPacific Trust Otago56 (15.8)
Somewhat or very helpful52 (92.3)
Received support fromPacific Islands Centre196 (54.9)
Somewhat or very helpful180 (92.0)
Received support fromOther help36 (10.1)
Somewhat or very helpful36 (100)

Of those who responded, most (99%) received a health pack, and of these 96% found it somewhat or very helpful. When asked ‘Can you share why you found this helpful?’ Student responses were categorised into themes as outlined below.

Pacific health and wellbeing

The responses from students identified a number of components that are important in the Pacific context for health and wellbeing. The Fonofale model of health26 highlights these components, which are family and culture, mental and physical wellbeing and spiritual wellbeing (included in the messages provided with the health packs).

The wellbeing pack offered me a peace of mind to know that if/when I get Covid I will be set up to ride it out …. It was comforting and [a] tangible show of support which is nice. I appreciate it a lot. Enjoyed the messages and motivation a lot. Made the idea of Covid seem less stressful …

Felt the island way, the sense of belonging. Being cared for. Thanks

It is such a kind gesture and shows how much the Pacific community here at Otago care about their Pacific students. It is very alleviating to know that if we do get sick, we have [a] care package … It also saves us the stress and strain of having to go out and purchase medications if we don’t feel well … I am greatly appreciative of that.

Financial constraints and affordability

Responses suggest that students prioritise limited available funds, and that they might not purchase some or most items that may be helpful to maintain wellness.

While most of the products are not too expensive individually, when you need to purchase several (or all) of them at once, it could be quite expensive. Money that most students don’t have to spare.

Receiving these things was super helpful! Especially since us students can’t actually afford many of these things that were in the packs such as vitamins and the thermometer!!

Helpful approaches

Having the right expertise and input into the development of the health packs, including an understanding of the context for students, made the provision of support impactful.

Such a thoughtful pack with content that was actually helpful. A great idea with great contents! Thank you so much.

It was a really well constructed pack and I feel I have everything I need if I should get unwell with Covid. It made me feel really supported and valued by having such a tangible piece of support.

Love the card with quotes and services we can seek help from. I felt cared for and know that there is support out there.

When asked ‘What more could be done to better support you?’. Most of the students felt that at the time there was enough support provided.

Already doing a great job. I know who to contact when I need more help or support.

It’s great to know that the Pacific team reached out to me (even though I wasn’t struggling for help) and especially when I live in Wellington. Fakafetai lahi lele – ke manuia koutou I tona aloha [thank you very much, may you be blessed with God’s love].

A few students provided additional suggestions:

Maybe a reusable ice pack could be added to the healthcare pack.

I think you guys have been amazing in making yourself present and ensuring that students know where to seek support. To improve, maybe an email or text to confirm if what we have applied for has been accepted and on the way …

Discussion

This questionnaire survey describes Pacific students’ perceptions of the support they received from the University of Otago during the COVID-19 pandemic. Almost all students received a healthcare pack through the University P.O.P.O. (Pacific Opportunities and Programmes at Otago) programme and two-thirds received additional support through the University. Participants also highlighted a number of areas where the additional support helped them through written feedback.

Pacific peoples make up approximately 9% of the total New Zealand population and are over-represented in poor health and education outcomes.27 The Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Act 2022 (NZ) included the provision for a Pacific Health Strategy to improve health outcomes and workforce development.28 Strengthening the Pacific health workforce is one of the priority areas for Pacific health improvement.27 Addressing issues related to equity in the health workforce will contribute to improving health outcomes in society. The Ministry of Health’s definition of equity is ‘In Aotearoa New Zealand, people have differences in health that are not only avoidable but unfair and unjust. Equity recognises different people with different levels of advantage require different approaches and resources to get equitable health outcomes.’29

Tertiary institutions in New Zealand can contribute to improving health outcomes and to apply the equity framework across all its programmes. A recent study in New Zealand focussing on tertiary institutions found that Māori and Pacific students had lower overall enrolments in the first year of study of health professional programmes.30 The University of Auckland has established an Equity Office to lead its approach for an inclusive and equitable environment for students and staff.31 The University of Otago has both Māori and Pacific Strategic Frameworks outlining its commitment to the advancement of Māori and Pacific aspirations and educational outcomes.32,33 In response to these, there are a number of support programmes to address equity issues for Māori and Pacific students.

The P.O.P.O. is a targeted programme for Pacific students undertaking courses and programmes within Health Sciences at the University of Otago. It is a partnership programme between the University of Otago and Ministry of Health (now Te Whatu Ora),34 with components aligned with the Tinto’s model of institutional departure.35 Tinto’s model places a specific importance on the role of institutions in supporting students to transition and remain at university. It highlights the importance of pre-entry attributes of incoming students and their level of preparedness for tertiary studies, the role of academic and social integration and the importance of students’ goals and intentions including institutional commitment for students’ success.36

The P.O.P.O. programme has three components: popo (to start), pōpō (to nurture) and popō (to capture). Popo (to start) is about the incoming students, understanding who they are, their values and what is important to them, to enable them to thrive in the new learning environment. pōpō (to nurture) is about the responsibility of institutions to provide a nurturing environment for students to thrive. Lastly, popō (to capture) requires students to take responsibility to fully utilise the support that is provided to them for their benefit.

At the beginning of the academic year in 2022, the threat of the Omicron strain of COVID-19 resulted in a range of directives and restrictions from the New Zealand government to keep the community safe. Most Pacific students who attended the University of Otago were from out of town, and many decided to remain locally during this period. While this was a difficult time for everyone, existing systems and networks of support assisted in coordinating support for all students. Those who had financial difficulties could apply through Putea Tautoko for access to emergency resources. Other supports were provided through the Otago University Students’ Association, the Pacific Islands Centre and local Pacific community providers also contributed. The Va’a o Tautai – Centre for Pacific Health through its P.O.P.O. programme also organised support for all enrolled Pacific students through the offer of a health care pack. Pacific students really appreciated the range of support they were able to access through a range of providers, both internal and external to the University.

The situation during the COVID-19 pandemic gives an example of how institutions can provide leadership in working together with government and non-governmental organisations to support the health and wellbeing of students in tertiary institutions. Targeted support for minority students or those less likely to access support will ensure that students are less likely to fall through the gap. Student-led organisations also provide a helpful role for the wellbeing of all students in the tertiary environment.

Strengths and limitations

The strength of this research is its contribution to the limited information on access to and feedback about services from minority students in higher education. We were able to obtain information from 358 Pacific students enrolled at one institution. The limitation however is its low response rate, and therefore it is not representative of all Pacific students within this institution, and only one New Zealand institution was involved. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and context at the time, an online survey was conducted. A face-to-face talanoa would have provided richer and more in-depth data.

Conclusion

Tertiary institutions are integral to the coordination of a whole of community approach in the provision of support for students. This research shows that tertiary institutions can provide effective leadership in the coordination and provision of support for the health and wellbeing of their students through working together with student-led, government and non-governmental organisations in the community.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available online.

Data availability

The data that support this study can be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of interest

Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Declaration of funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Health New Zealand which provided the healthcare packs for the student participants.

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the staff at the Va’a o Tautai – Centre of Pacific Health and across the University of Otago who assisted in the promotion of the research to eligible candidates.

References

Field R, Duffy J, Huggins A. Supporting transition to law school and student well-being: the role of professional legal identity. Int J FYHE 2013; 4(2): 15-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

James J. Covid-19 and tertiary students: the impact on the wellbeing, finance, and study of students at tertiary institutions in Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Union of Students’ Association; 2020. pp. 1–15. Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f0515b1b1a21014b5d22dd6/t/5fa218b297ec03254a8fc9b3/1604458682311/COVID-19+and+Tertiary+Students+The+impact+on+the+wellbeing%2C+finance%2C+and+study+of+students+at+tertiary+institutions+in+Aotearoa+New+Zealand+.pdf [accessed 4 February 2024].

Jameson M, Smith J. Voices of students in competition. N Z Med J 2011; 124(1338): 55-67.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hunt J, Eisenberg D. Mental health problems and help-seeking behaviour among college students. J Adolesc Health 2010; 46: 3-10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Bennett J, Heron J, Gunnell D, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student mental health and wellbeing in UK university students: a multiyear cross-sectional analysis. J Ment Health 2022; 31(4): 597-604.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Barkham M, Broglia E, Dufour G, et al. Towards an evidence‐base for student wellbeing and mental health: definitions, developmental transitions and data sets. Couns Psychother Res 2019; 19(4): 351-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Flatt AK. A suffering generation: six factors contributing to the mental health crisis in North American higher education. College Q 2013; 16(1): 1-17.
| Google Scholar |

Mori SC. Addressing the mental health concerns of international students. J Couns Dev 2000; 78: 137-44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Givens JL, Tjia J. Depressed medical students’ use of mental health services and barriers to use. Acad Med 2002; 77(9): 918-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

10  Kitzrow MA. The mental health needs of today’s college students: challenges and recommendations. NASPA J 2003; 41(1): 165-79.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

11  Cameron M, Fogarty-Perry B, Piercy G. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on higher education students in New Zealand. J Open Flex Distance Learn 2022; 26(1): 42-62.
| Google Scholar |

12  Salimi N, Gere B, Talley W, et al. College students mental health challenges: concerns and considerations in the COVID-19 pandemic. J College Stud Psychother 2023; 37(1): 39-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

13  Batchelor R, Pitman E, Sharpington A, et al. Student perspectives on mental health support and services in the UK. J Furth High Educ 2020; 44(4): 483-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

14  Sagar-Ouriaghli I, Brown J, Tailor V, et al. Engaging male students with mental health support: a qualitative focus group study. BMC Public Health 2020; 20(1): 1159.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

15  Gorczynski P, Sims-Schouten W, Wilson C. Evaluating mental health literacy and help-seeking behaviours in UK university students: a country wide study. J Public Ment Health 2020; 19(4): 311-19.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

16  Wang X, Hegde S, Son C, et al. Investigating mental health of US college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(9): e22817.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

17  Nurunnabi M, Almusharraf N, Aldeghaither D. Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic in higher education: evidence from G20 countries. J Public Health Res 2020; 9(1_suppl): jphr. 2020.2010.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

18  Santiago AdS, Sabóia VM, Souza SRd, et al. Health promotion actions in universities in the face of the covid-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Texto Contexto Enferm 2022; 31: e20210418.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

19  Lisiecka A, Chimicz D, Lewicka-Zelent A. Mental health support in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study and recommendations for practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20(6): 4969.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

20  Butcher A, McGrath T. International students in New Zealand: needs and responses. Int Educ J 2004; 5(4): 540-51.
| Google Scholar |

21  Stallman HM. University counselling services in Australia and New Zealand: activities, changes, and challenges. Aust Psychol 2012; 47(4): 249-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

22  Kypri K, Langley JD, McGee R, et al. High prevalence, persistent hazardous drinking among New Zealand tertiary students. Alcohol Alcohol 2002; 37(5): 457-64.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

23  Sopoaga F, Nada-Raja S, Leckie T, et al. Mental health and well-being of first year Pacific students at a New Zealand university. Open J Soc Sci 2023; 11(7): 365-81.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

24  Chia-Chen Chen A, Szalacha LA, Menon U. Perceived discrimination and its associations with mental health and substance use among Asian American and Pacific Islander undergraduate and graduate students. J Am Coll Health 2014; 62(6): 390-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

25  Gharibi K. Kei Te Pai? Report on student mental health in Aotearoa. 2018. Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56a801c4c21b869a7c0c8cb7/t/5b4e98d2758d468c0fc75fff/1531877600011/Kei+Te+Pai+Report+on+Student+Mental+Health.pdf [accessed 5 January 2024].

26  Fuimaono K. Fonofale: model of health. 2001. Available at https://whanauoraresearch.co.nz/research/fonofale-model-of-health/ [cited 20 March 2018]

27  Minister of Health. Te Mana Ola: The Pacific Health Strategy. 2023. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/te-mana-ola-pacific-health-strategy [accessed 17 February 2024].

28  New Zealand Government. Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Act 2022. 2022. Available at https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2022/0030/latest/versions.aspx [accessed 17 February 2024].

29  Manatu Hauora Ministry of Health. Definition of equity. 2022. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministry/what-we-do/achieving-equity [accessed 17 February 2024].

30  Crampton P, Bagg W, Bristowe Z, et al. National cross-sectional study of the sociodemographic characteristics of Aotearoa New Zealand’s regulated health workforce pre-registration students: a mirror on society? BMJ Open 2023; 13(3): 065380.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

31  University of Auckland. What is equity. Available at https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/about-us/about-the-university/equity-at-the-university/about-equity/what-is-equity.html [accessed 19 February 2024].

32  University of Otago. Pacific Strategic Framework 2022-2030. 2022. Available at https://www.otago.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/211217/the-university-of-otago-pacific-strategic-framework-2022-2030-088124.pdf [accessed 17 February 2024].

33  University of Otago. Maori Strategic Framework 2022. 2022. Available at https://www.otago.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0032/495626/Maori-Strategic-Framework-2022.pdf [accessed 19 February 2024].

34  Sopoaga F, Kokaua J, van der Meer J, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of a programme for improving the participation and academic success of an underrepresented minority group in New Zealand. Eval Program Plann 2017; 65: 20-29.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

35  Tinto V. From theory to action: exploring the institutional conditions for student retention. In: Smart J, editor. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol 25. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. pp. 51–89.

36  Tinto V. Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Rev Educ Res 1975; 45(1): 89-125.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |