Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Female genital mutilation: an update for primary health-care professionals*

Nikhilesh Todkari
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 University of Otago, Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, Wellington, New Zealand

Correspondence to: Nikhilesh Todkari, 67 Mandel Mews, Waiwhetu, Lower Hutt 5010, New Zealand. Email: npt_2000@hotmail.com

Journal of Primary Health Care 10(2) 110-113 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC18017
Published: 28 June 2018

Journal Compilation © Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 2018.
This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Female genital mutilation (FGM) has historically been seen as a health concern limited to women living in other parts of the world. However, with the rising number of migrants, refugees and asylum seekers, countries like New Zealand, Australia and Europe have seen a surge in the number of women and girls affected by FGM seeking medical care. This topic is increasingly becoming relevant to primary health-care providers in this country and therefore a good understanding of this practice is important.

KEYWORDS: Female genital mutilation; New Zealand; raising awareness; primary health care


References

[1]  Woodhouse M. Government announces increase to Refugee Quota. Wellington: New Zealand Government; 2016 [cited 2017 December 3]. Available from: https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/govt-announces-increase-refugee-quota

[2]  Koski A, Heymann J. Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries. BMJ Global Health. 2017; 2 e000467
Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Ohchr U, Undp U, Unesco U, et al. Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency statement. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008 [cited 2017 November 20]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43839/1/9789241596442_eng.pdf

[4]  Cook RJ, Dickens BM, Fathalla MF. Female genital cutting (mutilation/circumcision): ethical and legal dimensions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002; 79 281–7.
Female genital cutting (mutilation/circumcision): ethical and legal dimensions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Varol N, Fraser IS, Ng CHM,, et al. Female genital mutilation/cutting - towards abandonment of a harmful cultural practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 54 400–5.
Female genital mutilation/cutting - towards abandonment of a harmful cultural practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Said A, Simunovich P. Female genital mutilation challenges in practice and policy within New Zealand. Auckland University of Technology, Public Health Bulletin. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Public Health Bulletin; 2014 [cited 2017 December 3]. Available from: https://www.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/513327/Said-and-Simunovich-final-bulletin-2014.pdf

[7]  Knight R, Hotchin A, Bayly C, Grover S. Female genital mutilation - experience of The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 39 50–4.
Female genital mutilation - experience of The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Banks E, Meirik O, Farley T,, et al. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet 2006; 367 1835–41.
Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Hussain S, Rymer J. Tackling female genital mutilation in the UK. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 19 273–8.
Tackling female genital mutilation in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Female genital mutilation. Auckland; 2017 [cited 2017 December 3]. Available from: http://fgm.co.nz/fgm-in-nz/

[11]  Mortensen A, Rainger W, Hughes S. Refugee health care: a handbook for health professionals. Wellington: The Ministry of Health; 2012 [cited 2018 February 6]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/refugee-health-care-a-handbook-for-health-professionalsv2.pdf

[12]  Nations TU. The Secretary-General, Economic and Social Council, United Nations. Sustainable Development Goal 5: achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. New York; 2016 [cited 2018 February 6]. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg5

[13]  Simpson J, Robinson K, Creighton SM, Hodes D. Female genital mutilation: the role of health professionals in prevention, assessment, and management. BMJ. 2012; 344 e1361–1361.
Female genital mutilation: the role of health professionals in prevention, assessment, and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Smith H, Stein K. Health information interventions for female genital mutilation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017; 136 79–82.
Health information interventions for female genital mutilation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |