Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Is intranasal zinc effective and safe for the common cold? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hubert D'Cruze, Bruce Arroll and Time Kenealy

Journal of Primary Health Care 1(2) 134 - 139
Published: 2009

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for effectiveness of intranasal zinc used to treat a common cold, and pool the results in a meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was undertaken in the Cochrane register of controlled trials, Medline and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were randomised placebo controlled trials in patients with a common cold. RESULTS: Five studies were found. Three were relevant to the issue of treatment of common colds with intranasal zinc and the results were combined in meta-analysis. High doses of intranasal zinc preparation (2.1mg zinc/day) were reported in two studies to shorten the duration and reduce the symptom severity of common cold in healthy adults, when started within 24 to 48 hours of onset of illness. A lower dose study (0.044mg zinc/day) found no benefit in resolution, but did report a significant improvement in symptoms at day 1 and day 3. Combining the three studies, the relative risk for benefit at day 3 was 0.62 (95%CI 0.18 to 2.19) (random effects). There were no studies with children. There were no significant harms reported. CONCLUSION: Results from individual trials suggest some benefit from zinc for symptoms of a common cold, at least in adults. Pooling the results for symptom relief at day 3, in a conservative meta-analysis, suggests a non-significant benefit. Unquantified concerns about permanent anosmia following the use of intranasal zinc may mean that the issues raised will never be scientifically resolved. KEYWORDS: Administration, intranasal, zinc, common cold, meta-analysis, olfaction disorders, review

https://doi.org/10.1071/HC09134

© CSIRO 2009

Committee on Publication Ethics

PDF (248 KB) Export Citation

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share via Email

View Dimensions

View Altmetrics