Corrigendum to: Evaluating the impact of the Piki te Ora extended primary care team on clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients: a retrospective study
Sara Mustafa , Claire Cannon , Rawiri Keenan , Martin Mikaere , Tammy Dehar , Suzanne Moorhouse , Janine Thompson , Lynne Chepulis
Journal of Primary Health Care https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24108_CO
Published: 30 October 2024
This article corrects Journal of Primary Health Care. doi:10.1071/HC24108
The authors noticed that some data were missing from Table 2 in the published article. In bottom two rows for Systolic BP and Diastolic BP (mmHg) data the N’s were available, but the clinical values were missing. This oversight is regretted. The corrected Table 2 is presented below (with the missing values now added in bold):
TableĀ 2.
Clinical measures of patients at baseline and 3 and 6 months after enrolling in the Piki te Ora service (n = 64).
Clinical measures | Baseline vs 3 months | P-value | Baseline vs 6 months | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median (IQR) | |||||
HbA1c (mmol/mol) | N = 40 | <0.001 | N = 37 | 0.011 | |
88.5 (72.0, 104.8) vs 66.5 (50.5, 90.5) | 84.0 (67.0, 93.5) vs 68.0 (54.5, 83.0) | ||||
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | N = 22 | <0.001 | N = 24 | 0.495 | |
5.95 (4.68, 6.70) vs 5.45 (3.65, 6.00) | 5.40 (4.33, 6.20) vs 5.05 (4.35, 5.95) | ||||
HDLc (mmol/L) | N = 22 | 0.014 | N = 24 | 0.775 | |
3.30 (2.35, 4.30) vs 3.20 (1.48, 3.83) | 2.85 (2.18, 4.00) vs 2.90 (2.23, 3.78) | ||||
LDLc (mmol/L) | N = 7 | 0.751 | N = 12 | 0.167 | |
1.20 (1.10, 1.30) vs 1.20 (1.10, 1.50) | 1.00 (0.90, 1.10) vs 1.00 (0.90, 1.30) | ||||
Systolic BP (mmHg) | N = 38 | 0.737 | N = 36 | 0.398 | |
130.0 (120.0, 134.8) vs 128.0 (115.0, 143.0) | 130.0 (120.0, 134.8) vs 122.0 (120.0, 149.5) | ||||
Diastolic BP (mmHg) | N = 38 | 0.837 | N = 36 | 0.868 | |
76.5 (70.0, 80.75) vs 80.0 (67.0, 86.0) | 76.5 (70.0, 80.75) vs 74.0 (67.0, 87.0) |