Breastfeeding peer support in rural New Zealand: the views of peer supporters
Raewyn Johnson 1 , Pauline Ansley 1 , Fiona Doolan-Noble 2 , Erin Turley 1 , Tim Stokes 21 West Coast Primary Health Organisation, Greymouth, New Zealand
2 Department of General Practice and Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Correspondence to: Raewyn Johnson, Lactation Consultant and Breastfeeding Advocate, West Coast Primary Health Organisation, PO Box 544, Greymouth 7805, New Zealand. Email: raewyn.johnson@westcoastpho.org.nz
Journal of Primary Health Care 9(2) 173-177 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC16027
Published: 9 June 2017
Journal Compilation © Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 2017.
This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: New Zealand (NZ) has a high rate of breastfeeding initiation, declining sharply during the first six months. Although there is a range of support available to breastfeeding mothers, access can be problematic in rural areas. To extend the accessibility of breastfeeding support to rural women, a Primary Health Organisation established a breastfeeding peer supporters (BPS) programme (Mum4Mum – M4M).
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of the impact of the BPS training programme on participants, as well as understanding how they utilised the information, both personally and in their communities.
METHODS: All women who had completed the M4M training and for whom current contact details were available were contacted and invited to complete an online survey. The text data contained in returned surveys was collated and analysed using a general inductive thematic approach.
RESULTS: Forty-one out of 100 BPS graduates completed the survey. Five key themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: knowledge gained and shared; increased confidence; role of peer support; acceptance; personal satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: The M4M programme improved the personal knowledge and skills of participants and enhanced confidence in breastfeeding ability, which in turn empowered responding participants to successfully support other women to breastfeed in their communities. As a consequence, respondents reported experiencing a heightened sense of personal satisfaction. Furthermore, the initiative successfully established a network of BPS across a sparsely populated rural area of NZ.
KEYWORDS: Breastfeeding peer support; Mum4Mum (M4M) programme; rural primary health; informal; accessibility; role models; enhanced knowledge; confidence; satisfaction
WHAT GAP THIS FILLS |
What is already known: Peer breastfeeding support is an established strategy for effectively supporting the initiation and maintenance of breastfeeding. |
What this study adds: This evaluation expands the research on defined communities where breastfeeding peer support training programmes have an impact. As well as in disadvantaged communities, this evaluation shows the usefulness of the intervention in rural New Zealand where access to health professional support may be limited. |
Introduction
Exclusive breastfeeding until babies are 6 months of age is considered optimal for both child and maternal health.1–3 However, New Zealand (NZ) and international studies show that the rate of breastfeeding declines sharply during the first 6 months.4,5 In NZ in 2013, ~17% of infants were exclusively breastfed at 6 months, with lower rates for Māori and Pacific infants and babies living in areas of high deprivation.6 The decision to cease breastfeeding is influenced by a range of issues from having sore nipples to cultural influences.5,7,8
The provision of lay or professional support is important for successful breastfeeding.9 A Cochrane systematic review identified that duration of both exclusive and any breastfeeding was increased by providing extra breastfeeding support (lay and professional).10 Qualitative research shows that peer support is valued by breastfeeding mothers and increases their confidence and self-efficacy to breastfeed, and it not only provides psychosocial benefits for the mothers but also for the peer supporters and professionals involved.11,12 Those who provide peer support are also acknowledged as providing positive role models for women.13
In NZ, a range of support is available to breastfeeding mothers, but for mothers living in rural NZ, access to health services, including maternity care, is challenging.14 The West Coast Primary Health Organisation (WCPHO) provides antenatal breastfeeding education and lactation services to a rural population of 32,145, dispersed over a large geographical area of NZ’s South Island.15 Approximately 41% of the population live rurally, compared to 15% nationally; consequently, health service provision is challenging.16 In common with other rural and remote areas, recruitment and retention of health professionals is a major issue.17,18 These factors drive innovative ways to deliver health care using lay community networks and support.
In 2007, the Mum4Mum (M4M) initiative was introduced, aiming to enhance breastfeeding initiation and extending support available to women irrespective of location. The initiative is based on the Breastfeeding Peer Counsellor Programme developed by the La Leche League NZ. Both of the Breastfeeding Advocates employed by the WCPHO are qualified to deliver the training programme to lay women, enabling them to become breastfeeding peer supporters.
Research to date has focused on the experience of mothers receiving care from breastfeeding peer supporters; there is limited research on the impact the training has on the volunteer peer supporters themselves. The aim of this service evaluation was to understand the effect training had on participants and how they used the information both personally and in their communities.
Methods
Participants and data collection
In March 2014, all women who had completed the M4M training between 2007 and early 2014, and for whom current contact details were available (65%, 100/153), were contacted via a variety of channels including e-mail, Facebook, breastfeeding support groups and text, and invited to complete an online survey of seven questions, three of which had space for free-text responses. The three free-text questions were:
-
Did the knowledge you gained during the training contribute to you breastfeeding your own baby or subsequent babies for longer?
-
Do you/have you ever used your increased knowledge/confidence to encourage/support other women to breastfeed? If yes, how?
-
Please share some stories about women you have encouraged/supported?
The free-text responses to these questions comprised the data of interest for this report.
Data analysis
The free-text comments were analysed using a general inductive thematic approach.19 The preliminary analysis was completed by the Clinical Manager at the WCPHO (PA), with data then re-analysed and coded independently using NVivo 1020 by a Senior Research Fellow at the Department of General Practice and Rural Health, University of Otago (FDN). TS independently checked assignment of codes to categories. As this survey was undertaken as part of an internal evaluation of a service provided by the WCPHO, no ethical approval was required. Confidentiality of respondents was, however, considered important, so all returned surveys were anonymous. Survey return was deemed to imply consent for the included data to be analysed and reported, as participants were informed of the intent to publish in the preamble to the online survey.
Results
Forty-one (41%, 41/100) usable surveys were returned; eight were from Māori M4Ms. Thematic analysis of the survey comments identified five themes. Knowledge gained and shared was the over-arching theme permeating the other themes of: acceptance, increased confidence, personal satisfaction and peer support. For each theme, the associated descriptor and illustrative quotes can be seen in Table 1.
Discussion
This is the first study to explore the views of peer supporters in providing breastfeeding support in rural New Zealand through the M4M initiative. Five key themes were identified as (1) facilitating delivery of breastfeeding peer support (BPS): knowledge gained and shared; (2) increased confidence; (3) role of peer support; (4) acceptance; (5) personal satisfaction.
The findings of this study correspond with other studies of breastfeeding peer supporters, suggesting they are valid. Given that breastfeeding peer support is a complex intervention,21 the use of qualitative methods to explore free-text survey questions and identify how breastfeeding peer support may facilitate breastfeeding is a study strength. Generalisability of study findings may, however, be limited. The study used a convenience sample and was limited in size. Although there was a risk of bias due to the relationship between the WCPHO and the participants, independent oversight provided by the two academics reduced this risk. One key element that was not explored in the survey relates to how the peer supporters engage with local health professionals.
Our findings, in terms of knowledge gained and shared, align with Kempenaar and Darwent, who showed that mothers who undertook peer support training had improved breastfeeding knowledge and increased ability to provide effective support for breastfeeding.22 This is important as women value breastfeeding support from people with expert knowledge and experience.5,23 Closely linked to the main theme was the theme of increased confidence. A lack of self-confidence in breastfeeding is a recognised barrier to continuing with breastfeeding.23 This finding is important, because these women felt their levels of confidence had been improved by the training, which also translated into increased confidence in starting conversations with other mothers. Furthermore, the participants were more empowered to breastfeed in public; promoting an acceptance of breastfeeding in their communities. For women, having other women normalise breastfeeding in public is important and valued.24 The survey respondents felt they provided positive role models for others. Dykes highlights the importance of this in regard to increased initiation rates and improved continuation of breastfeeding.13
As well as acting as role models, the respondents outlined the ways they provided peer support. The most commonly described approach was via informal contact with mothers, suggesting that support was generally provided in social situations. Social support, over and above that provided by family and friends, is valued by women, as shown in a study by Fox et al.5 The personal satisfaction felt by the breastfeeding peer supporters evident in this study was also apparent in other studies.12,25 Other studies of peer support have identified the increased personal growth that peer supporters experience, and the various psychological and physical benefits associated with the experience of helping others.26,27 The qualities required for effective breastfeeding support are reported in a meta-synthesis by Schmied et al., and include the importance of an authentic presence (being there for the mother; taking time to touch base; providing affirmation; being responsive; sharing experiences and having a relationship), as well as the importance of having a facilitative style related to the provision of information and tailoring support to the values and needs of mothers.28 These factors are reflected in comments from respondents to this survey.
Conclusion
This evaluation, set in the real world of a rural primary health organisation, demonstrates how the M4M training initiative by the WCPHO resulted in the establishment of a network of breastfeeding peer supporters across the region; a strategy recognised as effective in the support of initiation and maintenance of breastfeeding. Since the initiation of the programme in 2007 until early 2014, 153 women have completed the training. The evaluation augments what is known about breastfeeding peer support by showing the utility of the intervention in a rural area of NZ.
FUNDING
None.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The three authors who are also employees of the West Coast Primary Health Organisation may be considered to have a potential conflict of interest. However, the independent analysis by FDN of the study data mitigates this risk.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to convey their thanks to all M4Ms who responded to the survey, as well as all those women in the West Coast community who have participated in the M4M training programme.
References
[1] World Health Organization. Exclusive breastfeeding for six months best for babies everywhere 2011. [cited 2015 July 20]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2011/breastfeeding_20110115/en/#[2] Kramer M, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding (Systematic Review). Cochrane Collaboration. London: Wiley; 2012.
[3] National Breastfeeding Advisory Committee of New Zealand. National Strategic Plan of Action for Breastfeeding 2008–2012: National Breastfeeding Advisory Committee of New Zealand’s advice to the Director-General of Health. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2009.
[4] National Breastfeeding Advisory Committee of New Zealand. Background report: protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in New Zealand. A review of the context of breastfeeding in New Zealand, and of the evidence for successful interventions supporting breastfeeding. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2008.
[5] Fox R, McMullen S, Newburn M. UK women’s experiences of breastfeeding and additional breastfeeding support: a qualitative study of Baby Cafe services. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15 147
| UK women’s experiences of breastfeeding and additional breastfeeding support: a qualitative study of Baby Cafe services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Royal New Zealand Plunket Society. Annual breastfeeding statistics. 2015. [cited 2015 July 22]. Available from: http://www.plunket.org.nz/news-and-research/research-from-plunket/plunket-breastfeeding-data-analysis/annual-breastfeeding-statistics/
[7] Dennis CL. Breastfeeding initiation and duration: a 1990–2000 literature review. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002; 31 12–32.
| Breastfeeding initiation and duration: a 1990–2000 literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Häggkvist AP, Brantsaeter AL, Grjibovski AM, et al. Prevalence of breast-feeding in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study and health service-related correlates of cessation of full breast-feeding. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13 2076–86.
| Prevalence of breast-feeding in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study and health service-related correlates of cessation of full breast-feeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Britton C, McCormick FM, Renfrew MJ, et al Support for breastfeeding mothers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; Jan 24 CD001141
| Support for breastfeeding mothers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Renfrew MJ, McCormick FM, Wade A, et al Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 5 CD001141
[11] Thomson G, Crossland N, Dykes F. Giving me hope: women’s reflections on a breastfeeding peer support service. Matern Child Nutr. 2012; 8 340–53.
| Giving me hope: women’s reflections on a breastfeeding peer support service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Ingram J. A mixed methods evaluation of peer support in Bristol, UK: mothers’, midwives’ and peer supporters’ views and the effects on breastfeeding. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13 192
| A mixed methods evaluation of peer support in Bristol, UK: mothers’, midwives’ and peer supporters’ views and the effects on breastfeeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Dykes F. Government funded breastfeeding peer support projects: implications for practice. Matern Child Nutr. 2005; 1 21–31.
| Government funded breastfeeding peer support projects: implications for practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Gibbons V, Lancaster G, Gosman K, Lawrenson R. Rural women’s perspectives of maternity services in the Midland Region of New Zealand. J Prim Health Care. 2016; 8 220–6.
[15] West Coast District Health Board. Annual plan and statement of intent. Greymouth: West Coast District Health Board; 2015.
[16] West Coast District Health Board. Primary health care on the West Coast. Kotahitanga (Working together). 2007. Available from: http://www.westcoastdhb.org.nz/publications/about_us/projects/sustainability_project/Primary%20Health%20Care%20Plan.pdf
[17] Strasser R. Rural health around the world: challenges and solutions. Fam Pract. 2003; 20 457–63.
| Rural health around the world: challenges and solutions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] West Coast District Health Board. District Strategic Plan 2005–2015. Greymouth: West Coast District Health Board; 2005. Available from: http://www.westcoastdhb.org.nz/publications/documents/strategic_plan_docs/2005-2015_strategic_plan.pdf
[19] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3 77–101.
| Using thematic analysis in psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] International QSR. NVivo: the #1 software for qualitative data analysis. 2015. [cited 2015 November 6]. Available from: http://www.qsrinternational.com/product
[21] Thomson G, Trickey H. What works for breastfeeding peer support: time to get real. EMJ. 2013; 1 15–22.
[22] Kempenaar LE, Darwent KL. The impact of peer support training on mothers’ attitudes towards and knowledge of breastfeeding. Matern Child Nutr. 2013; 9 359–68.
| The impact of peer support training on mothers’ attitudes towards and knowledge of breastfeeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Hoddinott P, Pill R. Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London. BMJ. 1999; 318 30–4.
| Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FptFCltw%3D%3D&md5=327f843c15277970e181ad491b8cb95aCAS |
[24] Ingram J, Rosser J, Jackson D. Breastfeeding peer supporters and a community support group: evaluating their effectiveness. Matern Child Nutr. 2005; 1 111–8.
| Breastfeeding peer supporters and a community support group: evaluating their effectiveness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Raine P. Promoting breast-feeding in a deprived area: the influence of a peer support initiative. Health Soc Care Community. 2003; 11 463–9.
| Promoting breast-feeding in a deprived area: the influence of a peer support initiative.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Moran GS, Russinova Z, Gidugu V, et al. Benefits and mechanisms of recovery among peer providers with psychiatric illnesses. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22 304–19.
| Benefits and mechanisms of recovery among peer providers with psychiatric illnesses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Konrath S, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Lou A, Brown S. Motives for volunteering are associated with mortality risk in older adults. Health Psychology. 2012; 31 87–96.
| Motives for volunteering are associated with mortality risk in older adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Schmied V, Beake S, Sheehan A, , et al Women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: a metasynthesis. Birth 2011; 38 49–60.
| Women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: a metasynthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |