Householder decision-making under imminent wildfire threat: stay and defend or leave?
Jim McLennan A B , Glenn Elliott A and Mary Omodei A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic. 3086, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: j.mclennan@latrobe.edu.au
International Journal of Wildland Fire 21(7) 915-925 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11061
Submitted: 5 May 2011 Accepted: 29 February 2012 Published: 26 July 2012
Abstract
The study examined aspects of decision-making that distinguish between those who stay and defend their property and those who leave for an assumed safer location when a community comes under imminent threat from a severe wildfire. The data were obtained from field interviews with 49 survivors of the Murrindindi wildfire (Victoria, Australia, 7 February 2009) in which 38 people perished and that destroyed the small township of Marysville. Uncertainty about the level of threat was a major feature of the decision-making context in the period immediately preceding the impact of the fire. The majority of those who stayed and defended did so because they were committed to this plan of action. For most of those who left, the action of leaving was triggered by realisation of the severe threat posed by the intensity or location of the fire.
Additional keywords: bushfire, community safety, natural hazards, survival.
References
2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission (2010) ‘2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission Final Report.’ (Government Printer for the State of Victoria: Melbourne) Available at http://www.royalcommission.vic.gov.au/Commission-Reports/Final-Report [Verified 18 April 2011]Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (2010) Bushfires and community safety: position. Version 4.1, 8 September 2010. (AFAC: Melbourne) Available at http://knowledgeweb.afac.com.au/positions/documents/AFAC_Position_Bushfires_Community_Safety_v4.1.pdf [Verified 18 April 2011]
Australasian Fire Authorities Council (2005) Position paper on bushfires and community safety. (AFAC: Melbourne) Available at http://www.firewise.org/resources/files/Resources_for_Life/Bushfires%20Community%20Safety%20nov05.pdf [Verified 18 April 2011]
Bradfield A, Wells GL (2005) Not the same old hindsight bias: outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments. Memory & Cognition 33, 120–130.
| Not the same old hindsight bias: outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101.
| Using thematic analysis in psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cohn PJ, Carroll MS, Kumagai Y (2006) Evacuation behaviour during wildfires: results of three case studies. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 21, 29–48.
Collins TW (2008) What influences hazard mitigation? Household decision-making about wildfire risks in Arizona’s White Mountains. The Professional Geographer 60, 508–526.
| What influences hazard mitigation? Household decision-making about wildfire risks in Arizona’s White Mountains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Franklin R (2009) ‘Inferno: the Day Victoria Burned.’ (Slattery Media Group: Melbourne)
Hall TE, Slothower M (2009) Cognitive factors affecting homeowners’ reactions to defensible space in the Oregon coast range. Society & Natural Resources 22, 95–110.
| Cognitive factors affecting homeowners’ reactions to defensible space in the Oregon coast range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Handmer J, Tibbits A (2005) Is staying at home the safest option during bushfires? Historical evidence for an Australia approach. Environmental Hazards 6, 81–91.
| Is staying at home the safest option during bushfires? Historical evidence for an Australia approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kissane K (2010) ‘Worst of Days: Inside the Black Saturday Firestorm.’ (Hachette: Sydney)
Martin WE, Martin IM, Kent B (2009) The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high-risk communities. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 489–498.
| The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high-risk communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marysville Community Website (2010) Available at http://marysville.vic.au/rebuilding [Verified 22 June 2012]
McCaffrey SM, Winter G (2011) Understanding homeowner preparation and intended actions when threatened by a wildfire. In ‘Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on the Human Dimensions of Wildland Fire’. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-P-84. (Eds SM McCaffrey, CL Fisher) pp. 88–95. (Newtown Square, PA) Available at http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/38521 [Verified 3 October 2011]
McGee TK, McFarlane BL, Varghese J (2009) An examination of the influence on wildfire risk perceptions and adoption of mitigation measures. Society & Natural Resources 22, 308–323.
| An examination of the influence on wildfire risk perceptions and adoption of mitigation measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McLennan J, Omodei M, Elliott G, McNeill I, Dunlop P, Suss J (2011) Bushfire survival-related decision-making: what the stress and human performance literature tells us. In ‘Proceedings of the Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre & AFAC 2011 Conference Science Day’. (Ed. RP Thornton) pp. 307–319. (Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre: Melbourne) Available at http://www.bushfirecrc.com/managed/resource/307-319_bushfire_survival-related_decision_making.pdf [Verified 9 February 2012]
Paveglio TB, Carroll MS, Jakes PJ (2010) Adoption and perceptions of shelter in place in California’s Santa Fe Protection District. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 677–688.
| Adoption and perceptions of shelter in place in California’s Santa Fe Protection District.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Proudley M (2008) Fire, families and decisions. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 23, 37–43.
Rhodes A (2007) The Australian ‘Stay or Go’ approach: factors influencing householder decisions. In ‘Extended Abstracts from the 2nd Human Dimensions of Wildfire Conference’, 23–25 October 2007. (International Association of Wildland Fire: Fort Collins, CO) Available at http://www.iawfonline.org/pdf/HumanDimensionsExtendedAbstracts.pdf [Verified 3 October 2011]
Tibbits A, Whittaker J (2007) Stay and defend or leave early: policy, problems and experiences during the 2003 Victorian bushfires. Environmental Hazards 7, 283–290.
| Stay and defend or leave early: policy, problems and experiences during the 2003 Victorian bushfires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tibbits A, Handmer J, Haynes K, Lowe T, Whittaker J (2008) Prepare, stay and defend or leave early. In ‘Community Bushfire Safety’. (Eds J Handmer, K Haynes) pp. 59–71. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Tulving E (2002) Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology 53, 1–25.
| Episodic memory: from mind to brain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whittaker J, McLennan J, Elliott G, Gilbert J, Handmer J, Haynes K, Cowlishaw S (2009) Victorian 2009 Bushfire Research Response: Final Report. Bushfire CRC Post-fire Research Program in Human Behaviour. (Bushfire CRC: Melbourne) Available at http://www.bushfirecrc.com/managed/resource/chapter-2-human-behaviour.pdf [Verified 18 April 2011]
