Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Community pharmacy service provision to adults with palliative care needs in their last year of life: a scoping review

Sheng-Ting Chiu https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4822-8299 1 * , Trudi Aspden 1 , Shane Scahill 1
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.

* Correspondence to: sheng-ting.chiu@auckland.ac.nz

Handling Editor: Tim Stokes

Journal of Primary Health Care https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24089
Submitted: 28 June 2024  Accepted: 2 September 2024  Published: 13 September 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Introduction

The provision of palliative care is central to primary health care delivery. In this setting, community pharmacies often act in a medication supply role, yet their broader involvement in supporting people in the last year of life is less well understood.

Aim

This study aimed to review the literature on community pharmacies supporting adults with palliative care needs in their last year of life, emphasising challenges to optimising their role and improving equity and service accessibility.

Methods

A five-stage scoping review using a comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and grey literature up to 30 April 2024. Eligible articles were charted, descriptively analysed, and mapped to a bicultural and holistic health care model, Te Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Palliative Care model.

Results

Twenty-five studies from seven countries were reviewed, revealing that community pharmacies provide a range of services to support people with palliative care needs. The main role of community pharmacies resides in Tinana, the physical health domain of Te Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Palliative Care model. Challenges experienced by pharmacy staff include communication with palliative care service providers and users, integrating their role into palliative care provision, addressing their educational needs, and managing palliative medication stock.

Discussion

The role of community pharmacy in providing palliative care is not widely understood. If the challenges identified in these studies can be addressed, there is potential for community pharmacies to offer a more proactive palliative care approach to their communities.

Keywords: community pharmacy, hospice care, models of care, palliative care, palliative medicine, pharmacy services, primary health care, terminal care.

WHAT GAP THIS FILLS
What is already known: Medication management for adults with palliative care needs in the last year of life is complex and challenging. However, there is a limited synthesis of the literature describing the breadth of palliative care services provided by community pharmacies.
What this study adds: This review provides evidence that community pharmacies worldwide offer a range of services to support people with palliative care needs and face similar challenges concerning how the public perceives their role in delivering palliative care. A thorough understanding of the role of community pharmacies could enhance care quality, extending benefits to individuals not currently receiving palliative care support in the community.

Introduction

In Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), the demand for palliative care is predicted to increase by 51% from 2017 to 2039.1 The NZ Ministry of Health’s Palliative Care Action Plan emphasised the importance of equitable access to palliative care services, aligned with recent health reforms aiming to eliminate disparities and provide equity-focused health care.1,2 Despite government efforts and collaboration with stakeholders, social and structural inequities remain in end-of-life care because of the challenges front-line health care professionals face in forming effective partnerships between generalists and specialists.3,4 Research indicates that individuals who lack access to community health or social services, including hospice community services, are ‘less likely to feel supported by their general practitioners and less likely to spend their last 2 days of life at home, or die at home.’4 Many Māori, indigenous people of NZ, also prefer to die at home.5

A recent NZ study identified inconsistent access to after-hours specialist palliative care services and cultural support for Māori and other ethnic groups, including Pacific, East Asian, and South Asian people. It also highlighted a gap in hospice care relating to meeting the palliative care needs of people with disabilities and children.6 Health care professionals providing palliative care, therefore, need to use a culturally appropriate and holistic model that strives to address the needs of all individuals at the end of life.79

Community palliative care in NZ is delivered via a primary-specialist model utilising hospices.6 There are 33 independently governed and managed hospices and just over 1000 community pharmacies across NZ. Community pharmacies are well-placed to support the palliative care needs of those spending the last days of their lives at home because of the long-standing relationships their staff often have with their patients.10,11 The term community pharmacy includes the environmental (physical) space and all the staff – technicians, assistants, as well as pharmacists. The staff of community pharmacies help to navigate the health journey of many, often acting as carer supporters for those in the terminal phase of their health journey.1113

This scoping review sought to answer the questions: What services are provided by community pharmacies worldwide to adults with palliative care needs in the last year of life? and What are the challenges to providing and expanding these services? The review used the Te Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Model of Palliative Care to frame the literature review and analysis.9

Te Whare Tapa Whā model, developed by leading Māori health advocate Sir Mason Durie in 1984, compares health to the four walls of a house (Fig. 1). It is a widely acceptable bicultural health and well-being model in NZ, where all four walls represent a different dimension: taha tinana (the physical wall), taha whānau (family wall), taha wairua (the spiritual wall), and taha hinengaro (thoughts and feelings wall).9,14

Fig. 1.

Te Whare Tapa Whā (Four-sided house) health model designed for and published with permission from Dr Tess Moeke-Maxwell as part of The Kōwhai Study, Māreikura Tū Kōwhai: Younger Māori Women’s Wellness programme after Breast Cancer report.14


HC24089_F1.gif

Methods

A scoping review is the most suitable type of review to map the evidence for this specialised community pharmacy service, as it allows for the examination and comparison of the scope of palliative care-related community pharmacy services and activities worldwide. Scoping reviews are broader than systematic reviews, allowing researchers to examine the extent of activity without a formal quality assessment of the evidence, such as a critical appraisal or risk of bias assessment.1517

This scoping review used the five-stage framework of Arksey and O’Malley and refined by other researchers.15,16,1823 It used the PRISMA-ScR checklist to guide how the scoping review and findings are reported.24 The review protocol was developed iteratively by the research team in consultation with a university librarian and prospectively registered on Open Science Framework in October 2023 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CVJ7X).

The inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in Table 1. The logic grid with keywords is found in Table 2. Relevant grey literature identified by searching the first 10 pages of hits from Google Scholar searches were included in the scoping review. The websites of the New Zealand Ministry of Health, Hospice New Zealand, World Health Organization, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, NHS Scotland Community Pharmacy Website, palliAGED and Caresearch Australia, End of Life Directions for Aged Care (ELDAC), Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association, and the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) were searched for relevant information.

Table 1.Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria
Adult palliative care patients aged 18 years and over.
Participants are defined as being in the last year of life, or living with advanced disease, or frail.
All pharmacy-related services to palliative care patients, including medication access, medication review, optimisation, management, and support to patients and families.
The provision of service is in the community, including transitions between community and acute care settings.
The study presents empirical data.
The study focuses on specific community pharmacy services or activities that meet the needs of the specified population.
The study is relevant to the research question.
The study is published in the English language.
Exclusion criteria
Studies evaluating services for, or related to, children.
Studies evaluating services provided in inpatient, secondary, or specialist care settings.
Studies evaluating specific treatment interventions such as chemotherapy agents, diagnostic tests, and medical devices.
Studies evaluating the training in palliative care offered to pharmacists.
Table 2.Logic grid with identified keywords.

PopulationConceptContext
Adults 18 years and olderPharmac* (to include pharmacy, pharmacies, pharmacist/s, pharmaceutical/s, pharmaceutics)Primary health care
Palliat* (to include palliative, palliation, palliate)Medic* management (to include medication management, medicine/s, medication/s)Communit* (as in community/ies) care
End-of-lifeMedic* servicesCommunity pharmacy services
HospiceCommunit* pharmac*
Terminal

This scoping review includes all relevant papers published up to 30 April 2024. The grey literature was searched between 1 May 2023 and 30 April 2024. The lead author (SC) retrieved studies and stored them in Mendeley referencing software, where duplicates were removed. Titles and abstracts were screened by SC for each paper retrieved using the inclusion and exclusion criteria to assess eligibility. The remaining papers were then read by SC in full to determine their eligibility. Papers were included if they addressed the aim of the review rather than being included based on quality scores (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.


HC24089_F2.gif

Included papers were reviewed, and key information from each paper was extracted and then added into an Excel spreadsheet under the headings: author(s), title, year, country, study setting, population studied, aim, study design, sample size, pharmacy service or activity, study results, challenges described, implications, and study limitations. See Supplementary Table S1 for a summary of the included studies.

Pharmacy activities described in the literature were categorised into practice types according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacist (ASHP) guidelines on the pharmacist’s role in palliative and hospice care,25 the advanced practice pharmacist roles for specialist palliative care services in South Australia,26 and the ELDAC Care Model.27 They were then mapped against the bicultural Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Palliative Care model.9 This model was used based on the holistic nature of palliative care that is profoundly relationship-oriented and applicable to indigenous and non-indigenous people. It was chosen as a method of producing insights into achieving equitable palliative care services through community pharmacies in NZ (see Table 3 for more details).

Table 3.Definitions of palliative care-related pharmacy practice that reflect the bicultural Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Palliative Care Model.9,2527

Whare Tapa Whā model of carePharmacy practicesIncluded activitiesA
Tinana: Physical health care domainDirect patient care
  • Recognising palliative care patients in the community pharmacy

  • Assessing and responding to the palliative care needs of those who are being cared for at home

  • Providing a clinical pharmacy service by performing medication optimisation, safety, and medication review across care settings

  • Anticipating transitions of care and, therefore, the relevant pharmacotherapy and support in the transition

Medication supply
  • Improving medication access in the community

  • Medication supply chain management, including safe disposal of medication no longer required

Hinengaro: Emotional/Mental health care domainEducation and counselling
  • Assisting in advance care planning

  • Providing bereavement support to informal care supporters and families

  • Medication education and counselling to patients, informal carers, and other care professionals

  • Providing care in a culturally safe manner and demonstrating competency in cultural safety, sensitivity, humility, and appropriateness

Wairua: Spiritual health care domain
Whānau: Social- family/whānau health care domainClinical liaison – network links and partnerships
  • Working as a team with family, informal care supporters, and other health professionals

  • Support stakeholders to provide broader palliative care service

A The activities described in the emotional and spiritual domains have overlaps in the pharmacy service provided, therefore they have been grouped together.

Results

Twenty-five studies were included in the review, published between 2002 and 2024 from seven countries: United Kingdom (n = 9), Australia (n = 9), United States of America (n = 2), Japan (n = 2), Ireland (n = 1), Germany (n = 1), and South Africa (n = 1) (Fig. 1). Study designs consisted of quantitative studies (n = 10), qualitative interviews (n = 8), mixed methods (n = 3), mixed phase or multiphase mixed methods (n = 2), a non-randomised cohort study (n = 1), and a pilot program evaluation (n = 1). The study populations were predominantly community pharmacists (n = 17) from the service provider perspective and patients from specialist palliative care centres (n = 10) from the service user perspective (see Table 4 for more details).

Table 4.Study populations in the included studies.

Study populationThe number of studies conducted with this population
Health care professionals
 Community pharmacists17
 Clinical or specialist palliative care pharmacists9
 General practitioners7
 Specialist health care professionals6
 Generalist health care professionals, including pharmacy technicians, pharmacy wholesalers4
Patients/whānau or other support people
 Patients from specialist palliative care centres7
 Patients from non-specialist palliative care services4
 Patients from GP/generalist registers2
 Patients included from the indigenous or ethnic minority populations1
 Whānau or support people2

Two broad topics relating to the roles of community pharmacy with respect to adults with palliative care needs in their last year of life were explored:

  1. The types of palliative care community pharmacy services and activities provided when mapped to Te Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Palliative Care Model.

  2. Reported challenges faced by community pharmacies delivering palliative care.

Community pharmacy services and activities

The 25 studies described various services provided for adult patients with palliative care needs in community pharmacies. These services mainly involved direct patient care, such as clinical pharmacy activities and medication supply functions aligning with Te Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Model’s Taha Tinana domain. Services categorised under social aspects of community pharmacies, including clinical liaison activities facilitating network links and partnerships with other care providers and users in the Taha Whānau domain and counselling and psychosocial support to patients and families in the Taha Hinengaro and Taha Wairua domains, were also provided.

In total, 22 out of the 25 included studies focused on the Tinana domain, a known scope of community pharmacies.2849 Supporting the physical health and well-being of adults with palliative care needs in their last year of life was viewed as quintessential community pharmacy practice that improves patient outcomes.

Just under half of the studies (n = 11/25) demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of these activities, where community pharmacists’ medication interventions, consultations, and optimisation activities improved patient outcomes.28,30,32,33,40,42,4446,49,50

Fifteen of the 25 studies described the importance of the Whānau social health care domain, demonstrating the close working relationships between community pharmacy staff and stakeholders of palliative care services.2830,3235,42,43,45,4751 However, only 8 of the 25 studies described the emotional and spiritual health care domains, Hinengaro and Wairua.28,30,33,34,40,49,50,52 The potential explanation for this scarcity lies in the perception that activities in this domain are not universally recognised or considered a standard role within community pharmacies.37,50

Challenges faced by staff of community pharmacies

To allow for the personalisation of medication care for the dying, medication management needs to be responsive and flexible. Pharmacies are well placed to assist with this as they are generally open long hours and often on weekends. However, a frequently reported issue was the lack of awareness of the role of community pharmacy in palliative care provision from other providers and those with palliative care needs. Other challenges community pharmacy staff encountered related to effective and efficient communication with other palliative care providers, meeting community pharmacy staff’s palliative care education needs, and a lack of efficient pharmacy stock management2830,3243,4648,50,53 (see Table 5 for more details).

Table 5.Suggested opportunities to overcome challenges.

Challenges describedOpportunities suggested by included studies
Communication with palliative care service providers and usersThere is a need for patients to register with a single pharmacy so that medical background information is given to dispensing pharmacies to aid communication. 28, 30, 32 38, 41, 43, 46, 47, 50
Role integration into current palliative care service provisionOpportunities for community pharmacists to support patient care include the need to quantify pharmacists’ activities in the community and increase referral to pharmacists. 29, 32, 39, 41, 48
Meeting the education needs of community pharmacy staffThere is a need for staff in community pharmacy to access training in palliative care to better support emotionally distressed individuals. 30, 33, 35, 36, 39, 42, 51
Patient access to medicinesThere is a need to increase stock availability on the funding schedules, to improve transportation of prescription and dispensed medications, and have better access to medicines outside normal business hours and in rural areas. 28, 30, 34, 36 40, 42, 43, 46 48, 50, 53

Discussion

This review scopes out the literature around the current role of community pharmacy in providing palliative care to adults in their last year of life living at home or in residential facilities. The review describes various services offered in community pharmacies that complement the holistic nature of palliative care, utilising a well-established bicultural health care model from NZ.

When mapped to the Te Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Palliative Care model, the services provided to adults in their last year of life described in the studies fell mainly in the physical health domain – Taha Tinana. The activities of responding to medication access and shortages in the community, especially during body deterioration and dying, are crucial and recognised roles of community pharmacies.5355 Community pharmacies demonstrated a pivotal role in providing direct patient care. Clinical interventions showed improvements in patient outcomes, emphasising the importance of community pharmacies in primary care settings. In the study conducted by Needham and colleagues in 2002, 81% of interventions were deemed beneficial to patient outcomes, demonstrating the value of community pharmacists in primary care.28 In another study conducted in 2008, 98% of pharmacist medication recommendations were accepted by the primary care oncologist, resulting in additional time spent with patients, and better pain and symptom management and psychosocial support.30 Palliative care pharmacists’ abilities to independently assess patients and expand the clinical reach of the service impacted not only palliative care medication access but also pharmaceutical palliative care educational resources and training for community pharmacy staff and other health professionals.30,40 A more recent study by Edwards and colleagues in 2019 reported that despite 17 out of 19 participating patients receiving specialist palliative care in the community, pharmacist medicine consultations identified a substantial number of drug-related problems (on average 2.5 drug-related problems (DRPs) per patient). This suggests the existence of unmet medicines-related needs for people with palliative care needs.46 Almost three-quarters of DRPs in this study were concerned with treatment effectiveness, and pharmacists could address and resolve most of them. Furthermore, Wilson and colleagues demonstrated that prescriber acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations is high in palliative care settings and strongly associated with the patient achieving the desired clinical outcome.32

The expanding role of pharmacists in providing pharmacy services that lead to beneficial health outcomes further supports the need to involve pharmacists in the multidisciplinary care of people with palliative care needs.5658

Community pharmacies can act as hubs for holistic care, facilitating communication between health care providers, aiding patients through care transitions, and offering services that relieve stress during the end-of-life journey, such as home delivery of medications and blister packing medicines. The gap identified in this review was in the Taha Hinengaro (mental and emotional well-being) and Taha Wairua (spiritual well-being) domains, underscoring the value of and current lack of staff continuing professional education to provide emotional and spiritual support.31,34,36,37,40,43,52

The value of community pharmacy staff in multidisciplinary palliative care teams, while not widely recognised, was acknowledged in several studies because shared care was found to be essential for providing successful palliative care in the community.28,39,44,52 However, the studies in this review demonstrated that the potential of community pharmacy in palliative care tends to remain unrealised. Maidment and colleagues39 reported that this was because community pharmacists are often left out of the clinical communication loop that occurs between other palliative care providers. Therefore, effective provision of palliative care in community pharmacies relies on a flexible medication management system that integrates primary and secondary care and involves patients, families, and care supporters. Communication plays a pivotal role in engaging stakeholders, such as patients, families, and other health care providers, in the palliative care process. The absence of robust communication negatively impacts palliative medication stock management, patients’ medication access, and care coordination across settings.48 There is also a need for community pharmacies to have an awareness of the cultures of local ethnic groups specifically with end-of-life caregiving preferences and cultural and spiritual needs, as this will likely help to support good relationships leading to better communication and care.

Doctoral studies completed by Quinn in 2020 in Northern Ireland generated similar themes to this review: the current and future roles of community pharmacy, integration and communication issues, and pharmacists’ beliefs about confidence, knowledge, and training.59 Additionally, their work highlighted the emotional role that pharmacists play in supporting the bereaved, along with pharmacists’ sense of isolation from other health care professionals. The emotional aspects of caring for patients with cancer were also described in nursing literature, where the personal toll of caregiving echoes similar struggles to pharmacists.60 However, the change in scope and public perception of nursing practice in recent years, especially with the role of nurse practitioners, demonstrates that specialist palliative care can successfully be provided in the community by health professionals other than medical doctors, widening access to palliative care and benefitting more people with palliative care needs.61

Over the past two decades, community pharmacy services have transformed significantly, expanding from traditional medication supply to encompassing physical assessment, medication administration, and medication consultation.11,13,6264 However, a study examining the evolution of pharmaceutical care reported that misconceptions about pharmacists’ roles among other health care professionals can hinder collaborative efforts.65 The shift in the roles of pharmacists and community pharmacies aligns with the changing needs of the community. Community pharmacies are well-positioned to bridge the gap and serve as important points of liaison between generalists and specialist palliative care providers in this evolving landscape.43,44 They play a crucial role in guiding patients toward available community-based palliative care services and facilitating improved interactions with palliative care providers.6,34,36

In the studies included in this review, palliative care service users mostly access specialised palliative care within the community (see Table 4). However, not all individuals with palliative care needs seek out specialised services.4 This highlights an unmet need that could be addressed through medication consultations and support from highly accessible community pharmacists. It also highlights a broader issue: underserved populations are often excluded from research studies, resulting in unheard voices and unaddressed needs.7,66,67

Furthermore, the care needs of underserved populations in palliative care align with challenges seen in rural and remote community settings, where limited access to care is a common barrier. A recent study exploring expanded rural pharmacy practice emphasised the necessity for a paradigm shift in the pharmacy profession to tackle health disparities in rural areas.68 The expanded role of community pharmacies and pharmacists is expected to enhance care access and equity for underserved populations and fill a significant gap in palliative care provision. This highlights the potential for community pharmacies to contribute meaningfully to palliative care, particularly for those people who may not typically engage with specialist services.

Integrating community pharmacies into the broader palliative care network offers an opportunity for enhanced access and quality of care; with improved patient outcomes. However, this potential is currently hindered by prevailing perceptions among the public and other health care providers around the role of community pharmacies and pharmacists being limited to medication supply.69 With a well-defined role in palliative care and government recognition and support including funding, pharmacies could develop new services that cater to the community’s palliative care needs. This would help to address the inequitable access to palliative care services experienced by many communities through medicines supply and serve as a knowledge hub in primary care.70

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this scoping review include being a snapshot of the pharmacy palliative care services and activities provided internationally, using a robustly developed search strategy. Using the NZ bicultural healthcare model, Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Palliative Care model, to map the literature increases its relevance for palliative care services in NZ.

However, limitations include only including studies published in English and the lead author (SC) being the only reviewer screening and identifying studies; there may be other community pharmacy services provided internationally that are not included in this review.

Implications for policy and practice

Increased recognition of community pharmacy’s current and potential role in palliative care is crucial for patients and their care supporters, leading to improved medication accessibility and safe usage and addressing their physical, emotional, and spiritual needs in the palliative care journey.

Pharmacy staff need enhanced education in communication, symptom management, and medication access to effectively meet patients’ complex needs. This investment would foster culturally safe practices and promote improved patient outcomes and preservation of personal dignity at the end of life.

Policymakers, health funders, and planners should facilitate the development of community palliative care services involving pharmacies, focusing on enabling improved communication between pharmacies and other providers, integrating pharmacists into palliative care teams, and endorsing their broader involvement in patient care beyond medication supply.

Future studies will focus on exploring pharmacies’ evolving roles within multidisciplinary palliative care teams in NZ to enhance the overall care experience for those at the end of life in the community.

Conclusion

This scoping review highlights the valuable role community pharmacies play in palliative care provision in the community. The findings indicate that to foster culturally safe practices, promote improved patient outcomes, and improve their ability to preserve personal dignity at the end of life, pharmacy staff need education in advanced communication, symptom management, and a better way to ensure access to palliative care medicines.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available online.

Data availability

The data that support this study are available in the article and accompanying online supplementary material.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of funding

This scoping review was carried out as part of a PhD programme of research. A Vernon Tews Education Trust PhD Scholarship supports the PhD candidate. Funders had no input into the writing of this scoping review.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the lead author of Te Whare Tapa Whā Older Person’s Model Palliative Care Model, Dr Tess Moeke-Maxwell (Ngāi Tai, Ngāti Porou), who reviewed the manuscript and approved the use of the model and the image for Te Whare Tapa Whā for this research investigation.

Author contributions

Sheng-Ting Chiu: conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, visualisation, writing original draft. Trudi Aspden: conceptualisation, supervision, validation, writing review and editing. Shane Scahill: conceptualisation, supervision, validation, writing review and editing.

References

Ministry of Health NZ. Palliative care action plan. 2017. Available at www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/palliative-care-action-plan_0.pdf [cited 8 August 2023].

Ministry of Health N. Health and Disability System Review Executive overview | He tirohanga whānui. 2020. Available at www.health.govt.nz/publications/health-and-disability-system-review-final-report

Gott M, Seymour J, Ingleton C, et al. That’s part of everybody’s job’: the perspectives of health care staff in England and New Zealand on the meaning and remit of palliative care. Palliat Med 2012; 26(3): 232-41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Robinson J, Frey R, Raphael D, et al. Difficulties in navigating the intersection of generalist and specialist palliative care services: a cross-sectional study of bereaved family’s experiences of care at home in New Zealand. Health Soc Care Community 2022; 30(1): 133-41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Moeke-Maxwell T, Mason K, Toohey F, et al. Pou Aroha: An Indigenous Perspective of Māori Palliative Care, Aotearoa New Zealand. In: MacLeod RD, Block L, editors. Textbook of Palliative Care. Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 1247–63.

Iupati S, Macleod R, Stanley J, et al. Community specialist palliative care services in New Zealand: a survey of Aotearoa hospices. N Z Med J 2022; 135(1566): 36-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Stajduhar K, Gott M. Closing the health equity gap in palliative care: the time for action is now. Palliat Med 2023; 37: 424-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gott M, Wiles J, Mason K, et al. Creating ‘safe spaces’: a qualitative study to explore enablers and barriers to culturally safe end-of-life care. Palliat Med 2023; 37(4): 520-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Moeke-Maxwell T, Collier A, Wiles J, et al. Bereaved families’ perspectives of end-of-life care. Towards a bicultural whare tapa whā older person’s palliative care model. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2020; 35(2): 177-93.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

10  Tordoff J, Chang SY, Norris PT. Community pharmacists’ perceptions of services that benefit older people in New Zealand. Int J Clin Pharm 2012; 34(2): 342-50.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

11  Ilardo ML, Speciale A. The community pharmacist: perceived barriers and patient-centered care communication. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(2): 536.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

12  Kidd J, Reid S, Collins N, et al. Kia Mau te Kahu Whakamauru: Health Literacy in Palliative Care. 2014. Available at www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/assets/fmhs/faculty/ABOUT/newsandevents/docs/Health%20literacy%20in%20palliative%20care%20report%20final.pdf

13  Love T, Moore D, Li W, et al. Independent Review of Community Pharmacy Services (Stage One). December 2020. Available at www.thinkSapere.com

14  Chistiansen L. A Holistic Model of Oranga Te Whare Tapa Whā in Tess Moeke-Maxwell’s The Kōwhai Study, Māreikura Tū Kōwhai: Younger Māori Women’s Wellness programme after Breast Cancer. Auckland: The University of Auckland; 2020.

15  Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13(3): 141-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

16  Khalil H, McInerney P, Pollock D, et al. Practical guide to undertaking scoping reviews for pharmacy clinicians, researchers and policymakers. J Clin Pharm Ther 2022; 47: 129-34.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

17  Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18(1): 143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

18  Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 18(10): 2119-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

19  Tricco A, Peters M, Pollock D, et al. JBI Scoping Review Network. Joanna Briggs Institute; 2019. Available at https://jbi.global/scoping-review-network [cited 11 October 2023].

20  Daudt HML, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

21  Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. 2010. Available at http://www.cihr-irsc.ca

22  Aromataris E, Riitano D. Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. Am J Nurs 2014; 114(5): 49-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

23  Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8(1): 19-32.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

24  Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169: 467-73.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

25  Herndon CM, Nee D, Atayee RS, et al. ASHP guidelines on the pharmacist’s role in palliative and hospice care. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2016; 73(17): 1351-67.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

26  Swetenham K, Rowett D, Stephenson D. Clinical networks influencing policy and practice: the establishment of advanced practice pharmacist roles for specialist palliative care services in South Australia. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38(2): 238-41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

27  End of Life Directions for Aged Care. ELDAC Care Model. End of Life Directions for Aged Care; 2021. Available at https://www.eldac.com.au/ [cited 1 September 2023].

28  Needham DS, Wong ICK, Campion PD. Evaluation of the effectiveness of UK community pharmacists’ interventions in community palliative care. Palliat Med 2002; 16(3): 219-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

29  Lucey M, McQuillan R, MacCallion A, et al. Access to medications in the community by patients in a palliative setting. A systems analysis. Palliat Med 2008; 22(2): 185-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

30  Atayee RS, Best BM, Daniels CE. Development of an ambulatory palliative care pharmacist practice. J Palliat Med 2008; 11(8): 1077-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

31  Ise Y, Morita T, Maehori N, et al. Role of the community pharmacy in palliative care: a nationwide survey in Japan. J Palliat Med 2010; 13(6): 733-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

32  Wilson S, Wahler R, Brown J, et al. Impact of pharmacist intervention on clinical outcomes in the palliative care setting. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 2011; 28(5): 316-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

33  Hussainy SY, Box M, Scholes S. Piloting the role of a pharmacist in a community palliative care multidisciplinary team: an Australian experience. BMC Palliat Care 2011; 10: 16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

34  O’Connor M, Fisher C, French L, et al. Exploring the community pharmacist’s role in palliative care: focusing on the person not just the prescription. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83(3): 458-64.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

35  Akram G, Bennie M, McKellar S, et al. Effective delivery of pharmaceutical palliative care: challenges in the community pharmacy setting. J Palliat Med 2012; 15(3): 317-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

36  O’Connor M, Hewitt LY, Tuffin PHR. Community pharmacists’ attitudes toward palliative care: an Australian nationwide survey. J Palliat Med 2013; 16(12): 1575-81.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

37  Savage I, Blenkinsopp A, Closs SJ, et al. Like doing a jigsaw with half the parts missing’: community pharmacists and the management of cancer pain in the community. Int J Pharm Pract 2013; 21(3): 151-60.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

38  Tait PA, Gray J, Hakendorf P, et al. Community pharmacists: a forgotten resource for palliative care. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2013; 3(4): 436-43.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

39  Maidment ID, Aston L, Moutela T, et al. A qualitative study exploring medication management in people with dementia living in the community and the potential role of the community pharmacist. Health Expect 2017; 20(5): 929-42.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

40  Akram G, Corcoran ED, MacRobbie A, et al. Developing a model for pharmaceutical palliative care in rural areas—experience from Scotland. Pharmacy 2017; 5(1): 6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

41  Tait PA, Cheung WH, Wiese M, et al. Improving community access to terminal phase medicines in Australia: identification of the key considerations for the implementation of a ‘core medicines list’. Aust J Prim Health 2017; 23(4): 373-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

42  Cortis LJ. A qualitative study to describe patient-specific factors that relate to clinical need for and potential to benefit from a medication management service in palliative care. J Pharm Pract Res 2017; 47(1): 34-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

43  Edwards Z, Blenkinsopp A, Ziegler L, et al. How do patients with cancer pain view community pharmacy services? An interview study. Health Soc Care Community 2018; 26(4): 507-18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

44  Kuruvilla L, Weeks G, Eastman P, et al. Medication management for community palliative care patients and the role of a specialist palliative care pharmacist: a qualitative exploration of consumer and health care professional perspectives. Palliat Med 2018; 32(8): 1369-77.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

45  Suzuki S, Uchida M, Suga Y, et al. A nationwide survey of community pharmacist contributions to polypharmacy in opioid-using and non-using cancer patients in Japan. Biol Pharm Bull 2019; 42(7): 1164-71.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

46  Edwards Z, Bennett MI, Blenkinsopp A. A community pharmacist medicines optimisation service for patients with advanced cancer pain: a proof of concept study. Int J Clin Pharm 2019; 41(3): 700-10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

47  Miller EJ, Morgan JD, Blenkinsopp A. How timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? A mixed methods study in a UK city. BMJ Open 2019; 9(11): e029016.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

48  Latter S, Campling N, Birtwistle J, et al. Patient and carer access to medicines at end of life: the ActMed mixed-methods study. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2022; 10(20): 1-208.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

49  Inderlall R, Naidoo P. Role of pharmacists in the provision of palliative care services and support in South Africa. Int J Pharm Pract 2021; 29(2): 157-63.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

50  Tait P, Chakraborty A, Jones K, et al. What is the community pharmacists’ role in supporting older Australians with palliative care needs? Healthcare 2021; 9(5): 489.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

51  Tait P, Sheehy K, Sindhusake D, et al. Factors affecting access to subcutaneous medicines for people dying in the community. Prog Palliat Care 2020; 28(5): 326-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

52  Homann K, Bertsche T, Schiek S. Pharmacy technicians’ perception about symptoms and concerns of older patients visiting pharmacies: a cross-sectional study. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021; 14: 103-14.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

53  Latter S. Access to palliative and end-of-life care medicines: supporting community pharmacy’s role. Int J Pharm Pract 2022; 30(4): 295-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

54  Latif A, Faull C, Ali A, et al. Caring for palliative care patients at home: medicines management principles and considerations. Pharm J 2020;
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

55  Pollock K, Wilson E, Caswell G, et al. Family and health-care professionals managing medicines for patients with serious and terminal illness at home: a qualitative study. Health Serv Delivery Res 2021; 9(14): 1-162.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

56  Herledan C, Cerfon MA, Baudouin A, et al. Impact of pharmaceutical care interventions on multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer: a systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14(4): 101450.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

57  Valença-Feitosa F, Carvalho GAC, Alcantara TS, et al. Identifying health outcomes of pharmaceutical clinical services in patients with cancer: a systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2023; 19(4): 591-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

58  Franco J, de Souza RN, Lima TdM, et al. Role of clinical pharmacist in the palliative care of adults and elderly patients with cancer: a scoping review. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2022; 28(3): 664-85.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

59  Quinn C. Medication use in palliative and end of life care. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. Queen’s University, Belfast; 2020.

60  Dunne K, Sullivan K, Kernohan G. Palliative care for patients with cancer: District nurses’ experiences. J Adv Nurs 2005; 50(4): 372-80.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

61  van Gaans D, Erny-Albrecht K, Tieman J. Palliative care within the primary health care setting in Australia: a scoping review. Public Health Rev 2022; 43: 1604856.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

62  McDonald J, Morris C, Pledger M, et al. A national survey of pharmacists and interns in Aotearoa New Zealand: provision and views of extended services in community pharmacies. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21(1): 1147.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

63  Scahill SL, Atif M, Babar ZU. Defining pharmacy and its practice: a conceptual model for an international audience. Integr Pharm Res Pract 2017; 6: 121-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

64  Smith AJ, Scahill SL, Harrison J, et al. Service provision in the wake of a new funding model for community pharmacy. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18(1): 307.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

65  Taylor S, Cairns A, Glass B. Role theory: a framework to explore health professional perceptions of expanding rural community pharmacists’ role. Pharmacy 2020; 8(3): 161.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

66  Torensma M, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, de Voogd X, et al. The role of research in improving responsiveness of palliative care to migrants and other underserved populations in the Netherlands: a qualitative interview study. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20(1): 5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

67  Elk R, Felder TM, Cayir E, et al. Social inequalities in palliative care for cancer patients in the United States: a structured review. Semin Oncol Nurs 2018; 34(3): 303-15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

68  Taylor SM, Cairns A, Glass BD. Expanded practice for rural community pharmacy: what are we waiting for? Int J Pharm Pract 2022; 30(1): 86-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

69  Ali A. A qualitative investigation of lay and professional perspectives of community pharmacy extended palliative care services Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; 2021.

70  Wilson A, Hope D, Hattingh L. The evolving public health role of pharmacists in pandemics: a scoping review. Aust Pharm Stud Js 2023; 2(1): 18-27.
| Google Scholar |