Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Expert patient and general practitioners’ perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty: a qualitative study

Tania Ghosh 1 , Erik Blair https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8660-7660 1 *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, Garrod Building, Turner Street, London E1 2AD, UK.

* Correspondence to: e.blair@qmul.ac.uk

Handling Editor: Tim Stokes

Journal of Primary Health Care https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24055
Submitted: 18 April 2024  Accepted: 14 June 2024  Published: 9 July 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical uncertainty is not uncommon; however, the current conception of the professional clinician has meant that discussion on uncertainty has focused on elimination rather than recognition. Uncertainty comes from an imbalance in knowledge, data, clinical experience, evidence-based guidelines, judgement, and decision-making. There is a strong argument for improving tolerance of clinical uncertainty, particularly in primary care where general practitioners might be especially vulnerable to uncertainty due to their exposure to undifferentiated illness.

Aim

This research aims to establish expert patient and general practitioners’ perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty.

Methods

Two focus groups, consisting of three general practitioners and five expert patients, discussed uncertainty regarding restless legs syndrome. This topic was used as a rhetorical proxy to examine expert patient and general practitioner perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty. The qualitative data were then analysed to form overarching thematic areas.

Results

Four overarching professional attributes were identified: collaboration, compassion, insight, and unconventional thinking. These are all attributes that lie within a clinician’s skillset, but the evidence here suggests that they need to be foregrounded in practice.

Discussion

In attempting to assess professional clinical practice in relation to uncertainty, this research recommends that clinicians work to adopt a holistic, patient-centred approach, where they explicitly share uncertainties, focus on a patient’s emotional state during the diagnostic phases of treatment, and see the merits of challenging themselves to look beyond routine algorithms.

Keywords: ambiguous, analysis, competence, decision, diagnosis, expertise, professionalism, RLS.

References

Borracci RA, Ciambrone G, Arribalzaga EB. Tolerance for uncertainty, personality traits and specialty choice among medical students. J Surg Educ 2021; 78(6): 1885-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pomare C, Churruca K, Ellis LA, et al. A revised model of uncertainty in complex healthcare settings: a scoping review. J Eval Clin Pract 2019; 25(2): 176-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Cooke GP, Doust JA, Steele MC. A survey of resilience, burnout, and tolerance of uncertainty in Australian general practice registrars. BMC Med Educ 2013; 13: 2.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Alam R, Cheraghi-Sohi S, Panagioti M, et al. Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review. BMC Fam Pract 2017; 18: 79.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kuhn G, Goldberg R, Compton S. Tolerance for uncertainty, burnout, and satisfaction with the career of emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 54: 106-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wallis K. Uncertainty, fear and whistling happy tunes. J Prim Health Care 2009; 1(1): 71-3.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

Schneider A, Löwe B, Barie S, et al. How do primary care doctors deal with uncertainty in making diagnostic decisions? The development of the ‘Dealing with Uncertainty Questionnaire’ (DUQ). J Eval Clin Pract 2010; 16(3): 431-37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Johansen ML, Risor MB. What is the problem with medically unexplained symptoms for GPs? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100(4): 647-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Scott IA, Doust JA, Keijzers GB, et al. Coping with uncertainty in clinical practice: a narrative review. Med J Aust 2023; 218(9): 418-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

10  Ilgen JS, Watsjold BK, Regehr G. Is uncertainty tolerance an epiphenomenon? Med Educ 2022; 56(12): 1150-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

11  Manconi M, Garcia-Borreguero D, Schormair B, et al. Restless legs syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7(1): 80.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

12  Cotter PE, O’Keeffe ST. Restless leg syndrome: is it a real problem? Ther Clin Risk Manag 2006; 2(4): 465-75.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

13  Walters AS, Hickey K, Maltzman J, et al. A questionnaire study of 138 patients with restless legs syndrome. Neurology 1996; 46(1): 92-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

14  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). CKS NICE ‘Scenario: management of restless legs syndrome’. 2022. Available at https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/restless-legs-syndrome/management/management/

15  Freeman T. Best practice’ in focus group research: making sense of different views. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56(5): 491-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

16  Krueger RA, Casey MA Focus Groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2000.

17  Tang KC, Davis A. Critical factors in the determination of focus group size. Fam Pract 1995; 12(4): 474-75.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

18  McMullin C. Transcription and qualitative methods: implications for third sector research. Voluntas 2023; 34(1): 140-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

19  Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

20  Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport, Exerc Health 2019; 11(4): 589-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

21  Greenhalgh T, Snow R, Ryan S, et al. Six ‘biases’ against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine. BMC Med 2015; 13(1): 200.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

22  Boellinghaus I, Jones FW, Hutton J. The role of mindfulness and loving-kindness meditation in cultivating self-compassion and other-focused concern in health care professionals. Mindfulness 2014; 5(2): 129-38.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

23  Mills J, Wand T, Fraser JA. On self-compassion and self-care in nursing: selfish or essential for compassionate care? Int J Nurs Stud 2015; 52(4): 791-3.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

24  Singer T, Klimecki OM. Empathy and compassion. Curr Biol 2014; 24(18): R875-78.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

25  Sinclair S, Norris JM, McConnell SJ, et al. Compassion: a scoping review of the healthcare literature. BMC Palliat Care 2016; 15(1): 6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |