Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Impact of emergency simulation training in primary care: a rapid review

Shomel Gauznabi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0155-1037 1 *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

* Correspondence to: shomel.gauznabi@auckland.ac.nz

Handling Editor: Tim Stokes

Journal of Primary Health Care https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24005
Submitted: 11 February 2024  Accepted: 13 May 2024  Published: 3 June 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Introduction

Primary care is increasingly exposed to acutely unwell patients and there is an increasing responsibility of primary care physicians to be well-equipped to manage medical emergencies. One means of training primary care staff is through simulation training; however, emergency simulation training in primary care is not well established.

Aim

The objective of this study was to conduct a rapid literature review of studies looking at the use and impacts of emergency care simulation training in primary care.

Methods

A systematic literature search with pre-defined key terms was carried out in November 2023 using the databases of PubMed, ERIC, EmBase and PsychInfo. Studies between 2013 and 2023 that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. Only journal articles in English with full texts that were available were reviewed. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, data extraction was systematically structured, and studies were appraised systematically.

Results

Of 523 initial studies found from the literature review, eight studies met the eligibility criteria. Seven of the eight studies evaluated the efficacy of simulation training for primary care providers; these were prospective cohort studies. One of the eight studies was a proof-of-concept study. One study specifically compared high-fidelity to low-fidelity simulations. No previous literature reviews on the use of emergency simulations in primary care were found in this literature search. All studies were consistent in terms of the significant benefits emergency care simulation has for primary care staff in improving confidence, clinical practice and emergency management systems. These changes applied to both clinical and non-clinical staff. There were specific benefits from in-clinic simulation.

Discussion

This review emphasises the significant benefits of emergency simulation training in primary care. There should be greater consideration of specifically incorporating such educational tools in primary care specialties such as general practice, rural general practice and urgent care.

Keywords: emergency, Health care education, primary health care, simulation training.

References

Kuo DZ, Cohen E, Agrawal R, et al. A national profile of caregiver challenges among more medically complex children with special health care needs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165(11): 1020-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Ong ME, Yan X, Lau G, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring in primary health care facilities in Singapore. Resuscitation 2007; 74: 38-43.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lamb EI, Jenkins N, Male P, et al. Primary care emergencies: improved confidence in clinical and non-clinical members of the multidisciplinary team using a simulation programme. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2019; 5: 192-3.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Forde E, Bromilow J, Jackson S, et al. Managing emergencies in primary care: does real-world simulation-based training have any lasting impact? BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2019; 5: 57-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

American Academy of Paediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine.. Preparation for emergencies in the offices of pediatricians and pediatric primary care providers. Pediatrics 2007; 120(1): 200-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Monachino A, Caraher C, Ginsberg J, et al. Medical emergencies in the primary care setting: an evidence based practice approach using simulation to improve readiness. J Pediatr Nurs 2019; 49: 72-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sanseau E, Reid J, Stone K, et al. Pediatric simulation cases for primary care providers: asthma, anaphylaxis, seizure in the office. MedEdPORTAL 2018; 14: 10762.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pietsch U, Schneider H, Schuhwerk W. Evaluation of multidisciplinary simulation-based team training: The way forward for training ICU teams. Intensive Care Med Exp 2015; 3(Suppl 1): A860.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kneebone RL, Scott W, Darzi A, et al. Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship. Med Educ 2004; 38: 1095-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

10  Robertson J, Bandali K. Bridging the gap: enhancing interprofessional education using simulation. J Interprof Care 2008; 22: 499-508.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

11  Chronister C, Brown D. Comparison of simulation debriefing methods. Clin Simul Nurs 2012; 8: e281-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

12  Forde E, Bromilow J, Wedderburn C. Practical management of emergencies in primary care: taking simulation out of the classroom and into real-life environments. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2018; 4: 43-4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

13  Aqel AA, Ahmad MM. High-fidelity simulation effects on CPR knowledge, skills, acquisition, and retention in nursing students. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2014; 11: 394-400.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

14  Zinsmaster J, Vliem S. The influence of high-fidelity simulation on knowledge gain and retention. Nurse Educ Perspect 2016; 37: 289-90.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

15  O’Leary F. Simulation as a high stakes assessment tool in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Australas 2015; 27: 173-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

16  Zante B, Schefold JC. Simulation training for emergency skills: effects on ICU fellows’ performance and supervision levels. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20: 498.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

17  Strachan AN, Graham AC, Hormis AP, et al. What were the perceptions of primary care teams on learning from a single multidisciplinary simulation-based training intervention? Educ Prim Care 2011; 22: 229-34.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

18  Royal New Zealand College of Urgent Care. Completing the training programme - Overview. 2024. Available at https://rnzcuc.org.nz/completing-the-training-programme/overview/

19  Division of Rural Hospital Medicine. Rural Hospital Medicine Training Programme Handbook 2024. In: Division of Rural Hospital Medicine, editor. New Zealand: The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners; 2024.

20  Resuscitation skills. Advanced life support training for health professionals. 2024. Available at https://www.resuscitationskills.com/onsite-visits

21  Tricco AC, Antony J, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med 2015; 13: 224.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

22  Klerings I, Robalino S, Booth A, et al. Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on literature search. BMJ Evid-Based Med 2023; 28: 412-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

23  King VJ, Stevens A, Nussbaumer-Streit B, et al. Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews. Syst Rev 2022; 11: 151.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

24  Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical appraisal tools. 2024. Available at https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

25  Espey E, Baty G, Rask J, et al. Emergency in the clinic: a simulation curriculum to improve outpatient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217(6): 699.e1-3.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

26  Halls A, Kanagasundaram M, Lau-Walker M, et al. Using in situ simulation to improve care of the acutely ill patient by enhancing interprofessional working: a qualitative proof of concept study in primary care in England. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e028572.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

27  Ranger C, Paradis MR, Morris J, et al. Transcutaneous cardiac pacing competency among junior residents undergoing an ACLS course: impact of a modified high fidelity manikin. Adv Simul 2018; 3: 24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

28  Eastwick-Field P. No more tick box resuscitation training: simulation in the surgery. Br J Gen Pract 2017; 67: 25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

29  Ramanayake RPJC, Ranasingha S, Lakmini S. Management of emergencies in general practice. J Family Med Prim Care 2014; 3: 305-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

30  Abelsson A, Rystedt I, Suserud BO, et al. Learning by simulation in prehospital emergency care – an integrative literature review. Scand J Caring Sci 2016; 30: 234-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

31  Bordley WC, Travers D, Scanlon P, et al. Office preparedness for pediatric emergencies: a randomized, controlled trial of an office-based training program. Pediatrics 2003; 112(2): 291-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

32  Mansfield CJ, Price J, Frush KS, et al. Pediatric emergencies in the office: are family physicians as prepared as pediatricians? J Fam Pract 2001; 50(9): 757-61.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

33  Cheng A, Lockey A, Bhanji F, et al. The use of high-fidelity manikins for advanced life support training—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2015; 93: 142-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

34  Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, et al. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. Med Teach 2013; 35: e1511-30.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

35  Williams KL, Crocker P, Dubrowski A. Chest pain on the ward: a simulation scenario for rural family and emergency medicine trainees. Cureus 2020; 12(6): e8887.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

36  Robertson B, Schumacher L, Gosman G, et al. Simulation-based crisis team training for multidisciplinary obstetric providers. Simul Healthc 2009; 4: 77-83.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

37  Nishisaki A, Keren R, Nadkarni V. Does simulation improve patient safety? Self-efficacy, competence, operational performance, and patient safety. Anesthesiol Clin 2007; 25: 225-36.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

38  Reynolds A, Ayres-De-Campos D, Lobo M. Self-perceived impact of simulation-based training on the management of real-life obstetrical emergencies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 159: 72-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

39  Steadman RH, Coates WC, Huang YM, et al. Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. CritCare Med 2006; 34: 151-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

40  Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P. The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 104-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

41  Doughty CB, Kessler DO, Zuckerbraun NS, et al. Simulation in pediatric emergency medicine fellowships. Paediatrics 2015; 136(1): e152-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

42  Sargeant J, Loney E, Murphy G. Effective interprofessional teams: “contact is not enough” to build a team. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008; 28: 228-34.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

43  Cooper J, Vogt JW, Simon R, et al. Team training for healthcare administrators using full environment simulation. International Meeting on Medical Simulation; 2004.

44  Fox R, Walker JJ, Draycott TJ. Medical simulation for professional development—science and practice. BJOG 2011; 118(Suppl 3): 1-4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

45  Small SD, Wuerz RC, Simon R, et al. Demonstration of high-fidelity simulation team training for emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 1999; 6: 312-23.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

46  Watmough S, Box H, Bennett N, et al. Unexpected medical undergraduate simulation training (UMUST): can unexpected medical simulation scenarios help prepare medical students for the transition to foundation year doctor? BMC Med Educ 2016; 16: 110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

47  Qayumi K, Pachev G, Zheng B, et al. Status of simulation in health care education: an international survey. Adv Med Educ Pract 2014; 5: 457-67.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

48  Bradley P. The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Med Educ 2006; 40: 254-62.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

49  La Cerra C, Dante A, Caponnetto V, et al. Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2018; 9: e025306.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

50  Good ML. Patient simulation for training basic and advanced clinical skills. Med Educ 2003; 37(Suppl. 1): 14-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

51  Criss EA. Patient simulators: changing the face of EMS education. JEMS 2001; 26(12): 24-31.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |