What are green prescriptions? A scoping review
Jessica Stanhope
1 2 3 * , Philip Weinstein 1 3 4 5
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
1 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
2 School of Allied Health Science and Practice, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
3 Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
4 School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
5 South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.
Journal of Primary Health Care 15(2) 155-161 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23007
Published: 21 April 2023
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Abstract
Introduction: Clear terminology is critical to allow accurate communication between practitioners, policy makers and the public.
Aim: We investigated how the term ‘green prescription’ has been used in the peer-reviewed literature.
Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature that used the term ‘green prescription(s)’ and determined how this term was used. We then investigated how the term has been used over time, in different geographic locations and in different academic disciplines.
Results: We included 268 articles that used the term ‘green prescription(s)’. We found that the phrase ‘green prescription(s)’ has been used since 1997 to mean a written prescription for a lifestyle change, most commonly physical activity, provided by a health practitioner. However, more recently (since 2014) the term has also been used to mean exposure to nature. Despite the emergence of this new meaning, ‘green prescription’ remains, in the health and medical science literature across all continents, most commonly used to describe a prescription for physical activity.
Conclusion: The use of the term ‘green prescriptions’ is inconsistent and has led to misuse of the research evidence regarding written prescriptions for exercise/diet being used to justify nature exposure to improve human health. We recommend that the term ‘green prescriptions’ continues to be used only as per its original definition, to refer to written prescriptions for physical activity and/or diet. For prescriptions to spend time in nature, we suggest use of the more appropriate term ‘nature prescriptions’.
Keywords: exercise, green prescription, health, lifestyle, nature, nature-based intervention, physical activity, review.
References
[1] Taylor L, Hochuli DF. Defining greenspace: multiple uses across multiple disciplines. Landsc Urban Plan 2017; 158 25–38.| Defining greenspace: multiple uses across multiple disciplines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Stanhope J, Pisaniello D, Tooher R, et al. How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used. Ind Health 2019; 57 454–94.
| How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Yamato TP, Saragiotto BT, Hespanhol Junior LC, et al. Descriptors used to define running-related musculoskeletal injury: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2015; 45 366–74.
| Descriptors used to define running-related musculoskeletal injury: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Swinburn BA, Walter LG, Arroll B, et al. Green prescriptions: attitudes and perceptions of general practitioners towards prescribing exercise. Br J Gen Pract 1997; 47 567–9.
[5] Ministry of Health. How the Green Prescription works. Wellington: New Zealand Government; 2022. Available at https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/our-health-system/preventative-healthwellness/green-prescriptions-2 [13 April 2023].
[6] Nabhan GP, Orlando L, Smith Monti L, et al. Hands-on ecological restoration as a nature-based health intervention: reciprocal restoration for people and ecosystems. Ecopsychology 2020; 12 195–202.
| Hands-on ecological restoration as a nature-based health intervention: reciprocal restoration for people and ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] McDonald RI, Beatley T, Elmqvist T. The green soul of the concrete jungle: the urban century, the urban psychological penalty, and the role of nature. Sustain Earth 2018; 1 3
| The green soul of the concrete jungle: the urban century, the urban psychological penalty, and the role of nature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Shanahan DF, Astell–Burt T, Barber EA, et al. Nature-based interventions for improving health and wellbeing: the purpose, the people and the outcomes. Sports 2019; 7 141
| Nature-based interventions for improving health and wellbeing: the purpose, the people and the outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Labib SM, Shuvo FK, Browning MHEM, et al. Noncommunicable diseases, park prescriptions, and urban green space use patterns in a global south context: the case of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 3900
| Noncommunicable diseases, park prescriptions, and urban green space use patterns in a global south context: the case of Dhaka, Bangladesh.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, et al. The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2011. Available at https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence [11 March 2023].
[11] Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18 143
| Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 467–73.
| PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Stanhope J, Weinstein P. A scoping review of the effort-reward imbalance model applied to musculoskeletal symptom outcomes. Occup Health Sci 2021; 5 55–68.
| A scoping review of the effort-reward imbalance model applied to musculoskeletal symptom outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016; 16 15
| A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 2014; 5 371–85.
| A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Stanhope J, Weinstein P. Critical appraisal in ecology: what tools are available, and what is being used in systematic reviews? Res Synth Methods 2022; 1–15. [Epub ahead of print]
| Critical appraisal in ecology: what tools are available, and what is being used in systematic reviews?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Seifert AR. Cultivating new lives an ethnographic pilot study of eco-therapy provision for people with alcohol-related problems in Northern Ireland. Anthropol Action 2014; 21 4–12.
| Cultivating new lives an ethnographic pilot study of eco-therapy provision for people with alcohol-related problems in Northern Ireland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Patel A, Keogh JWL, Kolt GS, et al. The long-term effects of a primary care physical activity intervention on mental health in low-active, community-dwelling older adults. Aging Ment Health 2013; 17 766–72.
| The long-term effects of a primary care physical activity intervention on mental health in low-active, community-dwelling older adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Furberg A-S, Espetvedt S, Emaus A, et al. Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol may signal breast cancer risk: recent findings and new hypotheses. Biomark Med 2007; 1 121–31.
| Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol may signal breast cancer risk: recent findings and new hypotheses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Juster-Horsfield HH, Bell SL. Supporting ‘blue care’ through outdoor water-based activities: practitioner perspectives. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2022; 14 137–50.
| Supporting ‘blue care’ through outdoor water-based activities: practitioner perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Lauwers L, Bastiaens H, Remmen R, et al. The integration of interlinkages between nature and human health in primary health care: protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8 e12510
| The integration of interlinkages between nature and human health in primary health care: protocol for a scoping review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Robinson JM, Breed MF. Green prescriptions and their co-benefits: integrative strategies for public and environmental health. Challenges 2019; 10 9
| Green prescriptions and their co-benefits: integrative strategies for public and environmental health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Robinson JM, Jorgensen A, Cameron R, et al. Let nature be thy medicine: a socioecological exploration of green prescribing in the UK. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 3460
| Let nature be thy medicine: a socioecological exploration of green prescribing in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Nelson DH, Prescott SL, Logan AC, et al. Clinical Ecology—Transforming 21st-Century Medicine with Planetary Health in Mind. Challenges 2019; 10 15
| Clinical Ecology—Transforming 21st-Century Medicine with Planetary Health in Mind.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Thomson L, Morse N, Elsden E, et al. Art, nature and mental health: assessing the biopsychosocial effects of a ‘creative green prescription’ museum programme involving horticulture, artmaking and collections. Perspect Public Health 2020; 140 277–85.
| Art, nature and mental health: assessing the biopsychosocial effects of a ‘creative green prescription’ museum programme involving horticulture, artmaking and collections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Twohig-Bennett C, Jones A. The health benefits of the great outdoors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environ Res 2018; 166 628–37.
| The health benefits of the great outdoors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Djernis D, Lerstrup I, Poulsen D, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of nature-based mindfulness: effects of moving mindfulness training into an outdoor natural setting. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16 3202
| A systematic review and meta-analysis of nature-based mindfulness: effects of moving mindfulness training into an outdoor natural setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Lahart I, Darcy P, Gidlow C, et al. The effects of green exercise on physical and mental wellbeing: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16 1352
| The effects of green exercise on physical and mental wellbeing: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Dankiw KA, Tsiros MD, Baldock KL, et al. The impacts of unstructured nature play on health in early childhood development: a systematic review. PLoS One 2020; 15 e0229006
| The impacts of unstructured nature play on health in early childhood development: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Baur JWR. Urban green spaces, recreation and spiritual experiences. Leisure/Loisir 2018; 42 205–29.
| Urban green spaces, recreation and spiritual experiences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Buckley RC, Brough P. Economic value of parks via human mental health: an analytical framework. Front Ecol Evol 2017; 5 16
| Economic value of parks via human mental health: an analytical framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Buckley RC, Brough P. Nature, eco, and adventure therapies for mental health and chronic disease. Front Public Health 2017; 5 220
| Nature, eco, and adventure therapies for mental health and chronic disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Buckley RC, Westaway D, Brough P. Social mechanisms to get people outdoors: bimodal distribution of interest in nature? Front Public Health 2016; 4 257
| Social mechanisms to get people outdoors: bimodal distribution of interest in nature?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Cianfagna M, Bolon I, Babo Martins S, et al. Biodiversity and human health interlinkages in higher education offerings: a first global overview. Front Public Health 2021; 9 637901
| Biodiversity and human health interlinkages in higher education offerings: a first global overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Fretwell K, Greig A. Towards a better understanding of the relationship between individual’s self-reported connection to Nature, personal well-being and environmental awareness. Sustainability 2019; 11 1386
| Towards a better understanding of the relationship between individual’s self-reported connection to Nature, personal well-being and environmental awareness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[36] James JJ, Christiana RW, Battista RA. A historical and critical analysis of park prescriptions. J Leis Res 2019; 50 311–29.
| A historical and critical analysis of park prescriptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[37] Marselle MR, Irvine KN, Warber SL. Walking for well-being: are group walks in certain types of natural environments better for well-being than group walks in urban environments? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10 5603–28.
| Walking for well-being: are group walks in certain types of natural environments better for well-being than group walks in urban environments?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[38] Roviello V, Roviello GN. Less COVID-19 deaths in southern and insular Italy explained by forest bathing, Mediterranean environment, and antiviral plant volatile organic compounds. Environ Chem Lett 2022; 20 7–17.
| Less COVID-19 deaths in southern and insular Italy explained by forest bathing, Mediterranean environment, and antiviral plant volatile organic compounds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[39] Van den Berg AE. From green space to green prescriptions: challenges and opportunities for research and practice. Front Psychol 2017; 8 268
| From green space to green prescriptions: challenges and opportunities for research and practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[40] Elley CR, Kerse N, Arroll B, et al. Effectiveness of counselling patients on physical activity in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2003; 326 793
| Effectiveness of counselling patients on physical activity in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Leung W, Ashton T, Kolt GS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pedometer-based versus time-based Green Prescriptions: the Healthy Steps Study. Aust J Prim Health 2012; 18 204–11.
| Cost-effectiveness of pedometer-based versus time-based Green Prescriptions: the Healthy Steps Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[42] Hamlin MJ, Yule E, Elliot CA, et al. Long-term effectiveness of the New Zealand Green Prescription primary health care exercise initiative. Public Health 2016; 140 102–8.
| Long-term effectiveness of the New Zealand Green Prescription primary health care exercise initiative.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
