English general practice: once, twice, three times a hybrid
Robin Miller
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
1 Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, UK
Correspondence to: Robin Miller, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, UK. Email: r.s.miller@bham.ac.uk
Journal of Primary Health Care 9(3) 204-207 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC17039
Published: 12 September 2017
Journal Compilation © Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 2017.
This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
[1] Powell M, Miller R. Framing privatisation in the English National Health Service. J Soc Policy. 2014; 43 575–94.| Framing privatisation in the English National Health Service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Allen P, Bartlett W, Perotin V, et al. New forms of provider in the English National Health Service. Ann Public Coop Econ. 2011; 82 77–95.
| New forms of provider in the English National Health Service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Heins E, Bennett H. ‘Best of both worlds’? A comparison of third sector providers in health care and welfare-to-work markets in Britain. Soc Policy Adm. 2016; 50 39–58.
| ‘Best of both worlds’? A comparison of third sector providers in health care and welfare-to-work markets in Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Powell M, Miller R. Seventy years of privatizing the British National Health Service? Soc Policy Adm. 2016; 50 99–118.
| Seventy years of privatizing the British National Health Service?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Wright JS, Dempster PG, Keen J, et al. The new governance arrangements for NHS foundation trust hospitals: reframing governors as meta-regulators. Public Adm. 2012; 90 351–69.
| The new governance arrangements for NHS foundation trust hospitals: reframing governors as meta-regulators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Miller R, Hall K, Millar R. Right to request social enterprises: a welcome addition to third sector delivery of health care? Voluntary Sector Rev. 2012; 3 275–85.
| Right to request social enterprises: a welcome addition to third sector delivery of health care?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Hall K, Miller R, Millar R. Public, Private or Neither? Analysing the publicness of health care social enterprises. Public Manage Rev. 2015; 18 539–557.
[8] Addicott R, Ham C. Commissioning and funding general practice. Making the case for family care networks. London: The King’s Fund; 2014.
[9] Goodwin N, Dixon A, Poole T, Raleigh V. Improving the quality of care in general practice. London: The King’s Fund; 2011.
[10] House of Commons Library. General practice in England. London: House of Commons Library; 2015.
[11] BBC. BMA team ‘stunned by GP contract’. 2007. [cited 2017 May 3]. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6314301.stm
[12] Smith J, Mays N, Dixon J, et al. A review of the effectiveness of primary care-led commissioning and its place in the NHS. London: The Health Foundation; 2004.
[13] Smith J, Curry N, Mays N, Dixon J. Where next for commissioning in the English NHS? London: King’s Fund & Nuffield Trust; 2010.
[14] Holder H, Robertson R, Ross S, et al. Risk or reward? The changing role of CCGs in general practice. London: The King’s Fund, Nuffield Trust; 2015.
[15] Ipsis Mori Social Research Institute. CCG 360 Stakeholder Survey 2016 Overall report. 2016. [cited 2017 April 11]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/07/ccg-360-degree-survey.pdf
[16] Dayan M, Arora S, Rosen R, Curry N. Is general practice in crisis? London: The Nuffield Council; 2014.
[17] Robertson R. Public satisfaction with the NHS and social care in 2016. Results and trends from the British social attitudes survey. London: King’s Fund; 2017.
[18] Kringos D, Boerma W, Bourgueil Y, et al. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63 e742–50.
| The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Penm J, MacKinnon NJ, Strakowski SM, et al. Minding the gap: Factors associated with primary care coordination of adults in 11 countries. Ann Fam Med. 2017; 15 113–9.
| Minding the gap: Factors associated with primary care coordination of adults in 11 countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Peckham S, Falconer J, Gillam S, et al. The organisation and delivery of health improvement in general practice and primary care: a scoping study. Health Services and Delivery Research. 2015; 3
| The organisation and delivery of health improvement in general practice and primary care: a scoping study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Rosen R, Kumpunen S, Curry N, et al. Is bigger better? Lessons for large-scale general practice. London: Nuffield Trust; 2016.
[22] Smith J, Holder H, Edwards N, et al. Securing the future of general practice: new models of primary care. London: Nuffield Trust; 2013.
[23] NHS England. The multispecialty community provider (MCP) emerging care model and contract framework. 2016. [cited 2017 May 3]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/mcp-care-model-frmwrk.pdf
