Trajectories in health recovery in the 12 months following a mild traumatic brain injury in children: findings from the BIONIC Study
Kelly M. Jones 1 , Suzanne Barker-Collo 2 , Priya Parmar 1 , Nicola Starkey 3 , Alice Theadom 1 , Shanthi Ameratunga 4 , Valery L. Feigin 1 51 National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, School of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
2 School of Psychology, Tamaki Campus, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
3 School of Psychology, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
4 School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
5 A list of members of the BIONIC team is available at: www.nisan.aut.ac.nz.
Correspondence to: Kelly M Jones, National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, School of Public Health & Psychosocial Studies, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, AUT North Shore Campus, AA254, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote 0627, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. Email: kelly.jones@aut.ac.nz
Journal of Primary Health Care 10(1) 81-89 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC17038
Published: 29 March 2018
Journal Compilation © Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 2018.
This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is growing consensus that adverse child outcomes may be evident in the early recovery phase following mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, controversy remains around the nature of children’s longer-term recovery.
AIM: To examine child cognitive, behavioural and quality-of-life outcomes over 12 months following mild injury, and to identify prognostic factors associated with outcomes.
METHODS: A prospective sample of 222 children (aged 2–15 years at injury) with mild TBI was assessed using a cognitive testing battery and parent-report questionnaires at ≤ 14 days, 1, 6 and/or 12-months post-injury.
RESULTS: Parents reported significant improvements in their child’s behavioural adjustment between baseline and 6 months (P = 0.003), with further improvements at 12 months following injury (P = 0.001). Cognitive recovery and quality-of-life improvements were more gradual with minimal changes in the first month (P > 0.05), but significant improvements by 12-months post-injury (P = 0.03, P = 0.02, respectively). Time since injury, male gender, living rurally and parent anxiety were associated with extent of recovery beyond the acute period.
CONCLUSIONS: Children’s recovery from mild TBI continues beyond the initial 6 months following injury. Health-care providers need to be vigilant about the varying trajectories in children’s recovery from TBI. On-going monitoring of children following injury will enable timely and proactive responses to persistent difficulties, with a view to minimising longer-term adverse consequences.
KEYWORDS: Health research; paediatrics; population health; carers
References
[1] Feigin VL, Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, et al. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: a population-based study. Lancet Neurol. 2013; 12 53–64.| Incidence of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: a population-based study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Peloso PM, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004; 43 28–60.
| Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Bazarian JJ, McClung J, Shah MN, et al. Mild traumatic brain injury in the United States, 1998–2000. Brain Inj. 2005; 19 85–91.
| Mild traumatic brain injury in the United States, 1998–2000.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Babikian T, Asarnow RF. Neurocognitive outcomes and recovery after pediatric TBI: Meta-analytic review of the literature. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009; 23 283–96.
[5] Battista AD, Soo C, Catroppa C, Anderson V. Quality of life in children and adolescents post-TBI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2012; 29 1717–27.
| Quality of life in children and adolescents post-TBI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Emery CA, Barlow KM, Brooks BL, et al. A systematic review of psychiatric, psychological, and behavioural outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents. Can J Psychiatry. 2016; 61 259–69.
| A systematic review of psychiatric, psychological, and behavioural outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Bowman SM, Bird TM, Aitken ME. Trends in hospitalizations associated with pediatric traumatic brain injuries. Pediatrics. 2008; 122 988–93.
| Trends in hospitalizations associated with pediatric traumatic brain injuries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] McKinlay A. Controversies and outcomes associated with mild traumatic brain injury in childhood and adolescence. Child Care Health Dev. 2010; 36 3–21.
| Controversies and outcomes associated with mild traumatic brain injury in childhood and adolescence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c%2FjsVOltw%3D%3D&md5=55649acef3fd81d2640c2d4dddc69890CAS |
[9] Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, Feigin V, et al. The spectrum captured: a methodological approach to studying incidence and outcomes of traumatic brain injury on a population level. Neuroepidemiology. 2012; 38 18–29.
| The spectrum captured: a methodological approach to studying incidence and outcomes of traumatic brain injury on a population level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC387ntVSisw%3D%3D&md5=a98be673b516c2ff650080210dab134dCAS |
[10] Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Holm L, et al. Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004; 43 113–25.
| Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM, et al. Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004; 43 84–105.
| Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW. Behavior assessment system for children (BASC). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.; 1992.
[13] Reynolds C, Kamphaus RW. Behavior assessment system for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.; 1998.
[14] Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 Generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001; 39 800–12.
| PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 Generic core scales in healthy and patient populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvitVGgtw%3D%3D&md5=4a0d10867f20798f66cf183ac1ed5381CAS |
[15] Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. Parent proxy-report of their children’s health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents’ reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007; 5 2
| Parent proxy-report of their children’s health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents’ reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006; 21 623–43.
| Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Efficient allocation of attentional resources in patients with ADHD: maturational changes from age 10 to 29. J Atten Disord. 2006; 9 534–42.
| Efficient allocation of attentional resources in patients with ADHD: maturational changes from age 10 to 29.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Antidepressant side effects in children and adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2006; 16 147–57.
| Antidepressant side effects in children and adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Gualtieri CT. A computerized test battery sensitive to mild and severe brain injury. Medscape J Med. 2008; 10 90
[20] Trewin D, Pink B. Australian and New Zealand standard classification of occupations. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2006.
[21] Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67 361–70.
| The hospital anxiety and depression scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL3s3nvFWjug%3D%3D&md5=5d6e0c2352a7630fc23839003e338ab5CAS |
[22] Team RDC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
[23] Statistics New Zealand. Urban and rural migration tables 1-17. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand; 2006. [cited 2017 February 24]. Available from: http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/population/migration/internal-migration/urban-rural-migration.aspx
[24] McCarthy ML, MacKenzie EJ, Durbin DR, et al. Health-related quality of life during the first year after traumatic brain injury. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006; 160 252–60.
| Health-related quality of life during the first year after traumatic brain injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Stancin T, Drotar D, Taylor HG, et al. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents after traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics. 2002; 109 e34
| Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents after traumatic brain injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Zonfrillo MR, Dennis DR, Koepsell T, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for poor functioning after isolated mild traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurotrauma. 2014; 31 722–7.
| Prevalence of and risk factors for poor functioning after isolated mild traumatic brain injury in children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Khairy SA, Eid SR, El Hadidy LM, et al. The health-related quality of life in normal and obese children. Egypt Pediatr Assoc Gaz. 2016; 64 53–60.
| The health-related quality of life in normal and obese children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Mangeot S, Armstrong K, Colvin AN, et al. Long-term executive function deficits in children with traumatic brain injuries: assessment using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Child Neuropsychol. 2002; 8 271–84.
| Long-term executive function deficits in children with traumatic brain injuries: assessment using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Anderson VA, Catroppa C, Rosenfeld J, et al. Recovery of memory function following traumatic brain injury in pre-school children. Brain Inj. 2000; 14 679–92.
| Recovery of memory function following traumatic brain injury in pre-school children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gvFejsg%3D%3D&md5=6aacf6da18858ebb2b817766347c9d1eCAS |
[30] Crowe LM, Catroppa C, Babl FE, Anderson V. Executive function outcomes of children with traumatic brain injury sustained before three years. Child Neuropsychol. 2013; 19 113–26.
| Executive function outcomes of children with traumatic brain injury sustained before three years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Loher S, Fatzer ST, Roebers CM. Executive functions after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective short-term longitudinal study. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2014; 3 103–14.
| Executive functions after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective short-term longitudinal study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Masarik AS, Conger RD. Stress and child development: a review of the family stress model. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2017; 13 85–90.
[33] Raj SP, Wade SL, Cassedy A, et al. Parent psychological functioning and communication predict externalizing behavior problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014; 39 84–95.
| Parent psychological functioning and communication predict externalizing behavior problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Peterson RL, Kirkwood MW, Gerry Taylor H, et al. Adolescents’ internalizing problems following traumatic brain injury are related to parents’ psychiatric symptoms. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2014; 28 E1–E12.
[35] Olsson KA, Lloyd OT, LeBrocque RM, et al. Predictors of child post-concussion symptoms at 6 and 18 months following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2011; 27
| Predictors of child post-concussion symptoms at 6 and 18 months following mild traumatic brain injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[36] Richters JE. Depressed mothers as informants about their children: A critical review of the evidence for distortion. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112 485–99.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2Fms1yhtQ%3D%3D&md5=30bb511f378cf409c077dfd6ec12fed8CAS |
[37] Brown FL, Whittingham K, Boyd RN, et al. Improving child and parenting outcomes following paediatric acquired brain injury: a randomised controlled trial of Steeping Stones Triple P plus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014; 55 1172–13.
