Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Pollination ecology of the rare desert species Eremosparton songoricum (Fabaceae)

X. Shi A B , J. C. Wang A B , D. Y. Zhang A C E , J. F. Gaskin D and B. R. Pan A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresource in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, PR China.

B Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, PR China.

C Turpan Eremophytes Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Turpan 838008, PR China.

D USDA Agricultural Research Service, Sidney, Montana 59270, USA.

E Corresponding author. Email: daoyuanzhang@163.net

Australian Journal of Botany 58(1) 35-41 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT09172
Submitted: 29 September 2009  Accepted: 8 December 2009   Published: 11 March 2010

Abstract

The pollination ecology of Eremosparton songoricum (Litv.) Vass., a rare desert species endemic to central Asia, was examined by a series of observational studies and manipulative experiments in two natural populations during 2007–2008. Results showed that the duration of flowering lasted 21 and 23 days, respectively, in Populations A and B from late May to late June in 2008. Anthesis of a single flower often lasted for 3 days. However, if pollinators were excluded, both the anthesis and stigma receptivity lasted 2 days longer. Mating-system experiment showed that E. songoricum was self-compatible and pollination success relied on pollinators. Fruit set after bagging without emasculation was 0.02 ± 0.01%. This suggested that spontaneous autogamy rarely happened. E. songoricum primarily relies on a combination of large floral display, secretion of nectar and a yellow ‘nectar guide’ on the standard to further attract pollinators, which may be the result of adaptation to a habitat with unreliable access to pollinators. A single flower produced ~0.18 μL and 0.50 μL of nectar during 2 days in Populations A and B, respectively. The peak secretion occurred at 1300–1500 hours, which overlapped with the climax of visitation of the effective pollinators at 1300–1400 hours. There were four effective pollinators in both populations, namely Colletes popovi Nosk., Megachile terminate Morawitz, Coelioxys sp. and Bembix planifrons F.Mor. The most frequent one, Colletes popovi Nosk., was observed pollinating many flowers of the same individual plant (65.8 ± 1.1%) in Population A, suggesting that geitonogamous self-pollination is unavoidable. Inbreeding depression played a role during the period from fertilisation to fruit maturation.


Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance and advice of Professor Tan Dunyan from Xinjiang Agriculture University. Insect specimens were identified by Dr Hu Hongying of Xinjiang University. This work was supported by grants from The National Basic Research Program, China (No. 2009CB825104), National natural science foundation project of China (No. 30970547) and Project of Xinjiang Committee of Science and Technology (No. 200933122).


References


Arizaga S, Ezcurra E, Peters E, Ramirez de Arellano F, Vega E (2000) Pollination ecology of Agave macroacantha (Agavaceae) in a Mexican tropical desert. II. The role of pollinators. American Journal of Botany 87, 1011–1017.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Ashman TL, Schoen DJ (1994) How long should flowers live? Nature 371, 788–791.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Bingham RA, Orthner AR (1998) Efficient pollination of alpine plants. Nature 391, 238–239.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Burd M (1994) Bateman principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review 60, 83–139.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Charlesworth D (1989) Evolution of low female fertility in plants pollen limitation, resource allocation and genetic load. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4, 289–292.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Chen CD, Zhang LY, Hu WK (1983) The basic characteristics of plant communities, flora and their distribution in the sandy district of Gurbantunggut Desert. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica 7, 89–99. open url image1

Chen RY, Zhang YM, Pan BR, Wu N, Wang HL, Nie HL (2007) Relation between disturbance and spatial heterogeneity of soil nitration in Gurbantunggut desert. Journal of Desert Research 27, 257–265.
CAS |
open url image1

Conner JK, Rush S (1996) Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105, 509–516.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dreisig H (1995) Ideal free distributions of nectar foraging bumblebees. Oikos 72, 161–172.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Eckhart VM (1991) The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 5, 370–384.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Etcheverry AV, Alemán MM, Fleming TF (2008) Flower morphology, pollination biology and mating system of the complex flower of Vigna caracalla (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae). Annals of Botany 102, 305–316.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Faegri K , Van der Pijl L (1980) ‘The principles of pollination ecology.’ (Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK)

Gómez JM , Zamora R (2006) Ecological factors that promote the evolution of generalization in pollination systems. In ‘Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization’. (Eds NM Waser, J Ollerton) pp. 145–166. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL)

Heinrich B (1983) Insect foraging energetics. In ‘Handbook of experimental pollination biology’. (Eds CE Jones, RJ Little) pp. 187–214. (Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York)

Kittelson PM, Maron JL (2000) Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in the perennial yellow bush lupine, Lupinus arbobeus (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 87, 652–660.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ, Linnebank LA (2001) Small-scale spatial patterns determine ecological relationships: an experimental example using nectar production rates. Ecology Letters 4, 559–567.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kunin WE (1997) Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. Journal of Ecology 85, 225–234.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Larson BMH, Barrett SCH (2000) A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 69, 503–520.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Leiss KA, Klinkhamer PGL (2005) Genotype by environment interactions in the nectar production of Echium vulgare. Functional Ecology 19, 454–459.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Liu H, Koptur S (2003) Breeding system and pollination of a narrowly endemic herb of the lower florida keys: impacts of the urban–wildland interface. American Journal of Botany 90, 1180–1187.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lloyd DG, Schoen DJ (1992) Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153, 358–369.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lu XY, Zhang DY, Ma WB (2007) Genetic variation and clonal diversity in fragmented populations of the desert plant Eremosparton songoricum based on ISSR markers. Biodiversity Science 15, 282–291.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Ma M, Fan JF, Li J (2006) Pollination characteristics of ephemeroid plant Eremurus anisopterus. Journal of Plant Ecology 30, 1012–1017. open url image1

Ma WB, Zhang DY, Yin LK (2007) Variation of seed sizes of Eremosparton songoricum geographic populations and germination characteristics. Arid Land Geography 30, 674–679. open url image1

Ma WB, Shi X, Zhang DY, Yin LK (2008) Flowering phenology and reproductive features of the rare plant Eremosparton songoricum in desert zone, Xinjiang, China. Journal of Plant Ecology 32, 760–767. open url image1

Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM (2004) The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollination visitation patterns. Functional Ecology 18, 116–124.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ohashi K , Yahara T (2001) Behavioural responses of pollinators to variation in floral display size and their influences on the evolution of floral traits. In ‘Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behavior and floral evolution’. (Eds L Chittka, JD Thomson) pp. 274–296. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Oldroyd BP, Thexton EG, Lawler RH, Crozier RH (1997) Population demography of Australian feral bees (Apis mellifer). Oecologia 111, 381–387.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Paton DC (1982) The diet of the New Holland honeyeater Phylidonyris novaehollandiae. Australian Journal of Ecology 7, 279–298.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Primack RB (1985) Longevity of individual flowers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 15–37.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Qi WQ, You RL, Chen XL (1998) Pollination biology in Cimicifuga nanchuanensis, an endangered species (Ranunculaceae). Acta Botanica Sinica 40, 688–694. open url image1

Saunders NE, Sedonia DS (2006) Reproductive biology and pollination ecology of the rare Yellowstone Park endemic Abronia ammophila (Nyctaginaceae). Plant Species Biology 21, 75–84.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schoen DJ, Ashman TL (1995) The evolution of floral longevity: resource allocation to maintance versus construction of repeated parts in modular organisms. Evolution 49, 131–139.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Silva-Montellano A, Eguiarte LE (2003) Geographic patterns in the reproductive ecology of Agave lechuguilla (Agavaceae) in the Chihuahuan Desert. I. floral characteristics, visitors, and fecundity. American Journal of Botany 90, 377–387.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sutherland S, Delph LF (1984) On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit set. Ecology 65, 1093–1104.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wainwright CM (1978) The floral biology and pollination ecology of two desert lupines. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 105, 24–38.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wang JC, Shi X, Zhang DY, Yin LK (2009) The morphological plasticity of Eremosparton songoricum along heterogeneous micro-habitats of continuous moisture gradient changes in sand dunes. Acta Ecologica Sinica 29, 3641–3648. open url image1

Wang XQ, Li BW, Zhang YM (2003) Stabilization of dune surface and formation of mobile belt at the top of longitudinal dunes in Gurbantunggut Desert, Xinjiang, China. Journal of Desert Research 23, 126–131. open url image1

Wang YQ, Zhang DX, Chen ZY (2005) A preliminary study of the pollination biology of Alpinia oxyphylia. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica 29, 599–609.
CAS |
open url image1

Weiss MR (1991) Floral colour changes as cues for pollinators. Nature 354, 227–229.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilcock C, Neiland R (2002) Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. Trends in Plant Science 7, 270–277.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Yang CF, Sun SG, Guo YH (2005) Resource limitation and pollen source (self and outcross) affecting seed production in two louseworts, Pedicularis siphonantha and P. longiflora (Orobanchaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 147, 83–89.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yin LK , Tan LX , Wang B (2006) ‘Rare and endangered higher plants endemic to Xinjiang.’ (Xinjiang Scientific and Technical Publishing House: Urumchi)

Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, 413–418.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zhang DY (2004) ‘Plant life-history evolution and reproductive ecology.’ (Science Press: Beijing)

Zhang DY, Ma WB, Shi X, Wang JC, Wang XY (2008) Distribution and bio-ecological characteristics of Eremosparton songoricum, a rare plant in Gurbantunggut desert. Journal of Desert Research 28, 430–436. open url image1

Zhang LY, Chen CD (2002) On the general characteristics of plant diversity of Gurbantunggut sandy desert. Acta Ecologica Sinica 22, 1923–1932. open url image1

Zhang LY, Hai Y (2002) Plant communities excluded in the book of ‘The vegetation and its utilization in Xijiang’ I. The desert plant communities. Arid Land Geography 25, 84–89.
CAS |
open url image1

Zhang YM, Wang HL, Wang XQ, Yang WK, Zhang DY (2006) The microstructure of microbiotic crust and its influence on wind erosion for a sandy soil surface in the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Geoderma 132, 441–449.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zimmerman M (1988) Nectar production, flowering phenology and strategies for pollination. In ‘Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies’. (Eds JL Doust, LL Doust) pp. 157–178. (Oxford University Press: New York)