Systematising experts’ understanding of traditional burning in Portugal: a mental model approach
Mayara Emilia Barbosa Souza
A * , Abílio Pereira Pacheco A B and Jorge Grenha Teixeira A
A INESC TEC and Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 378, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal. Email: jteixeira@fe.up.pt
B CoLAB ForestWISE, Collaborative Laboratory for Integrated Forest and Fire Management, Quinta de Prados, Campus da UTAD, 5001-801, Vila Real, Portugal. Email: pereira.pacheco@forestwise.pt; app@fe.up.pt; abilio.p.pacheco@gmail.com
Abstract
Traditional burning is a practice with social and ecological value used worldwide. However, given the often improper and negligent use of fire, this practice is often associated with rural fire ignitions.
Systematise experts’ understanding of traditional burning and identify its challenges in the Portuguese context.
Twenty-eight Portuguese experts from industry, academia, NGOs and public entities with in-depth involvement in fire and forest management were interviewed to create a mental model of traditional burning in Portugal.
Eight dimensions were identified: motivations behind traditional burning, alternative solutions, risks before a traditional burn, risks during a traditional burn, underlying causes of risk, exogenous elements and factors, potential impacts, and activities leading to a successful traditional burn.
This study provides a comprehensive understanding of traditional burn practice in the Portuguese context and offers a baseline to support stakeholders and policymakers in managing traditional burning’s social and environmental impacts in the future.
This research offers several implications across the eight dimensions identified, including the need to improve regulations on the use of fire and fuel reduction policies, promote fire use education and feasible and affordable alternatives to traditional burning, and increase communities’ commitment to mitigation actions.
Keywords: expert elicitation, fire-prone countries, Gioia methodology, mental model approach, risk communication, risk perception, rural fires, traditional burning.
References
Adeleke A, Apidechkul T, Kanthawee P, Suma Y, Wongnuch P (2017) Contributing Factors and Impacts of Open Burning in Thailand: Perspectives from Farmers in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand. Journal of Health Research 31, 159-167.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Akagi SK, Yokelson RJ, Wiedinmyer C, Alvarado MJ, Reid JS, Karl T, Crounse JD, Wennberg PO (2011) Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11, 4039-4072.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Aliperti G, Nagai H, Cruz AM (2020) Communicating risk to tourists: A mental models approach to identifying gaps and misperceptions. Tourism Management Perspectives 33, 100615.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bayne KM, Clifford VR, Baillie BR, Pearce HG (2019) Fire as a Land Management Tool: Rural Sector Perceptions of Burn-off Practice in New Zealand. Rangeland Ecology & Management 72, 523-532.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Canaveira P (2020) Portugal’s National Forestry Accounting Plan 2021-2025. Agência Portuguesa Do Ambiente 80,.
| Google Scholar |
Carroll MS, Edgeley CM, Nugent C (2021) Traditional Use of Field Burning in Ireland: History, Culture and Contemporary Practice in the Uplands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 30(6), 399-409.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Castro ACM, Nunes A, Sousa A, Lourenço L (2020) Mapping the Causes of Forest Fires in Portugal by Clustering Analysis. Geosciences 10(2), 53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Christianson A (2015) Social science research on Indigenous wildfire management in the 21st century and future research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 190-200.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Clark SA, Miller A, Hankings D (2021) Good Fire: Current Barriers to the Expansion of Cultural Burning and Prescribed Fire in California and Recommended Solutions. The Karuk Tribe. 17 February. Updated June 17, 2022. Available at https://fusee.org/fusee/good-fire-current-barriers-to-the-expansion-of-cultural-burning-and-prescribed-fire-in-california-and-recommended-solutions
Coelho S, Rafael S, Coutinho M, Monteiro A, Medina J, Figueiredo S, Cunha S, Lopes M, Miranda AI, Borrego C (2020) Climate-Change Adaptation Framework for Multiple Urban Areas in Northern Portugal. Environmental Management 66, 395-406.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Collins RD, de Neufville R, Claro J, Oliveira T, Pacheco AP (2013) Forest fire management to avoid unintended consequences: A case study of Portugal using system dynamics. Journal of Environmental Management 130, 1-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Davim DA, Rosa CG, Fernandes PM (2021) Survival of Prescribed Burning Treatments to Wildfire in Portugal. Forest Ecology and Management 493(August), 119250.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Decreto-Lei No 102-D/2020, de 10 de dezembro da Presidência do Conselho de Ministros - Ambiente e Ação Climática. Diário da República: Série I, No 239 (2020). Available at https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/102-d-2020-150908012 [In Portuguese]
Decreto-Lei No 14/2019, de 21 de janeiro da Presidência do Conselho de Ministros - Adjunto e Economia. Diário da República: Série I, No 14 (2019). Available at https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/14-2019-118051707 [In Portuguese]
DGPFR/Divisão de Gestão do Programa de Fogos Rurais (2021) 8.° Relatório Provisório De Incêndios Rurais De 2021. ICNF – SGIF/Sistema de Gestão de Informação de Incêndios Florestais. Available at https://www.icnf.pt/api/file/doc/504914cdd1a211bb [In Portuguese]
Doerr SH, Cerdà A (2005) Fire effects on soil system functioning: New insights and future challenges. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 339-342.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Doerr SH, Santín C, Maynard T, Smith N, Gonzalez S (2013) ‘Wildfire: A burning issue for insurers?’ (Lloyds: London, UK) 10.13140/2.1.2551.9681
Elbein S (2019) What Portugal’s hellish wildfires can tell us about forest futures. Science. (National Geographic Society) Available at https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/how-to-live-with-mega-fires-portugal-forests-may-hold-secret
Eriksen C, Prior T (2011) The art of learning: wildfire, amenity migration and local environmental knowledge. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 612-624.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
European Environment Agency (2021) Forest fires in Europe. Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/forest-fires-in-europe
Feng X, Fu T-M, Cao H, Tian H, Fan Q, Chen X (2019) Neural network predictions of pollutant emissions from open burning of crop residues: Application to air quality forecasts in southern China. Atmospheric Environment 204, 22-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Galizia LF, Curt T, Barbero R, Rodrigues M (2021) Understanding fire regimes in Europe. International Journal of Wildland Fire 31, 56-66.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ganteaume A, Barbero R, Jappiot M, Maillé E (2021) Understanding future changes to fires in southern Europe and their impacts on the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience 2, 20-29.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods 16(1), 15-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gomes JFP (2006) Forest fires in Portugal: how they happen and why they happen. International Journal of Environmental Studies 63, 109-119.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Han X, Frey GE, Sun C (2020) Regulation and Practice of Forest-Management Fires on Private Lands in the Southeast United States: Legal Open Burns versus Certified Prescribed Burns. Journal of Forestry 118, 385-402.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Huffman MR (2013) The Many Elements of Traditional Fire Knowledge: Synthesis, Classification, and Aids to Cross-cultural Problem Solving in Fire-dependent Systems Around the World. Ecology and Society 18, 3.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
ICNF (2023) Informação estatística oficial do Sistema de Gestão de Informação de Incêndios Florestais (SGIF). Available at https://www.icnf.pt/florestas/gfr/gfrgestaoinformacao/estatisticas [In Portuguese]
IRGC (2017) Introduction to the IRGC Risk Governance Framework, revised version. (Eds M-V Florin, MT Bürkler) (EPFL International Risk Governance Center: Lausane) 10.5075/epfl-irgc-233739
Kumar P, Kumar S, Joshi L (2015) ‘Socioeconomic and Environmental Implications of Agricultural Residue Burning.’ (Springer India: New Delhi) 10.1007/978-81-322-2014-5
Lewis M, Christianson A, Spinks M (2018) Return to Flame: Reasons for Burning in Lytton First Nation, British Columbia. Journal of Forestry 116(2), 143-150.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McGee TK, Cabling LPB (2022) Preventing wildfires with fire permits in rural Edson, Alberta. International Journal of Wildland Fire 31, 599-606.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McKemey M, The Banbai Rangers, , Patterson M (Lesley), Hunter J, Ridges M, Ens E, Miller C, Costello O, Reid N (2021) Indigenous cultural burning had less impact than wildfire on the threatened Backwater grevillea (Grevillea scortechinii subsp. sarmentosa) while effectively decreasing fuel loads. International Journal of Wildland Fire 30, 745-756.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Molina-Terrén DM, Xanthopoulos G, Diakakis M, Ribeiro L, Caballero D, Delogu GM, Viegas DX, Silva CA, Cardil A (2019) Analysis of forest fire fatalities in Southern Europe: Spain, Portugal, Greece and Sardinia (Italy). International Journal of Wildland Fire 28, 85-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Midmore P, Sherwood A-M, Roughley G (2001) Policy reform and the sustainability of farming in the uplands of the United Kingdom: conflicts between environment and social support. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 3(1), 43-63.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Morgan GW, Tolhurst KG, Poynter MW, Cooper N, McGuffog T, Ryan R, Wouters MA, Stephens N, Black P, Sheehan D, Leeson P, Whight S, Davey SM (2020) Prescribed Burning in South-Eastern Australia: History and Future Directions. Australian Forestry 83(1), 4-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nunes LJR (2021) Characterization of Cytisus striatus (Hill) Rothm.: Waste Biomass Energy Recovery as a Measure to Reduce the Risk of Rural Fires. Recycling 6, 36.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nunes LJR, Meireles CIR, Pinto Gomes CJ, Almeida Ribeiro NMC (2019) The Evolution of Climate Changes in Portugal: Determination of Trend Series and Its Impact on Forest Development. Climate 7(6), 78.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nunes LJR, Raposo MAM, Pinto Gomes CJ (2021) A Historical Perspective of Landscape and Human Population Dynamics in Guimarães (Northern Portugal): Possible Implications of Rural Fire Risk in a Changing Environment. Fire 4(3), 49.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Oliveira SLJ, Pereira JMC, Carreiras JMB (2012) Fire frequency analysis in Portugal (1975–2005), using Landsat-based burnt area maps. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 48-60.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Özesmi U, Özesmi SL (2004) Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecological Modelling 176, 43-64.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pacheco AP, Claro J (2018) Operational flexibility in forest fire prevention and suppression: a spatially explicit intra-annual optimization analysis, considering prevention, (pre)suppression, and escape costs. European Journal of Forest Research 137, 895-916.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pacheco AP, Claro J, Oliveira T (2014) Simulation analysis of the impact of ignitions, rekindles, and false alarms on forest fire suppression. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44, 45-55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Parente J, Pereira MG, Amraoui M, Tedim F (2018) Negligent and intentional fires in Portugal: Spatial distribution characterization. Science of The Total Environment 624, 424-437.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rabbat C, Awad S, Villot A, Rollet D, Andrès Y (2022) Sustainability of biomass-based insulation materials in buildings: Current status in France, end-of-life projections and energy recovery potentials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 156, 111962.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sharma G, Annadate S, Sinha B (2022) Will open waste burning become India’s largest air pollution source? Environmental Pollution 292, 118310.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Shyamsundar P, Springer NP, Tallis H, Polasky S, Jat ML, Sidhu HS, Krishnapriya PP, Skiba N, Ginn W, Ahuja V, Cummins J, Datta I, Dholakia HH, Dixon J, Gerard B, Gupta R, Hellmann J, Jadhav A, Jat HS, Keil A, Ladha JK, Lopez-Ridaura S, Nandrajog SP, Paul S, Ritter A, Sharma PC, Singh R, Singh D, Somanathan R (2019) Fields on fire: Alternatives to crop residue burning in India. Science 365, 536-538.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Steelman TA, McCaffrey S (2013) Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management. Natural Hazards 65, 683-705.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stege TAM, Bolte JFB, Claassen L, Timmermans DRM (2019) Particulate matter exposure in roadwork companies: A mental models study on work safety. Safety Science 120, 137-145.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Walpole EH, Toman E, Stidham M, Wilson R (2020) The science and practice of ecological restoration: a mental models analysis of restoration practitioners. Environment Systems and Decisions 40, 588-604.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
White B (2012) Agriculture and the Generation Problem: Rural Youth, Employment and the Future of Farming. IDS Bulletin 43, 9-19.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wysong M, Legge S, Clark A, Maier S, Cowell S, Mackay G, Bardi Jawi Rangers, Nyul Nyul Rangers, Yawuru Country Managers, (2021) The sum of small parts: changing landscape fire regimes across multiple small landholdings in north-western Australia with collaborative fire management. International Journal of Wildland Fire 31, 97-111.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zaksek M, Arvai JL (2004) Toward Improved Communication about Wildland Fire: Mental Models Research to Identify Information Needs for Natural Resource Management. Risk Analysis 24, 1503-1514.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
