Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Drivers of long-distance spotting during wildfires in south-eastern Australia

Michael A. Storey https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6662-9192 A C , Owen F. Price A , Jason J. Sharples B and Ross A. Bradstock A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfires, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

B School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: mas828@uowmail.edu.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 29(6) 459-472 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19124
Submitted: 14 August 2019  Accepted: 20 January 2020   Published: 2 March 2020

Journal Compilation © IAWF 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

We analysed the influence of wildfire area, topography, fuel, surface weather and upper-level weather conditions on long-distance spotting during wildfires. The analysis was based on a large dataset of 338 observations, from aircraft-acquired optical line scans, of spotting wildfires in south-east Australia between 2002 and 2018. Source fire area (a measure of fire activity) was the most important predictor of maximum spotting distance and the number of long-distance spot fires produced (i.e. >500 m from a source fire). Weather (surface and upper-level), vegetation and topographic variables had important secondary effects. Spotting distance and number of long-distance spot fires increased strongly with increasing source fire area, particularly under strong winds and in areas containing dense forest and steep slopes. General vegetation descriptors better predicted spotting compared with bark hazard and presence variables, suggesting systems that measure and map bark spotting potential need improvement. The results from this study have important implications for the development of predictive spotting and wildfire behaviour models.

Additional keywords: fire behaviour, line scan, spot fire.


References

Albini FA (1979) Spot fire distance from burning trees: a predictive model. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture. (Ogden, UT)

Albini FA, Alexander ME, Cruz MG (2012) A mathematical model for predicting the maximum potential spotting distance from a crown fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 609–627.
A mathematical model for predicting the maximum potential spotting distance from a crown fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Andrews PL (2014) Current status and future needs of the BehavePlus Fire Modeling System. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 21–33.
Current status and future needs of the BehavePlus Fire Modeling System.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blanchi R, Leonard JE, Leicester RH (2006) Lessons learnt from post-bushfire surveys at the urban interface in Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 234, S139
Lessons learnt from post-bushfire surveys at the urban interface in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Böhner J, Antonić O (2009) Land-surface parameters specific to topo-climatology. In ‘Developments in soil science’. (Eds T Hengl, HI Reuter) Vol. 33, pp. 195–226. (Elsevier: Amsterdam)

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2003) ‘Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach second edition.’ (Springer Science & Business Media: Fort Collins, CO)

Cawson JG, Duff TJ, Swan MH, Penman TD (2018) Wildfire in wet sclerophyll forests: the interplay between disturbances and fuel dynamics. Ecosphere 9, e02211
Wildfire in wet sclerophyll forests: the interplay between disturbances and fuel dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheney N, Bary G (1969) The propagation of mass conflagrations in a standing eucalypt forest by the spotting process. In ‘Mass Fire Symposium’, 10–12 February 1969, Canberra. Vol. 1, Paper A6. (Defense Standards Laboratories: Melbourne)

Cohen JD, Stratton RD (2008) Home destruction examination: Grass Valley Fire, Lake Arrowhead, California. Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory. (Missoula, MT)

Conrad O, Bechtel B, Bock M, Dietrich H, Fischer E, Gerlitz L, Wehberg J, Wichmann V, Böhner J (2015) System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geoscientific Model Development 8, 1991–2007.
System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cook R, Walker A, Wilkes S (2009) Airborne Fire Intelligence. In ‘Innovations in Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry’. (Eds S Jones, K Reinke) pp. 239–253. (Springer: Berlin)

Cruz MG, Sullivan AL, Gould JS, Sims NC, Bannister AJ, Hollis JJ, Hurley RJ (2012) Anatomy of a catastrophic wildfire: the Black Saturday Kilmore East fire in Victoria, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 284, 269–285.
Anatomy of a catastrophic wildfire: the Black Saturday Kilmore East fire in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Di Virgilio G, Hart MA, Jiang N (2018) Meteorological controls on atmospheric particulate pollution during hazard reduction burns. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18, 6585–6599.
Meteorological controls on atmospheric particulate pollution during hazard reduction burns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Duane A, Piqué M, Castellnou M, Brotons L (2015) Predictive modelling of fire occurrences from different fire spread patterns in Mediterranean landscapes. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 407–418.
Predictive modelling of fire occurrences from different fire spread patterns in Mediterranean landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Duff T, Keane R, Penman T, Tolhurst K (2017) Revisiting wildland fire fuel quantification methods: the challenge of understanding a dynamic, biotic entity. Forests 8, 351
Revisiting wildland fire fuel quantification methods: the challenge of understanding a dynamic, biotic entity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ellis PF (2000) The aerodynamic and combustion characteristics of eucalypt bark: a firebrand study. Ph.D. Thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.

Ellis PFM (2011) Fuelbed ignition potential and bark morphology explain the notoriety of the eucalypt messmate ‘stringybark’ for intense spotting. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 897–907.
Fuelbed ignition potential and bark morphology explain the notoriety of the eucalypt messmate ‘stringybark’ for intense spotting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ellis PFM (2013) Firebrand characteristics of the stringy bark of messmate (Eucalyptus obliqua) investigated using non-tethered samples. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 642–651.
Firebrand characteristics of the stringy bark of messmate (Eucalyptus obliqua) investigated using non-tethered samples.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Filkov A, Duff T, Penman T (2018) Improving fire behaviour data obtained from wildfires. Forests 9, 81
Improving fire behaviour data obtained from wildfires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ganteaume A, Lampin-Maillet C, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Jappiot M, Fonturbel T, Pérez-Gorostiaga P, Vega JA (2009) Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 951–969.
Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gelaro R, McCarty W, Suárez MJ, Todling R, Molod A, Takacs L, Randles CA, Darmenov A, Bosilovich MG, Reichle R, Wargan K, Coy L, Cullather R, Draper C, Akella S, Buchard V, Conaty A, da Silva AM, Gu W, Kim G-K, Koster R, Lucchesi R, Merkova D, Nielsen JE, Partyka G, Pawson S, Putman W, Rienecker M, Schubert SD, Sienkiewicz M, Zhao B (2017) The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). Journal of Climate 30, 5419–5454.
The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32020988PubMed |

Geoscience Australia (2011) 1 second SRTM digital elevation model. GeoScience Australia, Canberra. Available at http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/9a9284b6-eb45-4a13-97d0-91bf25f1187b [Accessed 2016].

Gill T, Johansen K, Phinn S, Trevithick R, Scarth P, Armston J (2017) A method for mapping Australian woody vegetation cover by linking continental-scale field data and long-term Landsat time series. International Journal of Remote Sensing 38, 679–705.
A method for mapping Australian woody vegetation cover by linking continental-scale field data and long-term Landsat time series.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

GMAO (2015a) MERRA-2 tavg1_2d_flx_Nx: 2d, 1-hourly, time-averaged, single-level, assimilation, surface flux diagnostics V5.12.4. Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD. Available at https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/daac-bin/FTPSubset2.pl [Accessed 31 January 2018]

GMAO (2015b) MERRA-2 tavg1_2d_slv_Nx: 2d, 1-hourly, time-averaged, single-level, assimilation, single-level diagnostics V5.12.4. Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD. Available at https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/daac-bin/FTPSubset2.pl [Accessed 31 January 2018]

GMAO (2015c) MERRA-2 tavg3_3d_asm_Nv: 3d, 3-hourly, time-averaged, model-level, assimilation, assimilated meteorological fields V5.12.4. Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD. Available at https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/daac-bin/FTPSubset2.pl [Accessed 31 January 2018]

Gould JS, McCaw W, Cheney N, Ellis P, Knight I, Sullivan A (2008) ‘Project Vesta: fire in dry eucalypt forest: fuel structure, fuel dynamics and fire behaviour.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Canberra)

Hall J, Ellis PF, Cary GJ, Bishop G, Sullivan AL (2015) Long-distance spotting potential of bark strips of a ribbon gum (Eucalyptus viminalis). International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 1109–1117.
Long-distance spotting potential of bark strips of a ribbon gum (Eucalyptus viminalis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harris S, Anderson W, Kilinc M, Fogarty L (2012) The relationship between fire behaviour measures and community loss: an exploratory analysis for developing a bushfire severity scale. Natural Hazards 63, 391–415.
The relationship between fire behaviour measures and community loss: an exploratory analysis for developing a bushfire severity scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hines F, Tolhurst KG, Wilson AAG, McCarthy GJ (2010) Overall fuel hazard assessment guide: Report no. 82. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment. (Melbourne)

Jackson S (2017) pscl: classes and methods for R developed in the political science computational laboratory. United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney. (Sydney). Available at https://github.com/atahk/pscl/ [Verified January 2020]

Keetch JJ, Byram GM (1968) A drought index for forest fire control. USDA Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. (Asheville, NC)

Keith D (2004) ‘Ocean shores to desert dunes: the native vegetation of New South Wales and the ACT.’ (New South Wales Government, Environment Protection Authority: Sydney)

Koo E, Pagni PJ, Weise DR, Woycheese JP (2010) Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 818–843.
Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Luke RH, McArthur AG (1978) ‘Bush fires in Australia.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra)

Magee L (1990) R 2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests. The American Statistician 44, 250–253.
R 2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martin J, Hillen T (2016) The spotting distribution of wildfires. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland) 6, 177
The spotting distribution of wildfires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Matthews AG (1997) FIRESCAN: a technique for airborne infra-red mapping of wild fires. Ph.D. Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne.

McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in Eucalypt forests. Department of National Development Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet Number 107. (Canberra)

McCaw WL, Gould JS, Phillip Cheney N, Ellis PFM, Anderson WR (2012) Changes in behaviour of fire in dry eucalypt forest as fuel increases with age. Forest Ecology and Management 271, 170–181.
Changes in behaviour of fire in dry eucalypt forest as fuel increases with age.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McRae R, Sharples J, Fromm M (2015) Linking local wildfire dynamics to pyroCb development. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 15, 417–428.
Linking local wildfire dynamics to pyroCb development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mills GA, McCaw WL (2010) Atmospheric stability environments and fire weather in Australia: extending the Haines Index. Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research. 1921605553. (Canberra)

Noble IR, Gill AM, Bary GAV (1980) McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Australian Journal of Ecology 5, 201–203.
McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Page WG, Wagenbrenner NS, Butler BW, Blunck DL (2019) An analysis of spotting distances during the 2017 fire season in the Northern Rockies, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 49, 317–325.
An analysis of spotting distances during the 2017 fire season in the Northern Rockies, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Plucinski MP, Anderson WR (2008) Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 628–637.
Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Plucinski MP, Pastor E (2013) Criteria and methodology for evaluating aerial wildfire suppression. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 1144–1154.
Criteria and methodology for evaluating aerial wildfire suppression.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Potter BE (2012a) Atmospheric interactions with wildland fire behaviour – I. Basic surface interactions, vertical profiles and synoptic structures. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 779–801.
Atmospheric interactions with wildland fire behaviour – I. Basic surface interactions, vertical profiles and synoptic structures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Potter BE (2012b) Atmospheric interactions with wildland fire behaviour – II. Plume and vortex dynamics. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 802–817.
Atmospheric interactions with wildland fire behaviour – II. Plume and vortex dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Potter B (2018) The Haines Index – it’s time to revise it or replace it. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 437–440.
The Haines Index – it’s time to revise it or replace it.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Price O, Bradstock R (2013) Landscape scale influences of forest area and housing density on house loss in the 2009 Victorian bushfires. PLoS One 8, e73421
Landscape scale influences of forest area and housing density on house loss in the 2009 Victorian bushfires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24009753PubMed |

Price OF, Purdam PJ, Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS (2018) Comparing the height and area of wild and prescribed fire particle plumes in south-east Australia using weather radar. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 525–537.
Comparing the height and area of wild and prescribed fire particle plumes in south-east Australia using weather radar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ramsay GC, McArthur NA, Dowling VP (1987) Preliminary results from an examination of house survival in the 16 February 1983 bushfires in Australia. Fire and Materials 11, 49–51.
Preliminary results from an examination of house survival in the 16 February 1983 bushfires in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rawson RP, Billing PR, Duncan SF (1983) The 1982–83 forest fires in Victoria. Australian Forestry 46, 163–172.
The 1982–83 forest fires in Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Riley SJ, DeGloria SD, Elliot R (1999) Index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Science 5, 23–27.

Rothermel RC (1991) Predicting behavior and size of crown fires in the northern Rocky Mountains. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Research paper INT-438. (Ogden, UT)https://doi.org/10.2737/INT-RP-438

Sharples JJ, McRae RHD, Weber RO, Gill AM (2009) A simple index for assessing fuel moisture content. Environmental Modelling & Software 24, 637–646.
A simple index for assessing fuel moisture content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sharples JJ, Cary GJ, Fox-Hughes P, Mooney S, Evans JP, Fletcher M-S, Fromm M, Grierson PF, McRae R, Baker P (2016) Natural hazards in Australia: extreme bushfire. Climatic Change 139, 85–99.
Natural hazards in Australia: extreme bushfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Simard M, Pinto N, Fisher JB, Baccini A (2011) Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne LiDAR. Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences 116, G04021

Tedim F, Leone V, Amraoui M, Bouillon C, Coughlan M, Delogu G, Fernandes P, Ferreira C, McCaffrey S, McGee T, Parente J, Paton D, Pereira M, Ribeiro L, Viegas D, Xanthopoulos G (2018) Defining extreme wildfire events: difficulties, challenges, and impacts. Fire 1, 9
Defining extreme wildfire events: difficulties, challenges, and impacts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thurston W, Kepert JD, Tory KJ, Fawcett RJB (2017) The contribution of turbulent plume dynamics to long-range spotting. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26, 317–330.
The contribution of turbulent plume dynamics to long-range spotting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tolhurst K, Shields B, Chong D (2008) Phoenix: development and application of a bushfire risk management tool. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 23, 47

Viegas DX, Almeida M, Raposo J, Oliveira R, Viegas CX (2014) Ignition of Mediterranean fuel beds by several types of firebrands. Fire Technology 50, 61–77.
Ignition of Mediterranean fuel beds by several types of firebrands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Werth PA, Potter BE, Alexander ME, Clements CB, Cruz MG, Finney MA, Forthofer JM, Goodrick SL, Hoffman C, Jolly WM (2016) Synthesis of knowledge of extreme fire behavior. Volume 2 for fire behavior specialists, researchers, and meteorologists. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-891. (Portland, OR)

Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Jackman S (2008) Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software 27, 1–25.
Regression models for count data in R.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Zero-truncated and zero-inflated models for count data. In ‘Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R’. (Eds AF Zuur, EN Ieno, N Walker, AA Saveliev, GM Smith) pp. 261–293. (Springer: New York, NY)