Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
REVIEW (Open Access)

A review of US wildland firefighter entrapments: trends, important environmental factors and research needs

Wesley G. Page A B , Patrick H. Freeborn A , Bret W. Butler A and W. Matt Jolly A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 Highway 10 W, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.

B Corresponding author. Email: wesleygpage@fs.fed.us

International Journal of Wildland Fire 28(8) 551-569 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19022
Submitted: 16 February 2019  Accepted: 21 May 2019   Published: 25 June 2019

Journal Compilation © IAWF 2019 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Wildland firefighters in the United States are exposed to a variety of hazards while performing their jobs. Although vehicle accidents and aircraft mishaps claim the most lives, situations where firefighters are caught in a life-threatening, fire behaviour-related event (i.e. an entrapment) constitute a considerable danger because each instance can affect many individuals. In an attempt to advance our understanding of the causes of firefighter entrapments, a review of the pertinent literature and a synthesis of existing data were undertaken. Examination of the historical literature indicated that entrapment potential peaks when fire behaviour rapidly deviates from an assumed trajectory, becomes extreme and compromises the use of escape routes, safety zones or both. Additionally, despite the numerous safety guidelines that have been developed as a result of analysing past entrapments, we found issues with the way factual information from these incidents is reported, recorded and stored that make quantitative investigations difficult. To address this, a fire entrapment database was assembled that revealed when details about the location and time of entrapments are included in analyses, it becomes possible to ascertain trends in space and time and assess the relative influence of various environmental variables on the likelihood of an entrapment. Several research needs were also identified, which highlight the necessity for improvements in both fundamental knowledge and the tools used to disseminate that knowledge.

Additional keywords: burnover, entrapment data, entrapment investigation, fire behaviour, fire environment, firefighter fatalities.


References

Abatzoglou JT (2013) Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling. International Journal of Climatology 33, 121–131.
Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Albini FA (1976) Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-30. (Ogden, UT, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_int/int_gtr030.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Alexander ME, Thorburn WR (2015) LACES: adding an ‘A’ for anchor point(s) to the LCES wildland firefighter safety system. In ‘Current international perspectives on wildland fires, mankind and the environment’. (Eds B Leblon, ME Alexander) pp. 121–144. (Nova Science Publishers Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA)

Alexander ME, Taylor SW, Page WG (2016) Wildland firefighter safety and fire behavior prediction on the fireline. In ‘Proceedings of the 13th international wildland fire safety summit & 4th human dimensions wildland fire conference’, 20–24 April 2015, Missoula, MT, USA. pp. 44–58. (International Association of Wildland Fire: Missoula, MT, USA) Available at http://www.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/36659.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Andrews PL (2012) Modeling wind adjustment factor and midflame wind speed for Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-266. (Fort Collins, CO, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr266.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Andrews PL, Rothermel RC (1982) Charts for interpreting wildland fire behavior characteristics. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-131. (Ogden, UT, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_int/int_gtr131.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Andrews PL, Loftsgaarden DO, Bradshaw LS (2003) Evaluation of fire danger rating indexes using logistic regression and percentile analysis. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 213–226.
Evaluation of fire danger rating indexes using logistic regression and percentile analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Andrews PL, Cruz MG, Rothermel RC (2013) Examination of the wind speed limit function in the Rothermel surface fire spread model. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 959–969.
Examination of the wind speed limit function in the Rothermel surface fire spread model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arnold RK, Buck CC (1954) Blow-up fires – silviculture or weather problems? Journal of Forestry 52, 408–411.
Blow-up fires – silviculture or weather problems?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrows JS (1951) Fire behavior in northern Rocky Mountain forests. USDA Forest Service, Northern Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Station Paper No. 29. (Missoula, MT, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_exp_for/priest_river/exp_for_priest_river_1951_barrows.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Baxter GJ, Alexander ME, Dakin G (2004) Travel rates by Alberta wildland firefighters using escape routes on a moderately steep slope. In ‘Advantage’, Vol. 5, no. 25. (Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada: Pointe Claire, QC, Canada) Available at http://training.nwcg.gov/pre-courses/S390/Advantage%20Article.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Beighley M (1995) Beyond the safety zone: creating a margin of safety. Fire Management Today 55, 21–24.

Beitia J, Ryerson M, Jerome E, Chandler J, Quinn M, Fisher C, Montoya T, Smith D (2013) Interagency serious accident investigation guide. National Interagency Fire Center. (Boise, ID, USA) Available at https://www.nifc.gov/safety/safety_documents/SAI_Guide.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Bishop J (2007) Technical background of the FireLine Assessment MEthod (FLAME). In ‘The fire environment – innovations, management, and policy; conference proceedings’, 26–30 March 2007, Destin, FL, USA. (Eds BW Butler, W Cook) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-46CD, pp. 27–74. (Fort Collins, CO, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p046/rmrs_p046_027_074.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Bjornsen R, Peterson J, Skufca T, Hardy M, Spaulding AE (1967) A plan to further reduce the chances of men being burned while fighting fires. USDA Forest Service. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at https://www.coloradofirecamp.com/fire-origins/1967-preface.htm [Verified 18 April 2019]

Blanchi R, Leonard J, Haynes K, Opie K, James M, Dimer de Oliveira F (2014) Environmental circumstances surrounding bushfire fatalities in Australia 1901–2011. Environmental Science & Policy 37, 192–203.
Environmental circumstances surrounding bushfire fatalities in Australia 1901–2011.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braun CC, Gage J, Booth C, Rowe AL (2001) Creating and evaluating alternatives to the 10 standard fire orders and 18 watch-out situations. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 5, 23–35.
Creating and evaluating alternatives to the 10 standard fire orders and 18 watch-out situations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brauneis K (2002) Fire orders: do you know the original intent? Fire Management Today 62, 27–29.

Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 5–32.
Random forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown AA (1937) The factors and circumstances that led to the Blackwater Fire tragedy. Fire Control Notes 1, 384–387.

Bureau of Land Management (2003) Bureau of Land Management serious accident investigation chief investigator’s manual. USDI, Bureau of Land Management Manual H-1112–3. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at https://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_documents/BLMChfInvstgtrManual.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Burgan RE, Andrews PL, Bradshaw LS, Chase CH (1997) Current status of the wildland fire assessment system (WFAS). Fire Management Notes 57, 14–17.

Butler BW (2014a) A study of the impact of slope and wind on firefighter safety zone effectiveness. USDI, Joint Fire Science Program Project 07–2-1–20. (Boise, ID, USA) Available at https://www.firescience.gov/projects/07-2-1-20/project/07-2-1-20_final_report.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Butler BW (2014b) Wildland firefighter safety zones: a review of past science and summary of future needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 295–308.
Wildland firefighter safety zones: a review of past science and summary of future needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Butler BW, Anderson WR, Catchpole EA (2007) Influence of slope on fire spread rate. In ‘The fire environment – innovations, management, and policy; conference proceedings’, 26–30 March 2007, Destin, FL, USA. (Eds BW Butler, W Cook) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-46CD, pp. 75–82. (Fort Collins, CO, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p046/rmrs_p046_075_082.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Butler BW, Bartlette RA, Bradshaw LS, Cohen JD, Andrews PL, Putnam T, Mangan RJ (1998) Fire behavior associated with the 1994 South Canyon Fire on Storm King Mountain, Colorado. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-9. (Ogden, UT, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_rp009.pdf [Verified 31 May 2019]

Butler C, Marsh S, Domitrovich JW, Helmkamp J (2017) Wildland fire fighter deaths in the United States: a comparison of existing surveillance systems. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 14, 258–270.
Wildland fire fighter deaths in the United States: a comparison of existing surveillance systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27754819PubMed |

Byram GM (1959) Combustion of forest fuels. In ‘Forest fire: control and use’. (Ed. KP Davis) pp. 61–89. (McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA) Available at https://www.frames.gov/documents/behaveplus/publications/Byram_1959_CombustionOfForestFuels.pdf [Verified 22 April 2019]

Calkin DE, Gebert KM, Jones JG, Neilson RP (2005) Forest Service large-fire area burned and suppression expenditure trends, 1970–2002. Journal of Forestry 103, 179–183.
Forest Service large-fire area burned and suppression expenditure trends, 1970–2002.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calkin DE, Cohen JD, Finney MA, Thompson MP (2014) How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland–urban interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 746–751.
How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland–urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24344292PubMed |

Calkin DE, Thompson MP, Finney MA (2015) Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management. Forest Ecosystems 2, 9
Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Campbell MJ, Dennison PE, Butler BW (2017) A LiDAR-based analysis of the effects of slope, vegetation density, and ground surface roughness on travel rates for wildland firefighter escape route mapping. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26, 884–895.
A LiDAR-based analysis of the effects of slope, vegetation density, and ground surface roughness on travel rates for wildland firefighter escape route mapping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Campbell MJ, Dennison PE, Butler BW, Page WG (2019) Using crowdsourced fitness tracker data to model the relationship between slope and travel rates. Applied Geography 106, 93–107.
Using crowdsourced fitness tracker data to model the relationship between slope and travel rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Butler BW, Rothermel RC, Morris GA, Latham DJ (1998) Rate of spread of free-burning fires in woody fuels in a wind tunnel. Combustion Science and Technology 131, 1–37.
Rate of spread of free-burning fires in woody fuels in a wind tunnel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheney NP, Gould JS (1995) Fire growth in grassland fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 5, 237–247.
Fire growth in grassland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR (1993) The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 3, 31–44.
The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire spread in grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheney NP, Gould JS, McCaw L (2001) The dead-man zone – a neglected area of firefighter safety. Australian Forestry 64, 45–50.
The dead-man zone – a neglected area of firefighter safety.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cliff EP, Price JH, Lindh CO, Mays LK, Cochran HD (1953) The Rattlesnake Fire. USDA Forest Service. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at http://wlfalwaysremember.org/images/incidents/documents/1953-07-09-rattlesnake-report.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Cook J (1995) Fire environment size-up: human limitations vs. superhuman expectations. Wildfire 4, 49–53.

Cook JR (2013) Trends in wildland fire entrapment fatalities … revisited. National Wildfire Coordinating Group. (Boise, ID, USA)

Countryman CM (1974) Can southern California wildland conflagrations be stopped? USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PSW-7. (Berkeley, CA, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr007/psw_gtr007.pdf [Verified 22 April 2019]

Countryman CM, Philpot CW (1970) Physical characteristics of chamise as a wildland fuel. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper PSW-66. (Berkeley, CA, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_rp066/psw_rp066.pdf [Verified 22 April 2019]

Countryman CM, Fosberg MA, Rothermel RC, Schroeder MJ (1968) Fire weather and fire behavior in the 1966 Loop Fire. Fire Technology 4, 126–141.
Fire weather and fire behavior in the 1966 Loop Fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD (1977) The National Fire-Danger Rating System – 1978. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-39. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Done J, Davis CA, Weisman M (2004) The next generation of NWP: explicit forecasts of convection using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model. Atmospheric Science Letters 5, 110–117.
The next generation of NWP: explicit forecasts of convection using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fellows I (2018) wordcloud: word clouds. R package version 2.6. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wordcloud [Verified 22 April 2019]

Forthofer JM, Butler BW, McHugh CW, Finney MA, Bradshaw LS, Stratton RD, Shannon KS, Wagenbrenner NS (2014a) A comparison of three approaches for simulating fine-scale surface winds in support of wildland fire management. Part II. An exploratory study of the effect of simulated winds on fire growth simulations. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 982–994.
A comparison of three approaches for simulating fine-scale surface winds in support of wildland fire management. Part II. An exploratory study of the effect of simulated winds on fire growth simulations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Forthofer JM, Butler BW, Wagenbrenner NS (2014b) A comparison of three approaches for simulating fine-scale surface winds in support of wildland fire management. Part I. Model formulation and comparison against measurements. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 969–981.
A comparison of three approaches for simulating fine-scale surface winds in support of wildland fire management. Part I. Model formulation and comparison against measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fryer GK, Dennison PE, Cova TJ (2013) Wildland firefighter entrapment avoidance: modelling evacuation triggers. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 883–893.
Wildland firefighter entrapment avoidance: modelling evacuation triggers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gabbert B (2013) Yarnell Fire lead investigator talks about the report and tracking firefighters. Wildfire Today. Available at https://wildfiretoday.com/2013/11/30/yarnell-fire-lead-investigator-talks-about-the-report-and-tracking-firefighters/ [Verified 24 April 2019]

Gabbert B (2019) 21 issues frequently identified in firefighter entrapment reports. Wildfire Today. Available at https://wildfiretoday.com/2019/02/10/21-issues-frequently-identified-in-firefighter-entrapment-reports/ [Verified 24 April 2019]

Gallacher JR, Ripa B, Butler BW, Fletcher TH (2018) Lab-scale observations of flame attachment on slopes with implications for firefighter safety zones. Fire Safety Journal 96, 93–104.
Lab-scale observations of flame attachment on slopes with implications for firefighter safety zones.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gleason P (1991) LCES – a key to safety in the wildland fire environment. Fire Management Notes 52, 9

Haunschild PR, Sullivan BN (2002) Learning from complexity: effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Administrative Science Quarterly 47, 609–643.
Learning from complexity: effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holden ZA, Jolly WM, Parsons R, Warren A, Landguth E, Abatzoglou J (2013) TOPOFIRE: a system for monitoring insect and climate impacts on fire danger in complex terrain. Cirmount 7, 2–5. Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/cirmount/publications/pdf/Mtn_Views_nov_13.pdf#page=6 [Verified 24 April 2019]

Holland PG, Steyn DG (1975) Vegetational responses to latitudinal variations in slope angle and aspect. Journal of Biogeography 2, 179–183.
Vegetational responses to latitudinal variations in slope angle and aspect.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holmstrom M (2016) Common denominators on tragedy fires – updated for a new (human) fire environment. Wildfire 25, 26–34. Available at http://wildfiremagazine.org/article/common-denominators-tragedy-fires-updated/ [Verified 24 April 2019]

Huntington JL, Hegewisch KC, Daudert B, Morton CG, Abatzoglou JT, McEvoy DJ, Erickson T (2017) Climate engine: cloud computing and visualization of climate and remote sensing data for advanced natural resource monitoring and process understanding. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 98, 2397–2410.
Climate engine: cloud computing and visualization of climate and remote sensing data for advanced natural resource monitoring and process understanding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Imai K, King G, Lau O (2008) Toward a common framework for statistical analysis and development. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 17, 892–913.
Toward a common framework for statistical analysis and development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson RH, Schumacher RS, Ruppert JH, Lindsey DT, Ruthford JE, Kriederman L (2014) The role of convective outflow in the Waldo Canyon Fire. Monthly Weather Review 142, 3061–3080.
The role of convective outflow in the Waldo Canyon Fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jolly WM, Freeborn PH (2017) Towards improving wildland firefighter situational awareness through daily fire behaviour risk assessments in the US Northern Rockies and Northern Great Basin. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26, 574–586.
Towards improving wildland firefighter situational awareness through daily fire behaviour risk assessments in the US Northern Rockies and Northern Great Basin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kendall MG (1975) ‘Rank correlation methods.’ (Charles Griffin and Co. Ltd.: London, UK)

Kourtz PH (1977) An application of Landsat digital technology to forest fire fuel type mapping. In ‘Proceedings, 11th international symposium on remote sensing of environment’, 25–29 April 1977, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. pp. 1111–1115. (Environmental Research Institute of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA) Available at http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/33792.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Lahaye S, Curt T, Fréjaville T, Sharples J, Paradis L, Hély C (2018a) What are the drivers of dangerous fires in Mediterranean France? International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 155–163.
What are the drivers of dangerous fires in Mediterranean France?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lahaye S, Sharples J, Matthews S, Heemstra S, Price O, Badlan R (2018b) How do weather and terrain contribute to firefighter entrapments in Australia? International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 85–98.
How do weather and terrain contribute to firefighter entrapments in Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lahaye S, Sharples J, Hély C, Curt T (2018c) Toward safer firefighting strategies and tactics. In ‘Advances in forest fire research’. (Ed. DX Viegas), pp. 1311–1316. (Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra: Coimbra, Portugal)10.14195/978-989-26-16-506_166

Leape LL (1994) Error in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 272, 1851–1857.
Error in medicine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 7503827PubMed |

Loudermilk EL, Hiers JK, O’Brien JJ, Mitchell RJ, Singhania A, Fernandez JC, Cropper WP, Slatton KC (2009) Ground-based LIDAR: a novel approach to quantify fine-scale fuelbed characteristics. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 676–685.
Ground-based LIDAR: a novel approach to quantify fine-scale fuelbed characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loveless B, Hernandez A (2015) Measuring the wildland firefighting safety culture change – an analysis of entrapment rates from 1994 to 2013. In ‘Proceedings of the large wildland fires conference’, 19–23 May 2014, Missoula, MT, USA. (Eds RE Keane, WM Jolly, RA Parsons, KL Riley) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-73, pp. 150–155. (Fort Collins, CO, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p073/rmrs_p073_150_155.pdf [Verified 17 April 2019]

Ma Y, Huang X, Mills GA, Parkyn K (2010) Verification of mesoscale NWP forecasts of abrupt cold frontal wind changes. Weather and Forecasting 25, 93–112.
Verification of mesoscale NWP forecasts of abrupt cold frontal wind changes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mangan RJ (1999) Wildland fire fatalities in the United States: 1990–1998. USDA Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center, Technical Report 9951–2808–MTDC. (Missoula, MT, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/pdfpubs/pdf99512808/pdf99512808pt01.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Mangan R (2007) Wildland firefighter fatalities in the United States: 1990–2006. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, Safety and Health Working Team, National Interagency Fire Center Report No. PMS 841. (Boise, ID, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/pdfpubs/pdf07512814/pdf07512814dpi72.pdf [Verified 18 April 2019]

Mann HB (1945) Non-parametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13, 245–259.
Non-parametric tests against trend.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maupin J (1981) Thirteen prescribed fire situations that shout watch out! Fire Management Notes 42, 10

McArdle RE (1957) Standard firefighting orders. Fire Control Notes 18, 151

Monedero S, Ramirez J, Cardil A (2019) Predicting fire spread and behaviour on the fireline. Wildfire analyst pocket: a mobile app for wildland fire prediction. Ecological Modelling 392, 103–107.
Predicting fire spread and behaviour on the fireline. Wildfire analyst pocket: a mobile app for wildland fire prediction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moore WR, Parker VA, Countryman CM, Mays LK, Greeley AW (1957) Report of task force to recommend action to reduce the chances of men being killed by burning while fighting fire. USDA Forest Service. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5393525.pdf [Verified 18 April 2019]

Munson S, Mangan D (2000) Wildland firefighter entrapments 1976 to 1999. USDA Forest Service, Technology & Development Program, Technical Report 0051–2853–MTDC. (Missoula, MT, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/htmlpubs/htm00512853/ [Verified 24 April 2019]

Nagy RC, Fusco E, Bradley B, Abatzoglou JT, Balch J (2018) Human-related ignitions increase the number of large wildfires across US ecoregions. Fire 1, 4
Human-related ignitions increase the number of large wildfires across US ecoregions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Interagency Fire Center (2018) Wildland fire fatalities by year. Available at https://www.nifc.gov/safety/safety_documents/Fatalities-by-Year.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (1980) Preliminary report of task force on study of fatal/near-fatal wildland fire accidents. National Interagency Fire Center. (Boise, ID, USA) Available at https://www.wildfirelessons.net/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=1f2f44ea-7ffc-c9d7-574f-2922d94e8e75&forceDialog=0 [Verified 18 April 2019]

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (1992) Look up, look down, look around. National Wildfire Coordinating Group Report No. PMS 427. (Boise, ID, USA)

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (1997) Historical wildland firefighter fatalities, 1910–1996, 2nd edn. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, National Fire Equipment System, Publication Report No. NFES 1849. (Boise, ID, USA)

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2006) NWCG fireline handbook appendix B. National Wildfire Coordinating Group PMS 410–2. (Boise, ID, USA) Available at https://training.nwcg.gov/pre-courses/s290/FHB_Appendix B.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2007) FireLine Assessment MEthod (FLAME) field guide. National Wildfire Coordinating Group NFES 2894. (Boise, ID, USA)

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2014) Glossary of wildland fire terminology. National Wildfire Coordinating Group PMS-205. (Boise, ID, USA)

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2017a) NWCG report on wildland firefighter fatalities in the United States: 2007–2016. National Wildfire Coordinating Group PMS 841. (Boise, ID, USA) Available at https://www.nwcg.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pms841.pdf [Verified 19 April 2019]

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2017b) Fire behavior field reference guide. PMS 437. (Boise, ID, USA)

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2018) Incident response pocket guide. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, Operations and Training Committee PMS 461. (Boise, ID, USA) Available at https://www.nwcg.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pms461.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Nauslar NJ, Abatzoglou JT, Marsh PT (2018) The 2017 North Bay and Southern California fires: a case study. Fire 1, 18
The 2017 North Bay and Southern California fires: a case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Page WG, Butler BW (2017) An empirically based approach to defining wildland firefighter safety and survival zone separation distances. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26, 655–667.
An empirically based approach to defining wildland firefighter safety and survival zone separation distances.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Page WG, Butler BW (2018) Fuel and topographic influences on wildland firefighter burnover fatalities in southern California. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 141–154.
Fuel and topographic influences on wildland firefighter burnover fatalities in southern California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Page WG, Butler BW (in press) Assessing wildland firefighter entrapment survivability. Fire Management Today

Page WG, Freeborn PH (2019) Entrapment. In ‘Encyclopedia of wildfires and wildland–urban interface (WUI) fires’. (Ed. SL Manzello) pp. 1–7. (Springer Nature: New York, NY, USA) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51727-8_183-1

Page WG, Wagenbrenner NS, Butler BW, Forthofer JM, Gibson C (2018) An evaluation of NDFD weather forecasts for wildland fire behavior prediction. Weather and Forecasting 33, 301–315.
An evaluation of NDFD weather forecasts for wildland fire behavior prediction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190, 231–259.
Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Putnam T (2002) The ten standard firefighting orders: can anyone follow them? Mindful solutions. (Missoula, MT, USA) Available at https://studylib.net/doc/10548284/the-ten-standard-firefighting-orders–can-anyone-follow-t [Verified 24 April 2019]

R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (Vienna, Austria) Available at http:www.R-project.org/ [Verified 24 April 2019]

Rollins MG (2009) LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 235–249.
LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_int/int_rp115.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Rothermel RC (1985) Fire behavior considerations of aerial ignition. In ‘Prescribed fire by aerial ignition, proceedings of a workshop’, 30 October–1 November 1984, Missoula, MT, USA. (Ed. RW Mutch) pp. 143–158. (Intermountain Fire Council: Missoula, MT, USA) Available at https://www.frames.gov/documents/behaveplus/publications/Rothermel_1984_AerialIgnition_ocr.pdf [Verified 23 April 2019]

Rothermel RC (1993) Mann Gulch Fire: a race that couldn’t be won. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-299. (Ogden, UT, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_int/int_gtr299.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Saura-Mas S, Paula S, Pausas JG, Lloret F (2010) Fuel loading and flammability in the Mediterranean Basin woody species with different post-fire regenerative strategies. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 783–794.
Fuel loading and flammability in the Mediterranean Basin woody species with different post-fire regenerative strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schroeder MJ, Buck CC (1970) Fire weather … a guide for application of meteorological information to forest fire control operations. USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 360 PMS 425-I. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at https://training.nwcg.gov/pre-courses/s290/Fire_Weather_Handbook_pms_425.pdf [Verified 4 October 2018]

Schultz DM (2005) A review of cold fronts with prefrontal troughs and wind shifts. Monthly Weather Review 133, 2449–2472.
A review of cold fronts with prefrontal troughs and wind shifts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scott JH (2007) Nomographs for estimating surface fire behavior characteristics. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-192. (Fort Collins, CO, USA) https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/27177 [Verified 4 October 2018]

Scott JH, Burgan RE (2005) Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-153. (Fort Collins, CO, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr192.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Shafer JC, Steenburgh WJ (2008) Climatology of strong intermountain cold fronts. Monthly Weather Review 136, 784–807.
Climatology of strong intermountain cold fronts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sharples JJ, Gill AM, Dold JW (2010) The trench effect and eruptive wildfires: lessons from the King’s Cross Underground disaster. In ‘Proceedings of Australian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council 2010 conference’, 8–10 September 2010, Darwin, NT, Australia. (Australian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council: Darwin, NT, Australia) Available at http://www.ma.man.ac.uk/~jwd/articles/10-TEaEW.pdf[Verified 31 May 2019]

Sharples JJ, McRae RHD, Wilkes SR (2012) Wind–terrain effects on the propagation of wildfires in rugged terrain: fire channelling. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 282–286.
Wind–terrain effects on the propagation of wildfires in rugged terrain: fire channelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Short KC (2015) Sources and implications of bias and uncertainty in a century of US wildfire activity data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 883–891.
Sources and implications of bias and uncertainty in a century of US wildfire activity data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Short KC (2017) Spatial wildfire occurrence data for the United States, 1992–2015 [FPA_FOD_20170508]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (Fort Collins, CO, USA)10.2737/RDS-2013-0009.4

Silva JS, Rego F, Fernandes P, Rigolot E (Eds) (2010) ‘Towards integrated fire management – outcomes of the European project fire paradox.’ European Forest Institute Research Report 23. (European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland) Available at https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/530-2013-10-15-efi_rr23.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Simpson KJ, Ripley BS, Christin PA, Belcher CM, Lehmann CER, Thomas GH, Osborne CP (2016) Determinates of flammability in savanna grass species. Journal of Ecology 104, 138–148.
Determinates of flammability in savanna grass species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26877549PubMed |

Sinclair VA, Niemelä S, Leskinen M (2012) Structure of a narrow cold front in the boundary layer: observations versus model simulation. Monthly Weather Review 140, 2497–2519.
Structure of a narrow cold front in the boundary layer: observations versus model simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Steele J, Krebs J (2000) Revisiting the ten standard orders. Wildfire 9, 21–23.

Strauss D, Bednar L, Mees R (1989) Do one percent of forest fires cause ninety-nine percent of the damage? Forest Science 35, 319–328.
Do one percent of forest fires cause ninety-nine percent of the damage?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sullivan AL (2009) Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 369–386.
Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

TriData Corporation (1996) Wildland firefighter safety awareness study: phase I – identifying the organizational culture, leadership, human factors, and other issues impacting firefighter safety. TriData Corporation. (Arlington, VA, USA) Available at https://www.nifc.gov/safety/safety_documents/phase1.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

TriData Corporation (1997) Wildland firefighter safety awareness study: phase II – setting new goals for the organizational culture, leadership, human factors, and other areas impacting firefighter safety. TriData Corporation. (Arlington, VA, USA) Available at https://www.wildfirelessons.net/viewdocument/wildland-firefighter-safety-awarene [Verified 24 April 2019]

TriData Corporation (1998) Wildland firefighter safety awareness study: phase III – implementing cultural changes for safety. TriData Corporation. (Arlington, VA, USA) Available at https://www.wildfirelessons.net/viewdocument/wildland-firefighter-safety-awarene [Verified 24 April 2019]

US Forest Service California Region (1954) Accident check list for forest fire fighters. Fire Control Notes 15, 14–15.

USDA Forest Service (1957) The Inaja forest fire disaster. USDA Forest Service. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at http://www.wlfalwaysremember.org/images/incidents/documents/1956-11-25-inaja-report.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

USDA, USDI (1995) Federal wildland fire management policy and program review. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/strategy/foundational/1995_fed_wildland_fire_policy_program_report.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

USDI, USDA (2014) National cohesive wildland fire management strategy. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/strategy/strategy/CSPhaseIIINationalStrategyApr2014.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Van Wagner CE (1977) Effect of slope on fire spread rate. Canadian Forest Service. Bimonthly Research Notes 33, 7–9. Available at http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/29435.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Viegas DX (2006) Parametric study of an eruptive fire behaviour model. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 169–177.
Parametric study of an eruptive fire behaviour model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Viegas DX, Simeoni A (2011) Eruptive behaviour of forest fires. Fire Technology 47, 303–320.
Eruptive behaviour of forest fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wall TU, Brown TJ, Nauslar NJ (2018) Fire stories – understanding wildland firefighters’ perceptions of unpredictable and extreme fire behavior. USDA Forest Service Research, Development and Applications Program, Final Report. (Reno, NV, USA)

Weick KE (2002) Human factors in fire behavior analysis: reconstructing the Dude Fire. Fire Management Today 62, 8–15.

Werth PA, Potter BE, Clements CB, Finney MA, Goodrick SL, Alexander ME, Cruz MG, Forthofer JM, McAllister SS (2011) Synthesis of knowledge of extreme fire behavior: Vol. I for fire managers. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-854. (Portland, OR, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr854.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Werth PA, Potter BE, Alexander ME, Clements CB, Cruz MG, Finney MA, Forthofer JM, Goodrick SL, Hoffman CM, Jolly WM, McAllister SS, Ottmar RD, Parsons RA (2016) Synthesis of knowledge of extreme fire behavior: Vol. 2 for fire behavior specialists, researchers, and meteorologists. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-891. (Portland, OR, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr891.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Whitlock C, Wolf JT (2005) Accident investigation guide: 2005 edition. USDA Forest Service, Technology and Development Program 7E72H46. (Missoula, MT, USA) Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/pdfpubs/pdf05672806/pdf05672806dpi72pt01.pdf [Verified 24 April 2019]

Wilson CC (1977) Fatal and near-fatal forest fires: the common denominators. The International Fire Chief 43, 9–15.

Wilson JF, Peterson RM, Mutch RW, Heilman EG, Abbott JR, O’Dell CA, Beer HJ (1976) Accident report, Battlement Creek Fire fatalities and injury, July 17, 1976. USDI Bureau of Land Management, State of Colorado, Grand Junction District. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at https://www.wildfirelessons.net/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=9c6862f8-a806-4efb-981b-1b3072b0173c&forceDialog=0 [Verified 24 April 2019]

Yarnell Hill Fire Investigation Report (2013) Yarnell Hill Fire: June 30, 2013. Serious Accident Investigation Report. Arizona State Forestry Division, Office of the State Forester. (Phoenix, AZ, USA) Available at https://www.wildfirelessons.net/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=4c98c51d-102c-4e04-86e0-b8370d2beb27&forceDialog=0 [Verified 24 April 2019]

Young MV, Hewson TD (2012) The forecasting challenge of waving cold fronts: benefits of the ensemble approach. Weather 67, 296–301.
The forecasting challenge of waving cold fronts: benefits of the ensemble approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ziegler JA (2007) The story behind an organizational list: a genealogy of wildland firefighters’ 10 standard fire orders. Communication Monographs 74, 415–442.
The story behind an organizational list: a genealogy of wildland firefighters’ 10 standard fire orders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ziegler JA (2008) How the ‘13 Situations that Shout ‘Watch Out’ became the ‘18 Watch Out Situations’. Valparaiso University, Department of Communication. (Valparaiso, IN, USA) Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237770852_How_the_13_Situations_that_Shout_’Watch_Out’_Became_the_18_Watch_Out_Situations [Verified 24 April 2019]