Novel fuelbed characteristics associated with mechanical mastication treatments in northern California and south-western Oregon, USA
Jeffrey M. Kane A C , J. Morgan Varner A and Eric E. Knapp BA Humboldt State University, Department of Forestry and Wildland Resources, Arcata, CA 95521, USA.
B USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Redding, CA 96002, USA.
C Corresponding author. Present address: Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA. Email: jeffreykane@gmail.com
International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(6) 686-697 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08072
Submitted: 10 May 2008 Accepted: 24 November 2008 Published: 22 September 2009
Abstract
Mechanically masticated fuelbeds are distinct from natural or logging slash fuelbeds, with different particle size distributions, bulk density, and particle shapes, leading to challenges in predicting fire behavior and effects. Our study quantified some physical properties of fuel particles (e.g. squared quadratic mean diameter, proportion of non-cylindrical particles) and surface fuel loading with planar intercept and plot-based methods in 10 mechanically masticated sites in northern California and south-western Oregon. Total woody fuel load differed among masticated sites, ranging from 15.3 to 63.4 Mg ha–1, with the majority of the load concentrated in the 10-h (53.7%) and 1-h (29.2%) time-lag classes. Masticated fuels were densely packed, with total depths ranging from 4.6 to 8.0 cm and fuelbed bulk densities ranging from 45.9 to 115.3 kg m–3. To accurately quantify loading in masticated fuelbeds, we recommend using a hybrid methodology, where 1-h and 10-h fuel loadings are estimated using a plot-based method and 100-h and 1000-h fuel loadings are estimated using the standard planar intercept method. Most masticated fuelbeds differed in loading by fuel class and fuelbed depth, when compared with existing natural and slash-based fuelbeds, suggesting new fire behavior fuel models specific to masticated fuelbeds may be warranted.
Additional keywords: Arctostaphylos, Ceanothus, fuel loading, fuels management, mechanical fuels treatment.
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the Joint Fire Science Program, JFSP project no. 05–2-1–20. J. D. Stuart, C. Skinner, J. S. Glitzenstein, and an anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments to earlier drafts. Field data collection and sample processing was completed by E. Dotson and E. Orling, with supplemental help from P. Zhang, J. Kreye, and B. Graham. Additional thanks to P. Sikkink for providing the bootstrapping code in S-Plus.
Agee JK , Skinner C (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 83–96.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Busse MD, Hubbert KR, Fiddler GO, Shestak CJ , Powers RF (2005) Lethal soil temperatures during burning of masticated forest residues. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 267–276.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jerman JL, Gould PJ , Fulé PZ (2004) Slash compression treatment reduced tree mortality from prescribed fire in south-western ponderosa pine. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 19, 149–153.
Moghaddas EEY , Stephens SL (2008) Mechanized fuel treatment effects on soil compaction in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer stands. Forest Ecology and Management 255, 3098–3106.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scarff FR , Westoby M (2006) Leaf litter flammability in some semi-arid Australian woodlands. Functional Ecology 20, 745–752.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephens SL , Moghaddas JJ (2005) Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior and predicted tree mortality in Californian mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 215, 21–36.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |