Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Ground-based LIDAR: a novel approach to quantify fine-scale fuelbed characteristics

E. Louise Loudermilk A G , J. Kevin Hiers B , Joseph J. O’Brien C , Robert J. Mitchell B , Abhinav Singhania D , Juan C. Fernandez D , Wendell P. Cropper Jr. E and K. Clint Slatton F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, PO Box 110410, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

B Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, Route 2, Box 2324, Newton, GA 39870, USA.

C USDA Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 320 Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

D Geosensing Engineering and Mapping Center, University of Florida, PO Box 116580, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

E School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, PO Box 110410, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

F Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, PO Box 116580, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

G Corresponding author. Email: louisel@ufl.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(6) 676-685 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07138
Submitted: 22 September 2007  Accepted: 11 November 2008   Published: 22 September 2009

Abstract

Ground-based LIDAR (also known as laser ranging) is a novel technique that may precisely quantify fuelbed characteristics important in determining fire behavior. We measured fuel properties within a south-eastern US longleaf pine woodland at the individual plant and fuelbed scale. Data were collected using a mobile terrestrial LIDAR unit at sub-cm scale for individual fuel types (shrubs) and heterogeneous fuelbed plots. Spatially explicit point-intercept fuel sampling also measured fuelbed heights and volume, while leaf area and biomass measurements of whole and sectioned shrubs were determined from destructive sampling. Volumes obtained by LIDAR and traditional methods showed significant discrepancies. We found that traditional means overestimated volume for shrub fuel types because of variation in leaf area distribution within shrub canopies. LIDAR volume estimates were correlated with biomass and leaf area for individual shrubs when factored by species, size, and plant section. Fuelbed heights were found to be highly variable among the fuel plots, and ground LIDAR was more sensitive to capturing the height variation than traditional point intercept sampling. Ground LIDAR is a promising technology capable of measuring complex surface fuels and fuel characteristics, such as fuel volume.

Additional keywords: fuel sampling, ILRIS, longleaf pine, saw palmetto, wax myrtle, wiregrass.


Acknowledgements

We thank the people at the Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center for their support, especially Matthew Greene and Jason McGee for their hard field and laboratory work. The staff at the Ordway–Swisher Biological Station, namely Steve Coates and James Perry, have been important contacts for the pilot stage of this research. None of this could have been done without the National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping (NCALM) at the University of Florida providing the MTLS and engineering expertise.


References


Andrews P, Bevins C, Seli R (2004) BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 3.0: user’s guide. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-106WWW. (Ogden, UT)

Andrews PL , Queen LP (2001) Fire modeling and information system technology. International Journal of Wildland Fire  10, 343–352.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Brown JK (1974) Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report GTR-INT-16. (Ogden, UT)

Brown JK (1981) Bulk densities of non-uniform surface fuels and their application to fire modeling. Forest Science  27, 667–683.
Burgan RE, Rothermel RC (1984) BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system – FUEL subsystem. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-167. (Ogden, UT)

Danson FM, Hetherington D, Morsdorf F, Koetz B , Allgower B (2007) Forest canopy gap fraction from terrestrial laser scanning. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE  4, 157–160.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | DeBano LF, Neary DG, Ffolliott PF (1998) ‘Fire Effects on Ecosystems.’ (Wiley: New York)

Drake JB , Weishampel JF (2000) Multifractal analysis of canopy height measures in a longleaf pine savanna. Forest Ecology and Management  128, 121–127.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fröhlich C, Mettenleiter M (2004) Terrestrial laser scanning – new perspectives in 3D surveying. In ‘Laser-Scanners for Forest and Landscape Assessment’. pp. 7–13. (International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Sensing: Freiburg, Germany)

Hall SA, Burke IC, Box DO, Kaufmann MR , Stoker JM (2005) Estimating stand structure using discrete-return Lidar: an example from low-density, fire-prone ponderosa pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management  208, 189–209.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Keane RE, Dickinson LJ (2007) The photoload sampling technique: estimating surface fuel loadings from downward-looking photographs of synthetic fuelbeds. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-190. (Fort Collins, CO)

Lee H, Slatton KC, Roth B , Cropper WP (2009) Prediction of forest canopy light interception using three-dimensional airborne LiDAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing  30, 189–207.

Crossref | McNab WH, Avers PE (Eds) (1994) ‘Ecological Subregions of the United States: Section Descriptions.’ USDA Forest Service. (Washington, DC)

Nelson R, Krabill W , Tonelli J (1988) Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data. Remote Sensing of Environment  24, 247–267.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ottmar RD, Vihnanek RE, Mathey JW (2003) Stereo Photo Series for Quantifying Natural Fuels. Volume VIa: Sand Hill, Sand Pine Scrub, and Hardwood with White Pine Types in the South-East United States with Supplemental Sites for Volume VI. National Interagency Fire Center, National Wildfire Coordinating Group, PMS 838, NFES 1119. (Boise, ID)

Parker GG, Harding DJ , Berger ML (2004) A portable LIDAR system for rapid determination of forest canopy structure. Journal of Applied Ecology  41, 755–767.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Scott JH, Burgan RE (2005) Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-153. (Fort Collins, CO)

Slatton KC, Coleman M, Carter W, Shrestha R, Sartori M (2004) Control methods for merging ALSM and ground-based laser point clouds acquired under forest canopies. In ‘4th International Asia–Pacific Environmental Remote Sensing Symposium’, 8 November 2004, Honolulu, HI. (Eds Bevis, M, Shoji, Y, Businger, S) pp. 96–103. (SPIE: Bellingham, WA)

Tanaka T, Park H , Hattori S (2004) Measurement of forest canopy structure by a laser plane range-finding method: improvement of radiative resolution and examples of its application. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology  125, 129–142.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wade DD, Lunsford JD, Dixon MJ (1989) A guide for prescribed fire in southern forests. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Southern Region Technical Publication R8-TP 11. (Atlanta, GA)

Watt PJ , Donoghue DNM (2005) Measuring forest structure with terrestrial laser scanning. International Journal of Remote Sensing  26, 1437–1446.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wolf PR, Ghilani CD (1997) ‘Adjustment Computations: Statistics and Least Squares in Surveying GIS.’ (Wiley: New York)