Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF07135
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 18(2)

Public perspectives of fire, fuels and the Forest Service in the Great Lakes Region: a survey of citizen–agency communication and trust

Bruce A. Shindler A D , Eric Toman B and Sarah M. McCaffrey C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

B School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

C USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Evanston, IL 60201, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: bruce.shindler@oregonstate.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(2) 157-164 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07135
Submitted: 14 September 2007  Accepted: 26 June 2008   Published: 2 April 2009

Abstract

Relative to the western United States, where fire and fuel management programs have received greater emphasis, few community-based studies have focused on the Great Lakes region. The present paper describes public opinion research from counties surrounding National Forests in Wisconsin, Minnesota and Michigan. Survey data address citizen perspectives on (1) fuel reduction practices and related risks, (2) confidence in the US Forest Service to effectively implement treatments, and (3) interactions between the agency and forest communities. Substantial support for prescribed fire and thinning treatments is evident, with few participants believing these practices should not be considered or are unnecessary. However, ratings of agency actions were weak at all three study sites; in particular, there is some skepticism that managers can safely implement prescribed fire programs. Overall, Minnesota residents had fewer concerns whereas Michigan respondents were more cautious. These results are discussed and compared with findings from the western US.

Additional keywords: citizen–agency interactions, fire risk, fuels reduction, public confidence, social acceptance.


Acknowledgements

Project support was provided by the USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station and the Joint Fire Science Program.


References


Brunson MW , Shindler BA (2004) Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States. Society & Natural Resources  17, 661–678.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Cortner HJ, Shannon M, Wallace M (1996) Institutional barriers and incentives for ecosystem management: a problem analysis. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-354. (Portland, OR)

Cortner HJ, Wallace M, Burke S , Moote MA (1998) Institutions matter: the need to address the institutional challenges of ecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning  40, 159–166.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Dillman D (1978) ‘Mail and Telephone Surveys: the Total Design Method.’ (Wiley: New York)

Ehrenhalt A (1994) Let the people decide between spinach and broccoli. Governing  7(10), 6–7.
Hansen M, Brand G (2006) Michigan’s forest resources in 2004. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, Resource Bulletin NC-255. (St Paul, MN)

King JB (1993) Learning to solve the right problems: the case of nuclear power in America. Journal of Business Ethics  12, 105–116.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Lehman DR (1989) ‘Market Research and Analysis.’ (Irwin Press: Boston, MA)

McCaffrey SM (2004) Fighting fire with education: what is the best way to reach out to homeowners? Journal of Forestry  102(5), 12–19.
McCaffrey SM (2006) The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report, NRS-1. (Minneapolis, MN)

Miles P, Brand G, Mielke M (2004) Minnesota’s forest resources in 2003. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, Resource Bulletin NC-246. (St. Paul, MN)

Monroe M , Nelson K (2004) The value of assessing public perceptions: wildland fire and defensible space. Applied Environmental Education and Communication  3, 109–117.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Monroe M, Nelson K, Payton M (2006) Communicating with homeowners in the interface about defensible space. In ‘The Public and Wildland Fire Management: Social Science Findings for Managers’. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-1, pp. 99–109. (Minneapolis, MN)

Needham MD, Vaske JJ (2008) Survey implementation, sampling, and weighting data. In ‘Survey Research and Analysis: Applications in Parks, Recreation, and Human Dimensions’. (Ed. JJ Vaske) (Venture Publishing: State College, PA)

Nelson K, Monroe M, Johnson JF , Bowers A (2004) Living with fire: homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire  13, 413–425.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Perry CH (2006) Wisconsin’s forest resources in 2004. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Statio, Resource Bulletin NC-261. (St. Paul, MN)

Radeloff VC, Hammer R , Stewart S (2005) Rural and suburban sprawl in the US Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and its relation to forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology  19(3), 793–805.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Shindler BA, Brunson MW, Stankey GH (2002) Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-537. (Portland, OR)

Smith P , McDonough M (2001) Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision-making. Society & Natural Resources  14, 239–249.
Winter G, Vogt C, McCaffrey SM (2006) Residents warming up to fuels management: homeowners’ acceptance of wildfire and fuels management in the wildland–urban interface. In ‘The Public and Wildland Fire Management: Social Science Findings for Managers’. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-1, pp. 19–32. (Minneapolis, MN)

Yankelovich D (1991) ‘Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World.’ (Syracuse University Press: Syracuse, NR)