Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Examining fire behavior in mesquite–acacia shrublands

Tamara J. Streeks A , M. Keith Owens A C and Steve G. Whisenant B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Uvalde, TX 78801, USA.

B Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: m-owens@tamu.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 14(2) 131-140 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF03053
Submitted: 26 June 2003  Accepted: 3 December 2004   Published: 17 May 2005

Abstract

The vegetation of South Texas has changed from mesquite savanna to mixed mesquite–acacia (Prosopis–Acacia) shrubland over the last 150 years. Fire reduction, due to lack of fine fuel and suppression of naturally occurring fires, is cited as one of the primary causes for this vegetation shift. Fire behavior, primarily rate of spread and fire intensity, is poorly understood in these communities, so fire prescriptions have not been developed. We evaluated two current fire behavior systems (BEHAVE and the CSIRO fire spread and fire danger calculator) and three models developed for shrublands to determine how well they predicted rate of spread and flame length during three summer fires within mesquite–acacia shrublands. We also used geostatistical analyses to examine the spatial pattern of net heat, flame temperature and fuel characteristics. The CSIRO forest model under-predicted the rate of fire spread by an average of 5.43 m min−1 and over-predicted flame lengths by 0.2 m while the BEHAVE brush model under-predicted rate of spread by an average of 6.57 m min−1 and flame lengths by an average of 0.33 m. The three shrubland models did not consistently predict the rate of spread in these plant communities. Net heat and flame temperature were related to the amount of 10-h fuel on the site, but were not related to the cover of grasses, forbs, shrubs, or apparent continuity of fine fuel. Fuel loads were typical of South Texas shrublands, in that they were uneven and spatially inconsistent, which resulted in an unpredictable fire pattern.

Additional keywords: fire intensity; net heat; rate of spread.


References


Albini FA (1976) Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-30. (Ogden, UT)

Anderson HE (1969) Heat transfer and fire spread. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-69. (Ogden, UT)

Ansley RJ , Jacoby PW (1998) Manipulation of fire intensity to achieve mesquite management goals in north Texas. Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference Proceedings  20C, 195–204.
Catchpole W, Bradstock R, Choate J, Fogarty L, Gellie N, McCarthy C, McCaw L, Marsden-Smedley J, Pearce G (1998) Cooperative development of equations for heathland fire behavior. III International Conference on Forest Fire Research, Luso, Portugal. 14th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 1, pp. 631–645.

Cheney NP , Gould JS (1995) Fire growth in grassland fuels. International Journal of Wildland Fire  5, 237–247.
Gill AM, Knight IK (1991) Fire measurement. In ‘Proceedings Conference on Bushfire Modeling and Fire Danger Rating System’. (Eds NP Cheney, AM Gill) pp. 137–146. (Canberra, Australia)

Hely C, Flannigan M, Bergeron Y , McRae D (2001) Role of vegetation and weather on fire behavior in the Canadian mixed wood boreal forest using two fire behavior prediction systems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  31, 430–441.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McArthur AG (1966) ‘Weather and grassland fire behavior.’ Leaflet No. 100. (Forest and Timber Bureau: Canberra)

McArthur AG (1967) ‘Fire behavior in eucalyptus forests.’ Leaflet No. 107. (Forest and Timber Bureau: Canberra)

McArthur AG (1973) ‘Forest fire danger meter, Mark V.’(Forest and Timber Bureau of Australia: Canberra)

Noble IR, Bary GAV , Gill AM (1980) McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Australian Journal of Ecology  5, 201–203.
Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Rothermel RC, Deeming JE (1980) Measuring and interpreting fire behavior for correlation with fire effects. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-93. (Ogden, UT)

Rothermel RC, Rinehart GC (1983) Field procedures for verification and adjustment of fire behavior predictions. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-142. (Ogden, UT)

Ruthven DC, Gallagher JF , Synatzske DR (2000) Effects of fire and grazing on forbs in the western south Texas plains. The Southwestern Naturalist  45, 89–94.
Scifres CJ (1980) ‘Brush management: Principles and practices for Texas and the Southwest.’ (Texas A&M University Press: College Station)

Scifres CJ, Hamilton WT (1993) ‘Prescribed burning for brushland management.’ (Texas A&M University Press: College Station)

Stinson KJ , Wright HA (1969) Temperatures of headfires in the southern mixed prairie of Texas. Journal of Range Management  22, 169–174.
Vega JA, Cuinas P, Fonturbel T, Perez-Gorostiaga P, Fernandez C (1998) Predicting fire behavior in Galician (NW Spain) shrubland fuel complexes. III International Confererence on Forest Fire Research, Luso, Portugal. 14th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 1, pp. 713–728.

Wright HA, Bunting SC , Neuenschwander LF (1976) Effect of fire on honey mesquite. Journal of Range Management  29, 467–471.