Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Observations of wildfire spread dynamics in southern Australian grasslands

Miguel G. Cruz https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3311-7582 A * , Musa Kilinc B , James S. Gould A and Wendy R. Anderson C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Country Fire Authority, PO Box 701, Mount Waverley, Vic 3149, Australia.

C Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia.

* Correspondence to: miguel.cruz@csiro.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 33, WF24095 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF24095
Submitted: 11 June 2024  Accepted: 5 August 2024  Published: 4 September 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of IAWF. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background

Wildfire propagation is inherently non-steady, although forecasts of their spread focus on a pseudo-steady state assumption.

Aims

To investigate the variability in rate of fire spread of wildfires in southern Australian grassland landscapes, and the effect of landscape features in inhibiting fire propagation. To evaluate the adequacy of grassfire rate of spread models currently used in Australia.

Methods

We reconstructed the propagation of six wildfires in grassland fuels and characterised the unsteady nature of rate of spread. We also analysed the effect of barriers to fire spread in slowing or halting wildfire propagation.

Key results

Headfire rate of spread in wildfires was observed to be non-steady, with peaks in forward rate of spread being on average 2.6-times higher than mean values. The rate of spread had an average coefficient of variation of 88%. Areas of fuel discontinuity, such as roads, did not stop fires under moderate burning conditions, but resulted in slowing the average rate of fire spread.

Conclusions

Analysis of wildfire observations is key to understand fire behaviour features that are not replicable in experimental or modelling environments. Findings from the analysis can support fire-fighting safety awareness and inform landscape fire propagation modelling.

Keywords: fire barriers, fire behaviour, fire environment, grass curing, non-steady fire propagation, rate of fire spread, wildfire documentation.

References

Albini FA (1982) Response of free-burning fires to nonsteady wind. Combustion Science and Technology 29, 225-241.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Andrews P, Finney M, Fischetti M (2007) Predicting wildfires. Scientific American 297, 46-55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Burrows N, Ward B, Robinson A (1991) Fire behaviour in spinifex fuels on the Gibson Desert Nature Reserve, Western Australia. Journal of Arid Environments 20, 189-204.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Butler BW (2014) Wildland firefighter safety zones: a review of past science and summary of future needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 295-308.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Butler BW, Bartlette RA, Bradshaw LS, Cohen JD, Andrews PL, Putnam T, Mangan RJ (1998) Fire behavior associated with the South Canyon Fire on Storm King Mountain, Colorado. (USDA, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Ogden, Utah, USA)

Butler B, Teske C, Jimenez D, O’Brien J, Sopko P, Wold C, Vosburgh M, Hornsby B, Loudermilk E (2016) Observations of energy transport and rate of spreads from low-intensity fires in longleaf pine habitat – RxCADRE 2012. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 76-89.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Byram GM (1959) Combustion of forest fuels. In ‘Forest Fire: Control and Use’. (Ed. KP Davis) pp. 61–89. (McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA)

Cardil A, Monedero S, SeLegue P, Navarrete MÁ, de-Miguel S, Purdy S, Marshall G, Chavez T, Allison K, Quilez R, Ortega M, Silva CA, Ramirez J (2023) Performance of operational fire spread models in California. International Journal of Wildland Fire 32, 1492-1502.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Rothermel RC, Morris GA, Butler BW, Latham DJ (1998) Rate of spread of free-burning fires in woody fuels in a wind tunnel. Combustion Science and Technology 131, 1-37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cheney NP, Gould JS (1995) Separating fire spread prediction and fire danger rating. CALMScience Supplement 4, 3-8.
| Google Scholar |

Cheney P, Sullivan A (2008) ‘Grassfires: fuel, weather and fire behaviour.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Australia)

Cheney NP, Gould JS, Hutchings PT (1989) ‘Prediction of fire spread in grassland.’ (CSIRO: Canberra, Australia)

Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR (1993) The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire-spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 3, 31-44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 8, 1-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cheney P, Gould J, McCaw L (2001) The dead-man zone - a neglected area of firefighter safety. Australian Forestry 64, 45-50.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cheney NP, Gould JS, McCaw WL, Anderson WR (2012) Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 280, 120-131.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Clark TL, Radke L, Coen J, Middleton D (1999) Analysis of small-scale convective dynamics in a crown fire using infrared video camera imagery. Journal of Applied Meteorology 38, 1401-1420.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cruz MG, Alexander ME (2013) Uncertainty associated with model predictions of surface and crown fire rates of spread. Environmental Modelling & Software 47, 16-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cruz MG, McCaw WL, Anderson WR, Gould JS (2013) Fire behaviour modelling in semi-arid mallee-heath shrublands of southern Australia. Environmental Modelling & Software 40, 21-34.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cruz MG, Alexander ME, Sullivan AL, Gould JS, Kilinc M (2018a) Assessing improvements in models used to operationally predict wildland fire rate of spread. Environmental Modelling & Software 105, 54-63.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cruz MG, Sullivan AL, Gould JS, Hurley RJ, Plucinski MP (2018b) Got to burn to learn: the effect of fuel load on grassland fire behaviour and its management implications. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 727-741.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cruz MG, Hurley RJ, Bessell R, Sullivan AL (2020) Fire behaviour in wheat crops – effect of fuel structure on rate of fire spread. International Journal of Wildland Fire 29, 258-271.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Finney MA, Cohen JD, Forthofer JM, McAllister SS, Gollner MJ, Gorham DJ, Saito K, Akafuah NK, Adam BA, English JD (2015) Role of buoyant flame dynamics in wildfire spread. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 9833-9838.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction System. (Forestry Canada, Science and Sustainable Development Directorate No. Information Report ST-X-3: Ottawa, Canada)

Gould JS (1991) Validation of the Rothermel fire spread model and related fuel parameters in grassland fuels. In ‘Proceedings of conference on Bushfire Modelling and Fire Danger Rating Systems’, 11–12 July 1988, Canberra. (Esd NP Cheney, AM Gill) pp. 51–64. (CSIRO Div. of Forestry: Yarralumla, ACT)

Gould JS, Sullivan AL (2020) Two methods for calculating wildland fire rate of forward spread. International Journal of Wildland Fire 29, 272-281.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kilinc M, Anderson W, Price B (2012) The applicability of bushfire behaviour models in Australia. (Department of Sustainability and Environment DSE Schedule 5: Fire Severity Rating Project No. Technical Report 1: Melbourne, Vic)

Liu X, He B, Quan X, Yebra M, Qiu S, Yin C, Liao Z, Zhang H (2018) Near real-time extracting wildfire spread rate from Himawari-8 satellite data. Remote Sensing 10, 1654.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Luke RH, McArthur AG (1978) ‘Bushfires in Australia.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra, ACT)

McArthur AG (1960) Fire danger rating tables for annual grasslands. (Commonwealth of Australia, Forestry and Timber Bureau: Canberra, ACT)

McArthur AG (1966) Weather and grassland fire behaviour. (Commonwealth of Australia, Forestry and Timber Bureau No. Leaflet 100: Canberra, ACT)

McArthur AG, Cheney NP, Barber J (1982) ‘The Fires of 12 February 1977 in the Western District of Victoria.’ (CSIRO Division of Forest Research: Canberra, ACT and Country Fire Authority: Melbourne, Vic)

McRae DJ, Jin JZ, Conard SG, Sukhinin AI, Ivanova GA, Blake TW (2005) Infrared characterization of fine-scale variability in behavior of boreal forest fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35, 2194-2206.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nelson RM, Butler BW, Weise DR (2012) Entrainment regimes and flame characteristics of wildland fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 127-140.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Noble IR, Bary GAV, Gill AM (1980) McArthur’s fire danger meters expressed as equations. Australian Journal of Ecology 5, 201-203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Plucinski MP (2019) Contain and control: wildfire suppression effectiveness at incidents and across landscapes. Current Forestry Reports 5, 20-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

R Core Team (2024) ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria)

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Research Paper INT-115. (USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: Ogden, Utah, USA)

Rothermel RC (1983) How to predict the spread and intensity of forest and range fires. General Technical Report INT-143. (USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Ogden, Utah, USA)

Rothermel RC (1991) Predicting behavior and size of crown fires in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Research Paper INT-438. (USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Ogden, Utah, USA)

Rothermel RC (1993) Mann Gulch fire: a race that couldn’t be won. General Technical Report No. INT-299. (USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Ogden, Utah, USA)

Rothermel RC, Rinehart GC (1983) Field procedures for verification and adjustment of fire behavior predictions. General Technical Report INT-142. (USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Ogden, Utah, USA)

Rothermel RC, Mutch RW (1986) Behavior of the live-threatening Butte fire: August 27–29, 1985. Fire Management Notes 47(2), 14-24.
| Google Scholar |

Sneeuwjagt RJ, Frandsen WH (1977) Behavior of experimental grass fires vs. predictions based on Rothermel’s fire model. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7, 357-367.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Taylor SW, Wotton BM, Alexander ME, Dalrymple GN (2004) Variation in wind and crown fire behaviour in a northern jack pine black spruce forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 1561-1576.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

van Wilgen BW, Wills AJ (1988) Fire behaviour prediction in savanna vegetation. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 18, 41-46.
| Google Scholar |

Viegas DXFC, Raposo JRN, Ribeiro CFM, Reis LCD, Abouali A, Viegas CXP (2021) On the non-monotonic behaviour of fire spread. International Journal of Wildland Fire 30, 702-719.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Viegas DXFC, Raposo JRN, Ribeiro CFM, Reis L, Abouali A, Ribeiro LM, Viegas CXP (2022) On the intermittent nature of forest fire spread – Part 2. International Journal of Wildland Fire 31, 967-981.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 63, 1309-1313.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wilson AAG (1988) Width of firebreak that is necessary to stop grass fires - some field experiments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18, 682-687.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |