Verification of WRF modelled fire weather in the 2009–10 New Zealand fire season
C. C. Simpson A B C E , H. G. Pearce D , A. P. Sturman A and P. Zawar-Reza A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Centre for Atmospheric Research, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
B School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences, University of New South Wales Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2610, Australia.
C Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre, East Melbourne, Vic. 3002, Australia.
D Rural Fire Research Group, Scion, Christchurch, New Zealand.
E Corresponding author. Email: colin.c.simpson@gmail.com
International Journal of Wildland Fire 23(1) 34-45 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12152
Submitted: 10 September 2012 Accepted: 22 July 2013 Published: 23 September 2013
Abstract
The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) mesoscale model was used to simulate the fire weather conditions for the 2009–10 wildland fire season in New Zealand. The suitability of WRF to simulate the high-end fire weather conditions for this period was assessed through direct comparison with observational data taken from 23 surface and two upper-air stations located across New Zealand. The weather variables and fire weather indices considered in the verification were the 1200 hours NZST air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and direction, 24-h rainfall, New Zealand Fire Weather Index (FWI) and Continuous Haines Index (CHI). On observed high-end fire weather days, the model under-predicted the air temperatures and relative humidities, and over-predicted the wind speeds and 24-h rainfall at most weather stations. The results demonstrated that although WRF is suitable for modelling the air temperatures, there are issues with modelling the wind speeds and rainfall quantities. The model error in the wind speeds and 24-h rainfall contributed significantly towards the model under-prediction of the FWI on observed high-end fire weather days. In addition, the model was not suitable for predicting the number of high-end fire weather days at most weather stations, which represents a serious operational limitation of the WRF model for fire management applications. Finally, the modelled CHI values were only in moderate agreement with the observed values, principally due to the model error in the dew point depression at 850 hPa.
References
Alexander ME (1994) Proposed revision of fire danger class criteria for forest and rural areas in New Zealand. National Rural Fire Authority, in association with the New Zealand Forest Research Institute. (Wellington)Alexander ME (2008) Proposed revision of fire danger class criteria for forest and rural areas in New Zealand, 2nd edn. National Rural Fire Authority, in association with the Scion Rural Fire Research Group. (Wellington)
Anderson S (2005) Forest and rural fire danger rating in New Zealand. In ‘Forestry Handbook’. (Ed. M Colley) pp. 241–244. (New Zealand Institute of Forestry: Christchurch)
Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land-surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I. Model description and implementation. Monthly Weather Review 129, 569–585.
| Coupling an advanced land-surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I. Model description and implementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke H, Evans JP, Andrew JP (2013) Fire weather simulation skill by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model over south-east Australia from 1985 to 2009. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 739–756.
| Fire weather simulation skill by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model over south-east Australia from 1985 to 2009.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Countryman CM (1972) The fire environment concept. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Technical Paper. (Berkeley, CA) Available at http://www.firemodels.org/downloads/behaveplus/publications/Countryman/Countryman_1972_TheFireEnvironmentConcept_ocr.pdf [Verified 6 September 2013]
Davis C, Carr F (2000) Summary of the 1998 workshop on mesoscale model verification. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 81, 809–819.
Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Hólm EV, Isaksen L, Kållberg P, Köhler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette J-J, Park B-K, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thépaut J-N, Vitart F (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 137, 553–597.
| The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD (1977) The National Fire-Danger Rating System – 1978. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-39. (Ogden, UT)
Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 46, 3077–3107.
| Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fogarty LG, Pearce HG, Catchpole WR, Alexander ME (1998) Adoption v adaptation: lessons from applying the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System in New Zealand. In ‘Proceedings of the III International Conference on Forest Fire Research and 14th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 21–24 November 1998, Luso, Coimbro, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) pp. 1011–1028. (ADAI: Coimbra, Portugal)
Haines DA (1988) A lower atmosphere severity index for wildlife fires. National Weather Digest 13, 23–27.
Hoadley JL, Westrick K, Ferguson SA, Goodrick SL, Bradshaw L, Werth P (2004) The effect of model resolution in predicting meteorological parameters used in fire danger rating. Journal of Applied Meteorology 43, 1333–1347.
| The effect of model resolution in predicting meteorological parameters used in fire danger rating.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hong SY, Lim JOJ (2006) The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme (WSM6). Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society 42, 129–151.
Janjić ZI (1990) The step-mountain coordinate: physical package. Monthly Weather Review 118, 1429–1443.
| The step-mountain coordinate: physical package.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Janjić ZI (1996) The surface layer in the NCEP Eta model. In ‘Eleventh Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction’, 19–23 August 1996, Norfolk, VA. pp. 354–355. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)
Janjić ZI (2002) Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada Level 2.5 Scheme in the NCEP Meso model. National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Office Note 437. (Camp Springs, MD)
Jiménez PA, Dudhia J (2012) Improving the representation of resolved and unresolved topographic effects on surface wind in the WRF Model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 51, 300–316.
| Improving the representation of resolved and unresolved topographic effects on surface wind in the WRF Model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jolliffe IT, Stephenson DB (2003) ‘Forecast Verification: A Practitioner’s Guide in Atmospheric Science.’ (Wiley: New York)
Kain JS (2004) The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. Journal of Applied Meteorology 43, 170–181.
| The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Hassiotis AD (2008) An upper gravity-wave absorbing layer for NWP applications. Monthly Weather Review 136, 3987–4004.
| An upper gravity-wave absorbing layer for NWP applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lawson BD, Armitage OB (2008) Weather guide for the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre. (Edmonton, AB) Avaiable at http://fire.ak.blm.gov/content/weather/2008%20CFFDRS%20Weather%20Guide.pdf [Verified 6 September 2013]
Mass CF, Ovens D, Westrick KJ, Colle BA (2002) Does increasing horizontal resolution produce more skillful forecasts? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 83, 407–430.
| Does increasing horizontal resolution produce more skillful forecasts?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McArthur AG (1966) Weather and grassland fire behaviour. Department of National Development, Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet number 100. (Canberra)
McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests. Department of National Development, Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet number 107. (Canberra)
Mills GA, McCaw WL (2010) Atmospheric stability environments and fire weather in Australia – extending the Haines Index. Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research Technical Report number 20. (Melbourne)
Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the long-wave. Journal of Geophysical Research 102, 16 663–16 682.
| Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the long-wave.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlsFGiu7s%3D&md5=2c085f96de73d6e5cde04a1d62aedfedCAS |
Mölders N (2008) Suitability of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to predict the June 2005 fire weather for interior Alaska. Weather and Forecasting 23, 953–973.
| Suitability of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to predict the June 2005 fire weather for interior Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NZMS (1983) Climatic Map Series (1 : 2 000 000). Part 2. Climate regions. New Zealand MetService Miscellaneous Publication 175. (Wellington)
Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263, 641–646.
| Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvit1OrsQ%3D%3D&md5=abb1e98100a1d0b06d8550a64d4517b5CAS | 17747657PubMed |
Pearce HG (1996) An initial assessment of fire danger in New Zealand’s climatic regions. Fire Technology Transfer Note. Forest and Rural Fire Research Programme, New Zealand Forest Research Institute. (Rotorua)
Pearce HG, Douglas KL, Moore JR (2003) A fire danger climatology for New Zealand. New Zealand Fire Service Commission, NZFSC Research Report number 39. (Wellington)
Pearce HG, Kerr JL, Clifford VR, Wakelin HM (2011) Fire climate severity across New Zealand. Scion, Rural Fire Research Group, Scion Client Report number 18264. (Christchurch)
Pielke RA Sr (2002) ‘Mesoscale Meteorological Modelling’, 2nd edn. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)
Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang XY, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-475. (Boulder, CO) Available at http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf [Verified 1 August 2013]
Stocks BJ, Alexander ME, Van Wagner CE, McAlpine RS, Lynham TJ, Dube DE (1989) The Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System: an overview. Forestry Chronicle 65, 450–457.
Van Wagner CE (1987) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Government of Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, Forestry Technical Report 35. (Ottawa, ON)
Van Wagner CE, Pickett TL (1985) Equations and FORTRAN program for the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Government of Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, Forestry Technical Report 33. Ottawa, ON)
White BG, Peagle J, Steenburgh WJ, Horel JD, Swanson RT, Cook LK, Onton DJ, Miles JG (1999) Short-term forecast validation of six models. Weather and Forecasting 14, 84–108.
| Short-term forecast validation of six models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wicker LJ, Skamarock WC (2002) Time splitting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes. Monthly Weather Review 130, 2088–2097.
| Time splitting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Physical Geography 2, 184–194.
Zeng X, Beljaars A (2005) A prognostic scheme of sea surface skin temperature for modeling and data assimilation. Geophysical Research Letters 32, L14605
| A prognostic scheme of sea surface skin temperature for modeling and data assimilation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
