Evaluating the ability of the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) to predict ecologically significant burn severity in Alaskan boreal forests
Karen A. Murphy A C , Joel H. Reynolds A and John M. Koltun BA US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Refuge System, 1011 E Tudor Road MS221, Anchorage, AK 99503, USA.
B Geographic Resource Solutions, Anchorage, AK 99503, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: Karen_A_Murphy@fws.gov
International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(4) 490-499 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08050
Submitted: 7 April 2008 Accepted: 6 May 2008 Published: 6 August 2008
Abstract
During the 2004 fire season ~6.6 million acres (~2.7 million ha) burned across Alaska. Nearly 2 million of these were on National Wildlife Refuge System lands inaccessible from the state’s limited road system. Many fires burned through September, driven by unusually warm and dry temperatures throughout the summer. Using several fires from this season, we assessed the national burn severity methodology’s performance on refuge lands. Six fires, spanning 814 489 acres (329 613 ha), were sampled on five boreal forest refuges. In total, 347 sites were sampled for vegetation composition and ground-based burn severity estimates following the national protocols. The relationship between the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) and composite burn index (CBI) was unexpectedly weak (R2adjusted, 0.11–0.64). The weak relationship was not a result of data or image processing errors, nor of any biotic or abiotic confounding variable. The inconsistent results, and dNBR’s limited ability to discern the ecologically significant differences within moderate and high severity burn sites, indicate that the current methodology does not satisfy key Alaskan boreal forest management objectives.
Additional keywords: Alaska, black spruce, composite burn index (CBI), fire effects, NBR, Picea, remote sensing, vegetation succession.
Acknowledgements
This has been a collaborative effort as multiple agencies and groups have worked with us to identify problems and discuss solutions. Some of the key individuals that have provided valuable assistance are Jennifer Allen and Brian Sorbel (National Park Service) who graciously shared data and ideas, Dave Verbyla (University of Alaska – Fairbanks), Eric Kasischke (University of Maryland), Merritt Turetsky (University of Michigan), and Nancy French (Michigan Technological University) who all shared preliminary results from their research. Stephen Howard, Randy McKinley, Zhi-Liang Zhu, and Jeffery Eidenshink of the EROS Data Center as well as Nate Benson (NPS) and Carl Key (Missoula Fire Laboratory) have been patient and helpful as we have encountered problems and looked for solutions. Finally, this project could not have been completed without Lisa Saperstein (Kanuti Refuge), Steve Kovach (Innoko Refuge), Merben Cebrian (Tetlin Refuge) and Michael Stefancic (intern) who were integral in data collection and in supporting this work. The manuscript was greatly improved in response to comments from two anonymous reviewers.
Allen JL , Sorbel B (2008) Assessing the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio’s ability to map burn severity in the boreal forest and tundra ecosystems of Alaska’s national parks. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 463–475.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cocke AE, Fule PZ , Crouse JE (2005) Comparison of burn severity assessments using differenced normalized burn ratio and ground data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 189–198.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Epting J, Verbyla D , Sorbel B (2005) Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environment 96, 328–339.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hall RJ, Freeburn JT, de Groot WJ, Pritchard JM, Lynham TJ , Landry R (2008) Remote sensing of burn severity: experience from western Canada boreal fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 476–489.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnstone JF , Chapin FS (2006) Effects of soil burn severity on post-fire tree recruitment in boreal forest. Ecosystems 9, 14–31.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lentile LB, Holden ZA, Smith AMS, Falkowski MJ, Hudak AT, Morgan P, Lewis SA, Gessler PE , Benson NC (2006) Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 319–345.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Osterkamp TE, Viereck L, Shur Y, Jorgenson MT, Racine C, Doyle A , Boone RD (2000) Observations of thermokarst and its impact on boreal forests in Alaska, USA. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 32((3)), 303–315.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roy DP, Boschetti L , Trigg SN (2006) Remote sensing of fire severity: assessing the performance of the normalized burn ratio. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 3((1)), 112–116.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith AMS, Wooster MJ, Drake NA, Dipotso FM, Falkowski MJ , Hudak AT (2005) Testing the potential of multi-spectral remote sensing for retrospectively estimating fire severity in African Savannahs. Remote Sensing of Environment 97, 92–115.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Cleve K, Dyrness CT, Viereck LA, Fox J, Chapin FS , Oechel W (1983) Taiga Ecosystems in Interior Alaska. Bioscience 33((1)), 39–44.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker LR, Zasada JC , Chapin FS (1986) The role of life history processes in primal succession on an Alaskan floodplain. Ecology 67((5)), 1243–1253.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |