Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Establishment of non-native plant species after wildfires: effects of fuel treatments, abiotic and biotic factors, and post-fire grass seeding treatments

Molly E. Hunter A C , Philip N. Omi A , Erik J. Martinson A and Geneva W. Chong A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

B USGS Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, P.O. Box 2353, 675 E. Broadway, Jackson, WY 83001, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: mhunter@cnr.colostate.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 15(2) 271-281 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF05074
Submitted: 8 August 2005  Accepted: 7 March 2006   Published: 31 May 2006

Abstract

Establishment and spread of non-native species following wildfires can pose threats to long-term native plant recovery. Factors such as disturbance severity, resource availability, and propagule pressure may influence where non-native species establish in burned areas. In addition, pre- and post-fire management activities may influence the likelihood of non-native species establishment. In the present study we examine the establishment of non-native species after wildfires in relation to native species richness, fire severity, dominant native plant cover, resource availability, and pre- and post-fire management actions (fuel treatments and post-fire rehabilitation treatments). We used an information-theoretic approach to compare alternative hypotheses. We analysed post-fire effects at multiple scales at three wildfires in Colorado and New Mexico. For large and small spatial scales at all fires, fire severity was the most consistent predictor of non-native species cover. Non-native species cover was also correlated with high native species richness, low native dominant species cover, and high seeded grass cover. There was a positive, but non-significant, association of non-native species with fuel-treated areas at one wildfire. While there may be some potential for fuels treatments to promote non-native species establishment, wildfire and post-fire seeding treatments seem to have a larger impact on non-native species.

Additional keywords: Colorado; New Mexico; ponderosa pine; prescribed fire; rehabilitation; thinning.


References


Abella SR , Covington WW (2004) Monitoring an Arizona ponderosa pine restoration: sampling efficiency and multivariate analysis of understory vegetation. Restoration Ecology  12, 359–367.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Allen CD (1989) Changes in the landscape of the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Armour CD, Bunting SC , Neuenschwander LF (1984) Fire intensity effects on the understory in ponderosa pine forests. Journal of Range Management  37, 44–49.
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) ‘Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edition.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Corbin JD , D’Antonio MD (2004) Competition between native perennial and exotic annual grasses: implications for a historical invasion. Ecology  8, 1273–1283.
DeBano LF, Neary DG, Ffolliott PF (1998) ‘Fire's effects on ecosystems.’ (John Wiley and Sons: New York)

ESRI (1999) ‘ArcView GIS software.’ (Environmental Systems Research Institute: Redlands, CA)

Fornwalt PJ, Kaufmann MR, Huckaby LS, Stoker JA , Stohlgren TJ (2003) Non-native plant invasions in managed and protected ponderosa pine Douglas-fir forests of the Colorado Front Range. Forest Ecology and Management  177, 515–527.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Robichaud PR, Beyers JL, Neary DG (2000) ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of postfire rehabilitation treatments.’ USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-63. (Fort Collins, CO)

Ryan KC, Naste NV (1985) Evaluating prescribed fires. In ‘Proceedings – symposium and workshop on wilderness fire’. pp. 230–238. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-182. (Ogden, UT)

SAS Institute (2001) ‘The SAS system for Windows.’ (SAS Institute, Inc.: Cary, NC)

Sieg CH, Phillips BG, Moser LP (2003) Exotic invasive plants. In ‘Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine forests’. (Ed. P Friederici) pp. 251–267. (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Smith MD , Knapp AK (1999) Exotic plant species in a C-4 dominated grassland: invasibility, disturbance and community structure. Oecologia  120, 605–612.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Swetnam TW, Baisan CH (1996) Historical fire regime patterns in the southwestern United States since AD 1700. In ‘Fire effects in southwestern forests – Proceedings of the second La Mesa fire symposium’. (Ed. CD Allen) pp. 11–32. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report RM-GTR-286. (Fort Collins, CO)

USDA NRCS (2006) The PLANTS Database, version 3.5. (National plant data center: Baton Rouge, LA) Available at http://plants.usda.gov [Verified October 2003]

Veblen TT, Lorenz DC (1991) ‘The Colorado Front Range: A century of ecological change.‘ (University of Utah Press: Salt Lake City)

Wagenbrenner JW (2003) Effectiveness of burned area emergency rehabilitation treatments, Colorado Front Range. M.S. Thesis, Colorado State University. (Fort Collins, CO)

Wienk CL, Sieg CH , McPherson GR (2004) Evaluating the role of cutting treatments, fire and soil seed banks in an experimental framework in ponderosa pine forests of the Black Hills, South Dakota. Forest Ecology and Management  192, 375–393.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |