Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF03067
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 13(4)

Living with fire: homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA

Kristen C. Nelson A D , Martha C. Monroe B , Jayne Fingerman Johnson C and Alison Bowers B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Forest Resources and Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, 115 Green Hall, 1530 Cleveland Ave. No., St Paul, MN 55108-6112, USA.

B School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, PO Box 110410, Gainesville, FL 32611-0410, USA. Telephone: +1 352 846 0878; fax: +1 352 846 1277; email: mcmonroe@ufl.edu

C Conservation Biology Graduate Program, University of Minnesota, 199 McNeal Hall, Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.

D Corresponding author. Telephone: +1 612 624 1277; fax: +1 612 625 5212; email: kcn@umn.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 13(4) 413-425 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF03067
Submitted: 16 September 2003  Accepted: 20 July 2004   Published: 15 December 2004

Abstract

Homeowners’ preferences for vegetation and defensible space near their homes were documented for wildfire-prone areas in Florida and Minnesota (USA) through 80 in-depth interviews and home site visits. The dominant preference for ‘natural’ landscapes was articulated as valuing vegetated views, wildlife, recreation, quiet, solitude, and privacy. Homeowners recognized wildfire risk but varied in their perceptions of effective wildfire prevention measures and willingness to take actions to reduce their risk. Most supported prescribed burns, especially if fire experts who understand the local ecology and fire behavior conduct the burns.

Additional keywords: fuel treatment preferences; homeowner behaviors; landscape preferences; vegetation reduction; wildfire; wildfire risk perception.


References


Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes  50, 179–211.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Heinselman M (1996) ‘The Boundary Waters Wilderness Ecosystem.’ (University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis)

Hodgson RW (1995) ‘Strategies for and barriers to public adoption of fire safe behavior.’ USDA Forest Service Report. pp. 93–98.

Jacobson SK, Monroe MC , Marynowski S (2001) Fire at the wildland urban interface: the influence of experience and mass media on public knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Wildlife Society Bulletin  29, 929–937.
Kellert SR (1996) ‘The value of life.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Koehler JT (1991) ‘The use of prescribed burning as a wildfire prevention tool.’ National Fire Academy Report. (Florida Division of Forestry: Orlando, FL) Available at http://flame.fl-dof.com/env/koehler.html [Verified 10 June 2004]

Lavin MJ (1997) Managing fire risk to people, structures, and the environment. Fire Management Notes  57, 4–6.
Machlis GE, Kaplan AB, Tuler SP, Bagby KA, McKendry JE (2002) ‘Burning questions: a social science research plan for federal wildland fire management.’ Report to the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. (College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho: Moscow, ID)

Macie EA, Hermansen LA (Eds) (2002) ‘Human influences on forest ecosystems: the southern wildland–urban interface assessment.’ USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station General Technical Report SNRS-55. (Asheville, NC)

Monroe M, Jacobson S, Marynowski S (1999) ‘Needs assessment report: Awareness and attitudes about fire in Florida.’ Report to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Available at www.sfrc.ufl.edu/Extension/needsurv.htm [Verified 10 January 2004]

Pyne S (1995) ‘World fire: the culture of fire on earth.’ (University of Washington Press: Seattle)

Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) ‘Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques.’ (Sage Publications: London)

Taylor JG , Daniel TC (1984) Prescribed fire: public education and perception. Journal of Forestry  82, 361–365.
US Forest Service (2001) ‘Firewise communities workshop participant booklet.’ Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Assessment Methodology. (U.S. Forest Service: Washington, DC)

Vining J, Daniel TC , Schroeder HW (1984) Predicting scenic values in forested residential landscapes. Journal of Leisure Research  16, 124–135.
Vogt C, Winter GJ, Fried JS (2003) Antecedents to attitudes toward prescribed burning, mechanical thinning, and defensible space fuel reduction techniques. In ‘People and wildfire. Proceedings from the 9th International Symposium on Society and Resource Management’. (Ed. Pam Jakes) pp. 74–83. (North Central Research Station: St Paul, MN)

Winter G , Fried JS (2000) Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland–urban interface. Society & Natural Resources  13, 33–49.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Winter GJ, Vogt C , Fried JS (2002) Fuel treatments at the wildland–urban interface, common concerns in diverse regions. Journal of Forestry  100, 15–21.