Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Intimate partner violence before and during the COVID-19 lockdown: findings from a cross-sectional study in Singapore

Caitlin Alsandria O’Hara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6171-1020 A * and Rayner Kay Jin Tan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-3368 B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

B University of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.

C Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

* Correspondence to: Caitlin.ohara@u.nus.edu

Handling Editor: Lisa McDaid

Sexual Health 19(3) 192-201 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH21229
Submitted: 23 November 2021  Accepted: 26 April 2022   Published: 31 May 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY)

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in lockdowns worldwide, with reports suggesting a concomitant increase in the incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV). This study was part of the International Sexual and Reproductive Health (I-SHARE) Consortium, examining IPV and its correlates before and during lockdown in April 2020.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study, conducted online during August–September 2020, recruited 259 participants from Singapore who reported having a steady partner. Alongside socio-demographic data before and during COVID-19 lockdown, the respondents self-reported their encounters with partner violence. Partner violence was measured using an adapted six-item version of the WHO IPV scale.

Results: Data revealed an incidence of 17.2%, 25.0%, 16.7%, 17.6%, 17.5% and 18.5% of restriction of contact with others, verbal abuse, restriction of access to finances, physical violence, pressured sex and forced sex, respectively, before COVID-19 lockdown. During lockdown, incidences of these forms of violence were 17.4%, 19.8%, 14.7%, 13.5%, 14.7% and 15.2%, respectively. Multivariable analyses showed that being younger, being non-heterosexual, and having more children and adolescents at home were significantly associated with partner violence both before and during lockdown. Analyses also revealed that being of Chinese ethnicity and having a monthly income above SGD3000 were not significantly correlated to partner violence before lockdown but emerged as significant during lockdown.

Conclusions: Some sociodemographic factors were associated with violence regardless of lockdown, while other factors were exacerbated by lockdown. Interventions should consider these key correlates of partner-based violence, ensuring adequate and appropriate support for vulnerable populations both within and outside of lockdown contexts.

Keywords: Asia, COVID-19, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, lockdown, relationships, sexual violence, Singapore.


References

[1]  Sri AS, Das P, Gnanapragasam S, Persaud A. COVID-19 and the violence against women and girls: ‘The shadow pandemic’. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2021; 67 971–973.
COVID-19 and the violence against women and girls: ‘The shadow pandemic’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33593144PubMed |

[2]  Walters J. COVID-19 shelter-at-home orders: impacts and policy responses in the context of intimate partner violence. World Med Health Policy 2020; 12 533–539.
COVID-19 shelter-at-home orders: impacts and policy responses in the context of intimate partner violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  World Health Organization. Intimate partner violence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/77432/WHO_RHR_12.36_eng.pdf [cited 22 October 2021]

[4]  World Health Organization. Prevention of violence: a public health priority. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/179463

[5]  Banjar O, Ford-Gilboe M, Wong C, Befus D, Alilyyani B. The association between intimate partner violence and functional gastrointestinal disorders and symptoms among adult women: systematic review. J Fam Viol 2022; 37 337–353.
The association between intimate partner violence and functional gastrointestinal disorders and symptoms among adult women: systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Salom CL, Williams GM, Najman JM, Alati R. Substance use and mental health disorders are linked to different forms of intimate partner violence victimisation. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015; 151 121–127.
Substance use and mental health disorders are linked to different forms of intimate partner violence victimisation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25841983PubMed |

[7]  Hess KL, Javanbakht M, Brown JM, Weiss RE, Hsu P, Gorbach PM. Intimate partner violence and sexually transmitted infections among young adult women. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39 366–371.
Intimate partner violence and sexually transmitted infections among young adult women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22504601PubMed |

[8]  Graham-Harrison E, Giuffrida A, Smith H, Ford L. Lockdowns around the world bring rise in domestic violence. The Guardian 2021; https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/28/lockdowns-world-rise-domestic-violence

[9]  Campbell L, Tucker J, Gabster A, Shamu S, Mark K, Olumide A,, et al. O18.5 comparison of intimate partner violence prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the I-SHARE cross-sectional multi-country study. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97 A59
O18.5 comparison of intimate partner violence prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the I-SHARE cross-sectional multi-country study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Lyons M, Brewer G. Experiences of intimate partner violence during lockdown and the COVID-19 pandemic. J Fam Violence 2021; 1–9.
Experiences of intimate partner violence during lockdown and the COVID-19 pandemic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33654343PubMed |

[11]  Peterman A, Potts A, O’Donnell M, Thompson K, Shah N, Oertelt-Prigione S, et al. Pandemics and violence against women and children. Center for Global Development; 2020. Available at https://www.cgdev.org/publication/pandemics-and-violence-against-women-and-children [cited 22 October 2021]

[12]  Roesch E, Amin A, Gupta J, García-Moreno C. Violence against women during covid-19 pandemic restrictions. BMJ 2020; 369 m1712
Violence against women during covid-19 pandemic restrictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32381644PubMed |

[13]  Hingorani S. Isolated with your abuser? Why COVID-19 outbreak has seen uptick in family violence. AWARE 2021; https://www.aware.org.sg/2020/03/isolated-with-your-abuser-why-covid-19-outbreak-has-seen-uptick-in-family-violence/

[14]  Government of Singapore. PM Lee’s address on the COVID-19 situation in Singapore (21 April 2020). Government of Singapore; 2021. Available at https://www.gov.sg/article/pm-lees-address-on-the-covid-19-situation-in-singapore-21-april-2020 [cited 30 October 2021]

[15]  Michielsen K, Larrson E, Kågesten A, Erausquin J, Griffin S, Van de Velde S, et al. International Sexual Health and REproductive Health (I-SHARE) survey during COVID-19: study protocol for online national surveys and global comparative analyses. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97 88–92.
International Sexual Health and REproductive Health (I-SHARE) survey during COVID-19: study protocol for online national surveys and global comparative analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33082232PubMed |

[16]  Singapore Department of Statistics. Key household income trends, 2020. Singapore: Singapore Department of Statistics; 2021. Available at https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/news/press080022021a.pdf [cited 22 October 2021]

[17]  Heise L, Hossain M. STRIVE technical brief: measuring intimate partner violence. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2017.

[18]  Spencer CM, Stith SM, Cafferky B. Risk markers for physical intimate partner violence victimization: a meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Behav 2019; 44 8–17.
Risk markers for physical intimate partner violence victimization: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Dank M, Lachman P, Zweig J, Yahner J. Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. J Youth Adolesc 2014; 43 846–857.
Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23861097PubMed |

[20]  Karney BR, Bradbury TN. The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, methods, and research. Psycholog Bull 1995; 118 3–34.
The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, methods, and research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Pietromonaco PR, Overall NC. Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. Am Psychologist 2021; 76 438–450.
Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Kolbe V, Büttner A. Domestic violence against men—prevalence and risk factors. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117 534–541.
Domestic violence against men—prevalence and risk factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33087241PubMed |

[23]  Singapore Department of Statistics. Singapore Department of Statistics – Singstat. 2020. Available at https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/publications/cop2020/sr2/findings2.pdf [cited 24 March 2022]

[24]  Ministry of Manpower, Singapore. Are Singaporeans working more remotely? Article: Impact of COVID-19: Remote Working in Singapore; 2022. Available at https://stats.mom.gov.sg/Pages/Impact-of-COVID-19-Remote-Working-in-Singapore.aspx [cited 24 March 2022]

[25]  Kaukinen C. When stay-at-home orders leave victims unsafe at home: exploring the risk and consequences of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Crim Justice 2020; 45 668–679.
When stay-at-home orders leave victims unsafe at home: exploring the risk and consequences of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32837152PubMed |

[26]  Gresham AM, Peters BJ, Karantzas G, Cameron LD, Simpson JA. Examining associations between COVID-19 stressors, intimate partner violence, health, and health behaviors. J Soc Pers Relatsh 2021; 38 2291–2307.
Examining associations between COVID-19 stressors, intimate partner violence, health, and health behaviors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Cafferky BM, Mendez M, Anderson JR, Stith SM. Substance use and intimate partner violence: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Violence 2018; 8 110–131.
Substance use and intimate partner violence: a meta-analytic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  Ang H. MSF launches 24-Hour domestic violence helpline for victims, public to seek help. Channel News Asia 2021; https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/msf-launches-24-hour-domestic-violence-helpline-victims-public-368891

[29]  Vives-Cases C, Parra-Casado DL, Estévez JF, Torrubiano-Domínguez J, Sanz-Barbero B.. Intimate partner violence against women during the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 4698
Intimate partner violence against women during the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33925021PubMed |

[30]  ACOG. Intimate Partner Violence. ACOG; 2021. Available at https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2012/02/intimate-partner-violence [cited 22 October 2021]

[31]  Bradley NL, DiPasquale AM, Dillabough K, Schneider PS. Health care practitioners’ responsibility to address intimate partner violence related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2020; 192 E609–E610.
Health care practitioners’ responsibility to address intimate partner violence related to the COVID-19 pandemic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32357996PubMed |