Management of sexually transmissible infections in the era of multiplexed molecular diagnostics: a primary care survey
Tal Brosh-Nissimov A B E , Ron Kedem B , Nimrod Ophir B , Omri Shental B , Nathan Keller C and Sharon Amit C DA The Infectious Disease Unit, Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua 7, Ashdod 7747629, Israel.
B Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Tel Hashomer, MilPOB 02149, Israel.
C The Department of Clinical Microbiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Haela 1, Ramat-Gan 5265601, Israel.
D The Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
E Corresponding author. Email: tbrosh@gmail.com
Sexual Health 15(4) 298-303 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH17190
Submitted: 11 October 2017 Accepted: 16 January 2018 Published: 30 April 2018
Abstract
Background: Data regarding sexually transmissible infections (STI) often originate from STI clinics, screening programs or laboratory-based studies, thus are biased for specific risk groups or lack clinical details. This real-life observational study presents sample data of most young adult Israeli population by exploiting the centralised diagnostic and documentation platforms resulting from a mandatory military service at the age of 18 years for both genders. Methods: All STI diagnoses of Israeli Defence Forces soldiers during a 6-month period were reviewed. Patients with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) (major-STI) and Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU), Ureaplasma parvum (UP) and Mycoplasma hominis (MH) (equivocal STI) were compared with STI-negative controls. Results: Sexually transmissible infection positivity rates (n = 2816) were as follows: CT 6.6%; MG 1.9%; NG 0.7%; TV 0.5%; UU 15.7%; UP 28.2%; and MH 6.2%. The CT+MG coinfection rate was 4.1%, yet CT+NG coinfections were rare (≈0.5%). More than half of the patients with ureaplasmas and/or MH were treated; 40% of them were recommended partner treatment. Most antibiotics were prescribed to patients with equivocal infections. Classic STI symptoms in males were linked to major-STI and UU, while females were asymptomatic or presented non-specific symptoms. Conclusions: The judicious use of antibiotics in the era of antimicrobial resistance necessitates re-evaluating the significance of equivocal pathogen detection and reporting (MH, UU, UP). Likewise, universal empiric treatment for NG should be reconsidered in light of its low rates in non-high-risk groups. Conversely, a high MG rate, a pathogen with potential resistance to common STI protocols, requires evaluation of guidelines adequacy.
Additional keywords: empiric therapy, epidemiology, ureaplasma, Mycoplasma, Chlamydia.
References
[1] Bamberger ES, Siegler E, Makler-Shiran E, Patel MV, Steinberg JM, Gershtein R, Srugo I. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female soldiers, Israel. Emerg Infect Dis 2003; 9 1344–6.| Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female soldiers, Israel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Brosh-Nissimov T, Mor Z, Avramovich E, Katchman E, Avidor B, Mor O, Turner D. Syphilis outbreak among men who have sex with men, Tel Aviv, Israel 2008–2009. Isr Med Assoc J 2012; 14 152–6.
[3] Mor Z, Shohat T, Goor Y, Dan M. Risk behaviors and sexually transmitted diseases in gay and heterosexual men attending an STD clinic in Tel Aviv, Israel: a cross-sectional study. Isr Med Assoc J 2012; 14 147–51.
[4] Gottesman T, Yossepowitch O, Samra Z, Rosenberg S, Dan M. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in men with urethritis and in high risk asymptomatic males in Tel Aviv: a prospective study. Int J STD AIDS 2016; 28 127–32.
| Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in men with urethritis and in high risk asymptomatic males in Tel Aviv: a prospective study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Chemtob D, Zenilman JM, Gandacu D. What do we need to learn for policy decision-making on sexually transmitted infections prevention and treatment in Israel? Int J STD AIDS 2012; 23 e11–5.
| What do we need to learn for policy decision-making on sexually transmitted infections prevention and treatment in Israel?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3s%2Fit1ertQ%3D%3D&md5=b8bf58d233b3be3a3057b4c02585dc6eCAS |
[6] Miller WC, Siripong N. Estimates of sexually transmitted infection prevalence and incidence in the United States: time to embrace uncertainty. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40 194–6.
| Estimates of sexually transmitted infection prevalence and incidence in the United States: time to embrace uncertainty.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64 1–137.
| Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Bignell C, Unemo M. 2012 European guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults. Int J STD AIDS 2013; 24 85–92.
| 2012 European guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2czivV2qsw%3D%3D&md5=ff7b71a55c4ed8e98913bc42097210e7CAS |
[9] World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of sexually transmitted diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
[10] Sequeira S, Morgan JR, Fagan M, Hsu KK, Drainoni ML. Evaluating quality of care for sexually transmitted infections in different clinical settings. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42 717–24.
| Evaluating quality of care for sexually transmitted infections in different clinical settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Schneider H, Chabikuli N, Blaauw D, Funani I, Brugha R. Sexually transmitted infections – factors associated with quality of care among private general practitioners. S Afr Med J 2005; 95 782–5.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnlvFShtQ%3D%3D&md5=5f283e623dc8f2cdcb6ba73f5f56c0afCAS |
[12] Patel MA, Nyirjesy P. Role of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma species in female lower genital tract infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2010; 12 417–22.
| Role of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma species in female lower genital tract infections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Wetmore CM, Manhart LE, Lowens MS, Golden MR, Jensen NL, Astete SG, Whittington WLH, Totten PA. Ureaplasma urealyticum is associated with nongonococcal urethritis among men with fewer lifetime sexual partners: a case-control study. J Infect Dis 2011; 204 1274–82.
| Ureaplasma urealyticum is associated with nongonococcal urethritis among men with fewer lifetime sexual partners: a case-control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Zhang N, Wang R, Li X, Liu X, Tang Z, Liu Y. Are Ureaplasma spp. a cause of nongonococcal urethritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9 e113771
| Are Ureaplasma spp. a cause of nongonococcal urethritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Daley GM, Russell DB, Tabrizi SN, McBride J. Mycoplasma genitalium: a review. Int J STD AIDS 2014; 25 475–87.
| Mycoplasma genitalium: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2cvjvFSruw%3D%3D&md5=3bce04e0ff94cb2a69baf5dca24b7844CAS |