How can university sexual health promotion events reach those most at risk? A cross-sectional study
Matthew E. Dunn A B and Merryn McKinnon A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University, Peter Baume Building #42A, Linnaeus Way, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email matthew.dunn@anu.edu.au
Sexual Health 15(4) 304-311 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH16228
Submitted: 20 September 2016 Accepted: 19 January 2018 Published: 22 May 2018
Abstract
Background: The rate of notifications of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) in Australians has increased dramatically, especially in those aged 16–30 years. This age bracket, typical of university students, is the most likely to report multiple sexual partners in the previous year. Individuals who have sex with multiple partners in a year have a significantly increased chance of contracting an STI, making them an important audience for sexual health promotion. This study aimed to determine how university sexual health promotion events can better reach this higher-risk subset of the population. Methods: Two anonymous cross-sectional surveys were used to understand current and ideal sexual health promotion events through the perspectives of student leaders (n = 62) and general university students (n = 502). Results: Students who had more than one sexual partner in the previous year (the higher-risk group) made up 22.7% of the students sampled. Higher-risk students differed substantially from lower-risk students in terms of preferred event types, incentives and topics to be covered, often prioritising those rarely used in current university sexual health events. Conclusion: While current university sexual health events include some features that align with student priorities, elements beyond sexual health information, such as social activity, alcohol incentives and on-site sexual health testing, can be helpful tools to attract students with higher numbers of sexual partners.
References
[1] Australian Government Department of Health. Third National Sexually Transmissible Infections Strategy 2014–2017. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2014. Available online at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ohp-bbvs-sti [verified 15 March 2015].[2] Family Planning NSW. Reproductive and sexual health in Australia. Sydney: Family Planning NSW; 2013. Available online at: https://www.fpnsw.org.au/sites/default/files/assets/rshinaust_book_webedition_1.pdf [verified 13 June 2014].
[3] Commonwealth Youth Programme. Australian Youth Development Index: a jurisdictional overview of youth development. Sydney: Commonwealth Youth Programme; 2016. Available online at: http://www.youthaction.org.au/australian_ydi [verified 2 March 2017].
[4] Ali H, Guy RJ, Fairley CK, Wand H, Chen MY, Dickson B, O’Connor CC, Marshall L, Grulich AE, Kaldor JM, Hellard ME, Donovan B. Understanding trends in genital Chlamydia trachomatis can benefit from enhanced surveillance: findings from Australia. Sex Transm Infect 2012; 88 552–7.
| Understanding trends in genital Chlamydia trachomatis can benefit from enhanced surveillance: findings from Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Aghaizu A, Atherton H, Hay S, Taylor-Robinson D, Simms I, Hay P. Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial. BMJ 2010; 340 1642–1649.
| Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Wiltshire K, Donnelly K. Review of the Australian Curriculum Final Report. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education and Training; 2014. Available online at: http://docs.education.gov.au/node/36269 [verified 6 May 2016].
[7] Australian Government Department of Education and Training. Selected Higher Education Statistics – 2013 Student Data. 2013 Student Summary. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education and Training; 2014. Available online at: http://www.education.gov.au/selected-higher-education-statistics-2013-student-data [verified 22 February 2015].
[8] Simpson S, Clifford C, Ross K, Sefton N, Owen L, Blizzard L, Turner R. Sexual health literacy of the student population of the University of Tasmania: results of the RUSSL Study. Sex Health 2015; 12 207–16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928047
| Sexual health literacy of the student population of the University of Tasmania: results of the RUSSL Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Grulich AE, de Visser RO, Badcock PB, Smith A, Richters J, Rissel C, Simpson JM. Knowledge about and experience of sexually transmissible infections in a representative sample of adults: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Sex Health 2014; 11 481–94. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377001
| Knowledge about and experience of sexually transmissible infections in a representative sample of adults: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Yeung AH, Temple-Smith M, Fairley CK, Vaisey AM, Guy R, Law MG, Low N, Bingham AL, Gunn J, Kaldor J, Donovan B, Hocking JS. Chlamydia prevalence in young attenders of rural and regional primary care services in Australia: a cross-sectional survey. Med J Aust 2014; 200 170–5.
| Chlamydia prevalence in young attenders of rural and regional primary care services in Australia: a cross-sectional survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Rissel C, Badcock PB, Smith AMA, Richters J, de Visser RO, Grulich AE, Simpson JM. Heterosexual experience and recent heterosexual encounters among Australian adults: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Sex Health 2014; 11 416–26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376995
| Heterosexual experience and recent heterosexual encounters among Australian adults: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Australian Government Department of Education and Training. Higher education enrolment tables 2015. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education and Training; 2016. Available online at: https://docs.education.gov.au/node/41696 [verified 20 September 2016].
[13] Wiederman MW. Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. J Sex Res 1999; 36 59–66.
| Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Downing-Matibag TM, Geisinger B. Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: a health belief model perspective. Qual Health Res 2009; 19 1196–209.
| Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: a health belief model perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Hickey MT, Cleland C. Sexually transmitted infection risk perception among female college students. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2013; 25 377–84. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24170621
| Sexually transmitted infection risk perception among female college students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings. Risk Anal 2004; 24 311–22.
| Risk as analysis and risk as feelings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Currie MJ, Schmidt M, Davis BK, Baynes AM, O’Keefe EJ, Bavinton TP, McNiven M,, Martin SJ, Bowden FJ. “Show me the money”: financial incentives increase chlamydia screening rates among tertiary students: a pilot study. Sex Health 2010; 7 60–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20152098
| “Show me the money”: financial incentives increase chlamydia screening rates among tertiary students: a pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Gold J, Hocking J, Hellard M. The feasibility of recruiting young men in rural areas from community football clubs for STI screening. Aust N Z J Public Health 2007; 31 243–6.
| The feasibility of recruiting young men in rural areas from community football clubs for STI screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Wilcox P, Winn S, Fyvie‐Gauld M. “It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people”: the role of social support in the first‐year experience of higher education. Stud High Educ 2005; 30 707–22.
| “It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people”: the role of social support in the first‐year experience of higher education.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] The Equality Rights Alliance’s Young Women’s Advisory Group (YWAG). Let’s talk: young women’s views on sex education. Canberra: Equality Rights Alliance; 2015. p. 4. Available online at: http://equalityrightsalliance.org.au/projects/lets-talk-young-womens-views-sex-education [verified 20 September 2016].
[21] Giordano M, Ross A. Let’s talk about sex: young people’s views on sex and sexual health information in Australia. Surry Hills: Australian Youth Affairs Coalition; 2012. Available online at: http://www.ayac.org.au/news/158/81/Support-for-overhaul-of-sex-education-in-Australian-schools.html [verified 20 September 2016].
[22] World Health Organization. Defining sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002. Geneva: WHO; 2006. Available online at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/gender_rights/defining_sexual_health.pdf [verified 7 April 2014].
[23] de Visser R, Smith A, Richters J. Can we generalise to other young people from studies of sexual risk behaviour among university students? Aust N Z J Public Health 2005; 29 436–41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16255445
| Can we generalise to other young people from studies of sexual risk behaviour among university students?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
