HIV results by phone: can we predict who will test HIV-negative?
Simon Wright A C , Nathan Ryder A B and Anna M. McNulty A BA Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, GPO Box 1614, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia.
B School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2031, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: simon.wright@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au
Sexual Health 7(4) 417-419 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09151
Submitted: 23 December 2009 Accepted: 23 February 2010 Published: 10 November 2010
Abstract
Introduction: In order to review the requirement for all patients to return for HIV test results, we sought to describe the number of cases of HIV infection detected at Sydney Sexual Health Centre among people who did not disclose known risk factors before testing. Method: The clinic database identified all HIV testing episodes between January 2004 and January 2007, along with gender, gender of sexual partners and test result. Pro-forma medical records were reviewed for each person who tested positive for gender of sexual partners, condom use, and sexual contact with a person from a country known to have a high HIV prevalence and injecting drug use. Results: During the 3-year period, a total of 13 290 HIV tests were performed. In men who have sex with men, 6194 tests were performed and 55 (0.88%) tested positive. In women and heterosexual men 7096 tests were performed, and only four (0.06%) tested positive. All four reported known risks for HIV before testing. Conclusion: Clients with no recognised risk factors for HIV are unlikely to test positive at our Australian sexual health clinic. Providing the option for low risk people to obtain their results other than face to face has advantages for both the clinic in terms of service provision and the clients in terms of time and the proportion who receive their result.
Additional keywords: low risk, telephone.
[1]
[2]
[3] CDC Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings 2006. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006; 55 1–14.
[4] Spielberg F, Branson B, Goldbaum GM, Lockhart D, Kurth A, Celum CL, et al. Overcoming barriers to HIV testing: preferences for new strategies among clients of a needle exchange, a sexually transmitted disease clinic, and sex venues for men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 32 318–27.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[5] Wilson DP, Hoare A, Regan DG, Law MG. Importance of promoting HIV testing for preventing secondary transmissions: modelling the Australian HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men. Sex Health 2009; 6 19–33.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[6]
[7] Chan E, McNulty A, Tribe K. Who returns for HIV screening test results? Int J STD AIDS 2007; 18 171–4.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[8] Weinhardt LS, Carey MP, Johnson BT, Bickham NL. Effects of HIV counselling and testing on sexual risk behaviour: a meta-analytic review of published research, 1985–1997. Am J Public Health 1999; 89 1397–405.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
[9] Ngo-Metzger Q. Breaking bad news over the phone. Am Fam Physician 2009; 80 520.
| PubMed |
[10] Wright SJ, Kell PD, Tobin R, Breen E. Review of policy change regarding how patients access their HIV test results at two genitourinary medicine services in Central London. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 753–4.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
[11] Baggaley RF, White RG, Boily MC. Systematic review of orogenital HIV-1 transmission probabilities. Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37 1255–65.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[12] Jin F, Crawford J, Prestage GP, Zablotska I, Imrie J, Kippax SC, et al. Unprotected anal intercourse, risk reduction behaviours, and subsequent HIV infection in a cohort of homosexual men. AIDS 2009; 23 243–52.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[13] Volk JE, Prestage G, Jin F, Kaldor J, Ellard J, Kippax S, et al. Risk factors for HIV seroconversion in homosexual men in Australia. Sex Health 2006; 3 45–51.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |