Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Individual, familial and extra-familial factors associated with premarital sex among Bangladeshi male adolescents

Nan Li A C and Marc Boulay B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

B Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: nli@jhsph.edu

Sexual Health 7(4) 471-477 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09108
Submitted: 30 September 2009  Accepted: 7 June 2010   Published: 10 November 2010

Abstract

Background: A national survey found that more than one-tenth of unmarried Bangladeshi adolescents were sexually experienced and much of this experience involves high-risk behaviours such as unprotected sexual intercourse with commercial sex workers. However, very few studies have explored the factors that contribute to premarital sex among Bangladeshi adolescents. Methods: Data are from the 2004 Adolescent Reproductive Health Communication Midline Survey, a national survey in Bangladesh. Multivariate statistical methods were applied to identify risk and protective factors for premarital sex among Bangladeshi male adolescents. Results: Among 1048 unmarried males between ages of 15 and 19 years, 12.8% reported ever having had sex. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that, in terms of the self system, having plans to study in the future were associated with a lower risk of engaging in premarital sex (odds ratio (OR) = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.25–0.59) while knowledge of reproductive health and life skills did not have a strong influence. Strong influences of both familial and extra-familial system were observed. Respect for parents’ values and beliefs about sex was associated with decreased odds of premarital sex (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.26–0.59). ‘Ever talked with friends about sex-related issues’ was associated with threefold increased odds and an increase in peer influence score was associated with increased odds of premarital sex. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that premarital sex among Bangladeshi male adolescents was influenced by numerous factors, and they should be taken into account in programs aiming to delay the age of sexual debut.

Additional keywords: teenagers, sexual behaviour, sexual debut.


References


[1] National Institute of Population Research and Training. Bangladesh demographic and health survey. Dhaka: NIPORT and Mitra Associates; 2004.

[2] Caldwell B,  Pieris I,  Caldwell J,  Caldwell P. Sexual regimes and sexual networking: the risk of an HIV/AIDS epidemic in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48 1103–16.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified July 2010].

[27] StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 9. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2005.

[28] Regnerus MD. Talking about sex: religion and patterns of parent–child communication about sex and contraception. Sociol Q 2005; 46 79–105.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29] Becker GS . Human capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993.

[30] Driscoll AK,  Sugland BW,  Manlove J. Community opportunity, perceptions of opportunity, and the odds of an adolescent birth. Youth Soc 2005; 37 33–61.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31] Mwambete KD,  Mtaturu Z. Knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases among secondary school students in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Afr Health Sci 2006; 6 165–9.
PubMed |

[32] Hutchinson MK,  Jemmott JB,  Jemmott LS,  Braverman P,  Fong GT. Role of mother–daughter sexual risk communication in reducing sexual risk behaviors among urban adolescent females: a prospective study. J Adolesc Health 2003; 33 98–107.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[33] Forehand R,  Wierson M. The role of developmental factors in planning behavioral interventions for children: disruptive behavior as an example. Behav Ther 1993; 24 117–41.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |