Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Testing multichambered bat box designs in a habitat-offset area in eastern Australia: influence of material, colour, size and box host

Niels Rueegger https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-4183 A C , Ross Goldingay A , Brad Law B and Leroy Gonsalves B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.

B Forest Science, New South Wales Primary Industries, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: niels_ruegger@hotmail.com

Pacific Conservation Biology 26(1) 13-21 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18092
Submitted: 25 December 2018  Accepted: 3 March 2019   Published: 16 April 2019

Abstract

Bat boxes are frequently used as conservation and habitat-offset measures, yet their effectiveness is equivocal, particularly in Australia. Boxes used in Australia are largely voluminous-type boxes with Chalinolobus gouldii (Gould’s wattled bat) frequently dominating their use. We tested multichambered boxes comprising fissure-type cavities made from either plywood (~20 000 cm3) or woodcement (~7400 cm3). We investigated whether occupancy was influenced by box colour (white boxes facing morning sun versus black boxes facing afternoon sun), box material/size, chamber width (15 mm versus 20 mm) and box host (tree versus pole). Boxes were monitored over 1.8 years. Overall, 245 bat observations were recorded. Boxes were frequently used (15% of 1088 box checks) by Nyctophilus geoffroyi (lesser long-eared bat), a species uncommonly reported to use boxes, which used 50 of the 64 boxes (78%), including for maternity roosting (n = 6). In comparison, C. gouldii was rarely detected (1% of box checks). Two other species were also found in boxes at low frequencies. Modelling showed a preference by N. geoffroyi for black boxes, the larger plywood box and boxes installed on poles. Fissure-type boxes appear to meet the roost requirements of N. geoffroyi but not that of C. gouldii, the species principally detected in voluminous-type boxes and postulated to gain a competitive advantage. The black woodcement box was the second most frequently used design, demonstrating that this long-lasting box material can be a suitable alternative to the less durable plywood material. Given that just one species commonly used boxes, there is a need for further research on box designs.

Additional keywords: artificial hollows, biodiversity offset area, hollow-bearing tree offset, roost box, tree cavity-roosting bat.


References

Adams, M., Law, B., and Gibson, M. (2010). Reliable automation of bat call identification for eastern New South Wales, Australia, using classification trees and AnaScheme software. Acta Chiropterologica 12, 231–245.
Reliable automation of bat call identification for eastern New South Wales, Australia, using classification trees and AnaScheme software.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Altwegg, R., Jenkins, A., and Abad, F. (2014). Nestboxes and immigration drive the growth of an urban peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus population. The Ibis 156, 107–115.
Nestboxes and immigration drive the growth of an urban peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baranauskas, K. (2009). The use of bat boxes of two models by Nathusius’ pipistrelle (Pipistrellus nathusii) in southeastern Lithuania. Acta Zoologica Lituanica 19, 3–9.
The use of bat boxes of two models by Nathusius’ pipistrelle (Pipistrellus nathusii) in southeastern Lithuania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baranauskas, K. (2010). Diversity and abundance of bats (Chiroptera) found in bat boxes in east Lithuania. Acta Zoologica Lituanica 20, 39–44.
Diversity and abundance of bats (Chiroptera) found in bat boxes in east Lithuania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bender, R. (2011). Bat roost boxes at Organ Pipes National Park, Victoria: seasonal and annual usage patterns. In ‘The Biology and Conservation of Australasian Bats’. (Eds B. Law, P. Eby, D. Lunney, and L. Lumsden.) pp. 443–459. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Bender, R., and Irvine, R. (2001). Bat boxes at Organ Pipes National Park. Australasian Bat Society Newsletter 16, 19–23.

Beyer, G. L., and Goldingay, R. L. (2006). The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials. Wildlife Research 33, 161–174.
The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bideguren, G., López-Baucells, A., Puig-Montserrat, X., Mas, M., Porres, X., and Flaquer, C. (2019). Bat boxes and climate change: testing the risk of over-heating in the Mediterranean region. Biodiversity and Conservation 28, 21–35.
Bat boxes and climate change: testing the risk of over-heating in the Mediterranean region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calder, T., Golding, B., and Manderson, A. (1983). Management for arboreal species in the Wombat State Forest. Environmental Report No. 16. Melbourne.

Churchill, S. (2009). ‘Australian Bats.’ (Holland Publishers: Sydney.)

Corrigan, R. M., Scrimgeour, G. J., and Paszkowski, C. (2011). Nest boxes facilitate local-scale conservation of common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula) and bufflehead (Bucephala albeola) in Alberta, Canada. Avian Conservation & Ecology , .
Nest boxes facilitate local-scale conservation of common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula) and bufflehead (Bucephala albeola) in Alberta, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cox, D. (1958). The regression analysis of binary sequences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 20, 215–232.
The regression analysis of binary sequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doty, A. C., Stawski, C., Currie, S. E., and Geiser, F. (2016). Black or white? Physiological implications of roost colour and choice in a microbat. Journal of Thermal Biology 60, 162–170.
Black or white? Physiological implications of roost colour and choice in a microbat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27503729PubMed |

Evans, L., and Lumsden, L. (2011). Comparison of the roosting behaviour of Gould’s wattled bats Chalinolobus gouldii using bat boxes and tree hollows in suburban Melbourne. In ‘The Biology and Conservation of Australasian Bats’. (Eds B. Law, P. Eby, D. Lunney, and L. Lumsden.) pp. 288–296. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Flaquer, C., Torre, I., and Ruiz-Jarillo, R. (2006). The value of bat-boxes in the conservation of Pipistrellus pygmaeus in wetland rice paddies. Biological Conservation 128, 223–230.
The value of bat-boxes in the conservation of Pipistrellus pygmaeus in wetland rice paddies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flaquer, C., Puig, X., López-Baucells, A., Torre, I., Freixas, L., Mas, M., Porres, X., and Arrizabalaga, A. (2014). Could overheating turn bat boxes into death traps? Barbastella 7, 46–53.

Fletcher, C. A. (2014). Bats, birds and boxes in an urban bushland matrix. B.Sc.(Honours) Thesis, University of Sydney.

Geiser, F., and Brigham, R. M. (2000). Torpor, thermal biology, and energetics in Australian long-eared bats (Nyctophilus). Journal of Comparative Physiology. B, Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology 170, 153–162.
Torpor, thermal biology, and energetics in Australian long-eared bats (Nyctophilus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10791575PubMed |

Goldingay, R. L., and Stevens, J. (2009). Use of artificial tree hollows by Australian birds and bats. Wildlife Research 36, 81–97.
Use of artificial tree hollows by Australian birds and bats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goldingay, R. L., Grimson, M. J., and Smith, G. C. (2007). Do feathertail gliders show a preference for nest box design? Wildlife Research 34, 484–490.
Do feathertail gliders show a preference for nest box design?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goldingay, R. L., Rueegger, N. N., Grimson, M. J., and Taylor, B. D. (2015). Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity-dependent arboreal mammals. Restoration Ecology 23, 482–490.
Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity-dependent arboreal mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goldingay, R. L., Thomas, K., and Shanty, D. (2018). Outcomes of decades long installation of nest boxes for arboreal mammals in southern Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration 19, 204–211.
Outcomes of decades long installation of nest boxes for arboreal mammals in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffiths, S. R., Bender, R., Godinho, L. N., Lentini, P. E., Lumsden, L. F., and Robert, K. A. (2017). Bat boxes are not a silver bullet conservation tool. Mammal Review 47, 261–265.
Bat boxes are not a silver bullet conservation tool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffiths, S., Lentini, P., Semmens, K., Watson, S., Lumsden, L., and Robert, K. (2018a). Chainsaw-carved cavities better mimic the thermal properties of natural tree hollows than nest boxes and log hollows. Forests 9, 235.
Chainsaw-carved cavities better mimic the thermal properties of natural tree hollows than nest boxes and log hollows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffiths, S., Lumsden, L., Bender, R., Irvine, R., Godinho, L., Visintin, C., Eastick, D., Robert, K., and Lentini, P. (2018b). Long-term monitoring suggests bat boxes may alter local bat community structure. Australian Mammalogy , .
Long-term monitoring suggests bat boxes may alter local bat community structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hackethal, H., and Oldenburg, W. (1983). Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Einsatz modifizierter FS1-Kästen in Waren-Ecktannen und in der Nossentiner Heide. Nyctalus 1, 513–514.

Heise, G., and Blohm, T. (2012). Arbeit mit Fledermauskästen – sinnvoll oder nicht. Nyctalus 17, 226–239.

Hoeh, J. P., Bakken, G. S., Mitchell, W. A., and O’Keefe, J. M. (2018). In artificial roost comparison, bats show preference for rocket box style. PLoS One 13, .
In artificial roost comparison, bats show preference for rocket box style.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30379849PubMed |

Kavanagh, R., Law, B., Lemckert, F., Stanton, M., Chidel, M., Brassil, T., Towerton, A., and Penman, T. (2010). Conservation value of eucalypt plantations established for wood production and multiple environmental benefits in agricultural landscapes. Final report for NAP/NHT2 Eucalypt Plantations Project SLA 0013 R3 NAP. NSW Industry and Investment.

Kerth, G., Weissmann, K., and König, B. (2001). Day roost selection in female Bechstein’s bats (Myotis bechsteinii): a field experiment to determine the influence of roost temperature. Oecologia 126, 1–9.
Day roost selection in female Bechstein’s bats (Myotis bechsteinii): a field experiment to determine the influence of roost temperature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28547427PubMed |

Larson, E. R., Eastwood, J. R., Buchanan, K. L., Bennett, A. T., and Berg, M. (2018). Nest box design for a changing climate: the value of improved insulation. Ecological Management & Restoration 19, 39–48.
Nest box design for a changing climate: the value of improved insulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, D., Tanton, M., and Cunningham, R. (1991). A critique of the use of nest boxes required for the conservation of Leadbeater’s possum. Wildlife Research 18, 619–624.
A critique of the use of nest boxes required for the conservation of Leadbeater’s possum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, D. B., Welsh, A., Donnelly, C., Crane, M., Michael, D., Macgregor, C., McBurney, L., Montague-Drake, R., and Gibbons, P. (2009). Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition. Biological Conservation 142, 33–42.
Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, D. B., Crane, M., Evans, M. C., Maron, M., Gibbons, P., Bekessy, S., and Blanchard, W. (2017). The anatomy of a failed offset. Biological Conservation 210, 286–292.
The anatomy of a failed offset.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lourenço, S. I., and Palmeirim, J. M. (2004). Influence of temperature in roost selection by Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Chiroptera): relevance for the design of bat boxes. Biological Conservation 119, 237–243.
Influence of temperature in roost selection by Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Chiroptera): relevance for the design of bat boxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lumsden, L., and Bennett, A. (2006). Flexibility and specificity in the roosting ecology of the lesser long-eared bat, Nyctophilus geoffroyi: a common and widespread Australian species. In ‘Functional and Evolutionary Ecology of Bats’. (Eds A. Zubaid, G. McCracken, and T. Kunz.) pp. 290–307. (Oxford University Press: New York.)

Lumsden, L. F., Bennett, A. F., and Silins, J. E. (2002). Selection of roost sites by the lesser long-eared bat (Nyctophilus geoffroyi) and Gould’s wattled bat (Chalinolobus gouldii) in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Zoology 257, 207–218.
Selection of roost sites by the lesser long-eared bat (Nyctophilus geoffroyi) and Gould’s wattled bat (Chalinolobus gouldii) in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maziarz, M., Broughton, R. K., and Wesołowski, T. (2017). Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: implications for hole-nesting birds. Forest Ecology and Management 389, 306–313.
Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: implications for hole-nesting birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meddings, A., Taylor, S., Batty, L., Green, R., and Latham, D. (2011). Managing competition between birds and bats for roost boxes in small woodlands, north-east England. Conservation Evidence 8, 74–80.

Racey, P. A. (1973). Environmental factors affecting the length of gestation in heterothermic bats. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 19, 175–189.
| 4522371PubMed |

Rhodes, M., and Jones, D. (2011). The use of bat boxes by insectivorous bats and other fauna in the greater Brisbane region. In ‘The Biology and Conservation of Australasian Bats’. (Eds B. Law, P. Eby, D. Lunney, and L. Lumsden.) pp. 424–442. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Rueegger, N. (2016). Bat boxes – a review of their use and application, past, present and future. Acta Chiropterologica 18, 279–299.
Bat boxes – a review of their use and application, past, present and future.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rueegger, N. (2017). Artificial tree hollow creation for cavity-using wildlife: trialling an alternative method to that of nest boxes. Forest Ecology and Management 405, 404–412.
Artificial tree hollow creation for cavity-using wildlife: trialling an alternative method to that of nest boxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rueegger, N. (2019). Variation in summer and winter microclimate in multi-chambered bat boxes in eastern Australia: potential eco-physiological implications for bats. Environments 6, 13.
Variation in summer and winter microclimate in multi-chambered bat boxes in eastern Australia: potential eco-physiological implications for bats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rueegger, N., Goldingay, R. L., Law, B., and Gonsalves, L. (2018). Limited use of bat boxes in a rural landscape: implications for offsetting the clearing of hollow‐bearing trees. Restoration Ecology , .
Limited use of bat boxes in a rural landscape: implications for offsetting the clearing of hollow‐bearing trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russo, D., and Ancillotto, L. (2015). Sensitivity of bats to urbanization: a review. Mammalian Biology 80, 205–212.
Sensitivity of bats to urbanization: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scanlon, A. T., and Petit, S. (2008). Effects of site, time, weather and light on urban bat activity and richness: considerations for survey effort. Wildlife Research 35, 821–834.
Effects of site, time, weather and light on urban bat activity and richness: considerations for survey effort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, G. C., and Agnew, G. (2002). The value of ‘bat boxes’ for attracting hollow-dependent fauna to farm forestry plantations in southeast Queensland. Ecological Management & Restoration 3, 37–46.
The value of ‘bat boxes’ for attracting hollow-dependent fauna to farm forestry plantations in southeast Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Spring, D. A., Bevers, M., Kenedy, J., and Harley, D. (2001). Economics of a nest-box program for the conservation of an endangered species: a reappraisal. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 1992–2003.
Economics of a nest-box program for the conservation of an endangered species: a reappraisal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stebbings, R. E., and Walsh, S. T. (1991). ‘Bat-Boxes: a Guide to the History, Function, Construction and Use in the Conservation of Bats.’ 3rd edn. (Bat Conservation Trust: London.)

Threlfall, C., Law, B., and Banks, P. (2012). Sensitivity of insectivorous bats to urbanisation: implications for suburban conservation planning. Biological Conservation 146, 41–52.
Sensitivity of insectivorous bats to urbanisation: implications for suburban conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tidemann, C., and Flavel, S. (1987). Factors affecting choice of diurnal roost site by tree-hole bats (Microchiroptera) in south-eastern Australia. Wildlife Research 14, 459–473.
Factors affecting choice of diurnal roost site by tree-hole bats (Microchiroptera) in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Traill, B. J., and Lill, A. (1997). Use of tree hollows by two sympatric gliding possums, the squirrel glider, Petaurus norfolcensis and the sugar glider, P. breviceps. Australian Mammalogy 20, 79–88.

Turbill, C., and Geiser, F. (2006). Thermal physiology of pregnant and lactating female and male long-eared bats, Nyctophilus geoffroyi and N. gouldi. Journal of Comparative Physiology. B, Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology 176, 165–172.
Thermal physiology of pregnant and lactating female and male long-eared bats, Nyctophilus geoffroyi and N. gouldi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16331479PubMed |

Turbill, C., and Geiser, F. (2008). Hibernation by tree-roosting bats. Journal of Comparative Physiology. B, Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology 178, 597–605.
Hibernation by tree-roosting bats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18210129PubMed |

Tuttle, M., Kiser, M., and Kiser, S. (2013). ‘The Bat House Builder’s Handbook.’ 3rd edn. (Bat Conservation International: Austin.)

Ward, S. (2000). The efficacy of nestboxes versus spotlighting for detecting feathertail gliders. Wildlife Research 27, 75–79.
The efficacy of nestboxes versus spotlighting for detecting feathertail gliders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whitaker, J. O., Sparks, D. W., and Brack, V. (2006). Use of artificial roost structures by bats at the Indianapolis International Airport. Environmental Management 38, 28–36.
Use of artificial roost structures by bats at the Indianapolis International Airport.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16622759PubMed |