Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Techniques and practices of Australian pest animal trappers

Paul D. Meek https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3792-5723 A E , Guy A. Ballard B D and Peter J. S. Fleming C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, PO Box 530, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia.

B NSW Department of Primary Industries, Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, c/- University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

C NSW Department of Primary Industries, Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

D University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: paul.meek@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Pacific Conservation Biology 25(3) 257-265 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18044
Submitted: 16 May 2018  Accepted: 21 August 2018   Published: 17 September 2018

Abstract

We conducted a survey of trappers to gather baseline information on the trapping methods and humane practices used in Australia, the types of traps being used, and the attitudes of trappers. Respondents indicated that they mostly trapped wild dogs and foxes with feral cats as by-catch; rabbits were trapped to a lesser degree. Respondents favoured Jake and Victor #3 traps for the capture of wild dogs. Victor #1.5, #3 and Jake traps were also favoured for capturing foxes and feral cats. Although some trappers placed up to four traps together in a set, a single trap per set was the most commonly reported approach. Trap maintenance varied between individuals but most said they checked traps for problems during deployment. Respondents preferred the term ‘rubber jawed traps’ over the plethora of other synonyms in current use. All respondents were cognisant of animal welfare requirements but their acceptance and adoption of related trapping methods varied. Most did not believe that licensing was required to govern trapping practices in Australia. Euthanasia was most commonly undertaken by shooting the captured animal in the head, although rabbits and some non-target animals were reportedly dispatched by a blow to the head. This is the first survey of Australian trappers and provides a benchmark for understanding trapping culture, practices and practitioner expectations so these can be considered in policy development and implementation.

Additional keywords: foot-hold trap, jaw trap, questionnaire, rubber jawed trap, trapping


References

Fleming, P. J. S., Allen, L. R., Berghout, M. J., Meek, P. D., Pavlov, P. M., Stevens, P., Strong, K., Thompson, J. A., and Thomson, P. C. (1998). The performance of wild-canid traps in Australia: efficiency, selectivity and trap-related injuries. Wildlife Research 25, 327–338.
The performance of wild-canid traps in Australia: efficiency, selectivity and trap-related injuries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fourier, G. (2011). ‘Training Guide. Canid Trapping and Management.’ (Federation des Trappeurs Gestionnaires de Quebec: Quebec, Canada.)

Glass, R. J., More, T. A., and DiStefano, J. J. (1991). Vermont trappers: characteristics, motivations and attitudes. Transactions of the Northeast Section of the Wildlife Society 48, 134–143.

Marks, C. A., Allen, L., Gigliotti, F., Busana, F., Gonzalez, T., Lindeman, M., and Fisher, P. M. (2004). Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 13, 393–399.

Meek, P. D. (2014). Development of Australian best practice trapping guidelines for improved animal welfare and pest animal management outcomes. Unpublished Report. NSW Department of Primary Industries.

Meek, P. D., Jenkins, D. J., Morris, B., Ardler, A. J., and Hawksby, R. J. (1995). Use of two humane leg-hold traps for catching pest species. Wildlife Research 22, 733–739.
Use of two humane leg-hold traps for catching pest species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meek, P. D., Shorter, K., and Falzon, G. (2018). Do lethal trap devices threaten foot-hold trap capture efficacy? International Journal of Pest Management , .
Do lethal trap devices threaten foot-hold trap capture efficacy?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Siemer, W. F., Batcheller, G. R., Glass, R. J., and Brown, T. L. (1994). Characteristics of trappers and trapping participation in New York. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22, 100–111.

Thompson, B. C., Barron, J. C., Boydston, G. A., Brownlee, W. C., and Martin, C. M. (1992). Methodological, geographic, and socioeconomic attributes of licensed furtakers in Texas, 1982–84. The Texas Journal of Science 44, 175–185.

Walsgott, D. (2001). ‘The Illustrated Walsgott Guide: Rabbit and Dog Traps.’ (Penna Print: Ararat.)