Stocktake Sale on now: wide range of books at up to 70% off!
Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
EDITORIAL

Visibility of published papers: a collaboration between authors and publishers

Mike Calver
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia. Email: m.calver@murdoch.edu.au

Pacific Conservation Biology 27(2) 101-103 https://doi.org/10.1071/PCv27n2_ED
Published: 2 June 2021


References

Biagioli, M., and Lippman, A. (2020). Introduction: metrics and the new ecologies of academic misconduct. In ‘Gaming the metrics: misconduct and manipulation in academic research.’ (Eds. M. Biagioli and A. Lippman). (MIT Publishing: Cambridge, Massachusetts).

Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., and Connolly, M. J. L. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 337, 343–345.
Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., and Mastrogiacomo, L. (2015). Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases. Scientometrics 102, 2181–2186.
Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Haldule, S., Davalbhakta, S., Agarwal, V., Gupta, L., and Agarwal, V. (2020). Post-publication promotion in rheumatology: a survey focusing on social media. Rheumatology International 40, 1865–1872.
Post-publication promotion in rheumatology: a survey focusing on social media.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harnad, S., and Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine 10, .
Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Klein, M., and Balakireva, L. (2020). On the Persistence of Persistent Identifiers of the Scholarly Web. In ‘Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 12246 LNCS.’ pp. 102–115).

Logan, J. (2019). More DOIs are accessed through library discovery services than through google. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 14, 134–136.
More DOIs are accessed through library discovery services than through google.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Machovec, G. (2019). Strategies for Transformational Publish and Read Agreements in North America. Journal of Library Administration 59, 548–555.
Strategies for Transformational Publish and Read Agreements in North America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meadows, A., and Haak, L. (2018). How persistent identifiers can save scientists time. FEMS Microbiology Letters 365, .
How persistent identifiers can save scientists time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mugnaini, R., Fraumann, G., Tuesta, E. F., and Packer, A. L. (2021). Openness trends in Brazilian citation data: factors related to the use of DOIs. Scientometrics 126, 2523–2556.
Openness trends in Brazilian citation data: factors related to the use of DOIs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pacchioni, G. (2018). ‘The overproduction of truth: Passion, competition and integrity in modern science.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford).

Pautasso, M. (2014). The jump in network ecology research between 1990 and 1991 is a Web of Science artefact. Ecological Modelling 286, 11–12.
The jump in network ecology research between 1990 and 1991 is a Web of Science artefact.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor, M., Perakakis, P., and Trachana, V. (2008). The siege of science. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8, 17–40.
The siege of science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang, W., Deng, L., You, B., Zhang, P., and Chen, Y. (2018). Digital object identifier and its use in core Chinese academic journals: A Chinese perspective. Learned Publishing 31, 149–154.
Digital object identifier and its use in core Chinese academic journals: A Chinese perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yang, S., Xing, X., Qi, F., and Grácio, M. C. C. (2021). Comparison of academic book impact from a disciplinary perspective: an analysis of citations and altmetric indicators. Scientometrics 126, 1101–1123.
Comparison of academic book impact from a disciplinary perspective: an analysis of citations and altmetric indicators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhu, J., Hu, G., and Liu, W. (2019). DOI errors and possible solutions for Web of Science. Scientometrics 118, 709–718.
DOI errors and possible solutions for Web of Science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |