Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

What’s wrong with the Australian River Assessment System (AUSRIVAS)?

Bruce C. Chessman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-8023
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Email: brucechessman@gmail.com

Marine and Freshwater Research 72(8) 1110-1117 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF20361
Submitted: 14 December 2020  Accepted: 18 January 2021   Published: 4 March 2021

Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2021 Open Access CC BY

Abstract

The Australian River Assessment System (AUSRIVAS or AusRivAS) is a national biomonitoring scheme that supposedly assesses the ‘biological health’ of rivers. AUSRIVAS outputs observed-over-expected (O/E) indices derived from macroinvertebrate survey data obtained both at a site to be assessed and at designated reference sites. However, AUSRIVAS reference sites lack any consistent or quantified status, and, therefore, AUSRIVAS O/E indices have no particular meaning. Moreover, many studies have found AUSRIVAS O/E to be a weak or inconsistent indicator of exposure to anthropogenic or human-influenced stressors. Poor performance by AUSRIVAS may relate to numerous factors including the following: (1) variable reference-site status, (2) inappropriate model predictors, (3) limitations of O/E indices, (4) inconstant sampling methods, and (5) neglect of non-seasonal temporal variability. The indices Ephemeroptera–Plecoptera–Trichoptera (EPT) and stream invertebrate grade number – average level (SIGNAL) provide alternatives that have often outperformed AUSRIVAS O/E in comparative tests. In addition, bioassessment of Australian rivers might be advanced by the development of diagnostic methods to identify the stressors causing ecological impact rather than merely to infer impact intensity and assign quality ratings to assessment sites.

Keywords: macroinvertebrate, O/E, predictive model, river health, RIVPACS.


References

Aguiar, F. C., Feio, M. J., and Ferreira, M. T. (2011). Choosing the best method for stream bioassessment using macrophyte communities: indices and predictive models. Ecological Indicators 11, 379–388.
Choosing the best method for stream bioassessment using macrophyte communities: indices and predictive models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Aroviita, J., Mykrä, H., Muotka, T., and Hämäläinen, H. (2009). Influence of geographical extent on typology- and model-based assessments of taxonomic completeness of river macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 54, 1774–1787.
Influence of geographical extent on typology- and model-based assessments of taxonomic completeness of river macroinvertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bailey, R. C., Kennedy, M. G., Dervish, M. Z., and Taylor, R. M. (1998). Biological assessment of freshwater ecosystems using a reference condition approach: comparing predicted and actual benthic invertebrate communities in Yukon streams. Freshwater Biology 39, 765–774.
Biological assessment of freshwater ecosystems using a reference condition approach: comparing predicted and actual benthic invertebrate communities in Yukon streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bailey, R. C., Linke, S., and Yates, A. G. (2014). Bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: comparing established and new methods with common data sets. Freshwater Science 33, 1204–1211.
Bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: comparing established and new methods with common data sets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bishop, K., Beven, K., Destouni, G., Abrahamsson, K., Andersson, L., Johnson, R. K., Rodhe, J., and Hjerdt, N. (2009). Nature as the ‘natural’ goal for water management: a conversation. Ambio 38, 209–214.
Nature as the ‘natural’ goal for water management: a conversation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19739555PubMed |

Bouleau, G., and Pont, D. (2015). Did you say reference conditions? Ecological and socio-economic perspectives on the European Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science & Policy 47, 32–41.
Did you say reference conditions? Ecological and socio-economic perspectives on the European Water Framework Directive.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bray, J. P., O’Reilly-Nugent, A., Kon Kam King, G., Kaserzon, S., Nichols, S. J., Mac Nally, R., Thompson, R. M., and Kefford, B. J. (2021). Can species at risk of pesticides (SPEAR) indices detect effects of target stressors amongst multiple interacting stressors? The Science of the Total Environment 763, 142997.
Can species at risk of pesticides (SPEAR) indices detect effects of target stressors amongst multiple interacting stressors?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33250249PubMed |

Bunn, S. E., and Davies, P. M. (2000). Biological processes in running waters and their implications for the assessment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia 422/423, 61–70.
Biological processes in running waters and their implications for the assessment of ecological integrity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carew, M. E., Nichols, S. J., Batovska, J., St Clair, R., Murphy, N. P., Blacket, M. J., and Shackleton, M. E. (2017). A DNA barcode database of Australia’s freshwater macroinvertebrate fauna. Marine and Freshwater Research 68, 1788–1802.
A DNA barcode database of Australia’s freshwater macroinvertebrate fauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chessman, B. C. (1999). Predicting the macroinvertebrate faunas of streams by multiple regression of biological and environmental differences. Freshwater Biology 41, 747–757.
Predicting the macroinvertebrate faunas of streams by multiple regression of biological and environmental differences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chessman, B. C. (2003). New sensitivity grades for Australian river macroinvertebrates. Marine and Freshwater Research 54, 95–103.
New sensitivity grades for Australian river macroinvertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chessman, B. C. (2014). Predicting reference assemblages for freshwater bioassessment with limiting environmental difference analysis. Freshwater Science 33, 1261–1271.
Predicting reference assemblages for freshwater bioassessment with limiting environmental difference analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chessman, B. C., and McEvoy, P. K. (1998). Towards diagnostic biotic indices for river macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 364, 169–182.
Towards diagnostic biotic indices for river macroinvertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chessman, B. C., and Royal, M. J. (2004). Bioassessment without reference sites: use of environmental filters to predict natural assemblages of river macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23, 599–615.
Bioassessment without reference sites: use of environmental filters to predict natural assemblages of river macroinvertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chessman, B., Growns, I., Currey, J., and Plunkett-Cole, N. (1999). Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers. Freshwater Biology 41, 317–331.
Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chessman, B. C., Thurtell, L. A., and Royal, M. J. (2006). Bioassessment in a harsh environment: a comparison of macroinvertebrate assemblages at reference and assessment sites in an Australian inland river system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 119, 303–330.
Bioassessment in a harsh environment: a comparison of macroinvertebrate assemblages at reference and assessment sites in an Australian inland river system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16741821PubMed |

Chessman, B., Williams, S., and Besley, C. (2007). Bioassessment of streams with macroinvertebrates: effect of sampled habitat and taxonomic resolution. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26, 546–565.
Bioassessment of streams with macroinvertebrates: effect of sampled habitat and taxonomic resolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chessman, B. C., Jones, H. A., Searle, N. K., Growns, I. O., and Pearson, M. R. (2010). Assessing effects of flow alteration on macroinvertebrate assemblages in Australian dryland rivers. Freshwater Biology 55, 1780–1800.
Assessing effects of flow alteration on macroinvertebrate assemblages in Australian dryland rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clapcott, J. E., Goodwin, E. O., Snelder, T. H., Collier, K. J., Neale, M. W., and Greenfield, S. (2017). Finding reference: a comparison of modelling approaches for predicting macroinvertebrate community index benchmarks. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 51, 44–59.
Finding reference: a comparison of modelling approaches for predicting macroinvertebrate community index benchmarks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clarke, R. T., and Murphy, J. F. (2006). Effects of locally rare taxa on the precision and sensitivity of RIVPACS bioassessment of freshwaters. Freshwater Biology 51, 1924–1940.
Effects of locally rare taxa on the precision and sensitivity of RIVPACS bioassessment of freshwaters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clarke, R. T., Furse, M. T., Wright, J. F., and Moss, D. (1996). Derivation of a biological quality index for river sites: comparison of the observed with the expected fauna. Journal of Applied Statistics 23, 311–332.
Derivation of a biological quality index for river sites: comparison of the observed with the expected fauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clarke, R. T., Wright, J. F., and Furse, M. T. (2003). RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers. Ecological Modelling 160, 219–233.
RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Collier, K. J., and Hamer, M. P. (2013). Ecological response differentials: an alternative benchmark to inform stream and river bioassessment. Freshwater Biology 58, 1471–1483.
Ecological response differentials: an alternative benchmark to inform stream and river bioassessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cox, B., Oeding, S., and Taffs, K. (2019). A comparison of macroinvertebrate-based indices for biological assessment of river health: a case example from the sub-tropical Richmond River catchment in northeast New South Wales, Australia. Ecological Indicators 106, 105479.
A comparison of macroinvertebrate-based indices for biological assessment of river health: a case example from the sub-tropical Richmond River catchment in northeast New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dafforn, K. A., Johnston, E. L., Ferguson, A., Humphrey, C. L., Monk, W., Nichols, S. J., Simpson, S. L., Tulbure, M. G., and Baird, D. J. (2016). Big data opportunities and challenges for assessing multiple stressors across scales in aquatic ecosystems. Marine and Freshwater Research 67, 393–413.
Big data opportunities and challenges for assessing multiple stressors across scales in aquatic ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davies, P. E. (2000). Development of a national river bioassessment system (AUSRIVAS). In ‘Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques’. (Eds J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe, and M. T. Furse.) pp. 113–124. (Freshwater Biological Association: Ambleside, UK.)

Davis, J., Horwitz, P., Norris, R., Chessman, B., McGuire, M., and Sommer, B. (2006). Are river bioassessment methods using macroinvertebrates applicable to wetlands? Hydrobiologia 572, 115–128.
Are river bioassessment methods using macroinvertebrates applicable to wetlands?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dufour, S., and Piégay, H. (2009). From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications 25, 568–581.
From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Edward, D. H. D., Storey, A. W., and Smith, M. J. B. (2000). Assessing river health in south-western Australia: comparison of macroinvertebrates at family level with Chironomidae at species level. Verhandlungen der Internationale VereinugungfürTheoretische und AngewandteLimnologie 27, 2326–2335.
Assessing river health in south-western Australia: comparison of macroinvertebrates at family level with Chironomidae at species level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Feio, M. J., Reynoldson, T. B., and Graça, M. A. S. (2006). Effect of seasonal changes on predictive model assessments of streams water quality with macroinvertebrates. International Review of Hydrobiology 91, 509–520.
Effect of seasonal changes on predictive model assessments of streams water quality with macroinvertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Feld, C. K., Saeedghalati, M., and Hering, D. (2020). A framework to diagnose the causes of river ecosystem deterioration using biological symptoms. Journal of Applied Ecology 57, 2271–2284.
A framework to diagnose the causes of river ecosystem deterioration using biological symptoms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Franks, C. A., Mahony, M. J., and Franks, S. W. (2005). Measuring river health: the uncertainty associated with impact assessment using a single sample biological assessment technique. In ‘Dynamics and Biogeochemistry of River Corridors and Wetlands’. (Eds L. Heathwaite, B. Webb, D. Rosenberry, D. Weaver, and M. Hayashi.) pp. 176–182. (International Association of Hydrological Sciences: Wallingford, UK.)

Growns, J. E., Chessman, B. C., Jackson, J. E., and Ross, D. G. (1997). Rapid assessment of Australian rivers using macroinvertebrates: cost and efficiency of 6 methods of sample processing. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16, 682–693.
Rapid assessment of Australian rivers using macroinvertebrates: cost and efficiency of 6 methods of sample processing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Haase, R., and Nolte, U. (2008). The invertebrate species index (ISI) for streams in southeast Queensland, Australia. Ecological Indicators 8, 599–613.
The invertebrate species index (ISI) for streams in southeast Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hageman, K. J., Simonich, S. L., Campbell, D. H., Wilson, G. R., and Landers, D. H. (2006). Atmospheric deposition of current-use and historic-use pesticides in snow at national parks in the western United States. Environmental Science & Technology 40, 3174–3180.
Atmospheric deposition of current-use and historic-use pesticides in snow at national parks in the western United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Halse, S. A., Scanlon, M. D., Cocking, J. S., Smith, M. J., and Kay, W. R. (2007). Factors affecting river health and its assessment over broad geographic ranges: the Western Australian experience. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 134, 161–175.
Factors affecting river health and its assessment over broad geographic ranges: the Western Australian experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17342438PubMed |

Hämäläinen, H., Aroviita, J., Jyväsjärvi, J., and Kärkkäinen, S. (2018). Dangerous relationships: biases in freshwater bioassessment based on observed to expected ratios. Ecological Applications 28, 1260–1272.
Dangerous relationships: biases in freshwater bioassessment based on observed to expected ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29645323PubMed |

Hargett, E. G., ZumBerge, J. R., Hawkins, C. P., and Olson, J. R. (2007). Development of a RIVPACS-type predictive model for bioassessment of wadeable streams in Wyoming. Ecological Indicators 7, 807–826.
Development of a RIVPACS-type predictive model for bioassessment of wadeable streams in Wyoming.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harrison, E. T., Norris, R. H., and Wilkinson, S. N. (2008). Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model? Hydrobiologia 600, 49–64.
Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Havel, J. E., Kovalenko, K. E., Thomaz, S. M., Amalfitano, S., and Kats, L. B. (2015). Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future. Hydrobiologia 750, 147–170.
Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32214452PubMed |

Hoang, H., Recknagel, F., Marshall, J., and Choy, S. (2001). Predictive modelling of macroinvertebrate assemblages for stream habitat assessments in Queensland (Australia). Ecological Modelling 146, 195–206.
Predictive modelling of macroinvertebrate assemblages for stream habitat assessments in Queensland (Australia).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Horrigan, N., Choy, S., Marshall, J., and Recknagel, F. (2005). Response of stream macroinvertebrates to changes in salinity and the development of a salinity index. Marine and Freshwater Research 56, 825–833.
Response of stream macroinvertebrates to changes in salinity and the development of a salinity index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hose, G., Turak, E., and Waddell, N. (2004). Reproducibility of AUSRIVAS rapid bioassessments using macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23, 126–139.
Reproducibility of AUSRIVAS rapid bioassessments using macroinvertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jyväsjärvi, J., Aroviita, J., and Hämäläinen, H. (2011). Evaluation of approaches for measuring taxonomic completeness of lake profundal macroinvertebrate assemblages. Freshwater Biology 56, 1876–1892.
Evaluation of approaches for measuring taxonomic completeness of lake profundal macroinvertebrate assemblages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kanninen, A., Hellsten, S., and Hämäläinen, H. (2013). Comparing stressor-specific indices and general measures of taxonomic composition for assessing the status of boreal lacustrine macrophyte communities. Ecological Indicators 27, 29–43.
Comparing stressor-specific indices and general measures of taxonomic composition for assessing the status of boreal lacustrine macrophyte communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kath, J., Thomson, J. R., Thompson, R. M., Kefford, B. J., Dyer, F. J., and Mac Nally, R. (2018). Interactions among stressors may be weak: implications for management of freshwater macroinvertebrate communities. Diversity & Distributions 24, 939–950.
Interactions among stressors may be weak: implications for management of freshwater macroinvertebrate communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kitchin, P. L. (2005). Measuring the amount of statistical information in the EPT index. Environmetrics 16, 51–59.
Measuring the amount of statistical information in the EPT index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knouft, J. H., and Ficklin, D. L. (2017). The potential impacts of climate change on biodiversity in flowing freshwater systems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 48, 111–133.
The potential impacts of climate change on biodiversity in flowing freshwater systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lake, P. S., Thomson, J. R., Lada, H., Mac Nally, R., Reid, D., Stanaway, J., and Taylor, A. C. (2010). Diversity and distribution of macroinvertebrates in lentic habitats in massively altered landscapes in south-eastern Australia. Diversity & Distributions 16, 713–724.
Diversity and distribution of macroinvertebrates in lentic habitats in massively altered landscapes in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lamche, G., and Fukuda, Y. (2008). Comparison of genus and family AUSRIVAS models for the Darwin–Daly region and relation to land use. Report 01/2008D, Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts, Darwin, NT, Australia.

Lancaster, J. (2000). The ridiculous notion of assessing ecological health and identifying the useful concepts underneath. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 6, 213–222.
The ridiculous notion of assessing ecological health and identifying the useful concepts underneath.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lemm, J. U., Feld, C. K., and Birk, S. (2019). Diagnosing the causes of river deterioration using stressor-specific metrics. The Science of the Total Environment 651, 1105–1113.
Diagnosing the causes of river deterioration using stressor-specific metrics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30360242PubMed |

Lenat, D. R., and Penrose, D. L. (1996). History of the EPT taxa richness metric. Bulletin of the North American Benthological Society 13, 1–3.

Linke, S., Norris, R. H., Faith, D. P., and Stockwell, D. (2005). ANNA: a new prediction method for bioassessment programs. Freshwater Biology 50, 147–158.
ANNA: a new prediction method for bioassessment programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Magierowski, R. H., Davies, P. E., Read, S. M., and Horrigan, N. (2012). Impacts of land use on the structure of river macroinvertebrate communities across Tasmania, Australia: spatial scales and thresholds. Marine and Freshwater Research 63, 762–776.
Impacts of land use on the structure of river macroinvertebrate communities across Tasmania, Australia: spatial scales and thresholds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maloney, K. O., Feminella, J. W., Mitchell, R. M., Miller, S. A., Mulholland, P. J., and Houser, J. N. (2008). Landuse legacies and small streams: identifying relationships between historical land use and contemporary stream conditions. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27, 280–294.
Landuse legacies and small streams: identifying relationships between historical land use and contemporary stream conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marchant, R., and Hehir, G. (2002). The use of AUSRIVAS predictive models to assess the response of lotic macroinvertebrates to dams in south-east Australia. Freshwater Biology 47, 1033–1050.
The use of AUSRIVAS predictive models to assess the response of lotic macroinvertebrates to dams in south-east Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mazor, R. D., Purcell, A. H., and Resh, V. H. (2009). Long-term variability in bioassessments: a twenty-year study from two northern California streams. Environmental Management 43, 1269–1286.
Long-term variability in bioassessments: a twenty-year study from two northern California streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19381714PubMed |

Mazor, R. D., Rehn, A. C., Ode, P. R., Engeln, M., Schiff, K. C., Stein, E. D., Gillett, D. J., Herbst, D. B., and Hawkins, C. P. (2016). Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an index for consistent meaning in different settings. Freshwater Science 35, 249–271.
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an index for consistent meaning in different settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meador, M. R., and Carlisle, D. M. (2009). Predictive models for fish assemblages in eastern US streams: implications for assessing biodiversity. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138, 725–740.
Predictive models for fish assemblages in eastern US streams: implications for assessing biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Metzeling, L., Chessman, B. C., Hardwick, R., and Wong, V. (2003). Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the role of experience, and comparisons with quantitative methods. Hydrobiologia 510, 39–52.
Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the role of experience, and comparisons with quantitative methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Metzeling, L., Perriss, S., and Robinson, D. (2006). Can the detection of salinity and habitat simplification gradients using rapid bioassessment of benthic invertebrates be improved through finer taxonomic resolution or alternative indices? Hydrobiologia 572, 235–252.
Can the detection of salinity and habitat simplification gradients using rapid bioassessment of benthic invertebrates be improved through finer taxonomic resolution or alternative indices?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Negus, P., Blessing, J., Clifford, S., and Marshall, J. (2020). Adaptive monitoring using causative conceptual models: assessment of ecological integrity of aquatic ecosystems. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 27, 224–240.
Adaptive monitoring using causative conceptual models: assessment of ecological integrity of aquatic ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nichols, S. J., and Dyer, F. J. (2013). Contribution of national bioassessment approaches for assessing ecological water security: an AUSRIVAS case study. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 7, 669–687.
Contribution of national bioassessment approaches for assessing ecological water security: an AUSRIVAS case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nichols, S. J., and Norris, R. H. (2006). River condition assessment may depend on the sub-sampling method: field live-sort versus laboratory sub-sampling of invertebrates for bioassessment. Hydrobiologia 572, 195–213.
River condition assessment may depend on the sub-sampling method: field live-sort versus laboratory sub-sampling of invertebrates for bioassessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nichols, S., Norris, R., Maher, W., and Thoms, M. (2006a). Ecological effects of serial impoundment on the Cotter River, Australia. Hydrobiologia 572, 255–273.
Ecological effects of serial impoundment on the Cotter River, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nichols, S. J., Robinson, W. A., and Norris, R. H. (2006b). Sample variability influences the precision of predictive bioassessment. Hydrobiologia 572, 215–233.
Sample variability influences the precision of predictive bioassessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nichols, S. J., Robinson, W. A., and Norris, R. H. (2010). Using the reference condition maintains the integrity of a bioassessment program in a changing climate. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29, 1459–1471.
Using the reference condition maintains the integrity of a bioassessment program in a changing climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nichols, S. J., Reynoldson, T. B., and Harrison, E. T. (2014). Evaluating AUSRIVAS predictive model performance for detecting simulated eutrophication effects on invertebrate assemblages. Freshwater Science 33, 1212–1224.
Evaluating AUSRIVAS predictive model performance for detecting simulated eutrophication effects on invertebrate assemblages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nichols, S. J., Barmuta, L. A., Chessman, B. C., Davies, P. E., Dyer, F. J., Harrison, E. T., Hawkins, C. P., Jones, I., Kefford, B. J., Linke, S., Marchant, R., Metzeling, L., Moon, K., Ogden, R., Peat, M., Reynoldson, T. B., and Thompson, R. M. (2017). The imperative need for nationally coordinated bioassessment of rivers and streams. Marine and Freshwater Research 68, 599–613.
The imperative need for nationally coordinated bioassessment of rivers and streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Norris, R. H., and Hawkins, C. P. (2000). Monitoring river health. Hydrobiologia 435, 5–17.
Monitoring river health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ogden, R. W. (2000). Modern and historical variation in aquatic macrophyte cover of billabongs associated with catchment development. Regulated Rivers 16, 497–512.
Modern and historical variation in aquatic macrophyte cover of billabongs associated with catchment development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olson, J. R., and Hawkins, C. P. (2012). Predicting natural base-flow stream water chemistry in the western United States. Water Resources Research 48, W02504.
Predicting natural base-flow stream water chemistry in the western United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olson, J. R., and Hawkins, C. P. (2013). Developing site-specific nutrient criteria from empirical models. Freshwater Science 32, 719–740.
Developing site-specific nutrient criteria from empirical models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pringle, C. M. (1997). Exploring how disturbance is transmitted upstream: going against the flow. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16, 425–438.
Exploring how disturbance is transmitted upstream: going against the flow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ruaro, R., Gubiani, E. A., Hughes, R. M., and Mormul, R. P. (2020). Global trends and challenges in multimetric indices of biological condition. Ecological Indicators 110, 105862.
Global trends and challenges in multimetric indices of biological condition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schäfer, R. B., Kefford, B. J., Metzeling, L., Liess, M., Burgert, S., Marchant, R., Pettigrove, V., Goonan, P., and Nugegoda, D. (2011). A trait database of stream invertebrates for the ecological risk assessment of single and combined effects of salinity and pesticides in south-east Australia. The Science of the Total Environment 409, 2055–2063.
A trait database of stream invertebrates for the ecological risk assessment of single and combined effects of salinity and pesticides in south-east Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21376369PubMed |

Sheldon, F. (2005). Incorporating natural variability into the assessment of ecological health in Australian dryland rivers. Hydrobiologia 552, 45–56.
Incorporating natural variability into the assessment of ecological health in Australian dryland rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sheldon, F., and Thoms, M. C. (2006). Relationships between flow variability and macroinvertebrate assemblage composition: data from four Australian dryland rivers. River Research and Applications 22, 219–238.
Relationships between flow variability and macroinvertebrate assemblage composition: data from four Australian dryland rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Simpson, J. C., and Norris, R. H. (2000). Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In ‘Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques’. (Eds J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe, and M. T. Furse.) pp. 125–142. (Freshwater Biological Association: Ambleside, UK.)

Sloane, P. I. W., and Norris, R. H. (2003). Relationship of AUSRIVAS-based macroinvertebrate predictive model outputs to a metal pollution gradient. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22, 457–471.
Relationship of AUSRIVAS-based macroinvertebrate predictive model outputs to a metal pollution gradient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, M. J., Kay, W. R., Edward, D. H. D., Papas, P. J., Richardson, K., St, J., Simpson, J. C., Pinder, A. M., Cale, D. J., Horwitz, P. H. J., Davis, J. A., Yung, F. H., Norris, R. H., and Halse, S. A. (1999). AusRivAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological conditions of rivers in Western Australia. Freshwater Biology 41, 269–282.
AusRivAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological conditions of rivers in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Spear, J. E., Grijalva, E. K., Michaels, J. S., and Parker, S. S. (2018). Ecological spillover dynamics of organisms from urban to natural landscapes. Journal of Urban Ecology 4, 1–12.
Ecological spillover dynamics of organisms from urban to natural landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Suter, G. W. (1993). A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexes. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 12, 1533–1539.
A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Suter, G. W. (2001). Applicability of indicator monitoring to ecological risk assessment. Ecological Indicators 1, 101–112.
Applicability of indicator monitoring to ecological risk assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor, D., Goonan, P., and McEvoy, P. (2002). Assessment of stream invertebrates and water quality during insecticide spraying of plague locusts in the Flinders Ranges, South Australia. Environmental Health 2, 19–29.

Theroux, S., Mazor, R. D., Beck, M. W., Ode, P. R., Stein, E. D., and Sutula, M. (2020). Predictive biological indices for algae populations in diverse stream environments. Ecological Indicators 119, 106421.
Predictive biological indices for algae populations in diverse stream environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turak, E., Flack, L. K., Norris, R. H., Simpson, J., and Waddell, N. (1999). Assessment of river condition at a large spatial scale using predictive models. Freshwater Biology 41, 283–298.
Assessment of river condition at a large spatial scale using predictive models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turak, E., Waddell, N., and Johnstone, G. (2004). ‘New South Wales (NSW) Australian River Assessment System (AUSRIVAS) Sampling and Processing Manual 2004.’(Department of Environment and Conservation: Sydney, NSW, Australia.)

Van Sickle, J. (2008). An index of compositional dissimilarity between observed and expected assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27, 227–235.
An index of compositional dissimilarity between observed and expected assemblages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Sickle, J., Larsen, D. P., and Hawkins, C. P. (2007). Exclusion of rare taxa affects performance of the O/E index in bioassessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26, 319–331.
Exclusion of rare taxa affects performance of the O/E index in bioassessments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vander Laan, J. J., and Hawkins, C. P. (2014). Enhancing the performance and interpretation of freshwater biological indices: an application in arid zone streams. Ecological Indicators 36, 470–482.
Enhancing the performance and interpretation of freshwater biological indices: an application in arid zone streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Walsh, C. J. (2006). Biological indicators of stream health using macroinvertebrate assemblage composition: a comparison of sensitivity to an urban gradient. Marine and Freshwater Research 57, 37–47.
Biological indicators of stream health using macroinvertebrate assemblage composition: a comparison of sensitivity to an urban gradient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wohl, E. (2019). Forgotten legacies: understanding and mitigating historical human alterations of river corridors. Water Resources Research 55, 5181–5201.
Forgotten legacies: understanding and mitigating historical human alterations of river corridors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yuan, L. L. (2006). Theoretical predictions of observed to expected ratios in RIVPACS-type predictive model assessments of stream biological condition. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25, 841–850.
Theoretical predictions of observed to expected ratios in RIVPACS-type predictive model assessments of stream biological condition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |