Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Predicting natural instream woody-habitat loads across large river networks

Adrian Kitchingman A D , Zeb Tonkin A , Renae M. Ayres A , Jarod Lyon A , Justin C. Stout B , Ian D. Rutherfurd B and Paul Wilson C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

B The University of Melbourne, Department of Resource Management and Geography, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

C Water Group, Department of Environment, Land Water and Planning, East Melbourne, Vic. 3002, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: adrian.kitchingman@delwp.vic.gov.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 67(12) 1844-1852 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF15246
Submitted: 26 June 2015  Accepted: 24 September 2015   Published: 27 November 2015

Abstract

Past waterway management practices worldwide involved extensive removal of instream woody habitat (IWH) and riparian vegetation. The importance of instream woody habitat for healthy aquatic ecosystems has now been recognised, with management approaches reversed to reintroduce instream woody habitat and replant riverbanks. Knowledge of natural or pre-disturbance IWH loads is useful to guide such restoration programs; however, such datasets are often unavailable. In this study, natural IWH loads were mapped along 105 km of undisturbed rivers in south-eastern Australia. This field dataset was modelled, using boosted regression trees, against geomorphic, environmental and climatic variables to predict natural IWH loads in rivers across Victoria. Mapped natural IWH loads averaged 0.029 m3 m–2 (±0.005), ranging from 0.083 to 0.002 m3 m–2. Natural IWH volumes were predicted to range from 0 to 0.102 m3 m–2. Distinct IWH loading trends were noticeable over larger spatial scales. Eastern Victoria showed relatively lower natural IWH loads than did western Victoria. Because many stream restoration efforts do not have a quantifiable knowledge of natural IWH load, the results of the present study provide some guidance. The predicted IWH loadings are a useful first step in identifying broad areas for further investigation and a natural condition base for current IWH condition modelling.

Additional keywords: large woody debris, management, modelling, reference reaches, restoration, state-wide assessment, waterway.


References

Baillie, B. R., Garrett, L. G., and Evanson, A. W. (2008). Spatial distribution and influence of large woody debris in an old-growth forest river system, New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management 256, 20–27.
Spatial distribution and influence of large woody debris in an old-growth forest river system, New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Benda, L. E., and Sias, J. C. (2003). A quantitative framework for evaluating mass balance of in-stream organic debris. Forest Ecology and Management 172, 1–16.
A quantitative framework for evaluating mass balance of in-stream organic debris.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bond, N., Thomson, J., Reich, P., and Stein, J. (2011). Using species distribution models to infer potential climate change-induced range shifts of freshwater fish in south-eastern Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 62, 1043–1061.
Using species distribution models to infer potential climate change-induced range shifts of freshwater fish in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Borg, D., Rutherfurd, I., and Stewardson, M. (2007). The geomorphic and ecological effectiveness of habitat rehabilitation works: continuous measurement of scour and fill around large logs in sand-bed streams. Geomorphology 89, 205–216.
The geomorphic and ecological effectiveness of habitat rehabilitation works: continuous measurement of scour and fill around large logs in sand-bed streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brooks, A. P., Brierley, G. J., and Millar, R. G. (2003). The long-term control of vegetation and woody debris on channel and flood-plain evolution: insights from a paired catchment study in southeastern Australia. Geomorphology 51, 7–29.
The long-term control of vegetation and woody debris on channel and flood-plain evolution: insights from a paired catchment study in southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brooks, A. P., Gehrke, P. C., Jansen, J. D., and Abbe, T. B. (2004). Experimental reintroduction of woody debris on the Williams River, NSW: geomorphic and ecological responses. River Research and Applications 20, 513–536.
Experimental reintroduction of woody debris on the Williams River, NSW: geomorphic and ecological responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Buston, P. M., and Elith, J. (2011). Determinants of reproductive success in dominant pairs of clownfish: a boosted regression tree analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology 80, 528–538.
Determinants of reproductive success in dominant pairs of clownfish: a boosted regression tree analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21284624PubMed |

Chee, Y. E., and Elith, J. (2012). Spatial data for modelling and management of freshwater ecosystems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26, 2123–2140.
Spatial data for modelling and management of freshwater ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chin, A., Laurencio, L. R., Daniels, M. D., Whol, E., Urban, M. A., Boyer, K. L., Butt, A., Piegay, H., and Gregory, K. J. (2014). The significance of perceptions and feedback for effectively managing wood in rivers. River Research and Applications 30, 98–111.
The significance of perceptions and feedback for effectively managing wood in rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crook, D. A., and Robertson, A. I. (1999). Relationships between riverine fish and woody debris: implications for lowland rivers. Marine and Freshwater Research 50, 941–953.
Relationships between riverine fish and woody debris: implications for lowland rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

DEPI (2013). ‘Index of Stream Condition: the Third Benchmark of Victorian River Condition ISC3.’ (Department of Environment and Primary Industries: Melbourne.)

DOWR (1989). ‘Water Victoria: an Environmental Handbook.’ (VGPO on behalf of the Department of Water Resources: Melbourne.)

Elith, J., Leathwick, J. R., and Hastie, T. (2008). A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology 77, 802–813.
A working guide to boosted regression trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cvgsFOqsQ%3D%3D&md5=6bf5cbdc5da9857e868eaf296231d27dCAS | 18397250PubMed |

Gippel, C. J., Finlayson, B. L., and O’Neill, I. C. (1996). Distribution and hydraulic significance of large woody debris in a lowland Australian river. Hydrobiologia 318, 179–194.
Distribution and hydraulic significance of large woody debris in a lowland Australian river.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gurnell, A. M., Piégay, H., Swanson, F. J., and Gregory, S. V. (2002). Large wood and fluvial processes. Freshwater Biology 47, 601–619.
Large wood and fluvial processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hooke, J. M. (2007). Spatial variability, mechanisms and propagation of change in an active meandering river. Geomorphology 84, 277–296.
Spatial variability, mechanisms and propagation of change in an active meandering river.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hughes, V., Thoms, M. C., Nicol, S. J., and Koehn, J. D. (2007). Physical–ecological interactions in a lowland river system: large wood, hydraulic complexity and native fish associations in the River Murray, Australia. In ‘Hydroecology and Ecohydrology: Past, Present and Future’. (Eds P. J. Wood, D. M. Hannah and J. P. Sadler.) pp. 387–403. (Wiley: Chichester, UK.)

Kaeser, A. J., and Litts, T. L. (2010). A novel technique for mapping habitat in navigable streams using low-cost side scan sonar. Fisheries 35, 163–174.
A novel technique for mapping habitat in navigable streams using low-cost side scan sonar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kitchingman, A., Tonkin, Z., and Lyon, J. (2013). A novel approach to spatially assessing instream woody habitat densities across large areas. Journal of Environmental Management 128, 555–560.
A novel approach to spatially assessing instream woody habitat densities across large areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23835519PubMed |

Koehn, J. D., Nicol, S. J., and Fairbrother, P. S. (2004). Spatial arrangement and physical characteristics of structural woody habitat in a lowland river in south-eastern Australia. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14, 457–464.
Spatial arrangement and physical characteristics of structural woody habitat in a lowland river in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ladson, A. R., White, L. J., Doolan, J. A., Finlayson, B. L., Hart, B. T., Lake, P. S., and Tilleard, J. W. (1999). Development and testing of an index of stream condition for waterway management in Australia. Freshwater Biology 41, 453–468.
Development and testing of an index of stream condition for waterway management in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lester, R., Wright, W., and Jones-Lennon, M. (2006). Determining target loads of large and small wood for stream rehabilitation in high-rainfall agricultural regions of Victoria, Australia. Ecological Engineering 28, 71–78.
Determining target loads of large and small wood for stream rehabilitation in high-rainfall agricultural regions of Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lyon, J. P., Nicol, S. J., Lieschke, J. A., and Ramsey, D. S. L. (2009). Does wood type influence the colonisation of this habitat by macroinvertebrates in large lowland rivers? Marine and Freshwater Research 60, 384–393.
Does wood type influence the colonisation of this habitat by macroinvertebrates in large lowland rivers?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Máčka, Z., Krejčí, L., Loučková, B., and Peterková, L. (2011). A critical review of field techniques employed in the survey of large woody debris in river corridors: a central European perspective. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 181, 291–316.
A critical review of field techniques employed in the survey of large woody debris in river corridors: a central European perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21188509PubMed |

Mao, L., Andreoli, A., Comiti, F., and Lenzi, M. A. (2008). Geomorphic effects of large wood jams on a sub-Antarctic mountain stream. River Research and Applications 24, 249–266.
Geomorphic effects of large wood jams on a sub-Antarctic mountain stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marsh, N., Rutherfurd, I., and Jerie, K. (1999). Large woody debris in some Australian streams: natural loading, distribution and morphological effects. In ‘Proceedings of the Second Australian Stream Management Conference Vol 2’, 8–11 February 1999, Adelaide, South Australia. (Eds I. Rutherfurd and R. Bartley.) pp. 427–432. (Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Adelaide)

Marsh, N., Rutherfurd, I. D., and Jerie, K. (2001). Predicting pre-disturbance loading and distribution of large woody debris. In ‘Proceedings of the Third Australian Stream Management Conference: the Value of Healthy Streams’, Brisbane, Queensland, 27–29 August 2001. (Eds I. D. Rutherfurd, F. Sheldon, G. Brierley and C. Kenyon.) pp. 391–396. (Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Monash University: Melbourne.)

MDBC (1990). ‘River Murray Riparian Vegetation Study.’ Prepared for Murray–Darling Basin Commission by Margules and Partners Pty Ltd, P. and J. Smith Ecological Consultants and Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands, Victoria. (Murray Darling Basin Commission: Canberra.)

Nagayama, S., and Nakamura, F. (2010). Fish habitat rehabilitation using wood in the world. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 6, 289–305.
Fish habitat rehabilitation using wood in the world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nicol, S., Bearlin, A., Robley, A., Koehn, J., and Lieschke, J. (2001). Distribution of large woody debris in the mid-reaches of the Murray River: a template for reconstruction. Ecological Management & Restoration 2, 64–67.

Nicol, S., Lieschke, J., Lyon, J., and Hughes, V. (2002). ‘Resnagging Revolution: River Habitat Rehabilitation through Resnagging.’ (Department of Sustainability and Environment: Melbourne.)

Nicol, S. J., Lieschke, J. A., Lyon, J. P., and Koehn, J. D. (2004). Observations on the distribution and abundance of carp and native fish, and their responses to a habitat restoration trial in the Murray River, Australia. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38, 541–551.
Observations on the distribution and abundance of carp and native fish, and their responses to a habitat restoration trial in the Murray River, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Connor, N. A. (1992). Quantification of submerged wood in a lowland Australian stream system. Freshwater Biology 27, 387–395.
Quantification of submerged wood in a lowland Australian stream system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pesonen, A., Maltamo, M., Eerikäinen, K., and Packalèn, P. (2008). Airborne laser scanning-based prediction of coarse woody debris volumes in a conservation area. Forest Ecology and Management 255, 3288–3296.
Airborne laser scanning-based prediction of coarse woody debris volumes in a conservation area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Petts, G. E., and Amoros, C. (Eds) (1996). The fluvial hydrosystem. In ‘Fluvial Hydrosystems’. pp. 1–12. (Chapman and Hall: London.)

Robson, B. (2008). ‘Managing Flows for Ephemeral Streams (Fact Sheet 2).’ (Land and Water Australia, Australian Government: Canberra.)

Rutherfurd, I. D. (1994). Inherited controls on the form of a large, low energy river system in south eastern Australia. Ph.D. Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne.

Schrack, E., Beck, M., Brumbaugh, R., Crisley, K., and Hancock, B. (2012). ‘Restoration Works: Highlights from a Decade of Partnership between the Nature Conservancy and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Restoration Center.’ (The Nature Conservancy: Arlington, VA.)

VRHS (2002). ‘Healthy Rivers, Healthy Communities and Regional Growth: Victorian River Health Strategy.’ (Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria: Melbourne.)

Wallace, J. B., Webster, J. R., and Meyer, J. L. (1995). Influence of log additions on physical and biotic characteristics of a mountain stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52, 2120–2137.
Influence of log additions on physical and biotic characteristics of a mountain stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Webb, A. A., and Erskine, W. D. (2003). Distribution, recruitment, and geomorphic significance of large woody debris in an alluvial forest stream: Tonghi Creek, southeastern Australia. Geomorphology 51, 109–126.
Distribution, recruitment, and geomorphic significance of large woody debris in an alluvial forest stream: Tonghi Creek, southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wohl, E., Cenderelli, D. A., Dwire, K. A., Ryan-Burkett, S. E., Young, M. K., and Fausch, K. D. (2010). Large in-stream wood studies: a call for common metrics. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 35, 618–625.