Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF07112
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 59(1)

Modelling and comparison of growth of the silver-lip pearl oyster Pinctada maxima (Jameson) (Mollusca : Pteriidae) cultured in West Papua, Indonesia

Anne M. Lee A C , Ashley J. Williams B and Paul C. Southgate A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Pearl Oyster Research Group, School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Qld 4811, Australia.

B Fishing and Fisheries Research Centre, School of Earth and Environmental Science, James Cook University, Qld 4811, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: anne.lee@jcu.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 59(1) 22-31 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF07112
Submitted: 30 May 2007  Accepted: 2 November 2007   Published: 25 January 2008

Abstract

A commonly used approach to quantifying growth is to fit mathematical models to length-at-age data. Growth of the silver-lip pearl oysters, Pinctada maxima, cultured at a commercial pearl farm in West Papua, Indonesia was expressed mathematically by fitting five growth models (Gompertz, Richards, Logistic, Special von Bertalanffy Growth Function (VBGF) and General VBGF) to length-at-age data. The criteria used to determine the best fit model were a low mean residual sum of squares (MRSS), high coefficient of determination (r2) and low deviation of the asymptotic length (L∞) from the maximum length (Lmax). Using these criteria, the models were ranked accordingly: Special VBGF; General VBGF; Gompertz; Richards and Logistic models. The Special VBGF yielded the best fit (L∞ = 168.38 mm; K = 0.930 year–1; t0 = 0.126; MRSS = 208.64; r2 = 0.802; Deviation of L∞ from Lmax = 37.52 mm) and, accordingly, was used to model the growth of oysters cultured at three sites and two depths within the farm. Likelihood ratio tests were used to compare growth of oysters cultured at these sites and depths. Based on L∞ and K values, favourable sites and depths could be determined that optimised growth requirements for the various stages of P. maxima culture. Sites with high K and L∞ values were preferred sites for culturing juvenile oysters before pearl production, when high growth rate is essential to produce large numbers of oysters in the shortest time possible. In addition, high L∞ may facilitate implantation of larger nuclei conducive to the production of larger, more valuable pearls. Conversely, sites with low K values were preferred sites for weakening P. maxima before pearl ‘seeding’, a process undertaken to minimise nucleus rejection after seeding.


Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Atlas Pacific Limited and to Dr Joseph Taylor in particular for their support of this research. We would also like to acknowledge technical assistance of P. T. Cendana staff at Aljui and Batu Terio, West Papua.


References

Alagarswami K. (1970). Pearl culture in Japan and its lessons for India. In ‘Proceedings of the Symposium on Mollusca, Part 3’. pp. 975–998. (Marine Biological Association of India: Cochin.)

Brown J. R. (1988). Multivariate analyses of the role of environmental factors in seasonal and site-related growth variation in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 45225236

Cerrato, R. M. (1990). Interpretable statistical tests for growth comparisons using parameter in the von Bertalanffy equation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47(7), 1416–1426.
Chalfant J. S., Archambault T., West A. E., Riley J. G., and Smith N. (1980). Natural stocks of mussels: growth, recruitment and harvest potential. In ‘Mussel Culture and Harvest: A North American Perspective. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science’. (Ed. R. A. Lutz.) p. 7. (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: Amsterdam.)

Comtrade (2005). United Nations statistical division, United Nations. Available at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/comtrade [Verified 15 May 2007].

Estacion J. S., and Braley R. D. (1988). Growth and survival of Tridacna gigas in an intertidal pond. In ‘Giant Clams in Asia and the Pacific’. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Monograph 9. (Eds J. W. Copland and J. S. Lucas.) pp. 191–192.

Friedman, K. J. , and Southgate, P. C. (1999). Growout of blacklip pearl oysters, Pinctada margaritifera collected as wild spat in the Solomon Islands. Journal of Shellfish Research 18(1), 159–167.
Gervis M. H., and Sims N. A. (1992). The biology and culture of pearl oysters (Bivalvia: Pteriidae).International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management Study Review 21, 49.

Gibson F. A. (1956). Escallops (Pecten maximus L.) in Irish waters. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 27, 253–270.

Gompertz, B. (1825). On the nature of the function expressive of human mortality, and on a new mode to determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 115, 513–585.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Lutz R. A., and Hess C. T. (1979). Biological and radiological analysis of the potential of nuclear power plant effluent waters for shellfish culture. In ‘Power Plant Waste Heat Utilisation in Aquaculture’. (Eds B. L. Godfriaux, A. F. Eble, A. Farmanfarmaian, C. R. Guerra and C. A. Stephens.) p. 266. (Allanheld, Osmun and Company: Montclair, NJ.)

Malouf, R. E. , and Breese, W. P. (1977). Seasonal changes in the effect of temperature and water flow rate on the growth of juvenile pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas Thunberg. Aquaculture 12, 1–13.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | O’Sullivan D., Cropp D. A., and Bunter O. (1998). The old and the new of Australian pearl production. In ‘Aquaculture ’98 Book of Abstracts’. p. 390. (World Aquaculture Society: Las Vegas.) [Abstract]

Pouvreau, S. , and Prasil, V. (2001). Growth of the black-lip pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera, at nine culture sites of French Polynesia: Synthesis of several sampling designs conducted between 1994 and 1999. Aquatic Living Resources 14(3), 155–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Quayle D. B., and Newkirk G. F. (1989). ‘Farming Bivalve Molluscs: Methods for Study and Development.’ (World Aquaculture Society: Baton Rouge, LA.)

Richards, F. F. (1959). A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of Experimental Botany 10, 290–300.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Saville-Kent W. (1893). Pearl and pearl shell fisheries. In ‘The Great Barrier Reef of Australia: Its Products and Potentialities’. pp. 204–224. (W. H. Allen: London.)

Seed, R. (1973). Absolute and allometric growth in the mussel Mytilus edulis L. (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 40, 343–357.
Vakily J. M. (1992). Determination and comparison of bivalve growth with emphasis on Thailand and other tropical areas. International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management Study Review Technical Report 36, 25.

von Bertalanffy, L. (1938). A quantitative theory of organic growth (enquiries on growth laws II). Human Biology 10, 181–213.
von Bertalanffy L. (1957). Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth. Quarterly Review of Biology 32, 217231

Wada, K. (1973). Modern and traditional methods of pearl culture. Underwater Journal 5(1), 28–33.
Wilbur K. M., and Owen G. (1964). Growth. In ‘Physiology of Mollusca. Vol. 1’. (Eds K. M. Wilbur and C. M. Yonge.) (Academic Press Inc.: New York.)

Yukihira, H. , Lucas, J. S. , and Klumpp, D. W. (2006). The pearl oysters, Pinctada maxima and P. margaritifera, respond in different ways to culture in dissimilar environments. Aquaculture 252(2–4), 208–224.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |