Fish fauna of dry tropical and subtropical estuarine floodplain wetlands
Marcus Sheaves A B , Ross Johnston A and Kátya Abrantes AA Coastal and Estuary Ecosystem Ecology Laboratory, School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: marcus.sheaves@jcu.edu.au
Marine and Freshwater Research 58(10) 931-943 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06246
Submitted: 22 May 2007 Accepted: 13 September 2007 Published: 30 October 2007
Abstract
Estuarine floodplain wetland pools occur adjacent to marine coasts and estuaries throughout the world. In Australia’s dry tropics and sub-tropics, low and irregular rainfall means estuarine wetland pools are isolated for much of the time, resulting in varied within-pool conditions, with chemistry ranging from fresh to hypersaline, depending on the balance between freshwater and marine inputs and the time between connections. Varied physical conditions and irregular connectivity provide the potential for substantial faunal difference among pools. The present study compares the compositions and structures of the fish fauna of a broad cross section of estuarine wetland pools adjacent to the estuary of the Fitzroy River, one of the largest rivers in Australia’s dry tropical/subtropical zone. Ten pools were sampled between February 2004 and May 2005. The total species richness was low, with the 6123 fish recorded over the study, comprising only 44 species. This low species richness was reflected at the individual pool level, with a maximum total richness of 25 species in a single pool. Different pools had faunas that differed as a function of the proportion of the community comprised of marine spawned, compared with freshwater spawned, species. This was a reflection of the extent of connectivity to freshwater and marine systems, which determined both the physical nature of pools and the sources of faunal supply. Despite faunal differences among pools, at a functional level pool fish faunas were dominated by detritivores, regardless of pool type, size, season or connectedness.
Additional keywords: connectivity, estuary, faunal composition, functional composition, physical conditions.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by a grant from the Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management. We thank R. Baker, A. Penny, L. Ortiz Guerra, B. Packett and P. Verwey for their valuable field assistance. Our thanks also go to the anonymous reviewers who provided extensive comments that greatly improved the manuscript.
Barbier, E. B. , and Strand, I. (1998). Valuing mangrove-fishery linkages. Environmental and Resource Economics 12, 151–166.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
De’ath, G. , and Fabriscius, K. E. (2000). Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81, 3178–3192.
Gelwick, F. P. , Akin, S. , Arrington, D. A. , and Winemiller, K. O. (2001). Fish assemblage structure in relation to environmental variation in a Texas Gulf coastal wetland. Estuaries 24, 285–296.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Javonillo, R. , Deegan, L. , Chiaravalle, K. , and Hughes, J. (1997). The importance of access to salt-marsh surface to short-term growth of Fundulus heteroclitus in a New England salt marsh. Biological Bulletin 193, 288–289.
McCune, B. , and Lesica, P. (1992). The trade-off between species capture and quantitative accuracy in ecological inventory of lichens and bryophytes in forests in Montana. The Bryologist 95, 269–304.
Russell, D. J. , and Garrett, R. N. (1983). Use by juvenile barramundi, Lates calcarifer (Bloch), and other fishes of temporary supralittoral habitats in a tropical estuary in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 34, 805–811.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sheridan, P. , and Hays, C. G. (2003). Are mangroves nursery habitat for transient fishes and decapods? Wetlands 23, 449–458.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |