Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF04210
REVIEW
Contents Vol 56(1)

Methodological and conceptual issues in the search for a relationship between animal body-size distributions and benthic habitat architecture

B. J. Robson A D , L. A. Barmuta B and P. G. Fairweather C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Ecology and Environment, Deakin University, PO Box 423, Warrnambool, Vic. 3280, Australia.

B School of Zoology and Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.

C School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: brobson@deakin.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 56(1) 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04210
Submitted: 5 August 2004  Accepted: 4 November 2004   Published: 4 February 2005

Abstract

Benthic ecologists have studied the distribution of animal body sizes because it is a form of ‘taxon-free’ classification that may be a useful metric for describing variation within and between ecological communities. In particular, the idea that the allometry of physiological and life-history traits may control species composition and relative abundances implies a functional link between body-size distributions and communities. The physical structure of aquatic habitats has often been cited as the mechanism by which habitat may determine body-size distributions in communities. However, further progress is hindered by a lack of theoretical clarity regarding the mechanisms that connect body size to the characteristics of ecological communities, leading to methods that may obscure interesting trends in body-size data. This review examines the methodological and conceptual issues hindering progress in the search for a relationship between animal body size and habitat architecture and suggests ways to resolve these issues. Problems are identified with current methods for the measurement of animal body size, the data and measures used to quantify body-size distributions and the methods used to identify patterns therein. Fundamentally, renewed emphasis on the mechanisms by which animal body sizes are influenced by habitat architecture is required to refine methodology and synthesise results from pattern-seeking and mechanistic studies.

Extra keywords: body-size spectra, experimental design, habitat complexity, habitat structure.


Acknowledgments

BJR would like to thank Ed Chester for intermittent but recurring discussions of these topics over several years. The aquatic ecology discussion group at Deakin is thanked for bearing with BJR and PGF during voluble discussions of these topics – it has finally borne fruit. Ty Matthews is thanked for commenting on an earlier version of the manuscript. LAB is ‘grateful’ for the nocturnal activity patterns of Mungo Jones that permitted his participation in this paper.


References

Allen C. R., and Holling C. S. (2002). Cross-scale morphology. In ‘Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. Volume 1’. (Eds A. H. El-Shaarawi and W. W. Piegorsch.) pp. 450–452. (John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.)

Beck, M. W. (1995). Size-specific shelter limitation in stone crabs: a test of the demographic bottleneck hypothesis. Ecology 76, 968–980.
Damuth J. D. (1992). Taxon-free characterization of animal communities. In ‘Terrestrial Ecosystems Through Time: Evolutionary Paleoecology of Terrestrial Plants and Animals’. (Eds A. K. Behrensmeyer, J. D. Damuth, W. A. DiMichele, R. Potts, H. Sues and S. L. Wing.) pp. 183–203. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)

Doledec, S. , and Statzner, B. (1994). Theoretical habitat templets, species traits and species richness: 548 plant and animal species in the Upper Rhone River and its floodplain. Freshwater Biology 31, 523–538.
Peters R. H. (1983). ‘The Ecological Implications of Body Size.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Poff, N. L. , Palmer, M. A. , Angermeier, P. L. , Vadas, R. L. , Hakenkamp, C. C. , Bely, A. , Arensburger, P. , and Martin, A. P. (1993). Size structure of the metazoan community of a Piedmont stream. Oecologia 95, 202–209.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sendzimir J. P., Allen C. R., Gunderson L., and Stow C. (2003). Implications of body mass patterns: linking ecological structure and process to wildlife conservation and management. In ‘Landscape Ecology and Resource Management: Linking Theory with Practice’. (Eds J. A. Bissonette and I. Storch.) pp. 125–152. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Siemann, E. , and Brown, J. H. (1999). Gaps in mammalian body size distributions re-examined. Ecology 80, 2788–2792.
Thornhill R., and Alcock J. (1983). ‘The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems.’ (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.)

Underwood A. J. (1997). ‘Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation using Analysis of Variance.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Wiens, J. A. (1989). Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3, 385–397.


Yamada, S. B. , Navarrete, S. A. , and Needham, C. (1998). Predation induced changes in behaviour and growth rate in three populations of the intertidal snail, Littorina sitkana (Philippi). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 220, 213–226.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |