Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mammalian microbiomes

Linda L Blackall
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Email: lblackall@swin.edu.au

Microbiology Australia 36(1) 3-3 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA15002
Published: 6 March 2015

Abstract

Endothermic (an organism that maintains its body at a metabolically favourable temperature) amniotes (who lay their eggs on land or retain the fertilised egg within the mother), also known as mammals, count among their cohort the largest (whales) and the most intelligent (some primates, cetaceans and elephants) animals on Earth. However, none of the 5488 mammalian species live alone since they all support a complex menagerie of microbes including prokaryotes (Bacteria and Archaea), microbial eukaryotes, and viruses. That so-called ‘microbiome’ plays myriad roles ranging from the very well known and well studied (disease) through to provocative involvements (mood alteration and brain activity). Indeed even the microbiome has been subdivided by some into the bacteriome, the mycobiome and the virome. It is very timely that this issue be devoted to mammalian microbiomes since the study of microbiomes is going through an unprecedented revolution due to current and projected capabilities to generate metagenome sequences, determine metatranscriptomic, metaproteomic and metametabolomic information and crucially, analyse the deluge of data and interpret findings ecologically. The novel procedures are broadly in the economic realm of numerous researchers, but many do pose considerable technical challenges. The practical outcomes for host species and their environments are diverse.


References

[1]  Hungate, R.E. (1966) The Rumen and its Microbes. Academic Press, New York.

[2]  Hungate, R.E. and Macy, J. (1973) The roll-tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. Bulletins of the Ecological Research Committee , 123–126.

[3]  Sanger, F. et al. (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463–5467.
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE1cXhtlaru7Y%3D&md5=994c8aff47dfaa78b7f4d09245e540d6CAS | 271968PubMed |

[4]  Sanger, F. et al. (1977) Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage PHICHI174 DNA. Nature 265, 687–695.
Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage PHICHI174 DNA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE2sXksV2js7s%3D&md5=ca408cdace380ea25715c0d8ee161b82CAS | 870828PubMed |

[5]  Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E. (1977) Phylogenetic structure of prokaryotic domain – primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5088–5090.
Phylogenetic structure of prokaryotic domain – primary kingdoms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE1c%2FltlSmtA%3D%3D&md5=cb9d8901aa134e805af69e8c959acbe1CAS | 270744PubMed |

[6]  Waldor, M.K. et al. (2015) Where next for microbiome research? PLoS Biol. , .
Where next for microbiome research?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25602283PubMed |