Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Foodborne campylobacteriosis in Australia

Russell Stafford
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Disease Surveillance, Prevention and Control
Communicable Diseases Unit
Chief Health Officer Branch
Department of Health, Queensland
Tel: +61 7 3328 9733
Fax: +61 7 3328 9740 Email: Russell_Stafford@health.qld.gov.au

Microbiology Australia 34(2) 98-101 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA13034
Published: 13 May 2013

Thermophilic Campylobacter are an important cause of human illness worldwide. Campylobacter reservoirs include a wide variety of wild birds, poultry, farm animals, domestic pets and natural water systems. In Australia, infection is mainly associated with foodborne transmission, though other routes of exposure including waterborne and direct zoonotic transmission are not uncommon. Most cases of infection appear to be sporadic in nature, with outbreaks rarely reported. Epidemiological and microbiological evidence suggests chicken meat is the principal source of infection among cases. A recent study estimated there are more than 50,000 cases of Campylobacter infection attributed to chicken meat each year in Australia. When outbreaks are detected, they are most often associated with the consumption of poultry, contaminated water and occasionally unpasteurised milk. The lack of recognised foodborne outbreaks of campylobacteriosis could be due to organism-related factors such as the inability of thermophilic Campylobacter to multiply on food left at room temperature, their microaerophilic nature and their susceptibility to drying. However, it is likely that outbreaks of Campylobacter infection are also under-reported in developed countries due to the current lack of a suitable phenotypic or genotypic typing method for routine surveillance and outbreak detection. The future development of improved typing methods for detecting outbreaks should enable further sources and risk factors for Campylobacter infection to be determined.


Campylobacter is the leading cause of gastrointestinal illness in Australia among all the notified enteric pathogens1. There are more than 15,000 cases of Campylobacter enteritis notified through surveillance systems in Australia each year; excluding cases from New South Wales where the disease is not notifiable. However, notified cases represent only a fraction of all cases of infection occurring in the community and after adjusting for under-reporting and incomplete population coverage, recent estimates indicate approximately 225,000 (1180/100,000 population) Campylobacter infections occur in Australia each year2. The majority of infections are sporadic illnesses with community outbreaks infrequently reported, partly due to the lack of an efficient standardized typing system for routine surveillance. Most infections are caused by two species, C. jejuni and C. coli3. Foodborne transmission appears to be the most common method of transmission of Campylobacter infection to humans causing an estimated 75% to 80% of sporadic infections46. While the majority (98% to 99%) of cases of campylobacteriosis lead to a self-limiting episode of acute gastroenteritis, antimicrobial therapy may be indicated in prolonged or complicated illness. Occasionally, more severe disease outcomes occur, particularly in patients with immune deficiency, notably hypogammaglobulinaemia and AIDS. Chronic carriage of Campylobacter with recurrent enteritis and bacteraemia are typical problems among this group. Post-infectious complications associated with Campylobacter infection include Guillain-Barré syndrome, an autoimmune disorder of the peripheral nervous system causing acute flaccid paralysis (0.01–0.1%) and reactive arthritis (1–5%)7.


Sources of infection

The intestinal tract of a wide range of wild and domestic birds and warm-blooded animals have been identified as major reservoirs of Campylobacter in the environment810. Colonisation of the intestinal mucosa may be as a commensal or as an asymptomatic transient infection11,12. Farm animals, in particular, are major reservoirs for this organism including beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep, pigs and poultry1315. Consequently, this organism is frequently found in foods of animal origin including raw meat and raw milk16. The organism is ubiquitous in the environment, probably as a result of faecal contamination by birds and animals, and is often detected in natural water sources including coastal seawater, rivers, streams, lakes, ponds and groundwater17.

At the retail level, Campylobacter are more frequently isolated from poultry meat than from red meats. Prevalence studies conducted in Australia and overseas of raw poultry meat, in particular raw chilled chicken, often show frequencies in excess of 50%. Furthermore, contamination levels in excess of 105 organisms per carcass at retail level have been reported1822. Prevalence studies conducted at the retail level on raw red meats have generally shown the frequency of contamination to be considerably lower than that seen in raw poultry. Australian surveys of beef, pork and lamb have shown a prevalence range of 0% to 8%23,24. The lower prevalence of Campylobacter seen in red meat as opposed to white meat is thought to be due to differences in slaughtering processes and the extended forced-air chilling of red meat carcasses (most chicken carcasses in Australia are subjected to immersion chilling)25. Offal, on the other hand, is not subjected to forced-air chilling and consequently the prevalence of Campylobacter contamination tends to be higher than for whole cut meats. A recent Australian retail study reported contamination frequencies of 13% and 23% for raw lamb kidneys and livers respectively23. The prevalence of Campylobacter in poultry livers is considerably higher26.

The intestinal tract of poultry, including laying hens, is a common reservoir for Campylobacter; however, shell eggs are not considered to be a high risk food for transmission as the organism does not survive well on the shell surface due to desiccation27. Although Campylobacter have been detected on the surface of faecally contaminated eggs that are not of commercial quality, penetration studies indicate the organism does not penetrate readily through the egg shell membrane28. A recent study also suggests that vertical transmission of Campylobacter through the egg yolk is likely to be rare29.


Risk factors for sporadic infection

Risk factors for Campylobacter infection have generally been identified either through case-control studies of laboratory-confirmed sporadic infections or from investigation of disease outbreaks. The vast majority of case-control studies have been conducted in developed countries including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark and New Zealand3036. The majority of studies have demonstrated that poor handling and/or consumption of raw or undercooked chicken was the single most important risk factor for infection, being reported in no less than 20 case-control studies. Other meats identified as potential risk factors for sporadic infection include pork and beef, though these foods are less frequently reported in case-control studies as risk factors than poultry. Raw milk is another regularly identified foodborne risk factor among case-control studies for sporadic infection, more so in those countries where raw milk consumption is relatively common30,35,36.

The association between chicken consumption and Campylobacter infection has been extensively reported in the literature and this risk factor appears to be the major source of infections in Australia as well. A large multi-centre case-control study conducted by OzFoodNet among persons aged five years or older identified the consumption of undercooked chicken and offal as independent risk factors for infection37. This study showed that almost one-third of Campylobacter infections that occur in Australia each year can be attributed to chicken meat, either through the consumption of undercooked chicken or from poor food handling of raw chicken and subsequent cross-contamination to cooked or ready-to-eat foods. The population attributable risk proportions from this study indicated that more than 50,000 cases of Campylobacter infection could be attributed to chicken meat annually in Australia among persons aged 5 years and older38. Similarly, there are an estimated 3,500 cases of Campylobacter infection each year in Australia attributed to eating offal.

Consumption of chicken has not been identified as a risk factor for Campylobacter infection in children ≤4 years of age in Australia, despite three case-control studies which have examined risk factors for infection in this age group3941. Two studies conducted outside of Australia in other developed countries have also failed to identify chicken consumption as a risk factor for infection in this age group42,43. Regardless of these findings, it is likely that foodborne transmission from chicken is a risk factor for infection in young children, albeit of less importance. Contact with pets such as puppies and young chickens have been identified as important risk factors for infection in young children39,40.


Outbreaks of Campylobacter infection

Foodborne transmission is the predominant route of infection for outbreaks of Campylobacter. In Australia, 27 (82%) of the 33 Campylobacter outbreaks reported between 2001 and 2006 were foodborne or suspected foodborne, three (9%) were waterborne, one (3%) was due to person to person transmission and two (6%) outbreaks had unknown transmission routes44. A food vehicle was confirmed for 16 (59%) of the 27 foodborne outbreaks; poultry (chicken or duck) was associated with 11 (41%) outbreaks, unpasteurised milk and salads were associated with two (7%) outbreaks each. Seven (44%) of the 16 outbreaks with identified food vehicles were attributed to consumption of the contaminated raw product (undercooked food) while four (25%) were attributed to consumption of a ready-to-eat food that was cross-contaminated from a raw food product. The contributing factors were unknown for the other five outbreaks. Although the sale of unpasteurised milk for consumption to the public is illegal in Australia, occasional outbreaks still occur. The two outbreaks reported above were associated with the consumption of raw milk during school excursions to dairy farms.

In recent years, both Australia and the United Kingdom have reported an increase in the number of outbreaks of Campylobacter associated with poultry liver dishes45,46. Seven outbreaks associated with poultry liver have been recorded in the OzFoodNet outbreak register since 2001, with six (86%) of these occurring between 2008 and 2011. All seven outbreaks involved commercial food venues with either chicken (5) or duck (2) liver dishes prepared on site. Undercooking of the poultry liver dishes was the likely contributing factor for these outbreaks.


Conclusion

Foodborne campylobacteriosis is a major cause of bacterial enteritis in Australia. The incidence of disease in our community provide a strong argument for both government and industry to focus efforts into reducing contamination of chicken carcasses with Campylobacter either through improved on-farm control or interventions during processing. In addition, the figures justify the need for government to continue educating consumers and foodhandlers about the risks associated with the handling of raw chicken and the potential for cross-contamination in the kitchen. Improved surveillance and detection of Campylobacter outbreaks will increase our knowledge on the epidemiology of this organism and help inform prevention and control strategies.



References

[1]  NNDSS Annual Report Writing Group (2012) Australia’s Notifiable Disease Status, 2010: Annual Report of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Commun. Dis. Intell. 35, 1–69.

[2]  Hall, G. et al. (2008) Estimating community incidence of Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections, Australia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14, 1601–1609.
Estimating community incidence of Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18826825PubMed |

[3]  Butzler, J. (2004) Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10, 868–876.
Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15373879PubMed |

[4]  Hall, G. et al. (2005) Estimating foodborne gastroenteritis, Australia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11, 1257–1264.
Estimating foodborne gastroenteritis, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16102316PubMed |

[5]  Adak, G.K. et al. (2002) Trends in indigenous foodborne disease and deaths, England and Wales: 1992 to 2000. Gut 51, 832–841.
Trends in indigenous foodborne disease and deaths, England and Wales: 1992 to 2000.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nmslehtg%3D%3D&md5=7f9c99dfe473317b229d6e5af571c2bbCAS | 12427786PubMed |

[6]  Mead, P.S. et al. (1999) Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5, 607–625.
Food-related illness and death in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvkt1CmsA%3D%3D&md5=f9d388a7effa5d26e2790c1381a603f8CAS | 10511517PubMed |

[7]  Molbak, K. and Havelaar, A.H. (2008) Clinical aspects of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli infections. In Campylobacter (Nachamkin, I. et al., eds), pp. 151-162, Washington, DC, ASM Press.

[8]  Altekruse, S.F. and Tollefson, L.K. (2003) Human campylobacteriosis: a challenge for the veterinary profession. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 223, 445–452.
Human campylobacteriosis: a challenge for the veterinary profession.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12930081PubMed |

[9]  Savill, M. et al. (2003) Elucidation of potential transmission routes of Campylobacter in New Zealand. Water Sci. Technol. 47, 33–38.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7isVOnug%3D%3D&md5=5585238ceb02420efddf4384d429fc5dCAS | 12639002PubMed |

[10]  Crushell, E. et al. (2004) Enteric Campylobacter: purging its secrets. Pediatr. Res. 55, 3–12.
Enteric Campylobacter: purging its secrets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14605259PubMed |

[11]  Newell, D. (2002) The ecology of Campylobacter jejuni in avian and human hosts and in the environment. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 6, 3S16–3S21.
The ecology of Campylobacter jejuni in avian and human hosts and in the environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23570169PubMed |

[12]  Everest, P. and Ketley, J. (2002) Campylobacter. In Molecular Medical Microbiology (Sussman, M., ed.), pp. 1311-1329, London, San Diego, San Francisco, Academic Press, A Harcourt Science and Technology Company.

[13]  Stanley, K. and Jones, K. (2003) Cattle and sheep farms as reservoirs of Campylobacter. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94, 104S–113S.
Cattle and sheep farms as reservoirs of Campylobacter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12675942PubMed |

[14]  Bailey, G.D. et al. (2003) A study of the foodborne pathogens: Campylobacter, Listeria and Yersinia, in faeces from slaughter-age cattle and sheep in Australia. Commun. Dis. Intell. 27, 249–257.

[15]  Fitzgerald, C. et al. (2001) Use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and flagellin gene typing in identifying clonal groups of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in farm and clinical environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 1429–1436.
Use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and flagellin gene typing in identifying clonal groups of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in farm and clinical environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXis1egs7c%3D&md5=f9527aa7069e90fe177b89486c675bfdCAS | 11282587PubMed |

[16]  Altekruse, S.F. (1998) Campylobacter jejuni in foods. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 213, 1734–1735.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FnvV2mtw%3D%3D&md5=875f4244a1f2fbc427c48f0a87595849CAS | 9861962PubMed |

[17]  Jones, K. (2001) Campylobacters in water, sewage and the environment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 90, 68S–79S.
Campylobacters in water, sewage and the environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Kramer, J.M. et al. (2000) Campylobacter contamination of raw meat and poultry at retail sale: identification of multiple types and comparison with isolates from human infection. J. Food Prot. 63, 1654–1659.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrmvVOitg%3D%3D&md5=362acd9678b4f49ec806d9d052f8d85aCAS | 11131886PubMed |

[19]  Jørgensen, F. et al. (2002) Prevalence and numbers of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. on raw, whole chickens in relation to sampling methods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 76, 151–164.
Prevalence and numbers of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. on raw, whole chickens in relation to sampling methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12038572PubMed |

[20]  Zhao, C. et al. (2001) Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella serovars in retail chicken, turkey, pork, and beef from the Greater Washington, D.C., area. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 5431–5436.
Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella serovars in retail chicken, turkey, pork, and beef from the Greater Washington, D.C., area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXovFehsLs%3D&md5=6b7e332c1aad73d741b043ff7209ba4aCAS | 11722889PubMed |

[21]  Pointon, A. et al. (2008) A baseline survey of the microbiological quality of chicken portions and carcasses at retail in two Australian states (2005 to 2006). J. Food Prot. 71, 1123–1134.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cvisVaqsw%3D%3D&md5=7fa2c6e324486ed0d2b5c6e4a2f8dca0CAS | 18592737PubMed |

[22]  FSANZ and the South Australian Research and Development Institute (2010) Baseline survey on the prevalence and concentration of Salmonella and Campylobacter in chicken meat on-farm and at primary processing. http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/Poultry%20survey%20rept%20March%202010.pdf

[23]  Delroy, B. et al. (2008) Survey of the presence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in raw meat and fish from retail outlets in Adelaide in 2002. Food Aust. 60, 256–260.

[24]  Phillips, D. et al. (2008) A national survey of the microbiological quality of retail raw meats in Australia. J. Food Prot. 71, 1232–1236.
| 18592751PubMed |

[25]  Humphrey, T. et al. (2007) Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: a food production perspective. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 117, 237–257.
Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: a food production perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17368847PubMed |

[26]  Noormohamed, A. and Fakhr, M.K. (2012) Incidence and antimicrobial resistance profiling of Campylobacter in retail chicken livers and gizzards. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 9, 617–624.
Incidence and antimicrobial resistance profiling of Campylobacter in retail chicken livers and gizzards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XpvVOjur4%3D&md5=00f3dbe8ebbd40f34625f45c5ea58d9fCAS | 22545960PubMed |

[27]  Jacobs-Reitsma, W.F. et al. (2008) Campylobacter in the food supply. In: Campylobacter (Nachamkin, I. et al., eds), pp. 627-644, Washington, DC, ASM Press.

[28]  Doyle, M.P. (1984) Association of Campylobacter jejuni with laying hens and eggs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 533–536.
| 1:STN:280:DyaL2c7nslCjuw%3D%3D&md5=da526c0bb40da08eb3e8d4341cc01810CAS | 6712220PubMed |

[29]  Sahin, O. et al. (2003) Detection and survival of Campylobacter in chicken eggs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95, 1070–1079.
Detection and survival of Campylobacter in chicken eggs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srlsVamuw%3D%3D&md5=6649be20695cdd0354f0c1423a51a8bcCAS | 14633036PubMed |

[30]  Friedman, C.R. et al. (2004) Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infection in the United States: a case-control study in FoodNet sites. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38, S285–S296.
Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infection in the United States: a case-control study in FoodNet sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15095201PubMed |

[31]  Michaud, S. et al. (2004) Campylobacteriosis, Eastern Townships, Quebec. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10, 1844–1847.
Campylobacteriosis, Eastern Townships, Quebec.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15504275PubMed |

[32]  Adak, G.K. et al. (1995) The Public Health Laboratory Service national case-control study of primary indigenous sporadic cases of Campylobacter infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 115, 15–22.
The Public Health Laboratory Service national case-control study of primary indigenous sporadic cases of Campylobacter infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzmvFequg%3D%3D&md5=a3dc19c9d948ca1d1d7f06b2c9c1845bCAS | 7641828PubMed |

[33]  Rodrigues, L.C. et al. (2001) The study of infectious intestinal disease in England: risk factors for cases of infectious intestinal disease with Campylobacter jejuni infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 127, 185–193.
The study of infectious intestinal disease in England: risk factors for cases of infectious intestinal disease with Campylobacter jejuni infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnjvVSntQ%3D%3D&md5=e2fec20bc99b7f3757c51688965554efCAS | 11693495PubMed |

[34]  Kapperud, G. et al. (2003) Factors associated with increased and decreased risk of Campylobacter infection: a prospective case-control study in Norway. Am. J. Epidemiol. 158, 234–242.
Factors associated with increased and decreased risk of Campylobacter infection: a prospective case-control study in Norway.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12882945PubMed |

[35]  Neimann, J. et al. (2003) A case-control study of risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infections in Denmark. Epidemiol. Infect. 130, 353–366.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3pvVSnsw%3D%3D&md5=40d56b022368a245268da939431e0305CAS | 12825719PubMed |

[36]  Eberhart-Phillips, J. et al. (1997) Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results of a case-control study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 51, 686–691.
Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results of a case-control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7nvFKmtQ%3D%3D&md5=15cbd84756842f3e2137d8ac0d33c219CAS | 9519133PubMed |

[37]  Stafford, R.J. et al. (2007) A multi-centre prospective case-control study of Campylobacter infection in persons aged 5 years and older in Australia. Epidemiol. Infect. 135, 978–988.
A multi-centre prospective case-control study of Campylobacter infection in persons aged 5 years and older in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svptlGmtQ%3D%3D&md5=2067e389b1ba935f7e18c511b60d90acCAS | 17134530PubMed |

[38]  Stafford, R.J. et al. (2008) Population-attributable risk estimates for risk factors associated with Campylobacter infection, Australia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14, 895–901.
Population-attributable risk estimates for risk factors associated with Campylobacter infection, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18507899PubMed |

[39]  Tenkate, T.D. and Stafford, R.J. (2001) Risk factors for Campylobacter infection in infants and young children: a matched case-control study. Epidemiol. Infect. 127, 399–404.
Risk factors for Campylobacter infection in infants and young children: a matched case-control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FosV2kug%3D%3D&md5=30c88ca258e58ff99b3c1305a38f169dCAS | 11811871PubMed |

[40]  Stephens, N. et al. (2008) Campylobacter infection in children aged 0–4 years in Australia: a multi-centre prospective case-control study. (unpublished data)

[41]  Unicomb, L.E. et al. (2008) Age-specific risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infection in regional Australia. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 5, 79–85.
Age-specific risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infection in regional Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18260818PubMed |

[42]  Carrique-Mas, J. et al. (2005) Risk factors for domestic sporadic campylobacteriosis among young children in Sweden. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 37, 101–110.
Risk factors for domestic sporadic campylobacteriosis among young children in Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15764201PubMed |

[43]  Fullerton, K.E. et al. (2007) Sporadic Campylobacter infection in infants: a population-based surveillance case-control study. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 26, 19–24.
Sporadic Campylobacter infection in infants: a population-based surveillance case-control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17195700PubMed |

[44]  Unicomb, L. et al. (2009) Outbreaks of campylobacteriosis in Australia, 2001 to 2006. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 6, 1241–1250.
Outbreaks of campylobacteriosis in Australia, 2001 to 2006.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19895264PubMed |

[45]  Little, C.L. et al. (2010) A recipe for disaster: outbreaks of campylobacteriosis associated with poultry liver pate in England and Wales. Epidemiol. Infect. 138, 1691–1694.
A recipe for disaster: outbreaks of campylobacteriosis associated with poultry liver pate in England and Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cbhsVOmtw%3D%3D&md5=42dfc5219df991ab12c9d9c739df18f4CAS | 20727250PubMed |

[46]  Merritt, T. et al. (2011) Campylobacter outbreaks associated with poultry liver dishes. Commun. Dis. Intell. 35, 299–300.


Biography

Russell Stafford (MPH, PhD) is an epidemiologist with the Communicable Diseases Unit in Queensland Health and has been a member of the OzFoodNet Working Group since its inception in 2001. He has a special interest in the epidemiology of Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli and Listeria.