Plugging in microbial metabolism for industrial applications
Carolyn A Bell A and Ashley E Franks A BA Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology
College of Science, Health and Engineering
La Trobe University
Melbourne, Vic. 3086, Australia
Tel: +61 3 9479 2206
B Email: a.franks@latrobe.edu.au
Microbiology Australia 38(2) 89-92 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA17037
Published: 11 April 2017
The ability of electric microbes to electrically interact with electrodes is opening up a number of possibilities with industrial applications. Microbes are able to utilise the electrode as an electron source to reduce CO2 for the production of organic compounds directly or produce H2 as a reducing equivalent for partner microbes for the production of commodity chemicals. Electrodes can also allow redox unbalanced fermentation processes to occur through the addition or subtraction of reducing equivalents that remove bottle necks in these pathways. Electrodes are also providing a physical refuge for electric microbes to maintain anaerobic fermenter stability. It can be expected that the role for electric microbes will continued to be expanded as part of industrial applications in the future.
Microbes and electrons
Microbial electrochemical systems enable electrons to be removed and inserted directly into microbial metabolic processes by microbes that are capable of interacting with an electrode, which are commonly called electric bacteria1. While first gaining much attention due to their ability to generate electricity, the ability of microbes to externally transfer electrons both directly and indirectly, has seen interest in their use for environmental monitoring, bioremediation applications and industrial processes (see 1,2). Processes, such as the production of commodity chemicals, such as acetate, butyrate and alcohols, using electrons as an energy source and unbalanced redox reactions in electrofermentation, has greatly expanded their industrial applications. These processes have the potential to revolutionise the industrial use of microbes into a new era of reduced inputs, stable outputs, and more customisation and design in bacterial metabolic processes.
Production of commodity chemicals utilising microbial electric systems
Acetogens and methanogens have long been of interest to industry due to their ability to reduce carbon dioxide to organic products such as acetate, methane, butanol, and ethanol3. When integrated into microbial electric systems, microbes capable of utilising electrodes as electron donors can use electricity to produce organic chemicals (Fig. 1a). An advantage of this process is the possibility for excess renewable or power production to be converted into organic compounds that are capable of acting as energy storage for later use, transport or as commodity chemicals4. A wide variety of microbes has been found to be capable of accepting electrons from an electrode to provide energy to drive the biological processes5. Termed microbial electrosynthesis, being likened to photosynthesis when using solar energy as an electron source6, the rates of organic product formation using direct electron transfer is currently significantly less than those utilising in situ H2 production as the electron donor to drive similar processes3.
Multistep electrode production with multiple species
Interest has been shown in the use of multiple microbial species that associate with electrodes to enhance the production of commercially valuable products. The use of two species allows for the specialisation of both and removes the need to collect, concentrate and process H2 gas from the system (Fig. 1b). A consortium was found to form a Rhodobacter sp. electrode-reducing biofilm in association with the electrode producing hydrogen and a planktonic culture comprising Clostridium sp., which reduced CO2 to organic compounds and a small amount of alcohols7. Co-cultures of Methanococcus maripaludis and Acetobacterium woodii demonstrated that dual species, specialising in either cathodic reduction or bioproduction, are currently able to outperform monocultures attempting to do both8. While electron-transfer pathways occurring in biocathodes have still not been fully elucidated, increases in production that occur have been linked to biologically induced hydrogen production9.
The use of co-cultures coupling cathodic electron uptake and biosynthesis reactions through interspecies electron transfer, either directly or through use of intermediate products, is proposed to be a useful strategy to allow modular systems to be established for production, and is a potential area of interest in the future utilising Synthetic Biology10. As Synthetic Biology principles are more widely accept by the general community, extensive effort will be placed on the production of a wide range of commodity chemicals to be introduced into commercial markets11.
Fermentation and electrons
Brewing beer is one of the most widely recognised fermentation processes, and has been intertwined with much of human history from being mentioned in cuneiform, the oldest known form of writing from ancient Mesopotamia, to speculation that it may have been a driver of modern agriculture12. Fermentation utilises microorganisms to convert organic compounds to acids, gases, or alcohols, and has been utilised for food preservation increasing product storage and stability. Fermentations now occur on industrial-level scales producing biomass, primary and secondary metabolites, enzymes, recombinant products, and products for consumption13. Industrial fermentation processes are often constrained due to the need for sterility, the use of specific strains, substrate selectivity, maintenance of redox balance, environmental control, and product recovery14.
The use of electrodes, and microbes capable of interacting with them, is now providing the possibility to control microbial cell growth and microbial density, increase product concentrations, allow imbalanced redox fermentations to occur, and provide energy requirements for organic carbon production from the reduction of carbon dioxide during microbial fermentation processes6,15,16. Fermentation can be benefited through microbial interactions with electrodes due to enhancement of electron transport pathways and improved energy production (Fig. 1c). Depending on the electrode potential, an excess of redox cofactors (such as NADH and NADPH) may be produced when an electrode is utilised as an electron acceptor, or in ATP production when being utilised as an electron acceptor17.
A large advantage of the use of electrodes in fermentation reactions is the ability to balance the redox reactions. Electrodes have allowed the stoichiometric conversion of glycerol to ethanol using an engineered strain of Shewanella oneidensis, removing redox bottle necks and allowing unbalanced redox reactions to occur18. Similarly, an electrode allowed a shift toward more reduced products during fermentation with Clostridium acetobutylicum19. In silico elementary mode analysis predicts an increase in yield of 18 out of 20 different valuable products using anaerobic electrically enhanced fermentation. These included compounds such as succinic acid, lysine, and diaminopentane, which are already produced on an industrial scale, as well as other valuable products like p-aminobenzoic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and isoprene17. Increase in product formation by electrical enhancement is not necessarily dependent on the degree of reduction of the product, but rather the metabolic pathway it is derived from. The method of electron transport in the enhanced fermentation has a major impact on theoretical biomass and product yields.
Engineering industrial relevant microbial communities using electrodes
Anaerobic digestion is commonly utilised for the biotransformation of organic wastes to either carbon dioxide or methane. Electric microbes have been demonstrated to be present in these systems, helping overcome energy barriers and allowing the degradation of compounds otherwise not thermodynamically possible by an individual, a process occurring commonly in anaerobic digesters20,21. The direct transfer of electrons is advantageous in syntrophic communities as it maintains concentrations of key intermediates below key threshold levels, does not require reverse electron flow for the formation of H2, and increases the Gibbs free energy of the intermediate reactions21. By enhancing the electrical link of these communities, such as the addition of conductive particles, or the addition of electrodes, it is possible to enhance the function, stabilise the microbial community structure, and increase the reactor performance overall22.
The addition of electrodes to an anaerobic digester had the overall effect of enriching Geobacter species in association with the electrode and the reactor sludge, which correlated to an increase in methane production23. The enhancement of methane production is hypothesised to have occurred through direct interspecies electron transfer between Geobacter and Methanosaeta species. These species have previously been utilised in co-culture to demonstrate the direct transfer of electrons between species without the reliance, or formation of a bottle neck, on H2 or formate in the anaerobic community24. Interestingly, in complex communities the electrode-associated communities are able to bring stability to the complex anaerobic digester community, helping prevent large fluctuations and preventing collapse and failure (Fig. 1d)25. It has been suggested that biomass retention on electrodes, rather than electrical current, enhances stability of the anaerobic digester community26.
Future perspectives
Electric microbiology is expected to play an increasingly important role in industrial microbiology. The ability to provide energy in the form of electrons and carry out unbalanced fermentation reactions expands the range of possibilities for bioproduction. Currently, technological developments are lagging behind requirements for large scale production. With continued advancements, and with systems utilising microbial produced H2 as a feedstock, dual culture systems are expected to be amongst the first widespread adoption of industrial electric microbiology.
References
[1] Semenec, L. and Franks, A.E. (2014) The microbiology of microbial electrolysis cells. Microbiol. Aust. 35, 201–206.| The microbiology of microbial electrolysis cells.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Bereza-Malcolm, L.T. and Franks, A.E. (2015) Coupling anaerobic bacteria and microbial fuel cells as whole-cell environmental biosensors. Microbiol. Aust. 36, 129–132.
[3] Butler, C.S. and Lovley, D.R. (2016) How to sustainably feed a microbe: strategies for biological production of carbon-based commodities with renewable electricity. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1879.
| How to sustainably feed a microbe: strategies for biological production of carbon-based commodities with renewable electricity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Lovley, D.R. and Nevin, K.P. (2013) Electrobiocommodities: powering microbial production of fuels and commodity chemicals from carbon dioxide with electricity. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, 385–390.
| Electrobiocommodities: powering microbial production of fuels and commodity chemicals from carbon dioxide with electricity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXjsFCisr0%3D&md5=d02bc0bc5b068a3e2dd577a14bd50edcCAS |
[5] Koch, C. and Harnisch, F. (2016) Is there a specific ecological niche for electroactive microorganisms? ChemElectroChem.
[6] Nevin, K.P. et al. (2010) Microbial electrosynthesis: feeding microbes electricity to convert carbon dioxide and water to multicarbon extracellular organic compounds. MBio 1, e00103-10.
| Microbial electrosynthesis: feeding microbes electricity to convert carbon dioxide and water to multicarbon extracellular organic compounds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Puig, S. et al. (2017) Tracking bio-hydrogen-mediated production of commodity chemicals from carbon dioxide and renewable electricity. Bioresour. Technol. 228, 201–209.
| Tracking bio-hydrogen-mediated production of commodity chemicals from carbon dioxide and renewable electricity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhtFeruw%3D%3D&md5=d526ae816ecce8e7b58152c1bdeb240aCAS |
[8] Deutzmann, J.S. and Spormann, A.M. (2017) Enhanced microbial electrosynthesis by using defined co-cultures. ISME J. 11, 704–714.
| Enhanced microbial electrosynthesis by using defined co-cultures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXivFeksLs%3D&md5=cde3b9b7e013e6d30282573598fed83dCAS |
[9] Jourdin, L. et al. (2016) Biologically induced hydrogen production drives high rate/high efficiency microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from carbon dioxide. ChemElectroChem.
[10] Rosenbaum, M.A. and Franks, A.E. (2014) Microbial catalysis in bioelectrochemical technologies: status quo, challenges and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 509–518.
| Microbial catalysis in bioelectrochemical technologies: status quo, challenges and perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvVGru7bL&md5=f996f2a731b0ad096ce72de931d68021CAS |
[11] Sivasubramaniam, D. and Franks, A.E. (2016) Bioengineering microbial communities: Their potential to help, hinder and disgust. Bioengineered 7, 137–144.
| Bioengineering microbial communities: Their potential to help, hinder and disgust.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XhtVKntrnK&md5=3a3ab5316a4c9e9be9da4f47f942dc2bCAS |
[12] Stol, M. (1994) Beer in Neo-Babylonian times. Drinking in ancient societies. 155–183.
[13] Schievano, A. et al. (2016) Electro-fermentation–merging electrochemistry with fermentation in industrial applications. Trends Biotechnol. 34, 866–878.
| Electro-fermentation–merging electrochemistry with fermentation in industrial applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XmvF2itLk%3D&md5=28fcfa2f073d2bbc558d04f4e82be440CAS |
[14] Bandyopadhyay, A.A. et al. (2017) Advancement in bioprocess technology: parallels between microbial natural products and cell culture biologics. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol , .
| Advancement in bioprocess technology: parallels between microbial natural products and cell culture biologics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Rabaey, K. and Rozendal, R.A. (2010) Microbial electrosynthesis—revisiting the electrical route for microbial production. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 706–716.
| Microbial electrosynthesis—revisiting the electrical route for microbial production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtFGqtbfO&md5=c69a4b0d1128ce317aa9adcf9101d5f8CAS |
[16] Ross, D.E. et al. (2011) Towards electrosynthesis in Shewanella: energetics of reversing the Mtr pathway for reductive metabolism. PLoS One 6, e16649.
| Towards electrosynthesis in Shewanella: energetics of reversing the Mtr pathway for reductive metabolism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXitVGiu74%3D&md5=df17a5eb0ff5e67a5e297341adfa1754CAS |
[17] Kracke, F. and Krömer, J.O. (2014) Identifying target processes for microbial electrosynthesis by elementary mode analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 410.
| Identifying target processes for microbial electrosynthesis by elementary mode analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Flynn, J.M. et al. (2010) Enabling unbalanced fermentations by using engineered electrode-interfaced bacteria. MBio 1, e00190-10.
| Enabling unbalanced fermentations by using engineered electrode-interfaced bacteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Kim, T.S. and Kim, B.H. (1988) Electron flow shift in Clostridium acetobutylicum fermentation by electrochemically introduced reducing equivalent. Biotechnol. Lett. 10, 123–128.
| Electron flow shift in Clostridium acetobutylicum fermentation by electrochemically introduced reducing equivalent.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXhs1Cmtrk%3D&md5=82660654cee50e7e2b2f57af475e53b4CAS |
[20] Summers, Z.M. et al. (2010) Direct exchange of electrons within aggregates of an evolved syntrophic coculture of anaerobic bacteria. Science 330, 1413–1415.
| Direct exchange of electrons within aggregates of an evolved syntrophic coculture of anaerobic bacteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsVyrsbbJ&md5=6d68350311b81a38091fa7b94d5b9f80CAS |
[21] Morita, M. et al. (2011) Potential for direct interspecies electron transfer in methanogenic wastewater digester aggregates. MBio 2, e00159-11.
| Potential for direct interspecies electron transfer in methanogenic wastewater digester aggregates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Sen, B. et al. (2016) State of the art and future concept of food waste fermentation to bioenergy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53, 547–557.
| State of the art and future concept of food waste fermentation to bioenergy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhsFWmsrrM&md5=aa160f9370ab5c9eb767b651a7422c2dCAS |
[23] Zhao, Z. et al. (2015) Potential for direct interspecies electron transfer in an electric-anaerobic system to increase methane production from sludge digestion. Sci. Rep. 5, 11094.
| Potential for direct interspecies electron transfer in an electric-anaerobic system to increase methane production from sludge digestion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtFyiu73L&md5=1b50be997a67d56e890b1b996460c541CAS |
[24] Rotaru, A.-E. et al. (2014) A new model for electron flow during anaerobic digestion: direct interspecies electron transfer to Methanosaeta for the reduction of carbon dioxide to methane. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 408–415.
| A new model for electron flow during anaerobic digestion: direct interspecies electron transfer to Methanosaeta for the reduction of carbon dioxide to methane.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvFKhtrbL&md5=44c1be39a68dea590a78242f458b0f5fCAS |
[25] Zhao, Z. et al. (2014) Bioelectrochemical enhancement of anaerobic methanogenesis for high organic load rate wastewater treatment in a up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Sci. Rep. 4, 6658.
| Bioelectrochemical enhancement of anaerobic methanogenesis for high organic load rate wastewater treatment in a up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXksVWhtrs%3D&md5=45a41bad8a8bb50b07b3e4df1e5919bdCAS |
[26] De Vrieze, J. et al. (2014) Biomass retention on electrodes rather than electrical current enhances stability in anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 54, 211–221.
| Biomass retention on electrodes rather than electrical current enhances stability in anaerobic digestion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXkt12qsr0%3D&md5=011624b297cf77952d9aa09cb9b34324CAS |
Biographies
Carolyn Bell is an Associate Lecturer in the Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology at La Trobe University. Her research interest areas include environmental microbiology, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, and applied plasmid biology.
Associate Professor Ashley E Franks is head of the Applied and Environmental Microbiology Laboratory at La Trobe University. He conducted his doctorate research as part of the Centre of Marine Biofouling and Bioinnovation at the University of New South Wales by investigating antifungal compounds produced by marine bacteria in biofilms. During his PhD he spent 4 months at the University of Exeter in the UK on an Adrian Lee Fellowship to develop dual bacterial/yeast biofilm systems. On graduating he moved to the Biomerit Research Centre in Cork, Ireland to work on bacterial plant interactions as a Government of Ireland Fellow in Science Technology and Engineering. This research looked at how to use bacteria to help plant growth. He then took a position as a Senior Scientist and Research Professor within the Geobacter Project at the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the USA where he worked on microbes that make electricity. He currently serves as the Chair of the Awards Committee for the International Society Microbial Electrochemical Technology and Secretary of Synthetic Biology Australasia.