Problems with Sb analysis of environmentally relevant samples
David S. T. Hjortenkrans A B , Nina S. Månsson A , Bo G. Bergbäck A and Agneta V. Häggerud AA School of Pure and Applied Natural Sciences, University of Kalmar, Barlastgatan 1, SE-391 82 Kalmar, Sweden.
B Corresponding author. Email: david.hjortenkrans@hik.se
Environmental Chemistry 6(2) 153-159 https://doi.org/10.1071/EN08077
Submitted: 15 October 2008 Accepted: 12 February 2009 Published: 27 April 2009
Environmental context. Reliable results of chemical analysis are crucial for a proper environmental risk assessment. The recovery of antimony concentrations in environmentally relevant samples is here shown to be most dependent on the extraction method chosen. A reported low antimony concentration in present or historical samples may be misleading for decision-makers.
Abstract. Antimony is found in elevated concentrations in the roadside environment, industrial sites and generally in urban areas. An extended use of multielement analysis has produced more concentration data for metals in the environment. However, volatilisation of elements in the digestion step may be a problem as some of the certified and recommended digestion methods are performed in open vessels. The aim of the current study was to focus on wet digestion-derived problems for the analysis of volatile elements, with specific reference to Sb. Both soils and products, namely tyres and brake linings, were sampled. The samples were digested using different methods with variations in temperature, acid mix, and the use of open or closed vessels. For some methods, the recovery was <10%, indicating a need for revision of certified and recommended digestion procedures. For a multielement analysis, a closed vessel method must be used. If the aim is to study only Sb, a wet-digestion method optimised for Sb is the natural choice. This may be valuable to consider when handling environmentally relevant samples such as soils contaminated with Sb from point or diffuse sources.
Additional keywords: brake lining, soil, tyre, volatile element, wet digestion.
Acknowledgements
Financial support for the present project was received from the Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Kalmar, Sweden.
[1]
G. C. Lough ,
J. J. Schauger ,
J.-S. Park ,
M. M. Shafer ,
J. T. Deminter ,
J. P. Weinstein ,
Emissions of metals associated with motor vehicle roadways.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005
, 39, 826.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
[Verified 27 March 2009]
[27]
M. Tighe ,
P. Lockwood ,
S. Wilson ,
L. Lisle ,
Comparison of digestion methods for ICP-OES analysis of a wide range of analytes in heavy metal-contaminated soil samples with specific reference to arsenic and antimony.
Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2004
, 35, 1369.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
[Verified 27 March 2009]
[29]
[30]
[31]
X. Li ,
B. Coles ,
M. Ramsey ,
I. Thornton ,
Chemical partitioning of the new National Institute of Standards and Technology standard reference materials (SRM-2709–2711) by sequential extraction using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry.
Analyst 1995
, 120, 1415.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
[32]
G. Hall ,
J. Vaive ,
R. Beer ,
M. Hoashi ,
Selective leaches revisited, with emphasis on the amorphous Fe oxyhydroxide phase extraction.
J. Geol. Explor. 1996
, 56, 59.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
[33]
K. Müller ,
B. Daus ,
P. Morgenstern ,
R. Wennrich ,
Mobilization of antimony and arsenic in soil and sediment samples – evaluation of different leaching procedures.
Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007
, 183, 427.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34]
X. S. Wang ,
Y. Qin ,
Leaching characteristics of heavy metals and As from two urban roadside soils.
Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007
, 132, 83.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
