Use of spike moisture content to define physiological maturity and quantify progress through grain development in wheat and barley
Corinne Celestina
A C , Maxwell T. Bloomfield A , Katia Stefanova B and James R. Hunt A
A Department of Animal Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio Centre for AgriBiosciences, La Trobe University, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.
B SAGI-West, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: c.celestina@latrobe.edu.au
Crop and Pasture Science 72(2) 95-104 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP20372
Submitted: 23 September 2020 Accepted: 7 December 2020 Published: 18 February 2021
Abstract
A single measurement is useful for determining how far a crop has progressed through grain development, and whether it has reached physiological maturity. Grain development is commonly assessed by using subjective, qualitative methods that describe the look and feel of the kernel or the colour of the straw. Physiological maturity in cereal crops can be determined more accurately by the grain moisture content; however, the moisture content of whole spikes is potentially quicker and easier to assess than that of individual kernels, and with a greater degree of accuracy. This experiment aimed to characterise the moisture dynamics of whole intact wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) spikes during the grain development phase and identify the spike moisture content corresponding to physiological maturity for both species. The dry matter and water contents of whole spikes of five wheat and five barley cultivars sown over six dates were determined at weekly intervals throughout the period of grain development from anthesis to harvest ripeness. Use of regression analysis determined that the spike moisture content at physiological maturity was 43% (95% confidence interval 41–45%) for wheat and 50% (95% confidence interval 49–51%) for barley, irrespective of differences in cultivar morphology, phenology and growing conditions. We demonstrate that progression through kernel development in wheat and barley can be assessed objectively and quantitatively by using spike moisture content, and we provide guidelines for accurate determination of the grain development stage using spike moisture.
Keywords: grain development, grain filling, moisture dynamics.
References
Alqudah AM, Schnurbusch T (2017) Heading date is not flowering time in spring barley. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 896| Heading date is not flowering time in spring barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28611811PubMed |
Alvarez Prado S, Gallardo JM, Serrago RA, Kruk BC, Miralles DJ (2013) Comparative behavior of wheat and barley associated with field release and grain weight determination. Field Crops Research 144, 28–33.
| Comparative behavior of wheat and barley associated with field release and grain weight determination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Auguie B (2017) gridExtra: Miscellaneous Functions for ‘Grid’ Graphics. R package version 2.3. The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gridExtra/index.html
Baillot N, Girousse C, Allard V, Piquet-Pissaloux A, Le Gouis J (2018) Different grain-filling rates explain grain-weight differences along the wheat ear. PLoS One 13, e0209597–5.
| Different grain-filling rates explain grain-weight differences along the wheat ear.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30596702PubMed |
Bell MA, Fischer RA (1994) Guide to plant and crop sampling: measurements and observations for agronomic and physiological research in small grain cereals. Wheat Special Report No. 32. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.
Bewley JD, Black M (1994) ‘Seeds: physiology of development and germination.’ (Plenum Press: New York)
Bingham IJ, Blake J, Foulkes MJ, Spink J (2007) Is barley yield in the UK sink limited? II. Factors affecting potential grain size. Field Crops Research 101, 212–220.
| Is barley yield in the UK sink limited? II. Factors affecting potential grain size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Calderini DF, Abeledo LG, Slafer GA (2000) Physiological maturity in wheat based on kernel water and dry matter. Agronomy Journal 92, 895–901.
| Physiological maturity in wheat based on kernel water and dry matter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Calpouzos LR, Roelfs AP, Madson ME, Martin FB, Welsh JR, Wilcoxson RD (1976) A new model to measure yield losses caused by stem rust in spring wheat. Technical Bulletin 307. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Cullis BR, Smith AB, Coombes NE (2006) On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 11, 381–393.
| On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
González FG, Aldabe ML, Terrile II, Rondanini DP (2014) Grain weight response to different postflowering source:sink ratios in modern high-yielding Argentinean wheats differing in spike fruiting efficiency. Crop Science 54, 297–309.
| Grain weight response to different postflowering source:sink ratios in modern high-yielding Argentinean wheats differing in spike fruiting efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirby EJM, Appleyard M (1987) ‘Cereal development guide.’ 2nd edn. (Arable Unit National Agricultural Centre: Stoneleigh, UK)
Lancashire PD, Bleiholder H, van den Boom T, Langeluddeke P, Stauss R, Weber E, Witzenberger A (1991) A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Annals of Applied Biology 119, 561–601.
| A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Large EC (1954) Growth stages in cereals. Illustration of the Feekes scale. Plant Pathology 3, 128–129.
| Growth stages in cereals. Illustration of the Feekes scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McMaster GS (1997) Phenology, development, and growth of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) shoot apex: a review. Advances in Agronomy 59, 63–118.
| Phenology, development, and growth of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) shoot apex: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Menendez YC, Botto JF, Gomez NV, Miralles DJ, Rondanini DP (2019) Physiological maturity as a function of seed and pod water concentration in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Research 231, 1–9.
| Physiological maturity as a function of seed and pod water concentration in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Neuwirth E (2014) RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer Palettes. R package version 1.1–2. The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer/
Pepler S, Gooding MJ, Ellis RH (2006) Modelling simultaneously water content and dry matter dynamics of wheat grains. Field Crops Research 95, 49–63.
| Modelling simultaneously water content and dry matter dynamics of wheat grains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Porter JR, Gawith M (1999) Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: a review. European Journal of Agronomy 10, 23–36.
| Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rondanini DP, Savin R, Hall AJ (2007) Estimation of physiological maturity in sunflower as a function of fruit water concentration. European Journal of Agronomy 26, 295–309.
| Estimation of physiological maturity in sunflower as a function of fruit water concentration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Saini HS, Westgate ME (1999) Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. Advances in Agronomy 68, 59–96.
| Reproductive development in grain crops during drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schnyder H, Baum U (1992) Growth of the grain of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The relationship between water content and dry matter accumulation. European Journal of Agronomy 1, 51–57.
| Growth of the grain of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The relationship between water content and dry matter accumulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Slafer GA (2003) Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop physiologist’s perspective. Annals of Applied Biology 142, 117–128.
| Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop physiologist’s perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Slafer GA, Kantolic AG, Appendino ML, Tranquilli G, Miralles DJ, Savin R (2014) Genetic and environmental effects on crop development determining adaptation and yield. In ‘Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy’. 2nd edn. (Eds V Sadras, D Calderini) pp. 285–319. (Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA)
Tottman DR, Broad H (1987) The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Annals of Applied Biology 110, 441–454.
| The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wickham H (2018) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. R package version 2.2–1. The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria. https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggplot2/)
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
| A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
