Strategies for developing a core collection of bladder clover (Trifolium spumosum L.) using ecological and agro-morphological data
K. Ghamkhar A D , R. Snowball A B , B. J. Wintle B and A. H. D. Brown CA Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture (CLIMA), University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
B Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.
C Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: kioumars@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(12) 1103-1112 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR08209
Submitted: 24 June 2008 Accepted: 13 October 2008 Published: 10 November 2008
Abstract
Core collections are a way to improve the functioning of germplasm collections through systematic evaluation, exploitation, and improved management of the whole collection. The published sizes of cores have ranged from 10 to 30% of the collection. The first step in developing a core collection is usually stratification of the whole collection. We adopted three approaches in the process of core designation. First, the existing ecological data and newly acquired agro-morphological (evaluation) data were analysed to determine the optimal method for capturing the ecological and morphological diversity of accessions. Second, different selection strategies were compared to identify the most powerful analysis with the greatest likelihood of covering maximum diversity. Third, the correlation between the two datasets was investigated. The annual pasture legume, bladder clover (Trifolium spumosum L.), was used for this pilot study because 80% of the existing 398 accessions have near-complete ecological data. The study found that a two-step selection process using ecological data and stratified proportional strategy followed by combined datasets and maximising strategy best represents the whole collection of T. spumosum in the core.
Additional keywords: canonical redundancy analysis (RDA), core size, ecogeography, GIS, MSTRAT, sampling strategy.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to the Grain Research and Development Corporation (GRDC), Australia, for funding this study. Thanks also to the staff of the Australian Trifolium Genetic Resources Centre (ATGRC) who maintain the passport and collection site database. Germplasm collectors who are the originators of these data are also gratefully acknowledged. Special acknowledgment goes to Pierre Legendre, University of Montreal (Canada), for introducing the RDA test to the first author. We also thank Doug McEachern, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research and Innovation) at the University of Western Australia, for providing extra funding to the first author for preparing this paper.
Bessega C,
Ferreyra L,
Vilardi JC, Saidman BO
(2000) Unexpected low genetic differentiation among allopatric species of section Algarobia of Prosopis (Leguminosae). Genetica 109, 255–266.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
(accessed May 2008).
Mantel N
(1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27, 209–220.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Noirot M,
Hamon S, Anthony F
(1996) The principal component scoring: a new method of constituting a core collection using quantitative data. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43, 1–6.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Prosperi JM, Sampoux JP
(2005) Conservation of the genetic resources of forage plants: what is the desired level of genetic diversity within a collection? Fourrages 182, 245–262.
Schoen DJ, Brown AHD
(1993) Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic markers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90, 10623–10627.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Wilkinson HH,
Spoerke JM, Parker MA
(1996) Divergence in symbiotic compatibility in a legume-Bradyrhizobium mutualism. Evolution 50, 1470–1477.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |